Impact Of Education And Occupational Status On Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Among Dental Patients - A Retrospective Study
Vaishali. S1, Santhosh Kumar M P2*, Revathi Duraisamy3
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS),
Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
Santhosh Kumar M P,
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: 8903271734
E-mail: santhoshkumar@saveetha.com
Received: August 10, 2020; Accepted: September 27, 2020; Published: September 29, 2020
Citation: Vaishali. S, Santhosh Kumar M P, Revathi Duraisamy. Impact Of Education And Occupational Status On Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Among Dental Patients - A Retrospective Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020;S12:02:001:1-6. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-SI02-012001
Copyright: Santhosh Kumar M P© 2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) are degenerative musculoskeletal conditions associated with morphological and functional
deformities. The etiology of TMD is considered multifactorial in nature and has been related to trauma, malocclusion,
parafunctional habits, socioeconomic status and dietary habits. Poor socioeconomic status which includes low literacy level and
unemployment may lead to stress among those individuals which might lead to development of TMD in those individuals. The
aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of education and occupational status of dental patients on temporomandibular joint
disorders. In this retrospective study, a total of 49 patients who had temporomandibular disorders were included. Demographic
details like age, gender and types of TMD was noted. Factors like education and occupation of the patients were assessed through
case sheets and confirmed through phone calls, thus socioeconomic status was obtained. Excel tabulation and SPSS version 23 was
used for statistical analysis. The statistical test used for the demographics was frequency distribution. Chi-square t test was used
to test the association between education and occupation with types of TMD and results obtained. The age group most affected
with TMD was 31-40 year (42.86%). The gender most affected with TMD was males (51.02%). Disc- condyle disorders (61.22%)
was the predominant type of TMD present in the study population. Overall, 30% of those in higher secondary education and
32% of those pursuing engineering were mostly affected with TMD. However this association between education and TMD was
statistically not significant (p>0.05). Overall, housewives (30%) and students (20%) were mostly affected with TMD. However this
association between occupation and TMD was statistically not significant (p>0.05). Within the limits of the study, temporomandibular
disorders were predominantly seen in the age group of 31-40 years with male predilection. Disc- condyle disorders was the
predominant type of TMD. From our study it can be concluded that education and occupational status of dental patients are not
associated with temporomandibular disorders.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Method
4.Results and Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.Acknowledgements and Declarations
7.References
Keywords
Degenerative Disorder; Dental Patients; Education; Occupation, Temporomandibular Disorders.
Introduction
Temporomandibular disorders are degenerative musculoskeletal
conditions associated with morphological and functional deformities
[5]. The temporomandibular articulation is composed
of bilateral, diarthrodial, temporomandibular joints (TMJs) [22].
Each joint is formed by a mandibular condyle and its corresponding
temporal cavity (glenoid fossa and articular eminence) [34].
The TMJ and its associated structures play an essential rule in
providing mandibular motion and distributing stresses produced
by everyday tasks such as chewing, swallowing and speaking [19].
The American academy of paediatric Dentistry (AAPD) has recognised
that disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ),
masticatory muscles and associated structures occasionally occur
within infants,children and adolescents [25].
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is a collective term for a
group of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions that include
several clinical signs and symptoms such as pain, headache,
TMJ sounds, TMJ locking and ear pain [7]. In addition to this pain
on mastication,with restricted mandibular movements associated
with joint sounds is observed. TMD include abnormalities of the intra- articular distal position and/or structure as well as dysfunction
of the associated musculature [3]. About 60-70% of the general
population has at least one sign of Temporomandibular joint
dysfunction (TMD), but only one out of 4 individuals is aware of
these symptoms and reports them to a specialist [18].
There are various factors associated with the occurrence of TMD
which includes dietary habits, parafunctional habits, stress, socioeconomic
status (education and occupation) etc. The etiology and
pathogenesis of this condition is poorly understood, therefore
treatment of Temporomandibular joint diseases is sometimes
difficult [15]. Poor socioeconomic status like low literacy level
and unemployment may lead to stress among those individuals
which might lead to development of TMD in those individuals
[11]. But this was not statistically significant in the majority of the
studies conducted [21]. While 25% of the population may experience
symptoms of TMD [32], only a small percentage of afflicted
individuals seek treatment. Recent studies have shown that rural
schools, low parental education levels, poverty, living outside the
home, poor general and oral health showed positive correlation
with TMD [8].
Several other factors other than occlusal, hormonal, trauma, parafunctions
to be involved in the occurrence of TMD like socioeconomic
status which has very little literature relating to it [8].
Thus understanding the etiology of Temporomandibular joint
disorders is extremely important in identifying and avoiding potential
pathological factors.
Previously our team had conducted numerous clinical trials [13,
27, 16, 30, 6, 1, 12, 29, 17, 29, 33, 28], in vitro studies [20] and
systematic reviews [26, 24] regarding TMD over the past 5 years.
Now we are focussing on epidemiological surveys on TMD. The
idea for this survey stemmed from the current interest in the community.
So this study aims to evaluate the impact of education and occupational
status of dental patients on temporomandibular joint
disorders, which would help in patient motivation, early intervention
and better prognosis.
Methods and Materials
Study design and Study setting
This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in
Saveetha dental college and hospital, Saveetha university, Chennai,
to evaluate the association between education, and occupational
status with temporomandibular joint disorders among dental patients
reporting from June 2019 to March 2020. The study was
initiated after approval from the institutional review board and
it was covered by the following ethical approval number ; SDC/
SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/0619-0320.
Study population and sampling
Inclusion criteria for the study were adult dental patients with
TMD. Exclusion criteria included history of trauma to the TMJ,
immunocompromised patients, history of orthodontic treatment,
having dental prostheses, dental anomalies, systemic diseases with
cognitive problems and speech problems, missing or incomplete
data. After assessment in the university patient data registry, consecutive
case records of 49 patients who were diagnosed with
TMD and were eligible for the study were included in the study.
Cross verification of data for errors was done with the help of an
external examiner.
Data collection and tabulation
Data regarding patients having TMD were retrieved after analyzing
86000 case sheets. The following parameters were evaluated
based on the dental records; age, gender and types of TMD. Chief
complaints, medical and dental history and treatment report of
the patients were examined for the data collection. Occupation
and education details of the patients were also recorded from patients
case sheets and confirmed with phone calls to the patients.
Patients diagnosed with TMD were further classified into disccondyle
disorder, degenerative disorder and myofascial pain and
dysfunction syndrome (MPDS). Data was entered in excel and
was imported to SPSS. The variables were defined.
Statistical Analysis
The collected data was validated, tabulated and analysed with
Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, version 23.0
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and results were obtained. Descriptive
analysis was used to describe age, gender and types of TMD
among the study population. Categorical variables were expressed
in frequency and percentage; and continuous variables in mean
and standard deviation. Chi-square test was used to test associations
between categorical variables (age, gender and types of
TMD). P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and Discussion
In our study sample of 49 patients with TMD, the most affected
age group by TMD is 31-40 years (42.86%) and the least affected
age group is 51-60 years (4.08%). 14.29% of patients in the age
group of 11-20 years were affected by TMD, followed by 22.45%
in the 21-30 years age group and 16.33% in the 41-50 years age
group [Figure 1].
In relation to the gender distribution of the patients with temporomandibular
disorders it was found that the males (51.02%)
were most affected than females (48.98%) [Figure 2]. Distribution
of TMD among the study population revealed that disc-condyle
disorder was present predominantly (61.22%), followed by MPDS
(34.69%) and with least occurrence of degenerative disorders
(4.08%) [Figure 3].
Graph 1. Pie chart showing distribution of Gender of the patient. Black color represents the Male patients and Pink color represents the Female patients. Male (53.33%) and Females (46.67%) among the study population.
Graph 2. Bar chart showing association between Gender and Postoperative Pain after serratiopeptidase. X axis represents the distribution of patients according to Gender. Y axis represents the number of patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. The Male patients (13.33%) had experienced higher prevalence of postoperative pain compared to female patients (6.67%). Chi square test was performed and association between Gender and Postoperative Pain after serratiopeptidase was found to be statistically not significant. Pearson Chi square Value = 0.438 (P>0.05), hence statistically not significant.
Graph 3. Bar chart showing association between Gender and Postoperative Swelling after serratiopeptidase. X axis represents the distribution of patients according to Gender. Y axis represents the number of patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. The Male and female patients (6.67%) had experienced postoperative swelling. Chi square test was performed and association between Gender and Postoperative Swelling after serratiopeptidase was found to be statistically not significant. Pearson Chi square Value = 0.919 (P>0.05), hence statistically not significant.
Graph 4. Bar chart showing association between Gender and Postoperative Trismus after serratiopeptidase. X axis represents the distribution of patients according to Gender. Y axis represents the number of patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction.The female patients (6.67%) had experienced higher prevalence of postoperative trismus compared to male patients. Chi square test was performed and association between Gender and Postoperative trismus after serratiopeptidase was found to be statistically not significant. Pearson Chi square Value = 0.333 (P>0.05), hence statistically not significant.
Graph 5. Bar chart showing association between Age and Postoperative pain after serratiopeptidase. X axis represents the distribution of patients according to age groups. Y axis represents the number of patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. The age group of 15-20 years of age (13.33%) had experienced higher prevalence of postoperative pain followed by 20-30 years of age (6.67%). Chi square test was performed and association between Age and Postoperative pain after serratiopeptidase was found to be statistically not significant. Pearson Chi square Value = 0.350 (P>0.005), hence statistically not significant.
On comparing the association between education and TMD, it was seen that disc-condyle disorders were mostly seen in patients who were in higher secondary education (20.41%) and engineering students (20.41%). In the middle school category, 2.04% of the study population had degenerative disorders and 2.04% had MPDS. In the High secondary category, 2.04% had degenerative disorders, 20.41% had disc-condyle disorders and 8.16% had MPDS. In the B.com category, 8.16% of the study population had disc-condyle disorders and 6.12% had MPDS. In the engineering category, 20.41% had disc-condyle disorders and 12.24% had MPDS. In the MBA category, 4.06% had disc-condyle disorder and 2.04% had MPDS. In the uneducated category, 8.16% of the study population had disc-condyle disorders and 4.08% had MPDS. Overall, 30% of those in higher secondary education and 32% of those pursuing engineering were mostly affected with TMD. However this association between education and TMD was statistically not significant (p = 0.394) [Figure 4 and Table 1].
On comparing the association between occupation and TMD, it was seen that Disc-condyle disorders were predominantly present in students (14.29%) and housewives (22.45%). MPDS was seen mostly in patients working in IT sectors (12.24%). In the accountant category, 2.04% of the study population had disc-condyle disorder. In the beautician category, 2.04% had disc-condyle disorder. In the businessman category, 4.08% of the study population had disc-condyle disorder. In the case of the daily wage worker group 2.04% of the study population had disc-condyle disorder and 2.04% had MPDS. In the driver category, 4.08% had disccondyle disorder. In the housewives group, it was observed that 4.08% had degenerative disorder, 22.45% had disc-condyle disorder and 8.16% had MPDS. In the IT professional category, 4.08% had disc-condyle disorder and 12.24% had MPDS. In the salesman category, 4.08% had MPDS. In the security category 4.08% had disc-condyle disorder and 2.04% had MPDS. In the servant category, 2.04% had disc-condyle disorder. In the student category, 14.29% of the study population had disc-condyle disorder and 6.12% had MPDS. Overall, housewives (30%) and students (20%) were mostly affected with TMD. However this association between Occupation and TMD was statistically not significant (p = 0.333). [Figure 5 and Table 2].
Temporomandibular disorders include alterations of the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) and associated structures, including facial and neck muscles [7]. According to our study, it was found that the most commonly affected by TMD was the 31-40 years age group and least affected was the 51-60 years age group. This was in accordance with the study by Anastassaki et al [4]. However this is contradictory to the study by Shet et al [31] where they stated that the prevalence of TMD increases as the age increases. This can be attributed to the fact that as the age increases, tooth loss is common, resulting in occlusal disturbances and ultimately resulting in TMD. The contradictory results obtained in our study may be due to the fact, differing sample size and variable population. In our study, it was found that males are most commonly affected by TMD than females. The results were similar to the study by Akhter et al [2]. However, study by Shet et al [31] and Hongxing et al [9] stated that females were more affected than males. They reasoned out the fact that parafunctional habits like nail biting, bruxism were more common in females and usually females take up more stress compared to men. This was attributed as the reason for TMD more prevalent in females when compared to men. The contradictory results obtained in our study may be due to differing sample size and the geographic location.
In our study, no statistically significant association was present between education and TMD. However it was found that the majority of students in their higher education and those pursuing engineering had TMD. This would be attributed to the fact, these groups are more prone to educational stress, which affects them psychologically and may result in TMD. This finding was similar to the study by Jussila et al [14] where no association was found between education and TMD. However contradictory results were present in a study conducted by Hongxing et al who stated that those with low parental education, those in rural schools, had positive correlation with TMD [10].
No statistically significant association was seen between occupation and TMD in our study. However students and housewives showed TMD signs and symptoms predominantly. The reason could be because of educational stress in case of students. The results were similar to study by Martin et al [21], where they found that there was no association between occupation and TMD. However our study results were contradictory to the study by Hongxing et al where they found that low parental education, poverty, unemployment, particularly low socioeconomic status had positive correlation with TMD. The reasons could be due to varied geographic location.
The limitations of the study was less sample size, single centered and geographic location. The future scope of the study is to do extensive research with large sample size to evaluate the association between socioeconomic status and TMD. This would help in assessment of TMD, patient motivation, early intervention and better prognosis.
Conclusion
Within the limits of the study, temporomandibular disorders were
predominantly seen in the age group of 31-40 years with male
predilection. Disc- condyle disorders was the predominant type
of TMD. From our study it can be concluded that education and
occupational status of dental patients are not associated with temporomandibular
disorders.
Acknowledgement
We take pleasure to express our sincere gratitude to the University
for granting us permission to utilize the data from patient records
for the study.
Author’s Contribution
First author Vaishali.S performed data collection, analysis and interpretation
and wrote the manuscript.
Second author Santhosh Kumar contributed to conception, study
design, analysis, interpretation and critically revised the manuscript.
Third author Revathi Duraisamy contributed to review the manuscript.
All the authors have discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
References
- Abhinav RP, Selvarasu K, Maheswari GU, Taltia AA. The Patterns and Etiology of Maxillofacial Trauma in South India. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):114-117.Pubmed PMID: 31293938.
- Akhter R, Hassan NM, Nameki H, Nakamura K, Honda O, Morita M. Association of dietary habits with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in Bangladeshi adolescents. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Aug;31(8):746-53.Pubmed PMID: 15265209.
- American Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders (1990) Craniomandibular Disorders: Guidelines for Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management. Quintessence Publ.
- Anastassaki Köhler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson T. Prevalence of symptoms indicative of temporomandibular disorders in adults: cross-sectional epidemiological investigations covering two decades. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 May;70(3):213-23.Pubmed PMID: 22126531.
- Carlsson GE. Epidemiology and treatment need for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 1999 Oct 1;13(4):232-237.
- Christabel A, Anantanarayanan P, Subash P, Soh CL, Ramanathan M, Muthusekhar MR, et al. Comparison of pterygomaxillary dysjunction with tuberosity separation in isolated Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective, multi-centre, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;45(2):180-5.Pubmed PMID: 26338075.
- Dimitroulis G. Temporomandibular disorders: a clinical update. Bmj. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):190-4.
- Guo H, Yang W, Cao Y, Li J, Siegrist J. Effort-reward imbalance at school and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents: the role of family socioeconomic status. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 10;11(6):6085-98. Pubmed PMID: 24919130.
- Hongxing L, Astrøm AN, List T, Nilsson IM, Johansson A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder pain in Chinese adolescents compared to an age-matched Swedish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Apr;43(4):241-8. Pubmed PMID: 26538188.
- Hongxing L, Astrøm AN, List T, Nilsson IM, Johansson A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder pain in Chinese adolescents compared to an age-matched Swedish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Apr;43(4):241-8. Pubmed PMID: 26538188.
- Inglehart MR, Patel MH, Widmalm SE, Briskie DM. Self-reported temporomandibular joint disorder symptoms, oral health, and quality of life of children in kindergarten through grade 5: Do sex, race, and socioeconomic background matter? J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Feb;147(2):131-41.Pubmed PMID: 26809694.
- Vijayakumar Jain S, Muthusekhar MR, Baig MF, Senthilnathan P, Loganathan S, Abdul Wahab PU, et al. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Following Isolated Lefort One Osteotomy for the Correction of Vertical Maxillary Excess: A Prospective Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Mar;18(1):139-146.Pubmed PMID: 30728705.
- Jesudasan JS, Wahab PU, Sekhar MR. Effectiveness of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel and a eugenol-based paste on postoperative alveolar osteitis in patients having third molars extracted: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;53(9):826-30.Pubmed PMID: 26188932.
- Jussila P, Knuutila J, Salmela S, Näpänkangas R, Päkkilä J, Pirttiniemi P, et al. Association of risk factors with temporomandibular disorders in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Oct 3;76(7):525-9.
- Karan A. General evaluation of temporomandibular joint disorders with symptoms and signs. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2010 Apr 1;56:11-14.
- Kumar S, Rahman RE. Knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding biomedical waste management among undergraduate dental students. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017;10(8):341.
- Kumar S, Snena S.‘Knowledge and awareness regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis among undergraduate dental students’, Asian J Pharm Clin Res.2016; 9:154–159.
- List T, Stenström B, Lundström I, Dworkin SF. TMD in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome: a comparison with temporomandibular clinic cases and controls. J Orofac Pain. 1999 Winter;13(1):21-8.Pubmed PMID: 10425965.
- Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. Treatment received, treatment demand, and treatment need for temporomandibular disorders in 35-year-old subjects. Cranio. 2002 Jan;20(1):883.Pubmed PMID: 11831338.
- Marimuthu M, Andiappan M, Wahab A, Muthusekhar MR, Balakrishnan A, Shanmugam S. Canonical Wnt pathway gene expression and their clinical correlation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 May 1;29(3):291-297.
- Martins RJ, Garcia AR, Garbin CA, Sundefeld ML. The relation between socio-economic class and demographic factors in the occurrence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2008 Dec;13:2089- 96.
- Mercuri LG, Olson RE, Laskin DM. The specificity of response to experimental stress in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. J. Dent. Res. 1979 Sep;58(9):1866-71.
- Kumar S. Relationship between dental anxiety and pain experience during dental extractions. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017;10(3):458-461.
- Kumar S. The emerging role of botulinum toxin in the treatment of orofacial disorders: Literature update. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017;10(9):21-9.
- Navi F, Motamedi MH, Talesh KT, Lasemi E, Nematollahi Z. Diagnosis and management of temporomandibular disorders. InA textbook of advanced oral and maxillofacial surgery 2013 Jun 26.
- Packiri S, Gurunathan D, Selvarasu K. Management of paediatric oral ranula: a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZE06-ZE09.
- Patil SB, Durairaj D, Suresh Kumar G, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Sep;16(3):312-321.Pubmed PMID: 28717289.
- Patturaja K, Pradeep D. Awareness of Basic Dental Procedure among General Population. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016 Sep 1;9(9):1349.
- Rahman RE, Mp SK. Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of dental undergraduate students regarding human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(5):175-80.
- Rao TD, Kumar MS. Analgesic efficacy of paracetamol vs ketorolac after dental extractions. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018 Aug 1;11(8):3375-9.
- Shet RG, Rao S, Patel R, Suvvati P, Sadar LR, Yadav RD. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction and its signs among the partially edentulous patients in a village of North Gujarat. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1151-5.Pubmed PMID: 24858766.
- Solberg WK, Woo MW, Houston JB. Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Jan 1;98(1):25-34.
- Sweta VR, Abhinav RP, Ramesh A. Role of Virtual Reality in Pain Perception of Patients Following the Administration of Local Anesthesia. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):110-113.Pubmed PMID: 31293937.
- Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J. Dent. Res. 2008 Apr;87(4):296-307.