Dentists Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Technique To Children With Mixed Dentition
Deepthi Sogasu1, Vignesh Ravindran2*
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai- 77, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical
Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha University, Chennai- 77, India.
*Corresponding Author
Vignesh Ravindran,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha
University, Chennai- 77, India.
Tel: +91-9789934476
E-mail: vigneshr.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: September 13, 2021; Accepted: September 22, 2021; Published: September 23, 2021
Citation:Deepthi Sogasu, Vignesh Ravindran. Dentists Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Technique To Children With Mixed Dentition. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci.
2021;8(9):4535-4538. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000923
Copyright: Vignesh Ravindran©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: The main purpose of brushing is to mechanically disturb the biofilm that is formed over the tooth surface by
oral bacteria. The undisturbed biofilm can become plaque, which eventually leads to caries. Thus tooth brushing is of extreme
importance especially among children. Correct brushing techniques can prevent early childhood caries.
Aim: To check the preference of dentists about the mode of teaching brushing techniques to children with mixed dentition.
Materials and Methods: A total of 1600 subjects with mixed dentition were chosen for this study. All the subjects were outpatients
in the pediatric outpatient department of Saveetha Dental College. The data for this study was collected from DIAS
and was verified using photographic confirmation and checking. All subjects were chosen randomly to minimise sampling
bias. The age group considered for mixed dentition is 6 to 12 years old. The data that was obtained was tabulated in an excel
spreadsheet and the analysis of the data was made using SPSS software with Chi-square test for association.
Results: From the data collected in our study, it was found that the most preferred method of teaching brushing technique is
by using digital modes, followed by using casts and models and the least preferred method was only verbal explanation. There
was no statistically significant difference when compared based on gender of the patient (p>0.05).
Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that dentists prefer using digital modes to explain and teach brushing techniques
to children with mixed dentition. The purpose is to check for evolving trends in preferences in teaching. This is important so
as to accommodate the increasing development of technology.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Innovative Teaching Method; Brushing Techniques; Health Education; Pedodontics.
Introduction
The main purpose of brushing is to mechanically disturb the biofilm
that is formed over the tooth surface by oral bacteria. The
undisturbed biofilm can become plaque, which eventually leads
to caries [1]. Thus tooth brushing is of extreme importance especially
among children. Correct brushing techniques can prevent
early childhood caries [2].
The best way to reduce the occurrence of plaque and caries is by
using mechanical and chemical plaque controlling measures. Correct
brushing technique is the most effective mechanical plaque
controlling measure [3]. Regular brushing can significantly reduce
the amount of plaque present on the surfaces of teeth. Due to the
lack of awareness about the right methods of brushing, children
brush ineffectively, preventing the removal of plaque biofilms [4].
Correct brushing requires a certain level of muscle coordination
and movement, acquired at a particular stage of motor skill development.
Hence assessing the kind of tooth brushing used by the
child, dentists can also help identify if the child suffers from any
neurological disorders [5].
Studies have shown that the brushing techniques of children below
the age of 10 years are ineffective in mechanically controlling
plaque biofilms [6]. Thus, dentists play an important role in
correctly identifying the stage of mental dexterity in children and
must use the right methods to teach effective brushing techniques to children. Parents mostly introduce brushing to the children;
hence awareness of correct brushing techniques among parents
is also important [7].
It is also important that the dentist correctly advises certain techniques
of crushing over others, so as to accommodate motor dexterity
of the child. It has been suggested to teach horizontal scrub
and Foves technique to children below the age of 8, and Bass
method for the children above 8 years [8].
Previous studies have shown that the conventional lecture pattern
of teaching children about correct brushing techniques can significantly
reduce the amount of plaque on the tooth surfaces [9].
Another study conducted by Malik A et al., concluded that using
crosswords as opposed to other game-based activities is more effective
in teaching children about oral health and hygiene.
The necessity of this research is to identify the most preferred
methods of teaching brushing techniques to children with mixed
dentition. This study can help increase the awareness of various
methods of teaching children. Such studies are important as
the prevalence of caries among children is extremely high even
though there have been so many strategies done to avoid the
same. Our team has extensive knowledge and research experience
that has translate into high quality publications [10-22, 23-29].
The aim of this study is to identify the preferred mode of teaching
brushing technique to children with mixed dentition.
Materials and Methods
The study was done under a university setting. The Ethical approval
was obtained from the Institutional ethical committee.
About 2,00,000 case sheets were obtained from June 2019 to
March 2020. Informed consent was obtained from the parents
or guardian regarding usage of the clinical data for research purposes.
The inclusion criteria for this study consisted that the subjects had
to be children within the age group of 6-12 years. The exclusion
criteria consisted of subjects younger than 6 years and those older
than 12 years old.
Digital entry of clinical examination, intraoral photographs of the
oral cavity and the treatment procedure were assessed. The data
collected (digital entry and intraoral photographs) was verified by
an external additional reviewer. The subjects were chosen at random,
inclusive of all genders to reduce and minimize sampling
bias. If any error in data entry or patient details or clinical data
were noticed, that case sheet was excluded from the study.
The data collected were tabulated in MS Excel and was then analysed
in SPSS software version 22 (IBM Corp, Texas, LA). The
independent variables of this study were gender and geographic
background. The dependent variables were the age of the patient
and mode of teaching brushing technique. Descriptive statistics
were used and comparison between groups were done by using
Chi square tests.
Results
A total of 1600 subjects were considered for this study. Majority
of the subjects in the study were male (55.7%) were as female
patients consisted of 44.3% of the sample population (Graph 1).
Majority of the dentists preferred digital mode for teaching children
(60.4%) followed by cast and model method (22.4%) and
verbal only (17.3%) (Graph 2). There was no difference in mode
of teaching brushing technique based on gender of the patient
(Pearson chi-square test, p-value=0.97 - not statistically significant)
(Graph 3).
Graph 1: Bar chart representing percentage distribution (%) of male and female subjects who participated in the study. The X axis represents the gender and the Y axis represents the percentage distribution among each gender. Majority of the subjects in the study were male (55.7%) were as female patients consisted of 44.3% of the sample population. Blue represents male population and orange represents female population.
Graph 2: bar chart representing the percentage distribution (%) for the different modes of teaching preferred by dentists for teaching children with mixed dentition about correct brushing techniques. The X axis represents the various modes of teaching and the Y axis represents the percentage distribution for each mode of teaching respectively. Majority of the dentists preferred digital mode for teaching children (60.4%-blue) followed by cast and model method (22.4%-green) and verbal only (17.3%-beige).
Graph 3: Bar graph representing comparison between gender and which mode of teaching brushing technique was preferred. The X axis represents gender and the Y axis represents the mode of teaching preferred. Blue color represents digital mode of teaching, green colour represents use of casts and models and brown colour represents use of only verbal modes of teaching. From the graph, we can conclude that there was no difference in mode of teaching brushing technique based on gender of the patient (Pearson chi-square test, p-value=0.97 - not statistically significant).
Discussion
The results from this study proved that dentists prefer using digital
audiovisual mode of educating patients rather than using casts
or verbally explaining brushing techniques. The results obtained
in graph 1 suggest that the majority of the subjects in the study
were male (55.7%) and females made up (44.3%) of the remaining
sample population. A study conducted in 1999 suggests that
male prevalence was slightly higher compared to females on comparing
the gender prevalence of paediatric patients using clinics.
All other recent studies deliberately included an equal number
of males and female participants in their study. Thus, in a randomised
sample population, male predominance is seen which
supports our finding from this study.
On analysing the results from graph 2, we can confirm that digital
or audiovisual mode of teaching brushing techniques to children
was mostly preferred by dentists (60.4%), followed by the used of
cast and models(22.4%) and finally, the use of verbal cues only
(17.3%). A study conducted in 2012 compared digital and manual
modes of teaching brushing techniques. The authorities concluded
that the digital method - ROBOTUTOR was easier to use and
more time efficient [30]. Another similar study by Leal et al suggested
that audiovisual modes of teaching brushing techniques to
children was more commonly preferred [6]. On the contrary, in
the study by Malik A et al., they suggested that using a game based
approach such as crosswords is a good way to reinforce oral hygiene
habits to children [31]. Considering precious literature, the
most common mode of teaching brushing techniques used include
some form of audiovisual or digital methods. This confirms
our findings from the study.
The results inferred from graph 3 is that the audiovisual code
was more commonly preferred for both male and female children
with mixed dentition. Preference of mode of teaching does not
depend on gender of the patient. Some studies by child psychologists
suggest that boys and girls have different perceptions about
learning and hence must be educated in prompt ways [32]. On the
whole, in a dental set up, gender does not influence the mode of
teaching selected for educating children about the correct brushing
techniques. It is found that good plaque control is achieved in
both males and females after audiovisual aids were used to teach
brushing techniques [6].
Instilling the correct brushing techniques from a young age is
imperative to maintaining good oral health. With age, multiple
problems arise as a consequence of incorrect brushing methods.
Correct and appropriate reinforcement of brushing techniques
among children with mixed dentition is of utmost importance,
concerning the dentist. There are multiple methods to teach
brushing techniques to children. From the results obtained from
our study, the most common and preferred method used for
teaching children the various brushing techniques is using digital
or audiovisual methods followed by use of casts and models and
only verbal means of communication. Other studies have also
concluded by mentioning greater credits and preference to digital
modes of teaching brushing techniques, hence reinforcing our
findings in this study. The purpose of this study is to increase the
awareness of the different possibilities in teaching children different
brushing techniques. It also analyses the most preferred, time
efficient method of teaching the same, i.e. digital means of teaching
brushing techniques. Although the choice of teaching method
depends on the comfort of the dentist and the patient.
The main advantage of conducting the study in a university setting
is that it aids as a single center for multiple people from different
localities at the same time. The main limitation of this study is
the unicentric nature of the topic. The results obtained have low
external validity and are not diversified. The reason for this could
be because of small sample size and male predominance within
the sample population. Inclusion of more teaching methods also
could have diversified the results.
The future scope of the study is that it can accommodate the
changing trends of teaching and learning patterns among children
with the increasing advancements in technology.
Conclusion
Thus, within the limits of the study, digital or audiovisual mode
of teaching brushing techniques to children with mixed dentition
was preferred by dentists. Preference did not change in relation to
the gender of the patient.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry,
Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and
Technical science, Saveetha University for providing a platform in
expressing their knowledge.
Source of Funding
The present project was sponsored by
• Saveetha Dental College,
• Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical science (SIMATS),
• Saveetha University and
• Sharmila Arts, Bangalore.
References
-
[1]. Aljerf L, Al Masri N. In Vitro Investigated Study of the Relationship among
Fluoride of Plaque and Caries. EC Dent Sci. 2018;17:892-9.
[2]. Boustedt K, Dahlgren J, Twetman S, Roswall J. Tooth brushing habits and prevalence of early childhood caries: a prospective cohort study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Feb;21(1):155-9.
[3]. Okada M, Kuwahara S, Kaihara Y, Ishidori H, Kawamura M, Miura K, et al. Relationship between gingival health and dental caries in children aged 7-12 years. J Oral Sci. 2000 Sep;42(3):151-5.Pubmed PMID: 11111326.
[4]. Deinzer R, Cordes O, Weber J, Hassebrauck L, Weik U, Krämer N, et al. Toothbrushing behavior in children–an observational study of toothbrushing performance in 12 year olds. BMC oral health. 2019 Dec;19(1):68.
[5]. Mafla AC, Benavides RJ, Giraudeau N, Meyer P. Toothbrushing Patterns as Indicator of Neurodevelopment in Children. iadr.abstractarchives.com. [6]. Leal SC, Bezerra AC, Toledo OA. Effectiveness of teaching methods for toothbrushing in preschool children. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):133-6.
[7]. Srivastava N, Gupta G, Rana V. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of different teaching methods of tooth brushing in children contributors. Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health. 2013 Dec 25;1(3):1-4.
[8]. Atarbashi-Moghadam F, Atarbashi-Moghadam S. Tooth brushing in children. J. dent. mater. tech. 2018;7(4):181-4.
[9]. Stein C, Santos NML, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN. Effectiveness of oral health education on oral hygiene and dental caries in schoolchildren: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;46(1):30-37.Pubmed PMID: 28815661.
[10]. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):67-70. Pubmed PMID: 29657527.
[11]. Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJ. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-50.
[12]. Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172.Pubmed PMID: 30983825.
[13]. Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan- Mar;12(1):21-26.Pubmed PMID: 29657521.
[14]. Princeton B, Santhakumar P, Prathap L. Awareness on Preventive Measures taken by Health Care Professionals Attending COVID-19 Patients among Dental Students. Eur J Dent. 2020 Dec;14(S 01):S105-S109.Pubmed PMID: 33321549.
[15]. Saravanakumar K, Park S, Mariadoss AVA, Sathiyaseelan A, Veeraraghavan VP, Kim S, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, and anti-diabetic activities of ethyl acetate fraction of Stachys riederi var. japonica (Miq.) in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Sep;155:112374.Pubmed PMID: 34186120.
[16]. Wei W, Li R, Liu Q, Seshadri VD, Veeraraghavan VP, Mohan SK, et al. Amelioration of oxidative stress, inflammation and tumor promotion by Tin oxide-Sodium alginate-Polyethylene glycol-Allyl isothiocyanate nanocomposites on the 1, 2-Dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Arab. J. Chem. 2021 Jun 3;14(8):103238.
[17]. Gothandam K, Ganesan VS, Ayyasamy T, Ramalingam S. Antioxidant potential of theaflavin ameliorates the activities of key enzymes of glucose metabolism in high fat diet and streptozotocin - induced diabetic rats. Redox Rep. 2019 Dec;24(1):41-50.Pubmed PMID: 31142215.
[18]. Su P, Veeraraghavan VP, Krishna Mohan S, Lu W. A ginger derivative, zingerone- a phenolic compound-induces ROS-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer cells (HCT-116). J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2019 Dec;33(12):e22403. Pubmed PMID: 31714660.
[19]. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3275-3280.Pubmed PMID: 31955271.
[20]. Sekar D, Johnson J, Biruntha M, Lakhmanan G, Gurunathan D, Ross K. Biological and clinical relevance of microRNAs in mitochondrial diseases/ dysfunctions. DNA Cell Biol. 2020 Aug 1;39(8):1379-84.
[21]. Velusamy R, Sakthinathan G, Vignesh R, Kumarasamy A, Sathishkumar D, Priya KN, et al. Tribological and thermal characterization of electron beam physical vapor deposited single layer thin film for TBC application. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop. 2021 Jun 24;9(2):025043.
[22]. Aldhuwayhi S, Mallineni SK, Sakhamuri S, Thakare AA, Mallineni S, Sajja R, et al. Covid-19 Knowledge and Perceptions Among Dental Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Survey. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 7;14:2851-2861.Pubmed PMID: 34262372.
[23]. Sekar D, Nallaswamy D, Lakshmanan G. Decoding the functional role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in hypertension progression. Hypertens Res. 2020 Jul;43(7):724-725.Pubmed PMID: 32235913.
[24]. Bai L, Li J, Panagal M, M B, Sekar D. Methylation dependent microRNA 1285-5p and sterol carrier proteins 2 in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):3417-3422.Pubmed PMID: 31407919.
[25]. Sekar D. Circular RNA: a new biomarker for different types of hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2019 Nov;42(11):1824-5.
[26]. Sekar D, Mani P, Biruntha M, Sivagurunathan P, Karthigeyan M. Dissecting the functional role of microRNA 21 in osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019 Jul;26(7-8):179-182.Pubmed PMID: 30905966.
[27]. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-295.Pubmed PMID: 31124826.
[28]. Parimelazhagan R, Umapathy D, Sivakamasundari IR, Sethupathy S, Ali D, Kunka Mohanram R, et al. Association between Tumor Prognosis Marker Visfatin and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Hypertensive Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 16;2021:8568926.Pubmed PMID: 33816632.
[29]. Syed MH, Gnanakkan A, Pitchiah S. Exploration of acute toxicity, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-pyretic activities of the black tunicate, Phallusia nigra (Savigny, 1816) using mice model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5809-5821.Pubmed PMID: 32978735.
[30]. Ahire M, Dani N, Muttha R. Dental health education through the brushing ROBOTUTOR: A new learning experience. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul;16(3):417-20.Pubmed PMID: 23162339.
[31]. Malik A, Sabharwal S, Kumar A, Singh Samant P, Singh A, Kumar Pandey V. Implementation of Game-based Oral Health Education vs Conventional Oral Health Education on Children's Oral Health-related Knowledge and Oral Hygiene Status. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):257-260. Pubmed PMID: 29104385.
[32]. Darling-Hammond L, Flook L, Cook-Harvey C, Barron B, Osher D. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci. 2020 Apr 2;24(2):97-140.