Awareness Of Biomedical Applications Of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation By Titanium Nanoparticles Among Dental Students
Dhanraj Ganapathy1*, Martina Catherine2
1 Professor & Head of Department, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
2 Tutor, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dhanraj Ganapathy,
Professor & Head of Department, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Tel: 9841504523
E-mail: dhanrajmganapathy@yahoo.co.in
Received: September 12, 2021; Accepted: September 20, 2021; Published: September 21, 2021
Citation:Dhanraj Ganapathy, Martina Catherine. Awareness Of Biomedical Applications Of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation By Titanium Nanoparticles Among Dental
Students. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4363-4366. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000888
Copyright: Dhanraj Ganapathy©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: Some NPs, once released into the body through different internalization methods such as oral, parenteral,
inhalation administration and skin adsorption, can affect redox homeostasis both by generating ROS or lessening scavenging
pathways. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most extensively used nanomaterials for several applications, but the photocatalytic
properties of TiO2NPs have raised many issues as a result of ROS generation while UV irradiation is performed.
Aim: This survey was conducted for assessing the awareness of Biomedical Applications of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation
by Titanium Nanoparticles among dental students.
Materials and Method: A cross-section research was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire containing ten questions
distributed amongst 100 dental students. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about Reactive Oxygen Species
Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles, their photocatalytic properties, anti-cancer properties, prooxidant effects, mechanism
of action and toxicity effects, The responses were recorded and analysed.
Results: 10% of the respondents were aware of the Biomedical Applications of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by
Titanium Nanoparticles. 9 % were aware of photocatalytic properties of Titanium Nanoparticle, 9 %, 5% were aware of anticancer
activities of Titanium Nanoparticles, 5% were aware of prooxidant effects of Titanium Nanoparticles and, 5% were
aware of mechanism of action and toxicity effects, of Titanium Nanoparticles.
Conclusion: There is limited awareness amongst dental students about Biomedical Applications of Reactive Oxygen Species
Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles. Enhanced awareness initiatives and dental educational programmes together with increased
importance for curriculum improvements that further promote knowledge and awareness of Titanium Nanoparticles
therapy.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Awareness; Titanium; Nanoparticles; Students; Medicinal; Reactive Oxygen Species.
Introduction
Nanoscience refers to the study and application of tiny materials
with dimensions equal to or less than 100 nm of which many other
fields, such as material science, engineering, physics, chemistry,
biology and medicine, can take advantage. One of the most active
areas of research in this field is the study and the development
of nanostructured materials (NSMs) and nanoparticles (NPs) [1]
NSMs and NPs have unique tunable physicochemical features
such as catalytic activity, electrical and thermal conductivity, light
absorption and scattering that, starting from bulk counterparts,
allow enhanced performance to be exploited by many different
areas such as food industry, agriculture, cosmetics and, of course,
medicine . In the latter area, NSMs and NPs have found suitable
applications in fluorescent biological labeling, pathogen detection,
protein analysis, DNA structure probing, tissue engineering,
separation and purification of cells and biological molecules
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement, drug
and gene delivery [2].
Particularly, in more recent decades, NPs have been successfully
used in the clinic as effective tools for alternative therapy such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), high-intensity focused ultrasound
therapy (HIFU), photothermal therapy (PPT) and sonodynamic
therapy [3]. The ever-increasing success of these therapies is due
to their ability to induce the death of prokaryotic and eukaryotic
cells through key cellular mechanisms such as that of induction
of NP-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [22].
Some NPs, once released into the body through different internalization
methods such as oral, parenteral, inhalation administration
and skin adsorption, can affect redox homeostasis both by
generating ROS or lessening scavenging pathways [4].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most extensively used nanomaterials
for several applications, but the photocatalytic properties
of TiO2NPs have raised many issues as a result of ROS
generation while UV irradiation is performed. Indeed, electrons
in the TiO2 valence band absorb the photon energy under UVA
irradiation, and jump to the conduction band, allowing extraction
of electrons from water or hydroxyl ions generating hydroxyl
radicals by valence band holes. Other methods of ROS formation,
such as superoxide anion and singlet oxygen by additionally
mechanisms, have also been demonstrated [5].
The photocatalytic properties of this NP make TiO2 a valuable
competitor for some biomedical applications, such as in killing
microorganisms and treating malignant tumors. From this initial
investigation, other researchers have studied the cytotoxicity by
photoexcited TiO2 on cancer cells , but more intriguing has been
two recent scientific works where the TiO2NPs have been found
to be effective in PTT against a melanoma cancer model and also
as sonosensitizer in SDT against a breast cancer model [6].
NPs of varying chemical composition such as metal oxides have
been shown to induce oxidative stress and, in this regard, NPs
have been reported to influence intracellular calcium concentrations,
activate transcription factors and modulate cytokine production
via generation of free radicals [7]. The main key factors
involved in NP-induced ROS include: prooxidant functional
groups on the reactive surface of NPs, active redox cycling on the
surface of NPs due to transition metal-based NPs (MNPs), and
particle-cell interactions. With regards to these key factors, several
studies have shown the significance of reactive particle surfaces
in ROS generation [8]. Our research experience has prompted us
in pursuing this research [9-20]. This survey was conducted for
assessing the awareness of Biomedical Applications of Reactive
Oxygen Species Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles among
dental students.
Materials and Methods
A cross-section research was conducted with a self-administered
questionnaire containing ten questions distributed amongst 100
dental students. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about
Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles,
their photocatalytic properties, anti-cancer properties, prooxidant
effects, mechanism of action and toxicity effects, the responses
were recorded and analysed.
Results
10% of the respondents were aware of the Biomedical Applications
of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles
(Fig 1). 9 % were aware of photocatalytic properties
of Titanium Nanoparticle (Fig 2), 5% were aware of anti-cancer
activities of Titanium Nanoparticles (Fig 3), 5% were aware of
prooxidant effects of Titanium Nanoparticles (Fig 4) and, 5%
were aware of mechanism of action and toxicity effects, of Titanium
Nanoparticles (Fig 5).
Figure 1. Awareness of the Biomedical Applications of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by Titanium Nanoparticles.
Discussion
Reactive oxygen species, key signaling molecules during cell signaling
and homeostasis, are produced in cells by oxidases, originating
from the excitation and univalent reduction of the molecular
oxygen, which leads to the generation of hydroxyl radicals,
superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide [21]. Briefly, molecular
oxygen generates superoxide anion, the primary ROS, via reduction
of one electron catalyzed by nicotinamide adenine dinucleo tide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. Further reduction of oxygen
may either lead to hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radicals via dismutation
and metal-catalyzed Fenton reaction, respectively [22].
Some of the endogenous sources of ROS include mitochondrial
respiration, inflammatory response, microsomes and peroxisomes.
However, the occurrence of free radicals from essential
byproducts of mitochondrial respiration and transition metal ioncatalyzed
Fenton-type reactions mainly can regulate many signal
transduction paths in a dose-dependent way. While low or medium
ROS levels raise mitogenic signaling via reversible oxidations,
high ROS levels lead to nucleic acids and lipid oxidation
and peroxidation, resulting in cellular apoptosis and necrosis phenomena
[23].
The photocatalytic properties of this NP make TiO2 a valuable
competitor for some biomedical applications, such as in killing
microorganisms and treating malignant tumors [24]. The latter
application has been investigated since 1992, when Sakai et
al. studied the effect of photoexcited TiO2 on cancer cells in in
vitro studies [25]. From this initial investigation, other researchers
have studied the cytotoxicity by photoexcited TiO2 on cancer
cells [26], but more intriguing has been two recent scientific
works where the TiO2NPs have been found to be effective in
PTT against a melanoma cancer model and also as sonosensitizer
in SDT against a breast cancer model [6].
The investigators assessed the application of PEGylated TiO2NPs
in inducing hyperthermia and necrosis in in vivo melanoma tumors
after PTT consisting of a continuous wave near-infrared
(NIR) laser diode at 808 nm wavelength with an intensity of 2
W/cm2 for seven minutes. Four mice groups were enrolled in the
experiments and the main result showed that in the PEGylated
TiO2NPs + laser therapy group, not only did the tumor growth
cease, but the tumor size also shrank according to the ultrasonography
images and the histopathological examination in the three
days following the experiment. Interestingly, five mice from the
PEGylated TiO2NPs + laser therapy group were euthanized after
three months of follow-up to demonstrate biocompatibility of
these PEGylated TiO2NPs. However, no data about the survival
rate of those animals were reported.
The latter work investigated TiO2NPs, more precisely the spherical
carbon-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles (C-doped
TiO2NPs), as a sonosensitizer in SDT in order to overcome the
major limitation associated with cancer therapies that involve
electromagnetic waves, i.e., the shallow penetration depth of light
sources into tumor tissue [27]. Taking this into consideration,
Yang and colleagues investigated whether C-doped TiO2NPs
were able to suppress the proliferation of 4T1 breast cancer cell
line in both in vitro and in vivo models in combination with US
treatment (US frequency of 1.0 MHz and a duty cycle of 50%
with a negative pressure of 0.33 MPa and intensity of 1.8 W/cm2
for 90 s) in order to inhibit tumor growth.
Firstly, in the in vitro study, the authors quantified ROS production
between treatment groups and found that C-doped
TiO2NPs, in combination with US, significantly increased the
level of ROS compared to control group. This result corroborated
that, under US irradiation, ROS generation could be improved
in the presence of C-doped TiO2NPs. Thereafter SDT cytotoxicity
was evaluated confirming that SDT, i.e., 4T1 cells cultured
with C-doped TiO2NPs and subjected to US exposure, induced
higher cytotoxicity in 4T1 cells than the other treatment groups.
Interesting was the speculation about the possible pathway of cell
damage induced by SDT, where the authors suggested a role of
sonoluminescence in the C-doped TiO2NPs activation to generate more ROS and kill 4T1 breast cancer cells [28].
Finally, in this work, to further investigate the cell death of 4T1
cells induced by SDT, an in vivo study was performed. Groups of
5 nude mice were enrolled, all bearing subcutaneous 4TI breast
cancer cells, and the data showed that the C-doped TiO2NPs
group (150 mg/mL C-doped TiO2NPs at day 0 and day 7) and
US group (PBS at day 0 and day 7) could not suppress the tumor
growth, while the SDT group (150 mg/mL C-doped TiO2NPs at
day 0 and day 7 with US exposure) was able to significantly delay
tumor growth in that the relative tumor volume at endpoint was
almost half that of other control groups. Moreover, by using histologic
staining of the tumor site, authors observed that SDT enhanced
the ability to cause 4T1 cell death compared to the other
groups, confirming that C-doped TiO2NPs could be considered
as sonosensitizers for sonodynamic treatments, and in general as
an efficient strategy for alternative cancer treatments.
In addition to the prooxidant effect of NPs, ROS are also induced
endogenously where the mitochondrion is a major cell target for
NP-induced oxidative stress. Specifically, once NPs gain access
into the mitochondria, they stimulate ROS via impaired electron
transport chain, structural damage, activation of NADPH-like
enzyme systems and depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane
[29, 30].
Despite these promising results, MNPs’ potential drug ability requires
further extensive evaluation before they can reach clinical
applications. Therefore, future research involving MNPs should
consist of robust clinical studies with a predominant focus on acceleration
of their clinical translation for biomedical uses.
Conclusion
There is limited awareness amongst dental students about Biomedical
Applications of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by
Titanium Nanoparticles. Enhanced awareness initiatives and dental
educational programmes together with increased importance
for curriculum improvements that further promote knowledge
and awareness of Titanium Nanoparticles therapy.
References
-
[1]. Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review
on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and
regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018 Apr 3;9:1050-1074. Pubmed
PMID: 29719757.
[2]. Jin S, Ye K. Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery and gene therapy. Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Jan-Feb;23(1):32-41. Pubmed PMID: 17269667.
[3]. Chan WC, editor. Bio-applications of Nanoparticles. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009 Sep 29.
[4]. Abdal Dayem A, Hossain MK, Lee SB, Kim K, Saha SK, Yang GM, Choi HY, Cho SG. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Biological Activities of Metallic Nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):120. Pubmed PMID: 28075405.
[5]. Hirakawa K, Hirano T. Singlet oxygen generation photocatalyzed by TiO2 particles and its contribution to biomolecule damage. Chemistry Letters. 2006 Aug;35(8):832-3.
[6]. Behnam MA, Emami F, Sobhani Z, Dehghanian AR. The application of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in the photo-thermal therapy of melanoma cancer model. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018 Nov;21(11):1133-1139. Pubmed PMID: 30483386.
[7]. Chakraborti S, Chakraborti T, Das SK, Chattopadhyay D. Oxidative Stress in Lung Diseases: Volume 1. Springer Nature; 2019. 491 p.
[8]. Schins RP. Mechanisms of genotoxicity of particles and fibers. Inhal Toxicol. 2002 Jan;14(1):57-78. Pubmed PMID: 12122560.
[9]. Hemalatha R, Ganapathy D. Disinfection of Dental Impression- A Current Overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016 Jul;8(7):661–4.
[10]. Ramya G, Pandurangan K, Ganapathy D. Correlation between anterior crowding and bruxism-related parafunctional habits. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Oct 15;12(10).
[11]. Anjum AS, Ganapathy D, Kumar K. Knowledge of the awareness of dentists on the management of burn injuries on the face. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Sep 1;11(9).
[12]. Inchara R, Ganapathy D, Kumar PK. Preference of antibiotics in pediatric dentistry. Drug Invent Today. 2019 Jun 15;11:1495-8.
[13]. Philip JM, Ganapathy DM, Ariga P. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of a polyvinyl acetate-based resilient liner following various denture base surface pre-treatment methods and immersion in artificial salivary medium: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):298-301. Pubmed PMID: 23293485.
[14]. Gupta A, Dhanraj M, Sivagami G. Implant surface modification: review of literature. The Internet Journal of Dental Science. 2009;7(1):10.
[15]. Indhulekha V, Ganapathy D, Jain AR. Knowledge and awareness on biomedical waste management among students of four dental colleges in Chennai, India. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):32-41.
[16]. Mohamed Usman JA, Ayappan A, Ganapathy D, Nasir NN. Oromaxillary prosthetic rehabilitation of a maxillectomy patient using a magnet retained two-piece hollow bulb definitive obturator; a clinical report. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:190180. Pubmed PMID: 23533823.
[17]. Ganapathy DM, Joseph S, Ariga P, Selvaraj A. Evaluation of the influence of blood glucose level on oral candidal colonization in complete denture wearers with Type-II Diabetes Mellitus: An in vivo Study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Jan;10(1):87-92. Pubmed PMID: 23878569.
[18]. Menon A, Ganapathy DM, Mallikarjuna AV. Factors that influence the colour stability of composite resins. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Mar 1;11(3).
[19]. Dhanraj G, Rajeshkumar S. Anticariogenic Effect of Selenium Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Brassica oleracea. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2021 Jul 10;2021.
[20]. Ganapathy D, Department of Prostodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, – C, India. Nanobiotechnology in combating CoVid-19 [Internet]. Vol. 16, Bioinformation. 2020. p. 828–30. Available from:
[21]. Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:942916. Pubmed PMID: 24027766.
[22]. Thannickal VJ, Fanburg BL. Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2000 Dec 1;279(6):L1005-28. [23]. Snezhkina AV, Kudryavtseva AV, Kardymon OL, Savvateeva MV, Melnikova NV, Krasnov GS, Dmitriev AA. ROS Generation and Antioxidant Defense Systems in Normal and Malignant Cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019 Aug 5;2019:6175804. Pubmed PMID: 31467634.
[24]. Foster HA, Ditta IB, Varghese S, Steele A. Photocatalytic disinfection using titanium dioxide: spectrum and mechanism of antimicrobial activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jun;90(6):1847-68. Pubmed PMID: 21523480.
[25]. Sakai H, Ito E, Cai RX, Yoshioka T, Kubota Y, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration change of T24 cell under irradiation in the presence of TiO2 ultrafine particles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Nov 11;1201(2):259-65. Pubmed PMID: 7947940.
[26]. Kubota Y, Shuin T, Kawasaki C, Hosaka M, Kitamura H, Cai R, Sakai H, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A. Photokilling of T-24 human bladder cancer cells with titanium dioxide. Br J Cancer. 1994 Dec;70(6):1107-11. Pubmed PMID: 7981061.
[27]. Yang CC, Wang CX, Kuan CY, Chi CY, Chen CY, Lin YY, Chen GS, Hou CH, Lin FH. Using C-doped TiO2 Nanoparticles as a Novel Sonosensitizer for Cancer Treatment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;9(9):880. Pubmed PMID: 32957611.
[28]. Canaparo R, Foglietta F, Giuntini F, Francovich A, Serpe L. The bright side of sound: perspectives on the biomedical application of sonoluminescence. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;19(9):1114-1121. Pubmed PMID: 32685951.
[29]. Sioutas C, Delfino RJ, Singh M. Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and implications in epidemiologic research. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):947-55. Pubmed PMID: 16079062.
[30]. Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, Oberley T, Sioutas C, Yeh JI, Wiesner MR, Nel AE. Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett. 2006 Aug;6(8):1794-807. Pubmed PMID: 16895376.