SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners

International Journal of Computational & Neural Engineering (IJCNE)  /  IJCNE-2572-7389-06-101

Identification of Citrus Fruit Diseases Through Intelligent Computational Approaches: A Review


Manavalan Radhakrishnan*

Assistant Professor in Computer Science, Head, Department of Computer Applications and Information Technology, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Villupuram - 605602, Tamilnadu, India.


*Corresponding Author

Manavalan Radhakrishnan,
Assistant Professor in Computer Science, Head, Department of Computer Applications and Information Technology, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Villupuram - 605602, Tamilnadu, India.
Tel: 9865125145
E-mail: manavalan_r@rediffmail.com

Received: May 05, 2020; Accepted: November 02, 2020; Published: December 18, 2020

Citation:Manavalan Radhakrishnan. Identification of Citrus Fruit Diseases Through Intelligent Computational Approaches: A Review. Int J Comput Neural Eng. 2020;6(1):105-116. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2572-7389-2000013

Copyright: Manavalan Radhakrishnan© 2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Agriculture plays a significant role in the growth of human civilization. The fruits and vegetables are an important ingredient in the regular diets of the human. They provide high sources of vitamins and minerals that allow us to remain healthy. Citrus is used as a major source of nutrients along with vitamin C worldwide. The Citrus family consists of grapes, grapefruits, orange and lemons. The Plant diseases highly decline the growth of citrus fruits, creating a significant economic loss in agriculture. The identification of the citrus fruits leaves diseases in naked eyes leads to inaccurate results for the control measurements of pesticides. Hence, early diagnosis of diseases in citrus fruit automatically is necessary to increase the productivity. Image processing techniques are generally used to design a diagnosis system for extracting the features from the citrus plant images and identify the types of diseases at the early stage itself. This paper exhibits survey on different image processing techniques and machine learning approaches used to extract and quick examination of various citrus fruits like lemon, orange, and grapes leaves. The issues faced by the computational approaches for analyzing citrus fruits leaves are also given with future directions.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Computational Approaches for Diagnosis of Citrus Fruit Diseases
4.Issues Related to Diagnosis of Citrus Leaves and Fruits Images
5.Performance Measures
6.Discussion
7.Conclusion
8.References

Keywords

Citrus; Grapes; Orange; Diseases; Image Processing; Automatic Identification.


Introduction

The research in the Agriculture sector aims at increasing production and quality of food with less cost and high profit [1]. Fruits have plenty of vitamins and minerals, fibers and other major nonnutrient substances such as plant sterols, flavonoids and antioxidants. Among fruit plants, citrus plants produce fruits with high sources of vitamin C, which is several benefits for human health and is also used as a raw material in many agro-industries [2].

The citrus fruit plants are affected by various diseases such as citrus canker, Melanose, citrus black spot, etc. Citrus canker is an inflammation of the citrus trees and is extremely infectious and causes yellow halo lesions or scabs on the leaves or fruits. Extreme infections can cause leaf damage, damaged fruit, drop of fruit and death. The cancer bacteria readily and rapidly disperse to air currents, plants, birds and also the humans via clothing and infected components [3].

The Melanose citrus disease can damage young leaves and fruits of some citrus varieties as their tissue expands and develops over long periods when the environment is rainy or damp. The signs of this common fungal disease ranges from small patches or scablike lesions, which are also referred to as tear drop, mudcake or star melanoses [4].

Citrus black spot (CBS) disease is caused by Phyllostictacitricarpa fungus and affects citrus plants in tropical climates, decreasing the quantity and quality of the fruit. Early CBS infections tend to be thin, oval, slightly elevated, reddish-brown with light centers and also a diffuse yellow halo. The older lesions are decayed with a dark brown border and a grey center [5]. Anthracnose is caused by the Colletotrichumgloeosporioides fungus, which occurs in the canopy on dead wood, and it extends short distances by rain splash, strong dew and overhead irrigation [6]. Table 1 presents the symptoms and favorable conditions of various Citrus diseases.


Table 1. Symptoms of various citrus plant diseases.


The computational approaches play a major role in automatic identification and early diagnosis diseases in citrus fruits for increasing growth and quality. Image processing techniques such as preprocessing, image segmentation, features extraction and classification are used to design a diagnosis system to identify the diseases in citrus plants. Typically, the users used sensors and cameras to acquire the Citrus leaves and fruit images from the field. The preprocessing techniques remove noises from the captured images and enhance the images. Image segmentation techniques are used to identify the diseased region and also detects the boundary regions of disease affected spots. The feature extraction techniques extract the features from the diseased regions. Finally, the classification techniques are applied to recognize the citrus plant diseases.

In this study, systematic reviews on computational approaches for efficient diagnoses of diseases in citrus fruit have been conducted. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Review of literature with the issues behind the diagnosis of citrus leaves diseases is exposed in computational approaches for diagnosis of citrus fruit diseases Section. The performance metrics used by the various researchers for citrus plant diseases diagnosis is exposed in performance measures section. Finally, the paper is concluded with further directions.


Computational Approaches for Diagnosis of Citrus Fruit Diseases

Computer-assisted plant disease detection is an important research topic. Since, it is beneficial to detect diseases from symptoms appearing on leaves at an early stage. The electronic databases such as IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Science Direct, Springer Link, Wiley and Google Scholar have been extensively searched for potential studies of various computational models used in Citrus fruits disease detection from 2007 to 2020. The reliable online articles such as thesis and book chapters were also searched for literature surveys. The depth review of computational approaches for diagnosis of Citrus leaves diseases are presented in the following section. The general structure so far applied for identification of citrus plant diseases and also the methods adopted by various researchers for each stage of the plant diseases detection is exposed in Figure 1 and the same is discussed here under.


Figure 1. Stages of Citrus Plant Diseases Identification.


Computational Approaches inCitrus Plant Diseases Diagnosis: A Review

In 2006, J. Blasco et al., [7] proposed Region Oriented Segmentation method for identification of citrus fruit peel defects. The dataset consists of 279 mandarins and 356 Oranges, in which 2132 individual surface blemishes and 162 stems were visible from the fruits. The average detection rate of defects from the tested image is 94.2%.

In 2007, R. Pydipati et al., [8] constructed Colour Co-occurrence Matrix for citrus fruit and extracted feature set with 4 data models such as 1B, 2B, 3B and 4B. The classifiers such as Squared Mahalanobis Distance, Back-Propagation Algorithm, and Neural Network with Radial Basis Functions were evaluated over the 4 data models. All the methods yielded only the best classification accuracy for the Model 4b feature set and their earned classification accuracy was 85%, 98.75% and 97.5% respectively.

In 2007, J. Blasco et al., [9] proposed a multispectral algorithm to detect defects in citrus fruit. Three types of image analysis such as Fluorescence (FL), Ultraviolet (UV) and Near Infrared Image (NIR) analysis were combined to detect defects. Linear Discriminant analysis was adopted for classification. The model achieved the maximum classification accuracy of 87.2% for HIS color space. The combined spectral analysis showed superior performance in identifying defects Compared to the individual analysis of FL, UV and NIR.

In 2007, J. Blasco et al., [10] developed combined multispectral and morphological features to identify defects in Citrus fruit. For 86% of the cases, the proposed system successfully identified the defects. Using only visible information, 82% of defects were correctly identified whereas the confusion matrix arises only between serious and slight defects. The green pattern can be detected with Ultra Violet Fluorescence (UVFL) for 97% of cases and anthracnose can be detected by NIR in 95% of cases.

In 2008, Meunkaewjinda et al., [11] developed a hybrid intelligent system to identify grape leaf diseases. A self-organizing Map (SOM) with Neural Network is applied to recognize the colors of grape. Segmentation is performed using Self organizing Map with a Genetic algorithm. Color features were extracted using Gabor filters. Finally, SVM classifies extracted features into diseases such as rust, scab, and normal. The dataset consists of 489 rust, 497 scab and 492 disease free grape leaves. The disease detection accuracy of the proposed method was 97.8%.

In 2009, G. Kim et al., [12] introduced Stepwise Discriminant technique for the classification of citrus disease. The feature was extracted using Color Co-Occurrence (CCM) matrix. The three classification models such as all leaf conditions, all leaf conditions except young flush leaves and all leaf conditions except young flush and mootle yielded the classification accuracy of 86.67%, 95.50% and 97.33% respectively.

In 2009, Kim et al., [13] extracted color and texture features to identify diseases in grapefruit peel. A colour imaging system was built to obtain RGB images from healthy grapefruits and five common diseased peels including canker, melanosa, greasy spot, wind scar and copper burn. GLCM extracted 39 texture features for each sample fruit images in the HSV space. The stepwise discriminant analysis was used to select the relevant features for the classification models. The dataset consists of 30 samples in which 20 samples used for training and 10 samples for testing. Four models such as HIS_13, HS_9 and I_11 and HIS_39 were developed for classification using the selected texture feature sets of the three color combinations [(H, S, I), (H, S), and (I)]. HSI_13 consists of 13 texture features. Nine and 11 texture features were in HS_9 and model I_11. HIS_39 consists of all 39 texture features. He overall classification accuracy of HIS_13, HS_9 and I_11 and HIS_39 models were 96.7%, 86.7%, 81.7% and 88.3% respectively.

In 2010, Garcia et al., [14] introduced a Multivariant image analysis approach to identify defects in Citrus fruit. In the proposed method, Principal Component Analysis is used to extract reference Eigenspace from matrix which is constructed by unfolding color and spatial data of defect-free peel samples. The dataset consists of 120 samples of oranges and mandarins. The success rate for detecting individual defects was 91.5%, whereas for the damaged samples the proposed method yielded 94.2%.

In 2011, Lorente et al., [15] introduced Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with an Extreme Learning Machine for decay detection in citrus fruit. The proposed classifier identified two classes such as decay and not-decay. The decay class consists of two infections such as P.digitatum and P.italicum. The classes such as green sound skin, orange sound skin, and scars were grouped into notdecay. Three features approaches were chosen for classification based on spectral index values. The achieved highest success rate of ELM was 95.5%.

In 2011, Zhang et al., [16] projected a two-level hierarchical detection structure to identify canker lesions. The dataset consists of 1000 positive and 2000 negative samples. The proposed zonebased feature extraction was compared to image based feature set. The performance of four classifiers such as Adaboost, Radial Basis Network, KNN and SVM were evaluated. The result showed that Adaboost achieved better performance compared to others. And also the experimental analysis revealed that zone based feature set yielded the highest classification rate of 88%.

In 2012, D. Lorente et al., [17] applied the area under the ROC curve to select features of citrus fruit from the hyperspectral images to identify defects in Citrus fruit. The performance of the ROC feature selection method was compared to three constructed feature selection approaches such as I, II and III. The number of features chosen by the approaches I, II and III were 6, 7 and 4 respectively. The ROC feature selection method yielded highest detection rate of 95.52% compared to Feature selection approach III.

In 2013, Bandi et al., [18] analyzed four classifiers such as Naïve Bayes classifier (NBC), k Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Discriminant Classifier (LDA) and Random Forest Tree (RFT) algorithms in the identification of diseased citrus leaves. The dataset consists of 40 samples. Features were extracted through the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM). The classification accuracy of KNN, NBC, LDA and RFT were 77.5%, 95%, 98.75%, and 97.5% respectively.

In 2013, Stegmayer et al., [19] tested three classifiers such as CART, Naive Bayes, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) classification models in the recognition of citrus diseases. Two datasets with 90 features and 14 features were used to measure the classification performance. The performance MLP is best in classifying diseases such as citrus canker, black spot, and scab. MLP achieved a classification ratio of 83% for all classes of quarantine/notquarantine samples. In 2013, S.Sannakki et al., [20] applied Feed Forward Neural Network to identify grape leaf diseases. The thresholding technique masked green pixels and anisotropic diffusion filter removed noise from the images. The diseased portion from segmented from grape leaf image using K-means clustering. The dataset consists of 16 powdery Mildew and 17 downy mildew images. The training accuracy of Feed Forward Neural Network was 100%.

In 2013, S. Sannakki et al., [21] proposed Feed Forward Neural Network and k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) for weather forecasts which utilized moisture and temperature as parameters to predict disease outbreaks in grapes. The system is designed with two modules such as weather forecasting and disease prediction. This weather data is taken from Belgaum/Sambra at the latitude of 15.85, longitude of 74.61 and altitude of 758.

In 2013, M. Bulanon et al., [22] applied Linear Discriminant Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks to identify black spots in citrus fruit through hyperspectral image analysis. The citrus fruit images were only selected from the four optimal wavelengths such as 493nm, 713 nm, 629nm and 781 nm for classification. LDC and ANN achieved an overall classification accuracy of 92%.

The method established in 2013 byPranjaliVinayakKeskar et al., [23] consists of four stages for the identification and diagnosis of leaf diseases. HSI transformation, histogram analysis and intensity adjustment are performed to enhance the image. The segmentation is carried out by the fuzzy algorithm. The color, size and shape features of the diseased spots are extracted and classified using Artificial Neural Network. The whole system is treated as three components such as image analyser, feature repository and classifier. The system works in two phases such as Offline and Online. In the offline phase, a large set of defected input images was processed by image analyser for extracting abnormal features. These features were stored in the classifier's function repository for subsequent usage. During the online process, the pathological feature retrieved by the image analyser from a single defective image is placed into the classifier to identify the specific disorder. In 2014, Narvekar et al., [24] constructed Spatial Gray-level Dependence Matrices [SGDM] from grape leaves images to extract features for the identification of various diseases. About 100 plant leaves of different native plant species in Maharashtra have been collected for analysis. The leaf images acquired are translated to HSI format.Otsu thresholding technique identifies the diseased regions. The co-occurrence features including, Cluster shade and Cluster prominence for classification were extracted from its hue content.

In 2014, R. Gavhale et al. [25] adopted the Support Vector Machine (SVM) to classify citrus leaf diseases. The training dataset consists of 200 images of Citrus canker and Anthracnose diseased leaves. The testing set consists of 50 images. The Genuine Acceptance Rate (GAR) of SVM with RBF and SVM with Polynomial kernel was 96% and 95% respectively.

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is used to identify grape leaf diseases by Nivedita.R.Kakad et al., [26] in 2015. Canny edge detection method segment the diseased region where features were extracted through GLCM and the same were given as an input to ANN. The ANN is trained with 115 images of different disease type and 40 images were used for testing. The classification rate of ANN was 92.94%.

In 2015,R.Kakade et al., [27] adapted SVM to classify diseases in grape leaves. Initially, the RGB image was converted into HIS space. Split and merge segmentation technique is used for segmentation of RoIs. Spatial Gray-level Dependency Matrices (SGDM matrix) is constructed for each RoIs to extract the features. Finally, SVM identified the diseases in grape leaves using extracted features.

2015, Priyaet al., [28] developed a knowledge-based system to identify plant diseases in lemon leaves. In the proposed approach, gray level threshold segmentation used to convert the grayscale images into binary images. Then the canny edge detection method extracted the features in segmented image calculated threshold value using a histogram. The threshold value of normal leaf always in the range of 30-32 where infected leaf lies out of the range. In the classifiers, the disease name was stored with the threshold value and remedy. If it’s infected, then the alarm will be generated to intimate the owner about the disease outbreak. In 2016, K.Padmavathi et al., [29] applied region merging and patching concept to segment the diseased region in citrus leaves. The performance of the proposed method was compared over Lazy Random Walk (LRW) method. The evaluation metrics such as Achievable Segmentation Accuracy, Boundary recall and under segmentation Error were calculated. The proposed method yielded an accuracy of 75%, whereas LRW achieved only 72%.

In 2016, Kamlapurkar [30] proposed an image processing techniques to identify and classify the diseases in leaf images accurately. The steps in the process are Preprocessing and Identification of Powdery Mildew, Downey Mildew diseases. Using the discontinuity and similarity principles the diseased region is extracted from the grapes leaves.

In 2016, Baldomero et al., [31] applied KNN techniques to detect Potassium Deficiency in grapes leaves. The segmentation method K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) was compared to the histogram technique. The proposed method was tested using 25 images of healthy and affected leaves. Six varieties of red grapes such as Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Merlot, Malbec, Shiraz and Tempranillo used to assess the methods. The 25 images healthy and affected leaves divided in two groups for classifications. Histogram based methods work with grayscale intensity images and can’t distinguish between colors. The proposed method can be adapted to detect one or many nutritional deficiencies and classify the symptoms.

In 2016, Sladojevic et al., [32] proposed Deep Convolutional Networks as an approach to recognize 13 types of plant diseases. The dataset consisted of 30880 images and 2589 images for training and testing respectively. The average precision of the CNN to recognize the pathogens was 96.3 percent.

In 2016, Petrellis [33] proposed Windows Phone application for measuring the plant lesion features for reliable diagnosis using descriptive information provided by the user. Appropriate actions can be suggested to the user based on these measurements. The most important symptoms of the disease include lesions, overdevelopment, or underdevelopment of various parts of a plant, necrosis and deteriorated appearance. The color, area and number of the lesions can often be used to determine the disease that has mortified a plant. The spots on citrus tree leaves (orange and tangerine), as well as pear trees have been used as case studies. In order to evaluate the developed spot recognition, algorithm 20 tangerine and 20 pear tree leaves images were used. The proposed system recognized 90% of lesions.

In 2016, Wetterich et al., [34] applied the SVM and Fluorescence imaging system to identify Citrus canker and Huanglongbing (HLB) detection. The classification accuracy of the method to identify citrus canker and citrus scab was 97.8% whereas 95% of accuracy was earned in identifying HLB and zinc deficiency. In 2016, K. Padmavathi et al., [35] dedicated Recursively Separated Weighted Histogram Equalization (RSWHE) technique to enhance the contrast of Citrus leaf images to identify citrus canker diseases. In the second stage, the median filter is applied to remove the unwanted noise from the citrus images. The proposed approaches increase the quality of the images which can be utilized for further processing.

In 2016, M. Abdelsalam et al., [36] devoted a voting technique to identify defects in citrus fruit. Initially, the orange fruit is segmented from the NIR and RGB images. Thresholding method identified defects in seven different color components. Finally, the voting process classifies the defects. The dataset consists of 43 defect-free and 100 defected orange fruits. The overall accuracy of the algorithm was more than 95%.

In 2016, Sandika et al. [37] applied the Random forest technique to identify grapes leaves diseases. The performance of Random Forest is compared with PNN, BPNN and SVM. The feature extraction algorithms such as Local Binary Pattern (LBP), GLCM features and local texture features were used. The experimental result proved that the Random forest with GLCM features yielded the highest classification accuracy of 86%.

In 2016, Waghmare et al., [38] introduced the SVM classifier to identify the diseases in grape leaves. The dataset consists of 450 grape leaves, in which 160 healthy leaves and 290 diseased leaves. SVM yielded a classification accuracy of 96.6%.

In 2016, K. Kharde et al., [39] applied the Neural Network technique to identify grape leaf diseases. Otsu algorithm and watershed segmentation techniques were applied for segmentation. The proposed method yielded an overall classification accuracy of 93.44%.

In 2016,K. Kharde et al., [40] applied ANN to identify 3 types of diseases such as Downy mildew, Powdery mildew and Black rot in grape leaves. The grapevine images were captured using mobile and stored in the Raspberry Pi system. Finally, image processing techniques were applied to identify the types of diseases. ANN yielded an overall classification accuracy of 93.33%.

In 2016, B. Padol et al., [41] applied SVM to identify grape leaf diseases. The diseased region is segmented using K Means clustering. Color and texture features were extracted from the segmented images. SVM yielded an accuracy of 88.89% to identify the grape leaf diseases.

In 2017, Tete et al., [42] applied Thresholding and K- means cluster algorithms to detect different plant leaf diseases. The digital images of plant leaves are acquired from the field using a camera. The image is preprocessed and segmented the original image to identify the infected parts of the plant leaf. The various varieties of plant leaves such as guldaudi leaf, lemon leaf, rose leaf and bitter gourd leaves with specific diseases were examined. The k means clustering recognized the diseased region and the results were expressed qualitatively.

In 2017, H. Ali et al., [43] proposed ΔE color difference algorithm to segment the diseased region in citrus fruit. Dataset includes 199 images with 99 infected with disease and 100 healthy images of citrus plants. Color and texture features were extracted from the segmented image. The classification techniques such as KNN, Cubic SVM, Boosted and Bagged tree classifiers were used to identify the types of diseases. The experimental result showed that the Bagged tree classifier outperformed others. The Bagged tree ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.5%, 100%, and 100% for disease level in RGB, HSV and LBP features respectively.

In 2017, K. Hase et al., [44] used the Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighborhood (FLANN) technique to identify diseases in tomato and grape leaves. The proposed system was developed in the Android environment. The diseased region is extracted using the adaptive thresholding technique. FLANN identified Bacteria and Fungus diseases in tomato and grape leaves. The proposed method achieved an accuracy of 91.5% and 94% in identifying Bacteria and Fungus diseases in tomato leaves. Similarly, the accuracy of identifying bacteria and fungus disease in Grape leaves was 93.2% and 94.7% respectively.

In 2017, S. Ustad et al., [45] applied K means clustering to extract the diseased region of grape leaves. Various features such as color, texture and shape were extracted from the segmented images. Then, SVM identifies the types of diseases in grape leaves. The average classification accuracy of SVM was 90%.

In 2018, Sharif et al., [46] dedicated optimized weighted segmentation method to detect lesion spots in citrus fruits. The color, geometric and texture features were extracted and the features set were reduced using PCA. The extracted features were given as input to the multi-SVM to classify the diseases. The proposed method was tested over 1000 citrus fruits images with various diseases such as canker, anthracnose. The performance of the optimized weighted method was compared to W-KNN, LDA, DT and Ensemble Boosted Tree (EBT) methods. The classification accuracy of optimized segmentation method achieved 96.9% which was superior to others.

In 2018, Banni et al., [47] devoted the Bi-LevelThresholding technique to segment the diseased region in citrus leaves. The various citrus leaves images collected from the plants like grapefruit, lemon, and orange. The features were extracted using the GLCM technique and the framed Hidden Markov Model is applied to classify the diseases. The dataset consists of 236 samples of citrus diseased leaves. The accuracy of the method to identify canker, Anthracnose, overwatering and citrus greening was 85.71%, 84.21%, 82.50% and 78% respectively.

In 2018, Behera et al., [48] personalized Multiclass SVM to classify the diseases in Orange fruit. The K-means clustering used to segment the diseased region where features were extracted using the GLCM technique. The severity of the disease is measured using Fuzzy logic. The dataset consisted of 20 diseased orange fruit. The proposed method yielded an accuracy of 90% to identify canker, Melanose, stubborn disease, brown rot diseases and healthy fruits.

In 2019, I. Ojelabi et al., [49] applied the K-means clustering technique to extract the diseased region in citrus fruit image where the color, geometric and texture features were extracted and the same was reduced using PCA. The extracted features were given to SVM to classify the diseases. The dataset consisted of 190 diseased citrus fruit samples. The performance of the proposed method was compared with the KNN classifier. The SVM classifier yielded an accuracy of 95% which is 6% higher than KNN. ANN and SVM classifiers used to classify citrus fruit diseases by Doh et al., [50] in 2019. The K-means clustering technique extracted the diseased region from the leaves images. The average classification accuracy of ANN and SVM was 88.96% and 93.12% respectively.

In 2019, Patel et al., [51] dedicated the K-Means clustering technique to segment the diseased spot in pre-processed orange fruit images using a median filter. The color, texture and shape features were extracted from the diseased region and classify the same with the SVM classifier. The combination of Color Moment, shape and GLCM features yielded the highest accuracy of 67.74%. In 2019, Andrushia et al., [52] adapted the Artificial Bee colony optimization technique to find the optimal features from the constructed feature sets of grape leaves. The cellular automation filter removed the noises from the image. The color, shape, and texture features were extracted from the grape leaves. The extracted features set given as input to the ABC algorithm to find the optimal features set. Then, the SVM classifier classified the diseases. The plant village dataset is used for experimentation. The performance of SVM was compared to the KNN classifier. The performance of the ABC feature selection method was compared with PSO and Genetic algorithm. The experimental results showed that SVM with ABC feature selection yielded 93.01% of accuracy, which was superior to other methods.

In 2019, Miaomiao Ji et al., [53] proposed CNN with united Model to identify grapes leaves diseases. The united Model hybrid the features of ResNet 50 architecture and Inception V3 component to extract the features of grapes leave images. The dataset collected from the plant village. The performance of CNN with unitedModel was compared with various CNN architectures such as ResNet, GoogleNet, DenseNet VGGNet. The testing accuracy of United models was 98.57%, whereas GoogleNet, ResNet, VGGNet and DenseNet yielded an accuracy of 95.47%, 98.09%, 93.32% and 96.62% respectively.

In 2019, Adeel et al., [54] proposed a Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) approach to find the optimal features from the grapes leaves images and multi SVM is adapted for classification. In the pre-processing stage, Local Contrast Haze Reduction (LCHR) is used to enhance the contrast of the diseased region. The color, geometric and texture features were extracted, which are used by CCA to find the optimal feature set. The proposed method was tested over the plant village dataset. The performance of M-SVM is compared with Ensemble Subspace Discriminative (ESD), Quadratic SVM (QSVM), Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM), Cosine KNN(CKNN) and Cubic K-Nearest Neighbor (CKNN). The accuracy of M-SVM was 91.4%, which is superior to others.

In 2019, K. R. Aravind et al., [55] applied CNN with Alexnet with a transfer learning approach to extract features from the grape leaves. The dataset consisted of 4063 diseased leaves. The proposed CNN with Alexnet architecture utilized 7 rectified linear unit (ReLu), 5 Convolution layers, 3 normalization layers, 2 drop out layers, and one softmax layers to extract the features. The extracted features were applied to Multi-SVM to classify the diseases. The proposed method yielded an accuracy of 99.23%.

In 2019, S.M. Jaisakthi et al., [56] devoted the methods SVM, Adaboost and Random Forest to identify grape leaves diseases. The background of the grape leaves images were removed using a graph cut method. The global thresholding technique used to extract the diseased region from the grape leaves. The GLCM technique personalized to extract the features. The dataset consisted of 5675 grape leaves images collected from the plant village dataset. The experimental result proved that the classification accuracy of SVM, Random Forest and Adaboost techniques were 91%, 74.79% and 83% respectively.

In 2020, Singh et al., [57] applied Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbours and Multi-Layer Perceptron technique to classify the citrus leaf diseases. The kmeans clustering technique segmented the diseased regions in leaves where the color and texture features were extracted. The ANOVA F-test is applied to select the important features. Finally, the above classification techniques were applied to identify the diseases. The dataset consisted of 236 citrus diseased leaves. The combination of color and texture features set yielded higher accuracy. The accuracy of LDA, MLP, KNN and SVM for color and texture features yielded an accuracy of 84.32%, 81.36%, 77.12% and 80.93% respectively.

The review of various methods used to identify citrus plant diseases is projected in Table 1 with their outcome and performance metrics.



Table 2. The review of various methods used to detect Citrus Disease Detection.


Issues Related to Diagnosis of Citrus Leaves and Fruits Images

The growth of the Country’s economy highly depends on the agriculture sector. The agriculture agencies are currently working on several agricultural data to increase productivity. Multiple projects are ongoing to boost the agriculture sector. There are many issues such as fungal and bacterial diseases that impede the economic growth of horticulture. Nevertheless, it is a priority for researchers to build a model that can support the prevention, early detection of the diseases and increase production with good quality. The computational approaches play an evolving role in identifying citrus fruit diseases at earlier stages. From the review of literature, the following issues are identified while processing and diagnosis of citrus fruits leaves images using computational approaches.

• In non-uniform lighting conditions, most of citrus leaves images appear darker. Due to the uneven contrasts and visual quality of citrus leaves leads to poor understanding of image features.
• The Citrus leaves images were randomly taken by the farmers using a low-quality camera, hence it may be blurred or unfocused on desired diseased regions.
• The irregular shapes of edges and diverse blending orientations of citrus leaves and fruits images make more difficult to extract features for disease diagnosis.
• Many Citrus leaves boundary are fuzzy in nature, because traditional methods cannot cope with this uncertainty.
• Most of the algorithms failed to separate leaf images from the complex background. Hence, it is difficult to identify the exact boundary of the citrus leaves.
• The edge detection algorithm fails to find which edge pixels should be discarded as noise from the distorted citrus leaves images.
• Due to the variable size, shape and location, variegated color, weak edges, low contrast, irregular and fuzzy borders of the diseased spot of citrus leaves, the image segmentation algorithm fails to extract the diseased region efficiently.
• It is very difficult to identify the exact location of the diseased leaves spot, since the poor quality of images, the presence of extraneous matters and complex image background.
• The majority of unhealthy leaves not identified effectively and the healthy leaves are recognized as diseased leaves due to the deficiencies of the classification models. So the presently available Computational system produces less accuracy.


Performance Measures

The performance matrices are substantial and computable measure used to quantitatively access the performance of Image processing algorithms. To date, researchers have been used specific assessment criteria to measure the efficiency of the proposed methods. The study noted that various metrics used for the diagnosis of diseases in citrus leaves. The short descriptions of these measures are given here along with their formulae.

The Mean Square Error (MSE) and the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) were used to measure the performance of algorithms. The MSE measures the cumulative squared error between the original and the enhanced citrus leaves images whereas the PSNR is the ratio between the squared maximum intensity value of the citrus leaves images and the mean squared error of image. The Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) is frequently used to measure the average of squared differences between enhanced and original citrus leaves images. The SNR is used to measure the random and uniformly distributed noise in the image. It measures how the original citrus leaves images were affected by the noise. It is measured in decibels. SNR metric is used to assess the performance of image compression and preprocessing techniques for citrus leaves images.

Accuracy is the ratio of the number of diseased citrus images that are correctly recognized to the total number of citrus leaves samples. Sensitivity and specificity are the two statistical measures of the performance for binary classification test. Sensitivity measures the percentage of healthycitrus leaves images are correctly identified whereas specificity measures the percentage of diseased citrus leaves were correctly identified.

True Positive Rate (TPR) is the proportion of healthy citrus leaves images that are correctly recognized as healthy samples for all positive data points. The False Positive Rate (FPR) is the proportion of unhealthy samples mistakenly predicted as positive for all negative samples.

Precision measures the overall number of correctly labeled healthy citrus samples divided by a predicted number of healthy samples. It measures the amount of retrieved instances are relevant to the classification. It is also known as Positive Predicted Value (PPV). Recall is the correct number of positive samples identified divided by the total number of samples. It measures the probability of relevant information that is retrieved successfully among all the relevant instances.

Area Under Curve (AUC) is used in image classification analysis in order to determine which models predict the classes accurately. The performance of the classifier model is calculated by calculating the AUC on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC).

Most of the classification problems handle imbalanced datasets. The balance between majority and minority class performance is measured through Geometric Mean or G-mean. The formulas of the above measures are exposed in Table 3.



Table 3. Performance Measures.


Discussion

Precise, timely identification and diagnosis of diseases helps for the agriculture growth. Naked eye observation can classify diseases using continuous monitoring experience. But it results in high costs and time consuming. Image processing has been shown to be an important tool for identifying and classifying plant diseases. To address manual process difficulties, many computer-based techniques have been developed in recent years to identify and recognize agricultural and horticultural diseases. The literature review clarified various methods of recognizing and classifying specific citrus plant leaf diseases from 2006 to 2020. From the review, it was proved that the Bagged Tree classifier achieved 99.9% of accuracy to classify grapes leaves diseases. The CNN with transfer learning approach yielded 99.23% of accuracy. The CNN with unitedModel achieved 98.57% of accuracy to recognize grapes leaves diseases. Most of the images used for analysis was taken from the camera, the images may appear noisy. The literature review found that the researchers not focusing on enhancing the quality of the Citrus plant leaves. The researchers will incorporate more innovative algorithms and more methods for improved performance. In future, Online tools and mobile based applications are necessary to provide instant solutions to the farmers regarding the disease severity.


Conclusion

Agriculture plays a vital role in the economic growth of the nation since the majority of developing countries survive on agriculture. Disease normally contaminated agricultural products such as vegetables, fruits. The outbreak of diseases depletes agricultural products quality and quantity. It directly influences the farmer’s financial growth and public health. Citrus fruits include lemons, oranges, limes, and grapefruits and enriched with vitamin C, flavonoids that have anti-cancer effects. Plant disease can devastate natural ecosystems, exacerbate environmental problems. Farmers are spending millions of dollars to control citrus plant diseases. The poor disease management without adequate technical support, poor pest control mechanism and naked eye observations of diseases severely affect the production of fruits. Hence, it is essential to identify citrus plant diseases through computational approaches. This paper portrays the survey of computing approaches so for used for analyzing the citrus fruits and leaves images to predict diseases as well as draw decisions for prognosis. This paper also discussed issues related to computational methods in analyzing citrus fruits and its leaves images. There is a need for automatic citrus disease identification, since the existing computational approaches did not provide a complete solution for all the issues related to diagnosing citrus diseases. This study can facilitate the researchers to contribute efficient computational approaches for quick and accurate diagnosis of citrus fruits diseases to increase the cultivation for the farmers.


References


  1. Sannakki SS, Rajpurohit VS, Nargund VB, Kumar A, Yallur PS. Leaf disease grading by machine vision and fuzzy logic. Int J. 2011;2(5):1709-16.
  2. Pujari JD, Yakkundimath R, Byadgi AS. Grading and classification of anthracnose fungal disease of fruits based on statistical texture features. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. 2013 Mar; 52(1): 121-32.
  3. Treehelp. Citrus Tree Insects & Diseases from TreeHelp [Internet]. Available from: www.treehelp.com/citrus-insects-diseases/.
  4. Nelson S. Citrus Melanose. 2008.
  5. USDA.Gov. Citrus Black Spot [Internet]. Available from: www.aphis.usda. gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-anddiseases/ citrus/citrus-black-spot/citrus-black-spot.
  6. Idtools.Org. Fact Sheet: Anthracnose Citrus Diseases. Available from: idtools. org/id/citrus/diseases/factsheet.php?name=Anthracnose.
  7. Blasco J, Aleixos N, Moltó E. Computer vision detection of peel defects in citrus by means of a region oriented segmentation algorithm. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007 Aug 1; 81(3): 535-43.
  8. Pydipati R, Burks T, Lee WS. Identification of citrus disease using color texture features and discriminant analysis. Comput Electron Agric. 2006; 52: 49–59.
  9. Blasco J, Aleixos N, Gómez J, Moltó E. Citrus sorting by identification of the most common defects using multispectral computer vision. Journal of food engineering. 2007 Dec 1; 83(3): 384-93.
  10. Blasco J, Aleixos N, Gómez-Sanchís J, Molto E. Recognition and classification of external skin damage in citrus fruits using multispectral data and morphological features. Biosyst Eng. 2009; 103: 137–45.
  11. Meunkaewjinda A, Kumsawat P, Attakitmongcol K, Srikaew A. Grape leaf disease detection from color imagery using hybrid intelligent system. IEEE. 2008 May 14; 1: 513-516.
  12. Kim DG, Burks TF, Schumann AW, Zekri M, Zhao X, Qin J. Detection of citrus greening using microscopic imaging. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 2009 Aug 5.
  13. Kim DG, Burks TF, Qin J, Bulanon DM. Classification of grapefruit peel diseases using color texture feature analysis. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering. 2009 Oct 16; 2(3): 41-50.
  14. López-García F, Andreu-García G, Blasco J, Aleixos N, Valiente JM. Automatic detection of skin defects in citrus fruits using a multivariate image analysis approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2010 May 1;71(2):189-97.
  15. Lorente D, Aleixos N, Gómez-Sanchis J, Cubero S, Blasco J. Selection of optimal wavelength features for decay detection in citrus fruit using the ROC curve and neural networks. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013 Feb 1; 6(2): 530-41.
  16. Zhang M, Meng Q. Automatic citrus canker detection from leaf images captured in field. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2011; 32: 2036–46.
  17. Lorente D, Blasco J, Serrano AJ, Soria-Olivas E, Aleixos N, Gómez-Sanchis J. Comparison of ROC feature selection method for the detection of decay in citrus fruit using hyperspectral images. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013 Dec 1; 6(12): 3613-9.
  18. Bandi SR, Varadharajan A, Chinnasamy A. Performance evaluation of various statistical classifiers in detecting the diseased citrus leaves. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 2013 Feb; 5(2): 298-307.
  19. Stegmayer G, Milone DH, Garran S, Burdyn L. Automatic recognition of quarantine citrus diseases. Expert systems with applications. 2013 Jul 1; 40(9): 3512-7.
  20. Sannakki SS, Rajpurohit VS, Nargund VB, Kulkarni P. Diagnosis and classification of grape leaf diseases using neural networks. In2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE. 2013 Jul 4; 1-5.
  21. Sannakki S, Rajpurohit VS, Sumira F, Venkatesh H. A neural network approach for disease forecasting in grapes using weather parameters. In2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE. 2013 Jul 4; 1-5.
  22. Bulanon D, Burks T, Kim DG, Ritenour M. Citrus black spot detection using hyperspectral image analysis. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2013; 15: 171–80.
  23. Keskar PV, Masare SN, Kadam MS, Deoghare SM. Leaf disease detection and diagnosis. Int J Emerg Trends Electr Electron. 2013; 2(2): 28-31.
  24. Narvekar PR, Kumbhar MM, Patil SN. Grape leaf diseases detection & analysis using SGDM matrix method. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 2014 Mar; 2(3): 3365-72.
  25. Pachore KA, Kishore R, Bhawari SG. Leaf Disease Recognition System. 2016.
  26. Kakade NR, Ahire DD. Real time grape leaf disease detection. Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ (IJARIIE). 2015; 1(4): 1.
  27. Kakade NR, Ahire DD. A review of grape plant disease detection. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015 Aug; 2.
  28. Satya Priya N, Nivetha E, Khilar R. Efficient Knowledge Based System to Detect Diseases in Lemon Leaf. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR). 2016; 2(5): 275-80.
  29. Padmavathi K, Thangadurai K. An Implementation of Segmentation in Citrus Canker Disease Detection Using Patches and Labels. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS). 2016 Jul; 14(7): 341–5.
  30. Kamlapurkar SR. Detection of plant leaf disease using image processing approach. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2016 Feb; 6(2): 73-6.
  31. Rangel BM, Fernández MA, Murillo JC, Ortega JC, Arreguín JM. KNNbased image segmentation for grapevine potassium deficiency diagnosis. In2016 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP). IEEE. 2016 Feb 24; 48-53.
  32. Sladojevic S, Arsenovic M, Anderla A, Culibrk D, Stefanovic D. Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2016 May; 2016: 1–11.
  33. Petrellis N. Plant lesion characterization for disease recognition A Windows Phone application. In2016 2nd International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP). IEEE. 2016 Oct 15; 10-14.
  34. Wetterich CB, de Oliveira Neves RF, Belasque J, Marcassa LG. Detection of citrus canker and Huanglongbing using fluorescence imaging spectroscopy and support vector machine technique. Applied Optics. 2016 Jan 10; 55(2): 400-7.
  35. Padmavathi K, Thangadurai K. The Role of Image Enhancement in Citrus Canker Disease Detection. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS. 2016 Sep 1; 7(9): 293-6.
  36. Abdelsalam AM, Sayed MS. Real-time defects detection system for orange citrus fruits using multi-spectral imaging. 2016 Oct 16; 1-4.
  37. Sandika B, Avil S, Sanat S, Srinivasu P. Random forest based classification of diseases in grapes from images captured in uncontrolled environments. IEEE. 2016 Nov 6; 1775-1780.
  38. Waghmare H, Kokare R, Dandawate Y. Detection and classification of diseases of grape plant using opposite colour local binary pattern feature and machine learning for automated decision support system. IEEE. 2016 Feb 11: 513-518.
  39. Kharde PK, Kulkarni HH. An unique technique for grape leaf disease detection. IJSRSET. 2016; 2: 343-8.
  40. Kharde PK, Kulkarni MH. Grape leaf disease detection using embedded processor. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 2016.
  41. Padol PB, Yadav AA. SVM classifier based grape leaf disease detection. IEEE. 2016 Jun 9; 175-179.
  42. Tete TN, Kamlu S. Detection of plant disease using threshold, k-mean cluster and ann algorithm. IEEE. 2017 Apr 7; 523-526.
  43. Ali H, Lali MI, Nawaz MZ, Sharif M, Saleem BA. Symptom based automated detection of citrus diseases using color histogram and textural descriptors. Computers and Electronics in agriculture. 2017 Jun 1;138: 92-104.
  44. Hase AK, Aher PS, Hase SK. Detection, Categorization and suggestion to cure infected plants of Tomato and Grapes by using OpenCV framework for Andriod Environment. IEEE. 2017 Apr 7; 956-959.
  45. Ustad MS, Korke AG, Bhaldar HK. Novel Algorithm for Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Disease Using K-Mean Clustering. 2017.
  46. Sharif M, Khan MA, Iqbal Z, Azam MF, Lali MI, Javed MY. Detection and classification of citrus diseases in agriculture based on optimized weighted segmentation and feature selection. Computers and electronics in agriculture. 2018 Jul 1;150: 220-34.
  47. .
  48. Banni R, SKSVMACET L. CITRUS LEAF DISEASE DETECTION USING IMAGE PROCESSING APPROACHES. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2018; 120(6): 727-35.
  49. Behera SK, Jena L, Rath AK, Sethy PK. Disease classification and grading of orange using machine learning and fuzzy logic. IEEE. 2018 Apr 3; 0678- 0682.
  50. Ojelabi AI, Omotosho OI, Olajide AO. Classification and Detection of Citrus Disease using Feature Extraction and Support Vector Machine (SVM). International Journal of Computer Applications. 2019 Nov; 177(17): 17-25.
  51. Doh B, Zhang D, Shen Y, Hussain F, Doh RF, Ayepah K. Automatic Citrus Fruit Disease Detection by Phenotyping Using Machine Learning. IEEE. 2019 Sep 5; 1-5.
  52. Patel H, Prajapati R, Patel M. Detection of Quality in Orange Fruit Image using SVM Classifier. IEEE. 2019 Apr 23; 74-78.
  53. Andrushia AD, Patricia AT. Artificial bee colony based feature selection for automatic skin disease identification of mango fruit. InNature Inspired Optimization Techniques for Image Processing Applications. Springer, Cham. 2019; 215-233.
  54. Ji M, Zhang L, Wu Q. Automatic grape leaf diseases identification via UnitedModel based on multiple convolutional neural networks. Information Processing in Agriculture. 2020 Sep 1; 7(3): 418-26.
  55. Adeel A, Khan MA, Sharif M, Azam F, Shah JH, Umer T, Wan S. Diagnosis and recognition of grape leaf diseases: An automated system based on a novel saliency approach and canonical correlation analysis based multiple features fusion. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems. 2019 Dec 1; 24: 100349.
  56. Aravind KR, Raja P, Aniirudh R, Mukesh KV, Ashiwin R, Vikas G. Grape crop disease classification using transfer learning approach. InInternational Conference on ISMAC in Computational Vision and Bio-Engineering. Springer, Cham. 2018 May 16; 1623-1633.
  57. Jaisakthi SM, Mirunalini P, Thenmozhi D. Grape Leaf Disease Identification using Machine Learning Techniques. IEEE. 2019 Feb 21; 1-6.
  58. Singh H, Rani R, Mahajan S. Detection and Classification of Citrus Leaf Disease Using Hybrid Features. InSoft Computing: Theories and Applications. 2020; 737-745.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn