Making Decisions Based on Feelings - How Dangerous It Could Be
Aleksandar Zunjic*
1 Professor, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
*Corresponding Author
Aleksandar Zunjic,
Professor, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
E-mail: azunjic@mas.bg.ac.rs
Received: April 05, 2022; Published: April 06, 2022
Citation: Aleksandar Zunjic. Making Decisions Based on Feelings - How Dangerous It Could Be. Int J Behav Res Psychol. 2022;10(01e):01-03. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2332-3000-2200013e
Copyright: Aleksandar Zunjic© 2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
2.Conclusion
Feelings and emotions are very important for human survival in the natural and social environment. There is no doubt that they can be useful to humans. It is this trait that sets people apart from machines, which have also learned to "think" and make certain decisions. However, the question arises, do feelings can have detrimental effects on the process of information processing and decision-making? This article focuses primarily on the role of feelings in decision-making.
The Difference Between Feelings And Emotions
Since there is a direct connection between feelings and emotions,
it is impossible to consider the role of feelings in decision-making
if the role of emotions is not taken into account beforehand.
However, the problem is that in everyday life, and even in science,
there is no clear distinction between feelings and emotions. Regarding
the influence of emotions, Nobel laureate Herbert Simon
wrote - "Hence, in order to have anything like a complete theory
of human rationality, we have to understand what role emotion
plays in it" [1]. Simon revolutionized decision theory when he introduced
the concept of bounded rationality, which involved refining
existing normative models of rational choice in order to account
for cognitive and situational constraints. He was aware that
his theory would not be complete until emotion was considered.
Thus, Simon foreshadowed the importance that contemporary
science has given to emotions in decision research [2].
As mentioned earlier, the difference between feelings and emotions
is often not completely obvious. However, as both of these
notions are phenomena that may influence decision-making, it is
necessary to distinguish and define them as clearly as possible.
According to [3], scientists do not always agree on what constitutes
an "emotion". Emotions can be expressed through bodily
reactions, such as when someone's heart beats faster when he/she
feels excited, and through expressive movements, such as facial
expressions and sounds. In addition, emotions can impact behaviors,
such as yelling at someone in a state of anger. Scientists often
include bodily reactions, expressive movements, and behaviors in
definitions of "emotion." Feelings, according to [3], represent the
way someone experiences emotions. People experience feelings
internally, in their minds.
In order to create an even clearer distinction between feelings and
emotions, it is necessary to go a step further. In this regard, it
is necessary to make an additional distinction when it comes to
the concept of feeling and what it can represent. The term feeling
is a verbal noun of the verb feel, etymologically derived from
the Middle English verb felen, meaning "to perceive by touch, by
palpation" [4]. Thus, feeling in that early period was associated
with what we now call sensation. In that case, since the sensation
is formed first (for example pain), emotions can be formed later
in relation to that sensation. However, the term feelings is now
rarely, or more precisely, very rarely used in that sense. After some
time, it came to the point that this concept is considered more
generally, in a way that does not refer to the human senses (that
is, to some sensory organ that produces a certain feeling). Thus,
the feeling produced by certain information should no longer be
viewed as a phenomenon that precedes the formation of emotions,
but actually the opposite, which will be discussed in more
detail below.
Classification Of Feelings
However, additional confusion in the distinction between the
meanings of the terms feelings and emotions is introduced by the
descriptors of these terms. For example, people describe emotions
based on subjective experiences using hundreds of semantic
terms. In connection with that, based on an analysis of 2,185
emotionally evocative short videos with richly varying situational
content, by using PCA in [5] has been discovered 27 varieties of
emotionally experienced states, such as anger, confusion, fear, etc.
The problem is, despite the scientific effort in the direction of
delimiting the notions of feelings and emotions, in everyday practice,
people use the same descriptors for both notions. In that
way, we have steel "feeling of anger", "feeling of confusion", or
"feeling of fear".
One of the solutions to this situation can be found in the viewpoint
of German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Namely, many
psychologists, however, still follow Kant in equating feelings to
states of pleasantness and unpleasantness, known in psychology
as affect. In this way, after receiving certain information, emotions
first arise, which are then transformed into two types of feelings,
pleasant and unpleasant.
If we adhere to the previously described distinctions, we can say
at this point that we already have a tool for distinguishing feelings
from emotions. However, before a new solution for distinguishing
feelings and emotions is proposed below, it is important to point
out the following. In psychology, the term feeling usually refers
to the conscious subjective experience of emotions [6]. So, from
this definition, it also follows that the feeling is a consequence of
emotions, that is, that it arises after the experienced emotion.
However, in order to make an additional distinction between feelings
and emotions, a classification of feelings in relation to the
decision-making process will be performed here. In this regard,
we can distinguish between excitatory feelings, inhibitory feelings
and neutral feelings. Excitatory feelings are those feelings that
motivate us to an activity, in terms of initiating, maintaining or
increasing the level of activity. Some typical excitatory feelings are
feelings of anger, joy, etc. For example, if a person is annoyed by
the actions of another person, they may experience feelings of
anger, which can be transformed into a decision to take action
against that other person. Inhibitory feelings are those feelings
that distract us from taking some action. Some typical inhibitory
feelings are feelings of fear, helplessness, etc. For example, if a
bare-handed man finds himself in the jungle in front of a lion, a
feeling of fear will normally appear, which will transform into an
inhibitory activity such as withdrawal (instead of an attack, which
would be the result of some excitatory feeling). Neutral feelings
are those feelings that produce neither excitation nor inhibition.
Examples of neutral feelings are lethargic, indifferent feelings and
the like. For example, if we see a beautiful painting in a museum,
there will be no excitatory feeling that would motivate us to buy it
(because it is impossible), there will be no inhibitory feeling that
would lead us to leave the museum, but there will exist a neutral
feeling that will not produce any concrete activity at that moment.
Regarding the formed classification of feelings into excitatory,
inhibitory and neutral, it is important to make two important remarks.
First, whether an emotion will cause an excitatory, inhibitory
or neutral feeling in a certain person depends on the person
himself. Therefore, individual feelings should not be generalized
explicitly as excitatory, inhibitory, or neutral, because for one person
a certain feeling may be excitatory, and for another inhibitory
(which largely depends on the adopted patterns of behavior).
Second, it should be borne in mind that feelings have a temporal
dimension, which means that if at one point a feeling was neutral
and did not cause an activity, at another time the same emotion
may cause an excitatory or inhibitory feeling. For example, after
a while, the mentioned painting from the museum may cause an
excitatory feeling that will encourage this person to go to other
museums to enjoy equally beautiful paintings (or encourage him/
her to take up painting on his own).
A Decision-Making Model That Includes The Feeling Factor
In order to understand the decision-making process that takes
into account the factor of feelings, a new decision-making model
will be presented below. This decision-making model is primarily
related to the processing of abstract information, ie. that information
that is viewed not only as a physical stimulus, but as complex,
meaningful information. Examples of such information are
that information that is communicated through speech, which is
transmitted in writing (through books), etc. Unlike other information
processing and decision-making models, such as models
of Broadbent, Wickens, Atkinson and Shiffrin, Mazur, and other
researchers, this model, as mentioned earlier, considers feelings as
a factor influencing decision-making. Below it will be described by
using this model, shown in Figure 1, how feelings influence the
decision-making process.
So, the external stimulus here is information, with its semantic,
semiotic and syntactic components. It can be presented in a video,
audio, or tactile format. A person receives this information
with the help of the senses, ie the sensory register. It is further
processed in short-term memory and can be stored in long-term
memory. After processing in the working memory and comparing
it with the stored information, certain emotions may appear,
which are related to that information. Such emotions now pass
through a filter consisting of the consciousness of the individual.
Here, feelings are formed and being classified as pleasant or unpleasant.
These feelings can also take on an excitatory, inhibitory,
or neutral character. Processing in the filter takes some time, which
can vary on an individual level. The formed feeling in the working
memory then further solidifies for such information and can be
subject to further processing. After processing, the information
with the associated feeling can be stored in long-term memory.
However, as a result of the processing of information and the associated feeling in the working memory, a certain decision is
made. This decision may represent a person's attitude towards a
particular event from the environment. Based on such an attitude,
the person makes a decision on what action to take in relation to
the information received.
The information that feelings are associated with is better stored in long-term memory. Remembering such information lasts shorter than information that is not accompanied by feelings. For this reason, abstract information that initiates neutral feelings is often harder to remember. In addition, decisions made on the basis of certain feelings have a greater motivational character. They influence a person to persevere in his decision.
A Decision-Making Model That Includes The Feeling Factor
Previously have been mentioned some of the useful functions
that feelings can have on remembering information and perseverance
in making a decision. But, unfortunately, feelings can have
negative consequences on decision-making, sometimes with a fatal
outcome. The problem arises when a person does not have
enough information to make decisions, or even has incorrect information.
One of the most common examples of such information is information
that is placed in the media (radio, television, newspapers,
internet, social networks). If such a medium places incorrect
information, and such information causes a strong feeling, the
person may take the wrong position and make the wrong decision,
in which he can persevere. No less a problem is the denial of
relevant information. If a person does not have enough relevant
information available, especially information that could cause
strong feelings or even nullify feelings related to other information
received, it is almost certain that such a person cannot make
the right decision.
Unfortunately, when they have a certain interest, the media often
place inaccurate or partially accurate information, trying to
make such information a certain feeling in people. Such media
know that this is the fastest and easiest way for individuals to
make decisions that are in their interests. States that care about the
truth should create additional mechanisms and institutions that
would seriously deal with this problem, if they want to form a
truly democratic society.
An additional problem is the denial of information, or censorship.
In times of crisis, even in countries that are considered democratic,
regulations and laws are passed that deny certain media
the right to communicate information. In this way, the population
of such countries remains deprived of potentially true and
relevant information, without the right and opportunity to make
the right decision.
Conclusion
In this article, the classification of feelings into excitatory, inhibitory
and neutral is presented. This classification is given primarily
from the aspect of the decision-making process. Although it is
not excluded that this classification can be used for other purposes,
it primarily serves to explain the importance of feelings in
the process of information processing. This classification seems
to have certain advantages over the classification of feelings into
pleasant and unpleasant, because it proactively takes into account
the role of feelings in the decision-making process.
A number of studies in the previous period have tried to point
out the importance of emotions in the decision-making process.
However, this is probably the first study that aimed to point out
the importance of including feelings as a separate entity in the
decision-making process. In order to explain this process, a new
decision-making model has been formed, which takes into account
feelings as a necessary factor for the information processing
process, and which has an impact on the outcome of decision-
making. There is no known model of decision-making or
information processing that has previously taken this factor into
consideration. Based on this model, it directly follows that inaccurate
information, especially information that induces certain
strong feelings, as well as censorship of information, is a direct
obstacle to making quality decisions. In the future, it is necessary
to pay special attention to this issue in order to ensure that people
achieve the right to objective information and the truth.
References
- Simon HA. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford Univ. Press: Stanford, CA. 1983.
- Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS. Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:799-823. PubMed PMID: 25251484.
- Cowen A. How Many Different Kinds of Emotion are There?. AGE. 2018 May 9;12:13.
- Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. 2012: 3. feeling. Encyclopedia Britannica.
- Cowen AS, Keltner D. Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):E7900-E7909. PubMed PMID: 28874542.
- Wikipedia. Feeling, March 2022: