Prevalence Of Different Age Groups That Under Go Extraction
Sarojini Ramya Pillay1, Balakrishnan2*, Remmiya Mary Varghese3
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University,Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
Balakrishnan,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha
University, Chennai, India.
E-mail: balakrishnarn.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: August 15, 2020; Accepted: August 26, 2020; Published: August 30, 2020
Citation:Sarojini Ramya Pillay, Balakrishnan, Remmiya Mary Varghese. Prevalence Of Different Age Groups That Under Go Extraction. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020;S4:02:0016:84-87. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-SI02-040016
Copyright: Balakrishnan© 2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
The present study is aimed at analysing the prevalence of different age groups that undergo extraction.Tooth extraction is one
of the dental treatments which should be considered the last option. A decrease in the number of teeth may result in poor
dietary habits and deterioration of quality of life. The number of extracted teeth can serve as an indicator of socio-economic
and oral hygiene level. Extraction of permanent teeth is performed for several reasons including dental caries, periodontal
disease, orthodontic reasons, impacted teeth and root stumps.A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the
patient records from the Department of Oral maxillofacial surgery, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai from February 2019
to February 2020, and patients who had undergone extraction were selected by nonprobability sampling. Data was collected
and then subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical Analysis was done with Microsoft Excel/2016 (Microsoft office 10) data
spreadsheet was used and later exported to the Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows (version 20.0, SPSS Inc.,
Chicago Ill., USA). Results: A total of 22521 teeth were extracted in 9245 patients with the highest prevalence seen in the age
group of 34-48 years old (28.1%) and the least seen in the age group of 79-93 years old (0.6%). Males (54.4 %) have more
teeth extracted than females (45.6%). There was a statistically significant difference between gender and age of the patient undergoing
extraction (0.000). This study concluded that the Prevalence of different age groups that undergo extraction seems
to be high when compared to other literature. Considering the limitations of this study extensive research needs to be done to
find the prevalence of different age groups that undergo extraction in a different study population. And to spread awareness
on oral hygiene to minimise the number of tooth being extracted.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Method
4.Results And Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.References
Keywords
Dental Caries; Extractions; Permanent Teeth; Primary Teeth Tooth Loss.
Introduction
Oral health is an essential component of general health as Sir William
Osler stated that ‘oral cavity is the mirror of general health’
[4, 12]. ‘ Dental extractions are mostly performed in dental clinics.
Tooth extraction is defined as painless removal of the whole
tooth or tooth root with minimal trauma to the investing tissues
[16, 20] Chair positions of both the operator and patient have
a pivotal role in determining the success of an extraction [25,
23]. The more common medical emergencies encountered in the
dental chair include syncope which may arise due to anxiety of
needle prick or dental extraction itself [7] he protocol followed
by dentists until now is to stop antiplatelet drugs before dental
procedures as they are known to affect coagulation and clot formation
but the most recent recommendations favour the tooth
extraction under continued antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy
[15] Dental mouth mirror is used for indirect vision and retraction
while doing maxillary extraction [22] Tooth extractions or
exodontia may be necessary to preserve or improve your dental
health [28] and it appears to be mainly in response to the need
for acute treatment and when there is a great accumulated need
for treatment, patients increasingly selected extraction of teeth
as the primary treatment rather than restorative procedures [31, 26] uncontrolled bleeding after extraction can be troublesome for
both patient and the surgeon and can lead to serious consequences
[12]. Local anaesthesia forms the backbone of pain control
techniques in dentistry and are the safest and most effective drugs
in all of medicine for the prevention and management of pain
[26] during dental extraction as they cause local analgesic effect
by inhibiting nerve conduction [23, 24] by doing so needle stick
injury is one of the most common injuries which happens to a
dentist. Infection [12, 31] control is a major part when performing
extraction and a lack in this may lead to infection. Extractions of
permanent and primary teeth are performed for several reasons
such as dental caries [9] periodontal diseases [5] traumatic injuries,
prosthetic considerations, orthodontic treatment, failed endodontic
treatment and tooth impaction. However, the two major reasons
for tooth loss worldwide are dental caries and periodontal
disease [25]. Tooth loss is often associated with poor oral health
which in order can affect the overall health of an individual [13].
Negative impact of tooth loss on oral health-related quality of life
has been well documented [8]. Therefore, as dental practitioners,
our main aim should be to prevent tooth loss. A number of epidemiological
surveys have been carried out by various researchers
in several countries across the world [3, 11, 6]. Majority of these
studies have recommended that dental caries is the major reason
for extraction of permanent teeth in younger age groups but as
the age increases periodontal disease becomes the main reason
for tooth loss. It is also seen that tooth extraction is considerably
higher in irregular patients than regular patients because of dental
caries [3]. Various studies conducted in different parts of India
have also reported that dental caries and periodontal diseases account
for the majority of tooth loss [21, 2, 14, 17]. These studies
suggested that tooth loss due to dental caries ranges from 19.8%
to 55.67% whereas periodontal disease accounts for 23.59% to
77% of tooth loss.
At present, limited data is available and the prevalence of different
age groups that undergo extraction in India, particularly
Chennai metropolitan city, tamilnadu.Availability of these data
can be utilized for planning preventive oral health care policies
in a given population. Hence, the aim of the present study was to
investigate the Prevalence of different age groups that undergo
extraction in Chennai.
Materials and Methods
Study design and setting This retrospective study examined the
records of patients during February 2019-Febuary 2020 who underwent
extraction at Saveetha Dental College, Chennai. Ethical
approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee.
The study population included patients who underwent extraction
and were selected by means of non-probability sampling.
Data collection Saveetha Dental College’s exclusive patient management
software (DIAS, Dental Information Archiving Software)
was used to identify 9245 patients from the hospital database
who underwent extraction. Relevant data such as patient
age, sex and tooth number was recorded. Data was verified by an
external reviewer.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients of all age group patients underwentextraction
of permanent teeth and primary teeth.
Statistical analysis: Data was recorded in Microsoft Excel/2016
(Microsoft office 10) and transferred to the Statistical Package for
Social Science for Windows (version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago Ill.,
USA) and subjected to statistical analysis. Chi square test was employed
with a level of significance set at p<0.05.
Results And Discussion
IDemographics The final dataset consisted of 9245 patients of
Indian origin who underwent extraction. The mean age of patients
who underwent extraction was 37.89 years (standard deviation
= 18.512 years). The patients average age ranged between 0
to 93 years in male and female.The patients were categorized into
6 age groups 0-17 years, 18-33 years, 34-48 years, 49-63 years,
64-78 years, 79-93 years The age group associated with greatest
prevalence of extraction was 34-48 years (28.1% N= 2600),
followed by 18-33 years old (24.8% n= 2297) ,49-63 years (21.9
% N=2028) ,0-17 years (16.2% N=1501),64-78 years old (8.2%
n=759) and the least was 79-93 years old (0.6% N=60) shown in
[Figure 1] There was a male dominance as most of the patients
who underwent extraction was male with a total of 5027 (54.4%)
extraction done and female with 4218 (45.6%) shown in figure 2.
Tooth type
On analysing the type of teeth, molars were found to be most
frequently extracted teeth (70.9% n= 5814) followed by anterior
teeth (15.5% N=1274). Premolars were the least to be removed
(13.5% N=1110) shown in figure 3.
Age vs gender
There was a statistically significant difference between age and gender using chi square test (p=0.000). The age group associated
with greatest prevalence of extraction was 34-48 years where
there was 1343 female and 1257 male ,followed by 18-33 years
old where male had 1207 and female had 1090 ,49-63 years where
male had 1178 and female had 850 ,0-17 years where male had
829 and female 672 ,64-78 years old where male had 510 and female
249 and the least was 79-93 years old where male had 46 and
female had 14. Shown in figure 4.
This retrospective research was focused on chennai residents
receiving treatment at saveetha dental college.All the data was
included without a sorting process, no bias was expected in the
selection of patients. The current study aims to shed light on the
current scenario ,where the preservation of natural teeth is considered
to be one of the main aims of oral health care and therefore,
the knowledge and understanding of the reasons influencing
tooth extractions may provide valuable information for planning
preventive oral health care strategies [27]. The World Health Organization
(WHO) in its report identified good oral health as
an indicator of good health and recommended various steps in
order to improve oral health globally [25]. In this retrospective
study more males had their tooth extracted than females this is
contradicted by the literature literature done by [30] where male
had n=305 and female n=310 the possible controversial findings
could be explained by differences in the characteristics of the
study population, immunological genetic factors, cultural beliefs.
According to [30] between the age group of 45-54 years old the
highest percentage of tooth extracted was found (24.62%) however
in the current study the highest was found in the age group
of 34-48 years old the possible reason could be socioeconomic
characteristics of the patients. Also a study done by [18], found
that the highest percentage of tooth extracted was found in 45-54 years old was found to be (20.4%) possible reason could be the
study population.
In the present molar teeth was found to be extracted more followed
by anterior tooth and least was premolar and In a previous
study done by [30] t was found that molars were most frequently
extracted (35.4%) This could be probably due to a several facts:
(a) molars are the first permanent teeth to be erupted in oral cavity
making them longest serving teeth; (b) they have a broader
surface area with pit and fissures making them more susceptible
to plaque accumulation and caries formation. 0.2% chlorhexidine
gel and a eugenol-based paste on postoperative alveolar osteitis
in patients having third molars extracted has been proven to be
effective [10].
Considering that few studies evaluated reasons for teeth loss in
Brazilians, our retrospective study may be useful in clinical dentistry
and used as baseline data regarding preva- lence and reasons
for teeth extractions in other populations; moreover, other prospective
studies might be performed.Considering that few studies
analyzed the prevalence of extraction of tooth in a prospective
study, our retrospective study may be useful in clinical dentistry
and used as baseline data regarding prevalence of teeth extractions
in other populations moreover, other prospective studies
might be performed.
Figure 1. Shows a Bar chart showing the distribution of age where the X axis represents age and Y axis represents frequency. The age group of 34-48 years had (28.1%), followed by 18-33 years old (24.8%) ,49-63 years (21.9 %) ,0-17 years (16.2%),64- 78 years old (8.2%) and the least was 79-93 years old (0.6%).
Figure 2. Bar chart showing the distribution of gender where X axis representing gender and Y axis representing frequency. Male had (54.4%) extraction done and female with (45.6%).
Figure 3. Shows a bar chart of the distribution of tooth type X axis shows the tooth type and Y axis shows the frequency. Molars had (70.9%) followed by anterior teeth (15.5%). Premolars were the least to be removed (13.5%).
Figure 4. Shows a graphical representation of age vsgender.X axis represents the age and the Y axis represents the frequency of patients who underwent extraction.Blue denotes female and red denotes male.Majority of the male and female patients between the age group of 34-48 years old (14.53%),(13.60%) respectively had extracted the maximum teeth.Pearson Chi square value-115.880,P value-0.000 which is significant proving that maximum teeth extracted is between the age group of 34-48 years old.
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study, it was found that the highest
prevalence seen in the 34-48 years old group (28.1%) and the least
seen in the 79-93 years old age group (0.6%).Males (54.4 %) have
more teeth extracted than females (45. 6%). Based on this finding,
we recommend that preventive oral health strategies in Chennai
should be designed to minimize the number of teeth being extracted.
This fact should be taken into account in the planning of
preventive programs and more attention should be given to the
age of the targeted population.
References
- Abhinav RP, Selvarasu K, Maheswari GU, Taltia AA. The Patterns and Etiology of Maxillofacial Trauma in South India. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):114-117. PubmedPMID: 31293938.
- Anand PS, Kuriakose S. Causes and patterns of loss of permanent teeth among patients attending a dental teaching institution in south India. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Sep 1;10(5):E057-64. PubmedPMID: 19838611.
- Cahen PM, Frank RM, Turlot JC. A survey of the reasons for dental extractions in France. J Dent Res. 1985 Aug;64(8):1087-93. PubmedPMID: 2862168.
- Caldas AF Jr. Reasons for tooth extraction in a Brazilian population. Int Dent J. 2000 Oct;50(5):267-73. PubmedPMID: 15988885.
- Chakraborty M, Thakkar RR, Swamy D, Kumar A, Badiyani SM, Dithi C, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices about Oral Hygiene Maintenance among Patients attending a Dental College in India. Int J Oral Care and Research. 2017;5(3):1-3.
- Chestnutt IG, Binnie VI, Taylor MM. Reasons for tooth extraction in Scotland. J Dent. 2000 May;28(4):295-7. PubmedPMID: 10722904.
- Christabel A, Anantanarayanan P, Subash P, Soh CL, Ramanathan M, Muthusekhar MR, et al. Comparison of pterygomaxillary dysjunction with tuberosity separation in isolated Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective, multi-centre, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;45(2):180-5. PubmedPMID: 26338075.
- Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 5;8:126. PubmedPMID: 21050499.
- Vijayakumar Jain S, Muthusekhar MR, Baig MF, Senthilnathan P, Loganathan S, Abdul Wahab PU, et al. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Following Isolated Lefort One Osteotomy for the Correction of Vertical Maxillary Excess: A Prospective Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Mar;18(1):139-146. PubmedPMID: 30728705.
- Jesudasan JS, Wahab PU, Sekhar MR. Effectiveness of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel and a eugenol-based paste on postoperative alveolar osteitis in patients having third molars extracted: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;53(9):826-30. PubmedPMID: 26188932.
- Kay EJ, Blinkhorn AS. The reasons underlying the extraction of teeth in Scotland. Br Dent J. 1986 Apr 19;160(8):287-90. PubmedPMID: 3457583.
- Kumar S, SnehaS. ‘knowledge and awareness regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis among undergraduate dental students’, asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2016; 154. doi: 10.22159/ ajpcr.2016.v9s2.13405.
- Mack F, Schwahn C, Feine JS, Mundt T, Bernhardt O, John U, et al. The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians: results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-O). Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):414-9. PubmedPMID: 16220807.
- Manekar VS, Kende P, Kulkarni S. Tooth mortality: an analysis of reasons underlying the extraction of permanent teeth. World J Dent. 2015;6(2):93- 6.
- Marimuthu M, Andiappan M, Wahab A, Muthusekhar MR, Balakrishnan A, Shanmugam S. Canonical Wnt pathway gene expression and their clinical correlation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 May- Jun;29(3):291-297. PubmedPMID: 29900911.
- Mathur MN, Nath S. Tooth mortality. An analysis of extraction cases. J Indian Dent Assoc. 1968 Aug;40(8):213-5.Pubmed PMID: 5247555.
- Migliorati C, Panagakos F, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Oral Lesions and Conditions: A Resource Handbook for the Clinician. BoD–Books on Demand; 2014 Feb 19.
- Montandon A, Zuza E, Toledo BE. Prevalence and reasons for tooth loss in a sample from a dental clinic in Brazil. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:719750. PubmedPMID: 22973312.
- Kumar S. Relationship between dental anxiety and pain experience during dental extractions. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2017;10(3):458-.
- Kumar S, Rahman RE. Knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding biomedical waste management among undergraduate dental students. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2017;10(8):341.
- Nair M, Jeevanandan G, Vignesh R, Subramanian EM. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with k-files, kedo-s files and mtwo files in deciduous molars-a randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Dental Science. 2018 Oct 24;21(4):411-7.
- Packiri S, Gurunathan D, Selvarasu K. Management of Paediatric Oral Ranula: A Systematic Review. J ClinDiagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZE06-ZE09. PubmedPMID: 29207849.
- Patil SB, Durairaj D, Suresh Kumar G, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap VersusBuccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Sep;16(3):312-321. PubmedPMID: 28717289.
- Patturaja K, Pradeep D. Awareness of Basic Dental Procedure among General Population. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Sep 1;9(9):1349.
- Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;31Suppl 1:3-23. PubmedPMID: 15015736.
- Rahman RE, Mp SK. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of dental undergraduate students regarding human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Asian J Pharm Clin Res [Internet]. 2017;10(5):175-80.
- Rakocz M, Mazar A, Varon D, Spierer S, Blinder D, Martinowitz U. Dental extractions in patients with bleeding disorders. The use of fibrin glue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Mar;75(3):280-2. PubmedPMID: 8469534.
- Rao TD, Kumar MS. Analgesic efficacy of paracetamolvs ketorolac after dental extractions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Aug 1;11(8):3375-9.
- Kumar MS. Evaluation of Various Factors for Extraction of Permanent Teeth in a Dental College.
- Shah A, Faldu M, Chowdhury S. Reasons for extractions of permanent teeth in western India: A prospective study.
- Sweta VR, Abhinav RP, Ramesh A. Role of Virtual Reality in Pain Perception of Patients Following the Administration of Local Anesthesia. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):110-113. PubmedPMID: 31293937.