Genetic Divergence Of Introduced Upland Rice Genotypes At Fogera In North Western Ethiopia
Mersha Tezera*
Researcher, cher Amhara National Regional State Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.
*Corresponding Author
Mersha Tezera,
Researcher, cher Amhara National Regional State Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.
Tel: 0932862658
Fax: 2512200520
E-mail: mertez19@yahoo.com
Received: September 21, 2020; Accepted: October 07, 2020; Published: March 11, 2021
Citation: Mersha Tezera. Genetic Divergence Of Introduced Upland Rice Genotypes At Fogera In North Western Ethiopia. Int J Plant Sci Agric. 2021;04(1):118-123.
Copyright: Mersha Tezera ©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Genetic divergence is basic in order to provide information for plant breeding programs. Forty nine upland rice genotypes were tested in 7*7 simple lattice design at Fogera in Wereta station of Adet Agricultural Research Center in 2012/13. The objectives of the study were to estimate the genetic divergence among the genotypes and cluster them in divergent clusters based on agro-morphological traits. Cluster analysis grouped 49 genotypes in to 9 distinct clusters. Clusters I and II were the largest clusters (34.7 %) containing 17 genotypes. Cluster III, IV and V had 21 genotypes (42.9%), 7 genotypes each. Principal component analysis showed that the first four principal components had explained about 85 % of the total variation. This study had indicated that there was significant genetic variability or divergence among the genotypes. Thus, the improvement program of the upland rice genotypes through direct selection rather than a lengthy crossing program is recommended.
2.Introduction
3.Material and Methods
4.Results and Discussion
5.Conclusion and Recommendation
6.References
Keywords
Principal Component; Agro-Morphological Traits.
Introduction
Rice belongs to the genus Oryzae, is one of the leading food
crops in the world. As such, it is a staple food of over a half of
the world’s population, mostly in Asia (IRRI, 2013). In Ethiopia,
the cultivation of the crop has begun at Fogera, Amhara region
and Gambella plains in the early 1970’s (Asefa Ayele, 2011).
Divergence analysis is a technique used to categorize genotypes
that are similar into one group and others into different groups
(Sharma, 1998). Knowledge on the extent and pattern of genetic
variability present and distance in a population is absolutely essential
for further improvement of the crop. Besides, knowledge of
the naturally occurring diversity in a population helps to identify
diverse groups of genotypes that can be useful for the breeding
program (Muhammad and Akbar, 2007). Such information is
scarce in upland rice production system of Ethiopia.
Objective
To estimate the genetic divergence of introduced upland rice
genotypes.
Material and Methods
The experiment was conducted at Woreta station (in Fogera) of
Adet Agricultural Research Center which is a national testing site
for rice research. Fogera is located 617 km away from Addis Ababa
in the north western Ethiopia and it is only 50 km away to the
north from Bahir Dar city, the capital of Amhara region. Nearly all
of the land in the district is in the lowlands it has vertisol soil type
and has an average elevation of 1812 m.a.s.l located at 11o54'N
latitude and 37o41'E longitude with an average temperature of
14.2 oC minimum and 29.9 oC maximum temperatures. The area
gets a unimodal annual average rain fall amount of 1556.8mm
which extends from early June to September. Forty-nine upland
genotypes/lines which are comprised from different preliminary
variety trials and variety adaptation trial accessions were evaluated
with two check varieties. The experiment was conducted in a simple
lattice design with two replications. Clean seeds of each genotype
were selected and planted on well prepared plots. The plot
size was 2.5 m long and 0.4 m wide, consisting of two rows per
plot with 20 cm spacing between them and 0.3m spacing between plots as well as 1m spacing between blocks. Sowing was done by
hand drilling at a seed rate of 60 kg/ha. The experimental plots
were prepared by tractor ploughing and harrowing. Nitrogen was
applied in the form of urea at the rate of 100 kg/ha, in three splits
i.e., one third at planting, tillering and panicle initiation. Phosphorus
was applied in the form of Di-Amonium phpsphate (DAP) at the rate of 100 kg/ha at planting. All other management practices
were uniformly applied to all plots using recommended practices.
Data on plot and plant basis was collected. Data on plant basis
were recorded by randomly taking six plants from each experimental
plot.
Methods Of Data Collection
The data collection was based on quantitative descriptors. The data for the following characters were recorded from six randomly taken plants from each experimental plot and the average was considered per plant basis.
Culm length (cm): measured from the base of the plant to the base of the panicle.
Flag leaf length (cm): measure length of the flag leaf, from the ligule to the tip of the blade.
Flag leaf width (cm): measure width at the widest portion of the flag leaf.
Number of tiller per plant: recorded as the total number of grainbearing and non bearing tillers.
Number of panicles per plant: number of primary panicle branches attached to the basal whorl of the panicle.
Panicle length (cm): Length of main axis of panicle measured from the panicle base to the tip.
Number of spikelet per panicle: total counted spikelets with inn a single panicle.
Flowering cycle: Number of days until 50% flowering starting from germination.
Maturation Cycle: Number of days until 50% of the panicles was mature.
1000-grain weight (gm): Random sample of 1000 well-developed, whole grains and dried to 13% moisture content weigh on a precision balance.
Grain yield (kg): estimated from the harvestable rows of the plot.
Data Analysis
Genetic divergence analysis was computed based on multivariate analysis using Mahalanobis’s D2 statistic (Mahalanobis, 1936) by SAS Software program.
Estimation of distances
Distances (D) for each pair of genotype combinations were computed using the following formula:
Dij = (Xi- Xj) S-1 (Xi – Xj)
Where, Dij = the distance between any two genotypes i and j,
Xi and Xj = the vectors for the values for genotype ith and jth genotypes, and
S-1 = the inverse of pooled variance covariance matrix.
Clustering of genotypes
Based on the distances (D) values, clustering of genotypes was done using Tocher’s method as described by Singh and Chaudhary (1999).
Principal component analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to find out the characters, which accounted more to the total variation. The data were standardized to mean zero and variance of one before computing principal component analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the multivariate statistical techniques which is a powerful tool for investigating and summarizing underlying trends in complex data structures (Legendre and Legendre, 1998). Principal component analysis reflects the importance of the largest contributor to the total variation at each axis for differentiation (Sharma, 1998). Principal components based on correlation matrix were calculated using SAS 9.1 computer software.
Results and Discussion
Genetic Divergence Analysis
In the present study, the variation among the tested genotypes for
all the characters studied justified the need to estimate distance
values among the genotypes.
Estimation Of Distance and Clustering Of Genotypes:
The distance values, based on the pooled mean of genotypes,
resulted in classifying the 49 genotypes in to nine distinct clusters
(Table 3.1). This indicated that the presence of wide diversity
among the genotypes. Clusters I and II were the largest clusters
(34.7 %) containing 17 genotypes together. Cluster III, IV and
V had 21 genotypes in total (42.9%), 7 genotypes each, Clusters
VI and VII had 8 genotypes together 4 genotypes each (16.3%),
Cluster VIII constituted 2 genotypes (4.1 %) and Cluster IX had 1
genotype (2.0 %). Cluster IX had the least performance than any
other genotypes tested (Fig 3.1).
Table 2. Distribution of genotypes in to nine clusters based on distance analysis for 49 upland rice genotypes tested at Fogera (2012/13).
Muhammad and Akbar (2007) in his study of clustering of basmati rice mutants by metrograph analysis also found 11 clusters of rice genotypes with cluster-I and cluster-II possessed the highest scores i.e., 66 % and 56 % respectively on morphological basis which is nearly similar result to this study.
Cluster Mean Analysis: The mean value of the 11 quantitative characters in each cluster is presented in Table 3.2.
Table 3. Mean value of 11 quantitative characters of the nine clusters for 49 upland rice genotypes tested at Fogera (2012/13).
Cluster I consisted of 9 genotypes having the characteristic of high culm length (75 cm), higher panicle length (2 cm), relatively high number of spikelet per panicle (74.68) and relatively higher yield (4408.44 kg/ha) next to cluster V (5,200 kg/ha) and cluster VI ( 4,875 kg/ha). This cluster is relatively early maturing with values of lower flowering cycle (97.19 days) and maturation cycle (135.44 days).
Cluster II had consisted of 8 genotypes. This cluster is characterized by high number of panicles per plant (10.14), relatively high number of spikelet per plant (75.55), high panicle length (20 cm) and relatively moderate yield (4011.63 kg/ha) next to cluster V (5,200 kg/ha), cluster VII (4,875 kg/ha) and cluster I (4,408 kg/ ha).
Cluster III had consisted of 7 genotypes, including the standard check Nerica-4, which are characterized by the following features, the highest culm length (75 cm) and relatively higher number of tillers per plant (9.80) next to cluster IX (10.9) and the earliest flowering types (93.63 days).
In cluster IV there are seven genotypes. The cluster is characterized by relatively higher flag leaf length (27 cm) next to cluster V (28 cm), lower tiller number per plant (7.44) next to cluster VIII (6.95), relatively lower maturation cycle (133.86 days) next to cluster VIII (133.25 days) and relatively lower number of spikelet per panicle (69.14) next to cluster VIII (66.85).
Cluster V had consisted of seven genotypes. The cluster could be characterized by highest flag leaf length (28 cm), relatively higher flowering cycle (103.53 days) next to cluster IX (109.1days), highest number of spikelet per panicle (76.7), highest panicle length (21 cm) and highest yield 5,200 kg/ha.
Cluster VI consisted 4 genotypes with a characteristic feature of higher flag leaf length (27 cm) next to cluster V (28 cm), shorter culm length (63 cm) next to cluster IX (61 cm), moderately higher flowering cycle (100.3 days) next to cluster IX (109.1 days) and cluster V (103.53 days) and relatively higher yield (4,875 kg/ha) next to cluster V (5,200 kg/ha).
Four genotypes made Cluster VII. This cluster had features of higher maturation cycle (137 days) next to cluster IX (138.5 days), lower number of panicle per plant (8.00) next to cluster IX (7.90), moderately lower number of spikelet per panicle (72.18) next to VIII (66.85) and IV (69.14) and relatively lower grain yield (2,750 kg/ha) next to cluster IX (1,557 kg/ha) and cluster VIII (2251 kg/ha).
Cluster VIII had only two genotypes. This cluster is also characterized by lower flag leaf length (24 cm) next to cluster VIII (22 cm), highest culm length (75 cm), lowest number of tiller per plant (6.95), relatively lower flowering cycle (95.60 days) next to cluster III (93.63 days), lowest maturation cycle (133.25 days), lowest number of spikelet per panicle (66.85), lower panicle length (18 cm) next to cluster IX (16 cm), highest thousand seed weight (0.03 kg) and lower grain yield (2,251 kg/ha) next to cluster IX (1,557 kg/ha).
Cluster IX had one genotype which was the least type by its performance in most of the traits, the cluster is characterized by the following features, lowest flag leaf length (22 cm), lowest flag leaf width (1 cm), lowest culm length (61 cm), highest number of tiller per plant (10.90), highest flowering cycle (109.10 days), highest maturation cycle (138.5 days) or late maturing type, lowest number of panicle per plant (7.90), lowest panicle length (16 cm) and lowest yield (1557 kg/ha).
Principal Component Analysis
The principal component analysis revealed that four principal components i.e., PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4 with eigenvalues of 6.45, 1.32, 0.93 and 0.68, respectively, have accounted for 85% of the total variation (Table 3.3). The first two principal components PC1 and PC2 with cumulative variance values of 71%, contributed more to the total variation. According to Chahal and Gosal (2002) characters with largest absolute values closer to unity with in the first principal component influence the clustering more than those with lower absolute values closer to zero. Therefore, in this study, differentiation of the genotypes into different cluster was because of a cumulative effect of a number of characters rather to the small contribution of each character.
Table 4. Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the first four principal components (PCs) for 11 characters of 49 upland rice genotypes tested at Fogera (2011/12).
Characters having relatively higher value in the first principal component (PC1) were flag leaf width, culm length, number of tiller per plant and maturation cycle. Characters like flag leaf length, flowering cycle and grain yield had contributed a lot for principal component (PC2); flag leaf length, flowering cycle and thousand seed weight had contributed in the third principal component (PC3); number of spikelet per panicle, grain yield, panicle length and flowering cycle in the fourth principal component (PC4) were the major contributors.
Ogunbayo et al. (2005) also found in his study of phylogenetic diversity and relationships among 40 rice accessions using morphological and RAPDs techniques that the PCA re-ordered the accessions into four broad groups that had within cluster similarities which is very similar to the finding of this study.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The nine clusters indicated that the presence of wide diversity
among the genotypes. Clusters I and II were the largest clusters
(34.7 %) containing 17 genotypes together. Cluster III, IV and V
had a total of 21 genotypes, 7 genotypes each (42.9 %), Clusters
VI and VII had 8 genotypes together 4 genotypes each (16.3%),
Cluster VIII constituted 2 genotypes (4.1 %) and Cluster IX had 1
genotype (2.0 %). Cluster IX had the least performance than any
other genotypes tested. This study had indicated that there was
significant genetic divergence among the genotypes. Thus, there
is an enormous opportunity in the improvement program of
the upland rice genotypes through direct selection rather than a
lengthy crossing program and hybridization which involves technical
expertise crossing of the genotypes from different clusters
that would produce viable and a potential segregate population.
Regarding this, due to its highly significance difference in yield
and related traits I recommend specially Accessions IR 78937-B-
3-B-B-1 for further breeding and selection procedures.
References
- Asefa A. Rice extension approaches and extension packages in Ethiopia. Journal Associof Adv. Sci Afri. 2003; 14(1): 27–40.
- Chahal GS, Gosal SS. Principles and procedures of plant breeding: Biotechnological and conventional approaches. Alpha Science Int'l Ltd.; 2002.
- Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical ecology. Elsevier; 2012 Jul 21.
- Mahalanobis PC. On the generalized distance in statistics. National Institute of Science of India. 1936; 2: 49-55.
- Rashid M, Cheema AA, Ashraf M. Clustering of basmati rice mutants by metroglyph analysis. Pak. J. Bot. 2007 Dec 1; 39(6): 2043-9.
- Ogunbayo SA, Ojo DK, Guei RG, Oyelakin OO, Sanni KA. Phylogenetic diversity and relationships among 40 rice accessions using morphological and RAPDs techniques. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005; 4(11).
- Sharma JR. Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. New Age International; 2006.
- Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. 1977.