International Journal of Stem Cell Research and Transplantation (IJST)    IJST-2328-3548-04-004e

Tolerance in Organ Transplantation: Evolution of Strategies



Shrestha BM

Division of Renal Transplantation, Sheffield Kidney Institute, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, UK.

*Corresponding Author

Badri Man Shrestha MD FRCS FACS,
Division of Renal Transplantation, Sheffield Kidney Institute,
Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Tel: +44 114 2434343
Fax: +44 114 2714604
E-mail: shresthabm@doctors.net.uk

Received: November 15, 2016; Published: November 16, 2016

Citation: Shrestha BM (2016) Tolerance in Organ Transplantation: Evolution of Strategies. Int J Stem Cell Res Transplant. 4(4e): 1-2. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2328-3548-160009e

Copyright: Shrestha BM© 2016. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


The primary objectives of prolonging survival of transplanted organs and their recipients are compromised by cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejections, infections, side-effects of immunosuppressive agents, malignancies and no-adherence [1]. Strategies to eliminate the need of long-term immunosuppressive agents and induction of tolerance have been the goal of research for 60 years. Transplantation tolerance is defined as induced modification of the host immune system which leads to indefinite, drugfree, transplant survival with maintenance of full incompetence [2].

Peter Medawar et al., pioneered in inducing tolerance in experimental animals 60 years ago. They demonstrated that prenatal or neonatal mice inoculated with allogeneic splenocytes were tolerant as adults to skin grafts from same donor strains resulting in drug-free indefinite graft survival, devoid of complications, including chronic rejection [3]. Since then several strategies of tolerance including heart, liver, kidney, bone marrow transplants have been developed in laboratory rodent models [4]. In 1999, Spitzer et al., demonstrated successful induction of tolerance in human renal transplant recipients through development of mixed lymphohaemopoietic chimerism and observed sustained allograft tolerance [5].

Tolerance of one’s own tissues and elimination of autoimmunity are achieved by central and peripheral mechanisms. Central tolerance is generated within the thymus where immature autoreactive T cells with a high affinity for self-major histocompatibility complex molecules are subjected to apoptosis, a process referred to as negative selection or deletional tolerance [6]. The peripheral tolerance involves extrathymic mechanisms, whereby the activated T cells, which have escaped negative selection and emigrated from thymus, are suppressed by specialised T cells, termed as regulatory T cells (Tregs) [7]. Combination of both central and peripheral mechanisms are essential for the elimination of autoreactive cells and induction of self-tolerance.

Thymic-derived, regulatory Treg cells represent a subset of CD4+ T cells (Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells), which suppress unwanted responses against self-antigens and prevent autoimmunity. Tregs can suppress a whole range of immune cells including B cells, NK cells, CD4+ or CD8+T cells, and both monocytes and dendritic cells. Emerging evidence suggest that the presence of regulatory B cells (Breg) in the spleen and blood of patients that spontaneously develop graft tolerance, bearing the phenotype CD24intCD38+CD27+IgD-IgM+/low, can transfer donorspecific tolerance via IL-10 and TGF-beta1-dependent mechanisms and to suppress in vitro TNF-alpha secretion [8, 9].

Based upon the experience of animal models and human studies, in transplant recipients, central deletional tolerance provides the most robust and long-lasting state of unresponsiveness. Mixed haemopoietic chimerism and donor thymic transplantation are two strategies aimed at harnessing the potential of central tolerance in humans. Co-stimulation blockade using cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte associated antigen-4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig) which blocks the CD28:CD80/86 costimulatory pathway has been used to develop peripheral tolerance.

Mixed haemopoietic chimerism strategy involves a bone marrow or stem cell transplant in addition to the organ transplant. Historically, the experimental transplant recipients were subjected to whole body irradiation to eliminate mature alloreactive T cells. This was followed by transfusion of donor haemopoietic stem cells. The donor alloreactive T cells in the recipient were subsequently eliminated by the thymus leaving behind the newly developed T-cell repertoire of mixed chimeras tolerant toward the donor organs [10].

Subsequently, a T-cell depleting and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens were introduced for induction of mixed chimerism, which included limited body irradiation, splenectomy, antithymocyte globulin, donor bone marrow cell infusion and course of cyclosporine [11]. To avoid the risk of non-myeloablative irradiation, less toxic protocols of co-stimulation blockade led to mixed chimerism animals. The most frequently used co-stimulation blockers interfere with CD28/CTLA4-CD80/CD86 or the CD40L(CD154)-CD40 pathways [12, 13]. Following administration of anti-CD154 and CTLA4Ig leads to a significant increase of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in tolerant animals [14].

To enhance central deletional tolerance, co-transplant of vascularised donor thymus at the time of organ transplantation were performed using composite organs called “thymokidneys” and “thymohearts” in thymectomised animals, which showed prolonged allograft survival and diminished development of chronic vascular lesions [15, 16].

Nobel laureate Rolf Zinkernagel and Starzl had proposed that all outcomes of organ or bone marrow transplantation are determined by the balance between the number of leukocytes that travel to lymphoid organs and the number of donor-specific T cells produced at those sites [17]. Recipients of organ allografts usually receive large doses of immunosuppressive therapy during the early period of maximal leukocyte migration. These large doses may erode the mechanism of tolerance by clonal exhaustion– deletion [18].

Currently available immunosuppressive agents impact Treg cells in the alloimmune milleu with both beneficial and deleterious interactions to the allograft. Basiliximab, an IL-2 receptor blocker decreases Tregs, while lymphocyte depleting agents such as antithymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab increase Tregs. Calcineurin inhibitors, a mainstay maintenance immunosuppression since the mid-1980s, suppresses Tregs, while mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors expands Tregs [19, 20].

Significant progress has been made in the development of biomarkers those can uncover mechanisms and act as tools for identifying and monitoring recipients who develop a state of operational tolerance, during accidental immunosuppression withdrawal secondary to problems of over-immunosuppression or toxicity [21]. Operationally tolerant kidney, liver and heart allograft recipients have been reported [22]. In addition to Tregs, other immune cells, such as dendritic cells, monocyte/macrophages or natural killer cells, have been described as part of the process operational tolerance [23-25].

A joint meeting organized by the European Society of Organ Transplantation and The Transplantation Society for basic science research was organized in Paris in 2013, recommended to establish a registry of results of patients enrolled in tolerance trials,establish protocols, biomarkers, include children 12 years and older and establish a task force to manage the logistics of the trials [26, 27].

In conclusion, induction of transplant tolerance and acceptance of organ without the perils of immunosuppression remain the holy grail, which depends on successful implementation of tolerance strategies in nonhuman primates. Although costimulatory blockade and mixed chimerism have been successful in inducing tolerance in nonhuman primates, the transfer of tolerogenic cell populations such as Tregs and mesenchymal stem cells are important advances, which are under investigation [28].


References

  1. Sellares J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Revee J, Sis B, et al., (2012) Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 12(2):388-99.
  2. Monaco AP (2004) Prospects and strategies for clinical tolerance. Transplant Proc. 36(1): 227-31.
  3. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB (1953) Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 172(4379): 603-606.
  4. Auchincloss H Jr (2001) In search of the elusive Holy Grail: the mechanisms and prospects for achieving clinical transplantation tolerance. Am J Transplant. 1(1): 6-12.
  5. Spitzer TR, Delmonico F, Tolkoff-Rubin N (1999) Combined histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-matched donor bone marrow and renal transplantation for multiple myeloma with end stage renal disease: the induction of allograft tolerance through mixed lymphohematopoietic chimerism. Transplantation. 68(4): 480-484.
  6. Griesemer AD, Sorenson EC, Hardy MA (2010) The role of the thymus in tolerance. Transplantation. 90(5): 465-474.
  7. Arnold B, Schonrich G, Hammerling GJ (1992) Extrathymic T-cell selection. Curr Opin Immunol. 4(2): 166-170.
  8. Durand J, Huchet V, Merieau E, Usal C, Remy S, et al. (2015) Regulatory B Cells with a Partial Defect in CD40 Signaling and Overexpressing Granzyme B Transfer Allograft Tolerance in Rodents. J Immunol. 195(10): 5035-5044.
  9. Mauri C, Menon M (2015) The expanding family of regulatory B cells. Int Immunol. 27(10): 479-486.
  10. Guo K, Ikehara S, Meng X (2014) Mesenchymal stem cells for inducing tolerance in organ transplantation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2: 8.
  11. Kawai T, Benedict Cosimi A (2010) Induction of tolerance in clinical kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 24(22): 2-5.
  12. Wekerle T, Sykes M (2004) Induction of tolerance. Surgery. 135(4): 359- 364.
  13. Kurtz J, Wekerle T, Sykes M (2004) Tolerance in mixed chimerism - a role for regulatory cells? Trends Immunol. 25(10): 518-523.
  14. Lin CH, Wang YL, Anggelia MR, Cheng HY, Mao Q, et al., (2016) Combined Anti-CD154/CTLA4Ig Costimulation Blockade-Based Therapy Induces Donor-Specific Tolerance to Vascularized Osteomyocutaneous Allografts. Am J Transplant. 16(7): 2030-2041.
  15. Yamada K, Shimizu A, Utsugi R, Lerino FL, Haller GW, et al., (2000) Thymic transplantation in miniature swine. II. Induction of tolerance by transplantation of composite thymokidneys to thymectomized recipients. J Immunol. 164(6): 3079-3086.
  16. Menard MT, Schwarze ML, Allan JS, Yamada K, Sachs DH, et al., (2004) Composite "thymoheart" transplantation improves cardiac allograft survival. Am J Transplant. 4(1): 79-86.
  17. Starzl TE, Rao AS, Murase N, Thomson A, Fung JJ, et al., (1999) Chimerism and xenotransplantation. New concepts. Surg Clin North Am. 79(1): 191-205.
  18. Al-Adra DP, Anderson CC (2011) Mixed chimerism and split tolerance: mechanisms and clinical correlations. Chimerism. 2(4): 89-101.
  19. Safa K, Chandran S, Wojciechowski D (2015) Pharmacologic targeting of regulatory T cells for solid organ transplantation: current and future prospects. Drugs. 75(16): 1843-1852.
  20. Gundroo A, Zachariah M, Singh N, Sharma R (2015) Alemtuzumab (Campath- 1H) experience in kidney transplantation what we have learned; current practices; and scope for the future? Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 20(6): 638-642.
  21. Gokmen R, Hernandez-Fuentes MP (2013) Biomarkers of tolerance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 18(4): 416-420.
  22. Baroja-Mazo A, Revilla-Nuin B, Parrilla P, Martinez-Alarcon L, Ramirez P, et al., (2016) Tolerance in liver transplantation: Biomarkers and clinical relevance. World J Gastroenterol. 22(34): 7676-7691.
  23. Sarwal MM (2016) Fingerprints of transplant tolerance suggest opportunities for immunosuppression minimization. Clin Biochem. 49(4-5): 404- 410.
  24. Mastoridis S, Martinez-Llordella M, Sanchez-Fueyo A (2016) Biomarkers and immunopathology of tolerance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 21(1): 81-87.
  25. Heidt S, Wood KJ (2012) Biomarkers of Operational Tolerance in Solid Organ Transplantation. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 6(4): 281-293.
  26. Kawai T, Leventhal J, Madsen JC, Wood KJ, Turka LA, et al., (2014) Tolerance: one transplant for life. Transplantation. 98(2): 117-121.
  27. Ebner S, Fabritius C, Ritschl P, Gunther J, Kotsch K, et al., (2014) Report of the joint ESOT and TTS basic science meeting 2013: current concepts and discoveries in translational transplantation. Transpl Int. 27(10): 987-993.
  28. Kitchens WH, Adams AB (2016) Nonhuman primate models of transplant tolerance: closer to the holy grail. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 21(1): 59- 65.

         Indexed in

               

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


Creative Commons License
SciDoc Publishers is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.