Dentist’s Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Techniques To Children With Permanent Dentition
Vidyashri.S1, Vignesh Ravindran2*
1 BDS Third Year Student, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai,
India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical
Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha University, Chennai- 77, India.
*Corresponding Author
Vignesh Ravindran,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences [SIMATS], Saveetha
University, Chennai- 77, India.
Tel: +91-9789934476
E-mail: vigneshr.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: September 13, 2021; Accepted: September 21, 2021; Published: September 22, 2021
Citation:Vidyashri.S, Vignesh Ravindran. Dentist’s Preference Of Mode Of Teaching Brushing Techniques To Children With Permanent Dentition. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4495-4499. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000914
Copyright: Vignesh Ravindran©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: Proper effective brushing of teeth aids in the management of dental caries and periodontal disease, which can
lead to eating difficulties, pain, esthetician problems, malnutrition, reducing self estimation, and consequently reducing the
quality of life. The method of teaching plays an important role in maintaining oral hygiene in children. The instructions should
be given according to the child's degree of readiness for learning brushing techniques and should include reinforcement and
systemic training.
Aim: to assess the common methods of teaching tooth brushing in young children with permanent dentition.
Materials and Methods: From the patients visiting the private dental hospital, those of the age group 13 to 18 years were
considered in the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria involved those with poor maintenance of records and follow-up of
uncooperative patients. The final sample size was 100. The gender and age were considered and tabulated, followed by their
statistical analysis using SPSS software version.
Results: From the results of the current study, the most preferred method of teaching brushing technique to children was
found to be audiovisual aids such as electronic devices (89%), while 8% preferred to demonstrate using cast and 2% preferred
vocal training and reinforcement. Electronic devices were commonly used to demonstrate for both male and female patients
which was statistically significant. (p value =0.02)
Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that using audiovisual aids like electronic devices were majorly
preferred among dentists to teach children of 13 to 18 years of age (permanent dentition) about the proper methods of
brushing. This data is useful because this method is both inexpensive and easily taught.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Brushing Techniques; Innovative Methods; Permanent Dentition; Dental Caries.
Introduction
Dental caries, or tooth decay, is an infectious process that leads
to damage of the tooth by causing breakdown of the tooth
enamel. Caries is caused by the complex interaction between acidproducing
cariogenic bacteria in combination with fermentable
carbohydrates intake in diet and other dietary, genetic, behavioral,
social, and cultural factors [1]. Children are susceptible to caries as
soon as the first teeth appear, which usually occurs around age 6
months [2]. Poor oral hygiene in children may lead to the early loss
of permanent teeth due to caries and periodontal problems. Poor
dental hygiene among the school children can have many detrimental
effects on children, some more major than others. One
of these effects is physical pain due to deeper spread of caries
which leads to eating problems, sleeping problems and behavioral
problems [3], all of which at such a young age should be avoided
as much as possible. According to American Dental Association,
oral health is the aesthetic, functional, structural, physiologic and
psychosocial state of well-being and is important to an individual’s
general health and quality of life. Maintaining good oral hygiene
is considered a lifelong habit [4]. Mover, these oral habits are
to be undertaken at an early stage of life. It is imperative to teach its importance to children in order to increase their knowledge on
maintaining good oral hygiene and a positive attitude towards oral
health. A better knowledge about oral health is needed for good
oral health related behaviour [5].
Proper effective brushing of teeth aids in the management of
dental caries and periodontal disease, which can lead to eating
difficulties, pain, esthetician problems, malnutrition, reducing
self estimation, and consequently reducing the quality of life
[1]. The principal etiological factor in dental caries and gingivitis
is dental plaque. Removal of plaque from tooth surfaces using
proper brushing technique can help in the management of both
periodontal problems and caries. The various methods of tooth
brushing used are Fones brushing technique, Bass brushing technique,
Modified Bass brushing technique, Scrub brushing technique,
Charters brushing technique, Roll brushing technique and
Stillman brushing technique [6]. These techniques are effective
in removing plaque biofilm and debris from the surface of the
teeth, stimulates the gingiva and aids in delivery of fluoridated
dentifrice to the tooth surfaces [7]. According to previous studies,
Fones technique is the most commonly preferred brushing
technique to be taught to children [8]. It was also observed that
the average percentage of plaque removal from the lingual and labial
tooth surface was higher in Fones method compared to other
techniques [8, 9].
The method of teaching plays an important role in maintaining
oral hygiene in children. The instructions should be given according
to the child's degree of readiness for learning brushing techniques
and should include reinforcement and systemic training
[10]. Although manual dexterity and ability are needed to properly
implement such techniques, intensive individual training is crucial.
The physiological development of children plays a major role in
the method of education in oral self-care. Oral hygiene instructions
through individual educational lectures result in highly significant
improvements in oral health. However, the grammatical
understanding in young children could impede such techniques
[11]. This can lead to the difficulty in training and practice of oral
hygiene techniques in children using instructions taught verbally
[12]. The use of audiovisual methods is also suggested for such
children [13]. Our team has extensive knowledge and research experience
that has translate into high quality publications [14-26,
27-33]. This study was undertaken with the aim to assess the common
methods of teaching tooth brushing in young children with
permanent dentition.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study was conducted as a university setting
which includes children of age group 13 to 18. The approval
for this study was obtained from the institutional ethical committee
(ethical approval number: SDC/SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/
0619-0320). This study had advantages of large data availability,
similar ethnicity, but it had disadvantages of smaller sample
size, geographic limitation and no external validity. This was a
convenience sampling conducted between June 2019 to March
2020. Data was collected from the dental records, patient management
records of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry. The
number of case sheets reviewed was 1000. Inclusion criteria were
the patients with permanent dentition (13 to 18 years). Patients
with only primary dentition (0-5 years) and mixed dentition (=13
years), including the incomplete and repeated data were excluded
from the study. Cross verification was done using a photographic
method to eliminate the errors made while recording. To eliminate
bias, simple random sampling was done. Final sample size
taken up for the study was 700 cases. The data obtained were
tabulated in excel, imported to SPSS software by IBM, a statistical
software with variables defined. The significance of this study
was obtained using the statistical test, Chi-Square and the results
were interpreted.
Results
In the present study frequency of patients treated PRR was 53.1%
were males and 46.8% were females (Fig 1). Around, 53.1% were
treated in left sided Mandibular teeth and 46.8% were treated in
18.14% of the subjects were 13 years old, 12.86% were 14 years
old,14% were 15 years old, 20.14% were 16 years old, 34.43 were
17 years old and 0.43% were 18 years old (Figure 1). 51.51% of
the subjects were male children and 48.43 of them were female
children (Figure 2). 89% of the Dental students preferred electronic
devices as a method of teaching while 9% used demonstration
using cast and 2% used vocal method of teaching (Figure 3).
Electronic devices were commonly used to demonstrate for both
male and female patients which was statistically significant (Figure
4). (p value = 0.02).
Figure 1. The bar graph represents the frequency distribution of age groups of patients. Lilac represents patients who are 13 years old, grey represents 14 year olds, pink represents 15 year olds, orange represents 16 year olds, red represents 17 year olds, and ye1low represents 18 year old patients. 18.14% of the subjects were 13 years old, 12.86% were 14 years old, 14% were 15 years old, 20.14% were 16 years old, 34.43 were 17 years old and 0.43% were 18 years old.
Figure 2. The bar graph represents the frequency distribution of gender of patients. Light blue represents male while brown represents female. 51.51% of the subjects were male and 48.43 of them were female.
Figure 3. The bar graph represents the frequency distribution of modes of teaching methods preferred by dentists. The blue colour indicates teaching using electronic devices; green indicates demonstration using cast and yellow indicates vocal training. 89% of the Dental students preferred electronic devices as a method of teaching while 9% used demonstration using cast and 2% used vocal method of teaching.
Figure 4. The graph represents the association between the mode of teaching and the gender of the patient. The x axis represents the gender of the patient and the y axis represents the mode of teaching. The blue colour indicates teaching using electronic devices; green indicates demonstration using cast and yellow indicates vocal training. Electronic devices were commonly used to demonstrate for both male (45.2%) and female (43.7%) patients which was statistically significant. (Chi Square test; p value =0.02; p<0.05: hence significant).
Discussion
Proper tooth brushing technique is required in order to ensure
good oral hygiene. It aids in the prevention of plaque accumulation,
gingiva, and periodontal diseases [34]. Plaque accumulation
is the primary cause for inflammation of gingiva and can result
in compromised periodontal health. The lingual surfaces of the
teeth are often overlooked during the brushing process leading to
increased plaque accumulation in that area which causes compromised
oral health [35]. The relation between incomplete plaque removal, sequelae of gingivitis and periodontitis and occurrence
of dental caries has been clinically proven [36]. It is the responsibility
of a dentist to incorporate such methods of brushing in patients,
especially of the younger age group. The mode of teaching
plays an important role in making sure the patient could process
the right information and implement it in their everyday life.
In this study it was found that using electronic devices and reinforcement
to implement the proper brushing techniques was
found to be most preferred. This is more likely due to the fact
that children nowadays tend to respond positively to audio-visual
reinforcement compared to other methods. It is also less time
consuming and easier for the dentist to convey information using
such devices. This is in correlation with a study by Soraya et al.,
who found that children who were taught brushing techniques
using audio-visual aids and individual reinforcement had better
plaque control [37]. Vocal teaching was not as much preferred as
patients of a younger age group may not remember the proper
sequence of brushing and there may be a gap in understanding.
However, a study by Williford et al.,[38] reported that educational
lectures result in highly significant improvements in oral health
when applied in adolescents. According to Simmons et al., [12],
most children were not able to understand the use of prepositions
such as "on top of", "inside", "behind", etc. Thus, the difficulty
found in teaching tooth brushing skills to these children using just
words. Therefore, other methods, such as audiovisual should be
indicated for children with such difficulties [39]. Demonstration
with a cast was preferred but it depends on the availability of
casts. It can provide a good way of conveying the proper information
to children.
The most crucial reason for proper, effective and frequent tooth
brushing is to preserve the health of the oral cavity. It is also
safe to say that, if proper tooth brushing habits are established at
home, the clinical situation is more easily accepted by the child.
Early establishment of good oral hygiene habits may also play a
role in the perception of oral health of a child.
Advantage of this study was that it had easy access, the large availability
of data and similar ethnicity. It was also used to identify
any mistakes in the brushing techniques advised. Limitation of
this study was that it had no external validity. The sample size was small and inadequate. It was a uni centered study with a geographic
limitation. The future scope was that it should be conducted as
a multi centered study with extension in the geographic limitation
and to create more effective ways of teaching brushing technique
to decrease the caries incidence and periodontal problems in children
with permanent dentition.
Conclusion
Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that using audiovisual
aids like electronic devices are majorly preferred among
dentists compared to vocal teaching or demonstration using cast
to teach the proper brushing techniques to children of 13 to 18
years of age (permanent dentition stage). This data is useful because
this method is both inexpensive and easily taught. It is imperative
to find which method of oral hygiene instruction is more
adequate for each child considering their age group as each child
responds differently to different modes of teaching.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to the Department of Pedodontics,
Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of
Medical and Technical sciences and Saveetha University for providing
a platform to express my knowledge.
Source of Funding
The present project was sponsored by
• Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical sciences
• Saveetha Dental college and Hospitals
• Saveetha University
• Little Holy Angels Matriculation Higher Secondary school.
References
-
[1]. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on the Future of Dental Education.
Dental education at the crossroads: challenges and change. National Academies;
1995 Jan 26:368.
[2]. Chou R, Cantor A, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Pappas M. Prevention of Dental Caries in Children Younger Than 5 Years Old: Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 May. Pubmed PMID: 24872964.
[3]. Elamin A, Garemo M, Mulder A. Determinants of dental caries in children in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review based on literature published from 2000 to 2019. BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 4;21(1):237.Pubmed PMID: 33947387.
[4]. Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman DV, Vujicic M, Watt RG, Weyant RJ. A new definition for oral health developed by the FDI World Dental Federation opens the door to a universal definition of oral health. J Public Health Dent. 2017 Dec;77(1):3–5.
[5]. Al Subait AA, Alousaimi M, Geeverghese A, Ali A, El Metwally A. Oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior among students of age 10–18 years old attending Jenadriyah festival Riyadh; a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Dent Res. 2016 Jan 1;7(1):45-50.
[6]. Van Der Weijden F, Slot DE. Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontology 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):104-23.
[7]. Wilkins EM. Clinical Practice of the Dental Hygienist. 2010:1216 .
[8]. R B, Bharathi R, Ravindran V, Senthil MP. Assessment of brushing techniques taught by dental students to children in mixed dentition stage - A retrospective study. Int. j. res. pharm. sci. 2020;11: 977–82.
[9]. Arai T. A comparison of different toothbrushes and toothbrushing methods on plaque removal (author's transl). Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi. 1976 Mar;18(1):13-31.Pubmed PMID: 1075059.
[10]. Sen Savara B, Suher T. Dental caries in children one to six years of age as related to socioeconomic level, food habits, and toothbrushing. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):870-5.
[11]. Casanova-Rosado AJ, Medina-Solís CE, Casanova-Rosado JF, Vallejos- Sánchez AA, Minaya-Sánchez M, Mendoza-Rodríguez M, et al. Tooth brushing frequency in Mexican schoolchildren and associated socio-demographic, socioeconomic, and dental variables. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jun 7;20:938-44. Pubmed PMID: 24907713.
[12]. Simmons S, Smith R, Gelbier S. Effect of oral hygiene instruction on brushing skills in preschoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1983 Aug;11(4):193-8.
[13]. Andelic I, Matijevic S, Andelic J. The importance of oral health behavior of children for their oral health. Sanamed. 2015;10(2):101-7.
[14]. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):67-70. Pubmed PMID: 29657527.
[15]. Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJ. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-50.
[16]. Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172.Pubmed PMID: 30983825.
[17]. Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan- Mar;12(1):21-26.Pubmed PMID: 29657521.
[18]. Princeton B, Santhakumar P, Prathap L. Awareness on Preventive Measures taken by Health Care Professionals Attending COVID-19 Patients among Dental Students. Eur J Dent. 2020 Dec;14(S 01):S105-S109.Pubmed PMID: 33321549.
[19]. Saravanakumar K, Park S, Mariadoss AVA, Sathiyaseelan A, Veeraraghavan VP, Kim S, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, and anti-diabetic activities of ethyl acetate fraction of Stachys riederi var. japonica (Miq.) in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Sep;155:112374.Pubmed PMID: 34186120.
[20]. Wei W, Li R, Liu Q, Seshadri VD, Veeraraghavan VP, Mohan SK, et al. Amelioration of oxidative stress, inflammation and tumor promotion by Tin oxide-Sodium alginate-Polyethylene glycol-Allyl isothiocyanate nanocomposites on the 1, 2-Dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Arab. J. Chem. 2021 Jun 3;14(8):103238.
[21]. Gothandam K, Ganesan VS, Ayyasamy T, Ramalingam S. Antioxidant potential of theaflavin ameliorates the activities of key enzymes of glucose metabolism in high fat diet and streptozotocin - induced diabetic rats. Redox Rep. 2019 Dec;24(1):41-50.Pubmed PMID: 31142215.
[22]. Su P, Veeraraghavan VP, Krishna Mohan S, Lu W. A ginger derivative, zingerone- a phenolic compound-induces ROS-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer cells (HCT-116). J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2019 Dec;33(12):e22403. Pubmed PMID: 31714660.
[23]. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3275-3280.Pubmed PMID: 31955271.
[24]. Sekar D, Johnson J, Biruntha M, Lakhmanan G, Gurunathan D, Ross K. Biological and clinical relevance of microRNAs in mitochondrial diseases/ dysfunctions. DNA Cell Biol. 2020 Aug 1;39(8):1379-84.
[25]. Velusamy R, Sakthinathan G, Vignesh R, Kumarasamy A, Sathishkumar D, Priya KN, et al. Tribological and thermal characterization of electron beam physical vapor deposited single layer thin film for TBC application. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop. 2021 Jun 24;9(2):025043.
[26]. Aldhuwayhi S, Mallineni SK, Sakhamuri S, Thakare AA, Mallineni S, Sajja R, et al. Covid-19 Knowledge and Perceptions Among Dental Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Survey. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 7;14:2851-2861.Pubmed PMID: 34262372.
[27]. Sekar D, Nallaswamy D, Lakshmanan G. Decoding the functional role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in hypertension progression. Hypertens Res. 2020 Jul;43(7):724-725.Pubmed PMID: 32235913.
[28]. Bai L, Li J, Panagal M, M B, Sekar D. Methylation dependent microRNA 1285-5p and sterol carrier proteins 2 in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):3417-3422.Pubmed PMID: 31407919.
[29]. Sekar D. Circular RNA: a new biomarker for different types of hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2019 Nov;42(11):1824-5.
[30]. Sekar D, Mani P, Biruntha M, Sivagurunathan P, Karthigeyan M. Dissecting the functional role of microRNA 21 in osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019 Jul;26(7-8):179-182.Pubmed PMID: 30905966.
[31]. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-295.Pubmed PMID: 31124826.
[32]. Parimelazhagan R, Umapathy D, Sivakamasundari IR, Sethupathy S, Ali D, Kunka Mohanram R, et al. Association between Tumor Prognosis Marker Visfatin and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Hypertensive Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 16;2021:8568926.Pubmed PMID: 33816632.
[33]. Syed MH, Gnanakkan A, Pitchiah S. Exploration of acute toxicity, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-pyretic activities of the black tunicate, Phallusia nigra (Savigny, 1816) using mice model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5809-5821.Pubmed PMID: 32978735.
[34]. NAKAJIMA Y. Influences of brushing force and the number of brushing strokes on brushing effect during manual toothbrushing in adults. J Dent Health. 1971;21(3):193-215.
[35]. Kaur K. Brushing Teeth. Brushing Teeth. 2019: 1–6. [36]. Ganavadiya R, Shekar BRC, Goel P, Hongal SG, Jain M, Gupta R. Comparison of anti-plaque efficacy between a low and high cost dentifrice: A short term randomized double-blind trial. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jul;8(3):381- 388.Pubmed PMID: 25202220.
[37]. Leal SC, Bezerra AC, Toledo OA. Effectiveness of teaching methods for toothbrushing in preschool children. Braz Dent J. 2002;13:133-6.
[38]. Williford JW, Muhler JC, Stookey GK. Study demonstrating improved oral health through education. J Am Dent Assoc. 1967 Oct 1;75(4):896-902.
[39]. Karabekiroglu S, Ünlü N. The Importance and Role of Early Prevention Practices in Community-Based Preventive Oral Health Programs. Journal of Ege University School of Dentistry. 2017;38: 89–100.