Dentist’s Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Technique For Children With Primary Dentition
Arokia Rajkumar Shancy Merlin1, Vignesh Ravindran2*
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai- 77, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical
Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha University, Chennai- 77, India.
*Corresponding Author
Vignesh Ravindran,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha
University, Chennai- 77, India.
Tel: +91-9789934476
E-mail: vigneshr.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: September 13, 2021; Accepted: September 21, 2021; Published: September 22, 2021
Citation:Arokia Rajkumar Shancy Merlin, Vignesh Ravindran. Dentist’s Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Technique For Children With Primary Dentition. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4514-4518. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000918
Copyright: Vignesh Ravindran©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: Caries and gum disorders such as gingivitis are prevalent among children and can result in tooth loss or accumulation
of plaque that can later become calcified forming - a calculus, that can result in a wide variety of problems. Brushing
of teeth is an integral part in the maintenance of oral hygiene and dentists play a crucial role in educating children in their early
age about the techniques of brushing to avoid plaque formation and reduce caries.
Aim: To evaluate the most commonly taught brushing technique by dental students in pediatric patients with primary dentition.
Materials and Method: A retrospective study was conducted among the outpatient population in Saveetha Dental College,
Chennai between July, 2019 and September, 2019. The data of the mode of teaching brushing techniques was collected using
150456 case sheet records of pediatric patients visiting the Department of Pediatric Dentistry. Patients of 2-6 years were
selected for the study. The data that was obtained was tabulated in an excel spreadsheet and the analysis of the data was made
using SPSS software with a chi-square test for association.
Results and Discussion: Gender distribution was male (52.17%) and female (47.83%) respectively. Most common mode
of teaching brushing technique was the digital method (66.67%) followed by model method (21.74%). Comparison based on
gender and age against the mode of teaching did not show any statistical significance (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the digital method was the most commonly taught method for teaching
the brushing technique by dental students.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Innovative Mode of Teaching; Oral Cavity; Tooth Brush; Plaque; Primary Dentition; Pediatrics.
Introduction
The proper preservation of primary dentition is essential for the
development of permanent teeth and the improper maintenance
can result in changing this balance [1]. The most common problem
pertaining to young children is dental caries and periodontal
problems such as gingivitis [2]. These may induce pain and can
lead to expensive and time consuming treatment procedures to
alleviate the pain [3].
Dental caries is a multifactorial microbial infectious disease that
is characterized by the demineralisation of the inorganic portion
and the destruction of the organic substances. The etiology of
formation of dental caries can range from the role of carbohydrates,
role of plaque due to improper brushing and increased
ingestion of sticky carbohydrates and the role of the bacteria
colonised in the plaque itself [4]. The bacteria first adhere to a
pellicle-coated surface of the tooth structure causing the formation
of a mature biofilm that along with the role of acids resulting
in an acidogenic environment can cause the bacteria to firmly adhere
and starts the demineralisation process that proceeds faster
than the remineralisation causing further damage [5, 6].
Tooth brushing is an effective method to reduce plaque formation, thereby reducing the bacterial accumulation that can in turn
reduce the bacterial accumulation resulting in reduced carious lesions.
The act of using a brush with tooth paste along with interdental
cleaning is the most effective in the maintenance of proper
oral hygiene [7]. The process of keeping one’s oral cavity clean
and free of diseases by proper dental habits such as brushing with
tooth brushing coupled with interdental brushing is referred to
as oral hygiene. Effective plaque removal in the most effective
method is the art of brushing. Brushing however is highly dependent
on one’s manual dexterity and the motivation to do so, to
prevent tooth decay. Young children lack the manual dexterity for
effective brushing [8].
Dentists are the most important medical professionals to help in
inculcating proper brushing techniques to prevent carious lesion
development. Effective teaching can have a positive impact on
the child and their parents that can thereby help in increasing the
oral hygiene of the pediatric patient for proper overall development
[9].
There is a wide range of brushing techniques that were developed
over the last 20-30 years. From the various techniques, the most
used and recommended is the modified bass technique [10]. Employment
of the right technique can help in successful removal of
plaque as well as prevent the detrimentation of the hard tissues.
Teaching can be done in various methods such as employment
of models, verbal communication and the use of technology in
education. The latter is currently the most commonly used method
of teaching in general. Therefore, proper mode of teaching
brushing techniques should be delivered to the pediatric patients
to effectively control plaque and reduce the formation of caries
or periodontal problems, helping in proper development of
permanent teeth. Our team has extensive knowledge and research
experience that has translate into high quality publications [11-23,
24-30].
The aim of the study was to analyse the preferred method of
teaching brushing techniques used by dental students in the pediatric
patients in their primary dentition stage.
Materials and Methods
The retrospective study was conducted in a university setting that
principally consists of South Indian population. The approval for
the study was obtained from the institutional ethical committee.
Data Collection
The outpatient data was collected from among the pediatric patients
that had visited the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at
the institution between July 2019 and September 2019 with all age
groups and gender. Data was obtained using 150456 case sheet
records. The number of patient records reviewed was 1000. Inclusion
criteria included patients with only primary dentition that
is, between 2-6 years of age. Exclusion criteria was patients with
mixed dentition (6-12 years) or permanent dentition (=13 years)
and incomplete or repeated data. Verification of the data collected
was done by cross checking with the photographic evidence.
Simple random sampling was done to reduce bias. The final sample
size was finalised as 69.
The collected data was then tabulated using a Microsoft Excel
Spreadsheet. The data was then analysed using SPSS software by
IBM (Version 23), a statistical software with defined variables. Significance
of the study was obtained using chi-square test and the
results are interpreted.
Results and Discussion
Age distribution of the study was 2 years (1.45%), 3 years (5.80%),
4 years (15.94%), 5 years (18.84%), 6 years (57.97%) respectively.
The most common age group in the study included pediatric patients
with six years of age [Figure 1]. Among the participants of
the study, there were 52.17% males and 47.83% females respectively
[Figure 2]. The most commonly employed teaching method
of brushing technique was the digital method (66.67%) followed
by the usage of models (21.74%) and verbal (11.59%) [Figure 3].
Prevalence of digital methods was seen in both male and female
participants of the study [Figure 4]. Prevalence of digital methods
was seen in 4,5,6 year old participants respectively. No prevalence
was seen in model or digital method among 3 year old participants
[Figure 5].
Brushing teeth is of extreme importance in plaque control. The
accumulation of plaque thereby leading to calcification forming
calculus can cause bad odour and can also result in periodontitis
and gingival recession [31]. Tooth brushing is the foundation of
maintenance of oral hygiene inorder to prevent caries and other
periodontal compromisations. The effectiveness of brushing
teeth and prevention of gingivitis is an ongoing research study
and it is required to investigate it in higher quality.
Patients, both pediatric and adult, do not pay much attention to
cleaning their teeth in a proper technique. Vigorous scrubbing is
followed by most patients in a horizontal/vertical pattern which
although useful in helping plaque removal, can lead to loss of
tooth structure and weakening the tooth itself [32]. The effectiveness
of brushing teeth depends on dexterity of the patients, type
of toothbrush used and the understanding of the particular technique
by the patients [33]. The most common problems pediatric
patients are associated with is the development of caries in an
early stage and periodontal compromisations.
It is of extreme importance to conserve the primary tooth as
much as the permanent teeth as primary teeth affect the development
of the permanent dentition. Hence, educating patients
and parents is a must on the methods of conservation of teeth
and prevention of any dental problems for healthy teeth growth.
Although challenging, the dentist must be a skilled professional
in analysing his/her patient and changing the mode of teaching
accordingly.
Verbal communication is one of the various methods of lecture
that can be used to educate patients. It is however best used in patients
able to comprehend language and understand the technique
adequately [34]. Children less than four years of age or children
with special needs must be taught by other means as words such
as ‘behind’, ‘under’, ‘inside’ may be hard for them to understand.
In such patients, use of models or digital methods must be employed.
Models are an excellent way to show the patient exactly how it is
done. Types of toothbrushes - hard, soft and medium can be displayed
along with models of dentition that can be present along
with the dentist. The dentist can then demonstrate the various
brushing techniques and ask the patient to repeat the technique
once done. This method of demonstration is better as it employs
usage of the five senses [35]. The jaw model can be used to teach
the pediatric patients about the grooves and the lingual regions
where the accumulation of the plaque is high. This uses four
senses and is hence helpful. The jaw model method is highly recommended
as a study concludes that the model method is more
advantageous in special needs patients when compared to lecturing/
verbal method of teaching [36].
Digital mode of teaching is one of the most recent methods that
were developed in educating children. Virtual learning or e-learning
is an effective use of technology to inculcate the child with
adequate knowledge of dental hygiene maintenance [37]. A study
done in 2016, with a newly developed digital toothbrushing monitoring
and training system(DTS) effectively improved the brushing
technique, the overall oral hygiene with a prolonged learning
effect [38].
This said, a study done in 2013, with children being divided into
groups for model training, individual lecturing and audio-visual
learning revealed that children had a better inclination to study
casts when compared to the other groups. The casts were also
preferred by the dentists as it is cheap to obtain the models and
can be better taught with [39].
Advantage of the study was the easy access, availability of a large
amount of data and the similarity in ethnicity. Limitations of the
study is the unavailability of external validity. The sample size was
also small and limited to a particular geographical area. The future
scope of the study is that it should be conducted as a multicentered
study with wide geographical location into consideration.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of age of pediatric population with primary dentition. X-axis represents the age of the child and the Y-axis represents the number of participants in the primary dentition stage. Children of the age group 2-6 years with primary dentition were taken for the study. Children at six years of age were higher in the study population (57.97%).
Figure 2. Graphical representation of gender of pediatric population with primary dentition. X-axis represents the gender of the child and the Y-axis represents the number of participants in the primary dentition stage. Majority of the study population in the primary dentition stage was males (52.17%).
Figure 3. Graphical representation of the prevalence of mode of brushing technique in the pediatric population with primary dentition. X-axis represents the different modes of teaching brushing techniques and Y-axis represents the number of the pediatric population in the primary dentition stage. Digital mode of teaching brushing technique was the most commonly employed with 66.67% followed by the usage of models at 21.74%.
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the comparison of mode of teaching brushing techniques with the age of the participants. X-axis represents mode of teaching brushing techniques and Y-axis represents the number of children. The colours represent the age of the children. Blue represents age 2, green represents age 3, beige represents age 4, purple represents age 5 and yellow represents age 6. Digital mode of teaching is commonly employed for teaching among two (1.45%), four(10.14%), five(11.59%) and six(40.58%) years of age respectively. Usage of models and digital methods of teaching was used collectively among three (2.90%) years of age respectively. This was not statistically significant (p=0.123).
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the comparison of mode of teaching brushing techniques with the gender of the participants. The X-axis represents the mode of teaching brushing techniques and the Y-axis represents the gender of the participants in the primary dentition stage. The blue colour represents male participants and red represents the female participants respectively. Digital mode of teaching brushing technique was most commonly employed in both males (39.13%) and females (27.54%) respectively. This was not statistically significant (p=0.42).
Conclusion
Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that the
digital mode of teaching is better preferred by dental students,
followed by the usage of models in educating the various brushing
techniques in pediatric patients between the age group of 2-6
years respectively (primary dentition stage).
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank the Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute
of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University,
Chennai for their valuable inputs for the study.
Source of Funding
The present project was sponsored by
• Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical sciences
• Saveetha Dental college and Hospitals
• Saveetha University
• Tilak Hospitals, Trichy.
References
-
[1]. R B, Bharathi R, Ravindran V, Senthil MP. Assessment of brushing techniques
taught by dental students to children in mixed dentition stage - A
retrospective study. Int. j. res. pharm. sci. 2020;11: 977–82.
[2]. Campanaro M, Huebner CE, Davis BE. Facilitators and barriers to twice daily tooth brushing among children with special health care needs. Spec Care Dentist. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):185-92.Pubmed PMID: 24252060.
[3]. Rossi GN, Sorazabal AL, Salgado PA, Squassi AF, Klemonskis GL. Toothbrushing procedure in schoolchildren with no previous formal instruction: variables associated to dental biofilm removal. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016 Apr;29(1):82-89.Pubmed PMID: 27701503.
[4]. Philip N, Suneja B, Walsh LJ. Ecological approaches to dental caries prevention: paradigm shift or shibboleth?. Caries Res. 2018;52(1-2):153-65. [5]. Shah N. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. Br. Dent. J. 2009 May;206(9):640.
[6]. Banerjee A, Pickard HM, Watson TF. Pickard's manual of operative dentistry. OUP. 2011 Jan 13:176.
[7]. Worthington HV, MacDonald L, Pericic TP, Sambunjak D, Johnson TM, Imai P, et al. Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;4.
[8]. Unkel JH, Fenton SJ, Hobbs Jr G, Frere CL. Toothbrushing ability is related to age in children. ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Sep 1;62(5):346-8.
[9]. Ramamoorthy J, Ravindran V, Mani G. Evaluation of brushing techniques taught by dental students in children with permanent dentition. Int. j. res. pharm. sci. 2020;11: 1611–6.
[10]. Patil SP, Patil PB, Kashetty MV. Effectiveness of different tooth brushing techniques on the removal of dental plaque in 6-8 year old children of Gulbarga. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 May;4(2):113-6.Pubmed PMID: 25254196.
[11]. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):67-70. Pubmed PMID: 29657527.
[12]. Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJ. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-50.
[13]. Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172.Pubmed PMID: 30983825.
[14]. Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan- Mar;12(1):21-26.Pubmed PMID: 29657521.
[15]. Princeton B, Santhakumar P, Prathap L. Awareness on Preventive Measures taken by Health Care Professionals Attending COVID-19 Patients among Dental Students. Eur J Dent. 2020 Dec;14(S 01):S105-S109.Pubmed PMID: 33321549.
[16]. Saravanakumar K, Park S, Mariadoss AVA, Sathiyaseelan A, Veeraraghavan VP, Kim S, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, and anti-diabetic activities of ethyl acetate fraction of Stachys riederi var. japonica (Miq.) in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Sep;155:112374.Pubmed PMID: 34186120.
[17]. Wei W, Li R, Liu Q, Seshadri VD, Veeraraghavan VP, Mohan SK, et al. Amelioration of oxidative stress, inflammation and tumor promotion by Tin oxide-Sodium alginate-Polyethylene glycol-Allyl isothiocyanate nanocomposites on the 1, 2-Dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Arab. J. Chem. 2021 Jun 3;1414(8):103238.
[18]. Gothandam K, Ganesan VS, Ayyasamy T, Ramalingam S. Antioxidant potential of theaflavin ameliorates the activities of key enzymes of glucose metabolism in high fat diet and streptozotocin - induced diabetic rats. Redox Rep. 2019 Dec;24(1):41-50.Pubmed PMID: 31142215.
[19]. Su P, Veeraraghavan VP, Krishna Mohan S, Lu W. A ginger derivative, zingerone-a phenolic compound-induces ROS-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer cells (HCT-116). J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2019 Dec;33(12):e22403. Pubmed PMID: 31714660.
[20]. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3275-3280.Pubmed PMID: 31955271.
[21]. Sekar D, Johnson J, Biruntha M, Lakhmanan G, Gurunathan D, Ross K. Biological and clinical relevance of microRNAs in mitochondrial diseases/ dysfunctions. DNA Cell Biol. 2020 Aug 1;39(8):1379-84.
[22]. Velusamy R, Sakthinathan G, Vignesh R, Kumarasamy A, Sathishkumar D, Priya KN, et al. Tribological and thermal characterization of electron beam physical vapor deposited single layer thin film for TBC application. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop. 2021 Jun 24;9(2):025043.
[23]. Aldhuwayhi S, Mallineni SK, Sakhamuri S, Thakare AA, Mallineni S, Sajja R, et al. Covid-19 Knowledge and Perceptions Among Dental Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Survey. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 7;14:2851-2861.Pubmed PMID: 34262372.
[24]. Sekar D, Nallaswamy D, Lakshmanan G. Decoding the functional role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in hypertension progression. Hypertens Res. 2020 Jul;43(7):724-725.Pubmed PMID: 32235913.
[25]. Bai L, Li J, Panagal M, M B, Sekar D. Methylation dependent microRNA 1285-5p and sterol carrier proteins 2 in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):3417-3422.Pubmed PMID: 31407919.
[26]. Sekar D. Circular RNA: a new biomarker for different types of hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2019 Nov;42(11):1824–5.
[27]. Sekar D, Mani P, Biruntha M, Sivagurunathan P, Karthigeyan M. Dissecting the functional role of microRNA 21 in osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019 Jul;26(7-8):179-182.Pubmed PMID: 30905966.
[28]. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-295.Pubmed PMID: 31124826.
[29]. Parimelazhagan R, Umapathy D, Sivakamasundari IR, Sethupathy S, Ali D, Kunka Mohanram R, et al. Association between Tumor Prognosis Marker Visfatin and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Hypertensive Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 16;2021:8568926.Pubmed PMID: 33816632.
[30]. Syed MH, Gnanakkan A, Pitchiah S. Exploration of acute toxicity, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-pyretic activities of the black tunicate, Phallusia nigra (Savigny, 1816) using mice model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5809-5821.Pubmed PMID: 32978735.
[31]. Toker H, Ozdemir H. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a university dental hospital in Turkey. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 May;7(2):115- 20.Pubmed PMID: 19413547.
[32]. Poyato-Ferrera M, Segura-Egea JJ, Bullón-Fernández P. Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal. Int J Dent Hyg. 2003 May;1(2):110-4.Pubmed PMID: 16451532.
[33]. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77.Pubmed PMID: 24275499.
[34]. Leal SC, Bezerra AC, Toledo OA. Effectiveness of teaching methods for toothbrushing in preschool children. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):133-6.
[35]. Noaman BR, Rauf SH. Initial impact of an educational program on the oral health awareness of Iraqi primary school students aged 12 years. J Dent Heal Oral Disord Ther. 2017;8(6):1-5.
[36]. Jatmika SE, Maulana M. Dental and Oral Health Education for Elementary School Students through Patient Hygiene Performance Index Indicator. Int. j. eval. res. educ. 2018 Dec;7(4):259-63.
[37]. Henderson M, Romeo G, editors. Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press; 2015 Sep 25:352.
[38]. Graetz C, Bielfeldt J, Wolff L, Springer C, El-Sayed KM, Sälzer S, et al. Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. J Periodontol. 2013 Feb;84(2):186-95.Pubmed PMID: 22420876.
[39]. Srivastava N, Gupta G, Rana V. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of different teaching methods of tooth brushing in children contributors. J. oral hyg. health. 2013 Dec 25:1-4.