SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


s
International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-8032

Evaluation of Tooth Shade in an Indian Population and its Correlation With Age, Gender and Skin Colour- Submission


Aishwaryah Ravisankar1, Raghu Sandhya2*

1 Graduate Student, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.
2 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.


*Corresponding Author

Raghu Sandhya,
Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.
Tel: 9884610410
E-mail: drsandhyaendo@gmail.com

Received: May 09, 2021; Accepted: August 5, 2021; Published: August 14, 2021

Citation:Aishwaryah Ravisankar, Raghu Sandhya. Evaluation of Tooth Shade in an Indian Population and its Correlation With Age, Gender and Skin Colour- Submission. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):3718-3722. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000762

Copyright: Raghu Sandhya©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Aim: Tooth shade selection is critical for estheticrehabilitation of smile. Tooth shade varies with racial origin and this in turn is influenced by various factors such as age, gender and skin colour.

To evaluate the tooth shade in Indian population and its correlation with age, gender, skin colour.

Materials and Methods: The study comprised of 100 individuals in the age group of 18-70 years. Among them 36 were males and 64 were females. The tooth shade of the patient was evaluated among Indian population using Vitapan classic shade guide. Age and gender of the patient were noted. Skin colour of the patient was recorded according to Fitzpatrick classification of skin colour. The recordings were tabulated and the results were calculated. The statistics was done using SPSS software.

Results: In the study population, people aged between 21-40 years most commonly had A2 shade (41.3%), 41-60 years had A3 shade (27.6%), and people more than 60 years had A3.5 shade (50.0%). A2 shade was the most common shade found in both males (25%) and females (34.4%).Population with Type I,II,IV,V skin tone have A2 shade (50%,36.4%,30%,26.7%respectively). Only age (p = 0.002)and gender (p = 0.018) were found to have the significant correlation with the tooth shade. There was no significant correlation found between skin colour and tooth shade (p=0.595).

Conclusion: The study showed that the most common tooth shade for population between <=20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years and >60 years was B1, A2,A3 and A3.5 respectively. A2 was found to be the most common teeth shade both in males and females. Individuals with Type I,II,IV,V skin colour had A2 as the most common tooth shade.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
6.Conclusion
8.References


Keywords

Age; Gender; Indian Population; Skin Colour; Tooth Color.


Introduction

The word “Esthetic” is concerned with the appreciation of beauty or with beauty and it is a regularly used term in dentistry to describe restoration and prosthetic replacement of tooth [1]. To achieve clinical success in terms of esthetics in prosthetic and restorative dentistry, one need to master the art of creating attractive and natural dental appearance [2]. Role of tooth colour on facial esthetics should not be overlooked. It is important to achieve satisfactoryrestoration especially among patients with complex expectations. Many factors influences shade selection, the source of light under which tooth is assessed being one of the major factors [3]. The next variable which can influence the shade selection process is the clinical skill of the operator and the choice of shade guide system [4]. The natural teeth are discoloured due to intrinsic factors which include amelogenesis and dentinogenesis imperfecta, environmental factors such as tetracycline staining, traumatic injury, dental caries, and aging. They may also experience discolouration due to extrinsic factors such as diet, smoking, xerostomia, and restorations.These discolorations influence and alter the decisions on the tooth shade for a final restoration [5]. Considering the harmony between tooth colour and soft tissues, the tooth colour along with the skin colour has to be recorded for an aesthetically successful facial restorations [6]. Colour of skin tone plays amajor role in tooth shade selection. Individuals with darker skin colour are perceived to have lighter teeth shade by dentists [7]. This perception can be attributed to the illusion of greater contrast between tooth shade and skin colour. Various research articles state that a valuable attention should be giventowards the racial distributive pattern of tooth shade. Every dentist has a perception on smile attractiveness which influences shade selection of tooth [8].

Aging has a substantial impact on the tooth shade selection. With theincrease in age,the teeth shadevalue decreases, translucence decreases and opacity increases [9]. Generally, lighter shade of teeth is recommended for younger patients and darker shades for geriatric patients. This is due to the fact that with age the dentin thickness increases resulting in smaller pulp chamber [6, 10]. Gender is yet another factor, significantly connected with tooth shade values [11]. Literature search reveals that men are more likely to present with darker tooth shade values whereas women of the same age group were more likely to show lighter tooth shade values [12].

Our understating about the dental shade is completely based on the studies obtained from western population.However, with increasing dental awareness and demand for esthetics in developing countries like the Indian subcontinent, research in the field of esthetics based on a local population has become the need of the hour [13]. Furthermore, limited literature or research work is available in our population in this regard. Hence the aim of this study was to evaluate the tooth shade in Indian population and its correlation with age, gender, skin colour. If such an association is established, this information will be utilized in restorative and prosthetic rehabilitation.


Materials And Methods

A cross-sectional, analytical study with a non-probability convenient sampling technique, conducted in the institution, for a duration of 2 months. Our sample size consisted of 100 patients, who visited for a routine dental checkup.The present project was approved at the Ethics Committee of Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science (SRB/SDBDS/FINAL/17-18/0295). The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. A written consent of each participant was obtained prior to the commencement of the assessment and the confidentiality of the information was maintained.

The cross-sectional study consisted of a sample size of 100 individuals belonging to both genders. Individuals in the age range of 16 years to 55 years with at least one completely erupted permanent maxillary left or right central incisor were considered for this study. Permanent maxillary central incisors with carious lesions, restorations, endodontically treated teeth, intrinsic staining, extrinsic staining due to diet, smoking and tobacco/pan chewing, tooth wear or any tooth abnormality, xerostomia and history of tooth bleaching or radiation therapy were excluded from the study.

The shade of middle third of the labial surface of permanent maxillary right central incisor was recorded using the Vitapan Classical shade guide. To avoid error the recording was done after drying the teeth with cotton. Skin colour was assessed on the dorsum of the hand. Skin colour was matched using the Fitzpatrick classification. Skin color was divided into 6 categories: Type 1 (pale white skin), Type 2(white skin), Type 3 (light brown skin), Type 4 (moderate brown skin), Type 5 (dark brown skin), and Type 6 (dark brown to black skin) [2].

All shade readings were made preferably between 10:00 PM and12:00 noon to get the maximum effect of the natural sunlight. Shades were established within 1 to 2minutes [14]. Only ten patients were evaluated in a day to reduce operator fatigue.

The data obtained was entered into the computer and statistical analysis was done using anstatistical package of social sciences (SPSS) software. Cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests were used to analyse the significance of the participant choices and the influence of socio-demographic variables on the selected teeth shades. A p-value of =0.05 was considered significant.


Results

The age of the individuals was divided into four groups as <=20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years and >60 years comprising of 2 patients, 63 patients, 29 patients, and 6 patients respectively in these groups counting a total of 100 patients. The tooth shade of patients less than <=20 years were found to be B1 and B2 shades. The tooth shade of patients from 21 to 40 years had majority of A2 shade. Patients from 41 to 60 years had a majority of A3 [Table 1]. Patients <=60 years had majority of A3.5 shade. The chi square value showed a significant difference of 0.002

Considering the gender, A2 was the most common tooth shade among both male and female study population with 25% and 34.4% respectively [Table 2]. The chi square values showed significant results between tooth shade and gender(0.003).

The skin colour was recorded according to the Fitzpatrick classification [Table 3]. Type IV was found to be the most common skin colour in40% of the study population. A2 was the most common tooth shade for Indian population with Type I,II,IV and V skin colour. Most of the study population with Type III skin colour had A3 tooth shade. The chi squared values showed insignificant correlation of tooth shade and skin shade (0.595).



Table 1. Cross tabulation of age and tooth shade.



Table 2. Cross tabulation of gender and tooth shade.



Table 3. Cross tabulation of skin colour and tooth shade.


Discussion

Color is a property of light. Objects have no color oftheir own; they just reflect a particular wavelength fromthe color spectrum [15]. As the light reflected from the objects enters the eye cornea, lens, retina, iris, and the area around fovea centralis work together to help appreciation of the object and to discriminate the colour [16].

Colour measurement in dentistry can be done in two ways, visual and instrumental.Various colour measuring devices used in dentistry includes digital camera, stereomicroscope, colorimeters, digital spectrophotometers and spectroradiometers [17, 18]. Digital camera has filters where colorimeter works on the principle of charger couple devices [19]. Spectrophotometersand spectroradiometers [20] consists of a single photodiode detector that records the amount of light at each wavelength [18]. The various shade tabs available includes custom shade guide, ideal shade guide,Shofu shade guide (based on the natural colour concept) [21], Vita Classical(uses hue value),Vita 3D-Master shade guide (tabs arranged based on chroma and value) [15] and VITA easy shade guide.

Shade tabs in a shade guide are matched to teeth in the order of value, hue, and chroma. “Hue” is the quality that differentiates one family of color from another. Hue is a physiologic and psychologicinterpretation of a sum of wavelengths. Hue is represented by A, B, C or D on the commonly used Vita Classic shade guide. Value or brightness, is the amount of light returned from an object. Chroma is the saturation, intensity or strength of the Hue [22]. VITAPAN classical shade guide was used for the research since it determines the correct tooth shade quickly and precisely. The modern design and systematic structure of the VITAPAN classical shade guide enabled the appropriateshade identification. The VITAPAN classical shade guidefacilitates the changeover from traditional shade-taking systems to the precise shade determination. The shade guide has aclassical, linear handling. These shade guides are very easy to use as it is self-explanatory and simple.

The shade guide is reliable and fast. Precise shade can be determined rapidly. The VITAPAN classical shade guide has a modern design and is an expression of perfect esthetics and a clear structure. The Fitzpatrick scale remains a recognized tool for dermatological research into human skin pigmentation and is based on the response of different types of skin to ultraviolet (UV) light [23]. The back of the palm was used in observing the skin colour so that the area was free of makeup or makeup residues [1].

This study shows that individuals with Type I, Type II, Type III, Type IV, Type V, Type VI represents pale white skin, white skin, light brown skin, moderate brown skin, dark brown skin and dark to black skin as follows.A2 was the most common tooth shade for Indian population with Type I,II,IV and V skin colour. The current study identifies that individuals with lighter skin shade have lighter teeth shade which is in accordance with previous studies [24].

The tooth shade of patients less than <=20 years were found to be B1 and B2 shades. The tooth shade of patients from 21 to 40 years had majority of A2 shade. Patients from 41 to 60 years had a majority of A3. Patients <=60 years had majority of A3.5 shades. These results indicates that the teeth darkens as the age of the patients advances which is in accordance with previous studies [2, 5, 14, 25]. In the present study, A2 was found to be the be the most frequently seen shade among male and female study population in the age group 18-40 years. This is in contradiction to earlier studies where men were found to have darker teeth shades in comparison with female.[26] In an African population older adults and men were found to have darker teeth [25].

Difference in choice of shade guides in various studies interferes with the comparison of tooth shade in various racial groups. Pakistani population were found to have 2M1 as the most common tooth shade which was recorded using VITA 3D master shade guide [27]. Among Sudanese populationA3 was the most common classical tooth shade. The shade was recorded using VITA easy shade guide [28, 29]. Spanish population showed 3M1 as the mostfrequent tooth shade when measured with easyguide spectrophotometer [30].

Our team has numerous highly cited publications on well-designed clinical trials and lab studies on various topics in the past couple of years [31-45]. This provided uswith theright platform to pursue the current study. Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based research and has excelled in various fields [46-55].


Conclusion

Within the limitations of the study it was concluded, thatthe most common tooth shade for this population between <=20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years and >60 years was B1, A2,A3 and A3.5 respectively. A2 was found to be the most common teeth shade both in male and female population. Individuals with Type I,II,IV,V skin colour had A2 as the most common teeth shade.


Acknowlegments And Declarations

The authors thank Saveetha Dental College and Hospital for theappproval and support rendered for the study.


References

  1. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod. 2009 Jul 1;35(7):930-7.
  2. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod. 2004 Dec 1;30(12):827-45.
  3. Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW. Ultrastructural examination of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod. 2009 Sep;35(9):1303-9.Pubmed PMID: 19720237.
  4. Davis JM, Maki J, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of the antimicrobial effects of various endodontic medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2007 May 1;33(5):567-9.
  5. Giuliani V, Cocchetti R, Pagavino G. Efficacy of ProTaper universal retreatment files in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2008 Nov 1;34(11):1381-4.
  6. Merrett SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals. J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):960-2.Pubmed PMID: 16982273.
  7. Crozeta BM, Lopes FC, Menezes Silva R, Silva-Sousa YTC, Moretti LF, Sousa-Neto MD. Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):891-899.Pubmed PMID: 32506324.
  8. Marinho AC, Martinho FC, Gonçalves LM, Rabang HR, Gomes BP. Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems? IntEndod J. 2015 Jun;48(6):542-8.Pubmed PMID: 25070009.
  9. Lopes HP, Gambarra-Soares T, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Inojosa IF, Lopes WS,et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of rotary instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, or nickel-titanium alloy in R-phase. J. Endod. 2013 Apr 1;39(4):516-20.
  10. Webber J. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots. 2015;1(3):34-40.
  11. Romeiro K, de Almeida A, Cassimiro M, Gominho L, Dantas E, Chagas N, et al. Reciproc and Reciproc Blue in the removal of bioceramic and resin-based sealers in retreatment procedures. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):405-416.Pubmed PMID: 31104115.
  12. Govindaraju L, Gurunathan D. Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective Clinical Study. J ClinDiagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31-ZC34.Pubmed PMID: 28511505.
  13. Christabel A, Anantanarayanan P, Subash P, Soh CL, Ramanathan M, Muthusekhar MR, et al. Comparison of pterygomaxillarydysjunction with tuberosity separation in isolated Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective, multi-centre, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;45(2):180-5.Pubmed PMID: 26338075.
  14. Soh CL, Narayanan V. Quality of life assessment in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Aug;42(8):974-80.Pubmed PMID: 23702370.
  15. Mehta M, Deeksha, Tewari D, Gupta G, Awasthi R, Singh H, et al. Oligonucleotide therapy: An emerging focus area for drug delivery in chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases. ChemBiol Interact. 2019 Aug 1;308:206- 215.Pubmed PMID: 31136735.
  16. Ezhilarasan D, Apoorva VS, Ashok Vardhan N. Syzygiumcumini extract induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Feb;48(2):115-121.Pubmed PMID: 30451321.
  17. Campeau PM, Kasperaviciute D, Lu JT, Burrage LC, Kim C, Hori M, et al. The genetic basis of DOORS syndrome: an exome-sequencing study. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):44-58.Pubmed PMID: 24291220.
  18. Sneha S. Knowledge and awareness regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis among undergraduate dental students. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016 Oct 1:154-9.
  19. Christabel SL, Linda Christabel S. Prevalence of type of frenal attachment and morphology of frenum in children, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. World J Dent. 2015 Oct;6(4):203-7.
  20. Kumar S, Rahman R. Knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding biomedical waste management among undergraduate dental students. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(8):341.
  21. Sridharan G, Ramani P, Patankar S. Serum metabolomics in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2017 Jul 1;13(3):556-61.
  22. Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Doraiswamy JN, Malaiappan S. Herbs as an antioxidant arsenal for periodontal diseases. J IntercultEthnopharmacol. 2016 Jan 27;5(1):92-6.Pubmed PMID: 27069730.
  23. Thamaraiselvan M, Elavarasu S, Thangakumaran S, Gadagi JS, Arthie T. Comparative clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of isolated gingival recession. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2015 Jan;19(1):66-71.
  24. Thangaraj SV, Shyamsundar V, Krishnamurthy A, Ramani P, Ganesan K, Muthuswami M, et al. Molecular Portrait of Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Shown by Integrative Meta-Analysis of Expression Profiles with Validations. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0156582.Pubmed PMID: 27280700.
  25. Ponnulakshmi R, Shyamaladevi B, Vijayalakshmi P, Selvaraj J. In silico and in vivo analysis to identify the antidiabetic activity of beta sitosterol in adipose tissue of high fat diet and sucrose induced type-2 diabetic experimental rats. ToxicolMech Methods. 2019 May;29(4):276-290.Pubmed PMID: 30461321.
  26. Ramakrishnan M, Shukri M. Fluoride, Fluoridated Toothpaste Efficacy And Its Safety In Children-Review. Int J Pharm Res. 2018 Oct 1;10(04):109-14.
  27. D'aviz FS, Farina AP, Souza MA, Cecchin D. Does adding an instrument after root preparation with Reciproc® R25 increase bacterial reduction? J Conserv Dent. 2018 May-Jun;21(3):269-273.Pubmed PMID: 29899628.
  28. Nevares G, Romeiro K, Albuquerque D, Xavier F, Fogel H, Freire L, et al. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment using ProTaper Next and Reciproc in severely curved canals. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(3):323-8.
  29. VijayashreePriyadharsini J. In silico validation of the non-antibiotic drugs acetaminophen and ibuprofen as antibacterial agents against red complex pathogens. J Periodontol. 2019 Dec;90(12):1441-1448.Pubmed PMID: 31257588.
  30. Pc J, Marimuthu T, Devadoss P, Kumar SM. Prevalence and measurement of anterior loop of the mandibular canal using CBCT: A cross sectional study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr 6;20(4):531-4.
  31. Ramesh A, Varghese S, Jayakumar ND, Malaiappan S. Comparative estimation of sulfiredoxin levels between chronic periodontitis and healthy patients - A case-control study. J Periodontol. 2018 Oct;89(10):1241-1248.Pubmed PMID: 30044495.
  32. Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJ. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-50.
  33. Sridharan G, Ramani P, Patankar S, Vijayaraghavan R. Evaluation of salivary metabolomics in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Apr;48(4):299-306.
  34. Ezhilarasan D, Apoorva VS, Ashok Vardhan N. Syzygiumcumini extract induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Feb;48(2):115-121.Pubmed PMID: 30451321.
  35. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):1-6.Pubmed PMID: 31955271.
  36. Samuel SR. Can 5-year-olds sensibly self-report the impact of developmental enamel defects on their quality of life? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Mar;31(2):285-286.Pubmed PMID: 32416620.
  37. R H, Ramani P, Ramanathan A, R JM, S G, Ramasubramanian A, et al. CYP2 C9 polymorphism among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and its role in altering the metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Sep;130(3):306-312.Pubmed PMID: 32773350.
  38. Chandrasekar R, Chandrasekhar S, Sundari KKS, Ravi P. Development and validation of a formula for objective assessment of cervical vertebral bone age. ProgOrthod. 2020 Oct 12;21(1):38.Pubmed PMID: 33043408.
  39. VijayashreePriyadharsini J, SmilineGirija AS, Paramasivam A. In silico analysis of virulence genes in an emerging dental pathogen A. baumannii and related species. Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Oct;94:93-98.Pubmed PMID: 30015217.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn