Effectiveness Of Anti-Inflammatory Properties Of Combination Of Bromelain,Trypsin And Rutoside With Combination Of Diclofenac And Serratiopeptidase Following Surgical Removal Of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Randomised Double Blinded Clinical Trial
Vivek D. Menon1, M R Muthusekhar2*
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, TamilNadu, India.
2 Professor and Head of Department, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. M R Muthusekhar,
Professor and Head of Department, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, 162, PH Road,
Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: Muthusekar@saveetha.combr/>
Received: June 16, 2021; Accepted: August 29, 2021; Published: September 03, 2021
Citation:Vivek .D. Menon, M R Muthusekhar. Effectiveness Of Anti-Inflammatory Properties Of Combination Of Bromelain,Trypsin And Rutoside With Combination Of
Diclofenac And Serratiopeptidase Following Surgical Removal Of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Randomised Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):
4217-4221. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000859
Copyright:Dr. M R Muthusekhar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background: The surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most performed Dento-alveolar procedures,
associated with varying degrees of postoperative discomfort. Pharmacologic strategies for minimizing the clinical
manifestations of surgical injury are therefore, logically directed at blocking the formation or inhibiting the effects of mediators
of acute inflammation. NSAIDs are being used very extensively all over the world but their chronic use may lead to side
effects such as gastric ulcers and liver kidney damage. Considering these facts, the use of drugs of natural origin with lesser
hazards is a positive alternative. Bromelain, Rutoside and Trypsin are known to have a very promising role in relieving inflammation
and promote wound healing.
Materials and Methods:The study was conducted on 60 patients of either sex between the age group of 18-40 years who
required surgical removal of mandibular impacted 3rd molars. Group 1:- comprising 15 patients received the drug combination
of bromelain 90mg, trypsin 48mg, rutoside 100mg(Phlogam)for three times a day for three days. Group 2:- comprising 15
patients received diclofenac 50 mg and serratiopeptidase 10 mg(Lyser -D) for three times a day for three days. Measurement
of facial swelling, was made pre operatively and on the first, third and seventh postoperative day. Pain was evaluated from the
patient's response to visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Group 2 with Diclofenac and serratiopeptidase (Lyser-D) showed a significant reduction in pain score when compared
with Group 1 (Phlogam)at all time intervals. Significant difference was seen in reduction of facial swelling in Group 1
(Phlogam) when compared to Group 2(Lyser -D).
Conclusion: Bromelain and other proteolytic enzymes can be considered as an effective alternative to NSAIDs in reducing
the postoperative sequelae associated with surgical extraction of third molars and causing less health hazards. Diclofenac offers
superior analgesia when compared to Bromelain.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Mandibular Third Molar Surgery; Trypsin; Bromelain; Rutoside; Diclofenac Sodium; Serratiopeptidase; Swelling; Trismus; Pain.
Introduction
Surgical removal of mandibular third molar teeth under local anaesthesia
is widely administered and is typically related to postoperative
pain, swelling, and trismus, as direct and immediate consequences
of the surgery [1]. Postoperative pain following third
molar surgery results from trauma to bone and soft tissue. Management
of post¬operative pain may be a challenging task for the
surgeons in these patients [2].
Mandibular third molar surgeries are widely used, validated and
a highly standardized model as acute pain model for evaluating
analgesic efficacy of the drug utilized in acute pain control [3].
It allows examination of the peripheral and central nervous system pathways involved within the pathophysiology of pain and
its treatment after acute tissue injury. Analgesics like nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug drugs Opioids are commonly used for
postoperative pain management.
In order to avoid or minimize post-surgical complications, like
pain, swelling, and trismus, surgeons have either modified surgical
techniques, like using lasers and cryotherapy, or advised the patients
to use proteolytic enzymes, like trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain,
serratiopeptidase, and bromelain (pineapple enzyme), alongside
routine antibiotics, analgesics, and corticosteroids [4]. The
advantages of administering enzymes after surgical procedures
demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo are anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic,
and fibrinolytic, thereby minimizing postoperative
complications [5].
The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare the anti- inflammatory
properties of combination of bromelain, trypsin and
rutoside (Phlogam) with the combination of diclofenac and serratiopeptidase
(Lyser-D) following surgical removal of impacted
mandibular 3rd molar in terms of reducing postoperative pain,
facial swelling and improvement in mouth opening.
Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various
research projects across multiple disciplines [6-20]. Now the
growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.
Materials and Methods
The study was carried out in an institutional setting with the advantage
being a large data availability and the disadvantage being
assessment of patients belonging to a similar geographic location.
A retrospective study was done using the case records of patients
visiting University hospital from June 2019 - February 2020. Prior
permission to use the data for the study was obtained from the Institutional
Review Board of the University (SDC/SIHEC/2020/
DIASDATA/0619-0320).
A total of 38 case sheets containing information on benign migratory
syndrome were retrieved and the demographics of the
data analysed. The collected data was subjected to photographic
cross verification. The data collected was statistically analysed using
SPSS Version 20.0. Descriptive statistics and chi square tests
were performed. A p value of less than 0.05% was considered to
be statistically significant.
Sixty outpatients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, for surgical extraction of impacted third molars
were randomly selected for a double-blind study to compare the
effectiveness of combination of Trypsin, Bromelain, Rutoside
and Diclofenac sodium, Serratiopeptidasecombination. Patients
above 25 years requiring mandibular third molar surgery with
ASA Physical status I and II were selected for the study. Patients
were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2 were randomly
assigned with the assigned code Group 1(Phlogam) and
Group 2(Lyser-D).
Inclusion criteria
• Patients in the age group of 17-45 years
• Patients with unilateral/bilateral impacted mandibular third
molars diagnosed for surgical extraction.
Exclusion criteria
• Patients with known severe systemic diseases contraindicating
tooth extraction.
• Known mentally challenged patients, and patients who are
unable to communicate.
• Pregnant and lactating women
• Patients on anticoagulant therapy
• Patients allergic to bromelain
• Immunocompromised patients.
All drugs were dispersed in the form of packets. Patients were
taken up for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar
under standardized local anaesthetic technique and surgical procedure.
The study being Double-blinded, the operating surgeon was
not aware of the drug dispensed by the controller to the patient’s
postoperatively neither did the patients nor the investigators
aware of the drug given. The codes of the drugs were disclosed
to the investigator by the controller after the pain assessment.
Post-operatively pain assessment was done with the help of Visual
Analogue Scale (VAS).Swelling was assessed by means of twopoint
measurement of soft tissue(tragus-pogonion distance). All
the parameters were assessed on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day postoperatively
and using the above-mentioned methods the results of the
two groups were compared and statistically analysed. Paracetamol
500mg combination was given as a rescue medication. The statistical
analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) Version 15.0 Statistical Analysis Software. The values were
represented in mean ± SD.
Surgical Procedure
Isolation of the surgical field was accomplished. Patients were
administered local anaesthetic 2% Lignocaine hydrochloride with
1:80,000 epinephrine and the area was anesthetized using Inferior
Alveolar Nerve Block Technique. Ward’s incision was placed using
a standard No.15 blade and muco-periosteal flap was then
raised. Bone guttering and tooth sectioning was then completed
using a No.702 SL (Surgical Length) Taper Fissure Crosscut Carbide
bur.Tooth was then elevated and extracted from the socket,
the extraction socket was irrigated with saline and primary closure
of the surgical wound was done with 3-0 silk suture. After surgery
Post extraction instructions were given to the patients, Antibiotics
prescribed, and the coded study drugs were given to the patients
immediately after surgery postoperatively. Patients were recalled
after seven days for suture removal. The individual parameters
such as swelling, pain, trismus were recorded on 1st day,3rd and
7th day postoperatively.
Results
Of all the 60 patients studied divided into 2 groups, we found that
in Group 1 (PHLOGAM), 30 patients with a mean age of 27.4
years, included 20 males (66.7%) and 10 females (33.3%) who received
the tablet orally immediately after surgery and 12 hours after
surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
In Group 2 (Lyser-D) 30 patients with a mean age of 31.6 years,
included 17 females (56.7%) and 13 males (43.3%),as shown in Fig 1, received the tablet combination of diclofenac sodium and
serratiopeptidase orally immediately after surgery and 12 hours
after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
The mean value of swelling for Group 1 pre operatively was
found to be 14.57cm (SD: 0.94),on day one mean distance was
15.36 cm (SD: 0.89), on day 3 mean distance was 15.13 cm (SD:
0.99), and on day 7 mean distance was 14.64 cm (SD: 0.95).The
mean value of swelling for Group 2 pre operatively was found
to be 14.57cm(SD:0.94),on day 1 mean distance was 16.53 cm
(SD: 0.96), on day 3 mean distance was 16.13 cm (SD: 1.03), and
on day 7 mean distance was 15.57 cm (SD: 0.93).Swelling was
more in Combination of Diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase
when compared to combination of Rutoside, Bromelain and
Trypsin, as shown in Table 1.Mean value of pain was more in
group 1(Phlogam) compared to group 2 (Lyser - D), as shown
in Table 2.
Discussion
The common problems patients complain of after the surgical
removal of impacted teeth are pain, swelling, and trismus. Various
measures like application of ice, analgesics, anti-inflammatory
agents, and proteolytic enzymes are practiced attenuating these
complications. Bromelain may be a blend of enzymes extracted
from the stem and fruit of pineapple, pineapple , and is understood
for its proteolytic action [6]. It belongs to a family of
sulfhydryl proteolytic enzymes, which also contain components
like acid phosphatase, peroxidase, many protease inhibitors, and
organically bound calcium [7]. It is prepared by centrifugation,
ultrafiltration, and lyophilisation of fruit juice .In the past, studies
were conducted to work out the effect of orally administered bromelain
in reducing the postsurgical complications; these studies
suggested few mechanisms of actions like the subsequent
Altering pain mediators like bradykinin Inhibiting the synthesis
of pro¬inflammatory prostaglandins, mainly PGE2 Its fibrinolytic
action aids within the reabsorption of oedema into the blood
circulation Overall, it had been found to be effective in reducing
pain, swelling, and healing time [8]. However, its actions are found
to vary in several persons and different tissues within the same
person.
Several clinical studies are administered to work out the therapeutic
uses of bromelain, and it's been found to be effective in
minimizing the severity of angina and transient ischemic attack,
osteoarthritis, autoimmune diseases, diarrhoea, cancer (by activating
apoptosis), renal diseases, and respiratory diseases like asthma,
sinusitis, and eosinophilia. The opposite significant advantage of
bromelain is that it enhances the permeability of antibiotics like
penicillin and tetracycline, thereby increasing their absorption.
Even though studies have shown bromelain to possess exceptionally
low toxicity, its Ige mediated allergenic potential can't be underestimated.
it is recommended to administer bromelain before
food and daily dosage should be 750–1000 mg/day in divided
doses.
The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare the anti- inflammatory
properties of combination of bromelain, trypsin and
rutoside (Phlogam) with the combination of diclofenac and serratiopeptidase
(Lyser-D) following surgical removal of impacted
mandibular 3rd molar in terms of reducing postoperative pain,
facial swelling and improvement in mouth opening.
Hozt et al. [9] during a test study measured the space between
tragus and pogonion to estimate swelling after administration of
placebo and bromelain (80 mg thrice daily for six days) after the
extraction of third molars. They found a discount in swelling. We
also found equivalent results, however, the dose administered in
our study was 200 mg twice each day (400 mg).
Inchingolo et al. [10] and de la Barrera-Nunez et al. also found a discount in postoperative swelling after the extraction of third
molars by using bromelain. They used bromelain in doses of 240
mg for six days and 150 mg for 3 days.
Majid et al. [11] compared the efficiency of bromelain and diclofenac
sodium after surgical removal of lower third molars and
found significant reduction in pain in both the groups. They supported
the effectiveness of bromelain in reducing postoperative
pain, swelling, and postoperative life.
In our study we found thatSwelling was more in Combination
of Diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase when compared
to combination of Rutoside,Bromelain and Trypsin. The mean
value of trismus that was measured was more in Diclofenac sodium
and serratiopeptidase when compared to Combination of
Trypsin, Bromelain and Rutoside respectively. Mean value of pain
was more in group 1(Phlogam) compared to group 2 (Lyser - D)
We recommend further such studies on a larger sample size and
using placebo as controls to determine the effectiveness of bromelain
in reducing pain and swelling after removal of impacted
third molars, so that we can utilize its multi therapeutic benefits.
There is also a need to conduct studies comparing different routes
of administration as well as different doses of bromelain in altering
pain and swelling after third molars removal.
Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based
research and has excelled in various fields [27-37].
Conclusion
Bromelain and other proteolytic enzymes can be considered as
an effective alternative to NSAIDs in reducing the postoperative
sequelae associated with surgical extraction of third molars and
causing less health hazards. Diclofenac offers superior analgesia
when compared to Bromelain.
References
-
[1]. ANI,Newer covid symptoms you should know. Mint. 2021, April, 10.
[2]. Corchuelo J, Ulloa FC. Oral manifestations in a patient with a history of asymptomatic COVID-19: Case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:154- 157.Pubmed PMID: 32882435.
[3]. Dos Santos JA, Normando AG, da Silva RL, De Paula RM, Cembranel AC, Santos-Silva AR, et al. Oral mucosal lesions in a COVID-19 patient: New signs or secondary manifestations?. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 1;97:326-8.
[4]. Froum, S. Top 5 oral manifestations of COVID-19. Perio-Impant Advisory. 2020, December 3.
[5]. Halboub E, Al-Maweri SA, Alanazi RH, Qaid NM, Abdulrab S. Orofacial manifestations of COVID-19: a brief review of the published literature. Braz Oral Res. 2020 Oct 30;34:e124.Pubmed PMID: 33146320.
[6]. Haseltine, W. A. What Are The 677 Mutations? New Covid-19 Variants Found In The US. Forbes. 2021, February 19.
[7]. Harris, K. (2021, January 22). Is my sore throat COVID-19 or not? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.osfhealthcare.org/blog/is-my-sore-throatcovid- 19-or-not/
[8]. How Many New Coronavirus Variants Are There? (2021, March 12). Retrieved from https://www.healthline.com/health/how-many-strains-of-covid- are-there#bottom-line
[9]. IANS, (2021, February 23). India detects over 24,000 mutations in 7,000 variants of Covid. The Economic Times. https://health.economictimes. indiatimes.com/news/diagnostics/india-detects-over-24000-mutations-in- 7000-variants-of-covid/81169132
[10]. Iranmanesh B, Khalili M, Amiri R, Zartab H, Aflatoonian M. Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: A review article. Dermatol. Ther. 2020 Jan;34(1):e14578.
[11]. Lozada-Nur F, Chainani-Wu N, Fortuna G, Sroussi H. Dysgeusia in COVID- 19: possible mechanisms and implications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Sep;130(3):344.
[12]. Lubell, J. Is the Presence of Enanthem a Clue for COVID-19?. Medscape. 2020, July 24.
[13]. Pandey, K. How are symptoms of new COVID-19 strains and variants different from original coronavirus?. Timesnownews.com. 2021, April 8.
[14]. Singh CV, Jain S, Parveen S. The outcome of fluticasone nasal spray on anosmia and triamcinolone oral paste in dysgeusia in COVID-19 patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May 1;42(3):102892.
[15]. World Health Organization. (2020-a, April 23). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 94.
[16]. World Health Organization. Archived: Who timeline-covid-19. 2020-b, April 27.
[17]. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19) . 2020-c, November 10.
[18]. World Health Organization. The effects of virus variants on COVID-19 vaccines. 2021.
[19]. World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Retrieved April 28, 2021, fromhttps://covid19.who.int/
[20]. Zahra SA, Iddawela S, Pillai K, Choudhury RY, Harky A. Can symptoms of anosmia and dysgeusia be diagnostic for COVID-19?. Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01839.