Assessment Of Probiotic Activity and Anti-Oxidant Potential Of Commercially Available Probiotic Chocolate In India
Lalitha Rani Chellappa1, Srisakthi Doraikannan1*, Meignana Arumugham Indiran1
1 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Management and Technical Sciences, No.162, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Srisakthi Doraikannan,
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Management and Technical Sciences, No.162, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai 600077,
Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: + 918122399966
E-mail: drsrisakthiphd@gmail.com
Received: April 02, 2021; Accepted: September 20, 2021; Published: September 21, 2021
Citation:Lalitha Rani Chellappa, Srisakthi Doraikannan, Meignana Arumugham Indiran. Assessment Of Probiotic Activity and Anti-Oxidant Potential Of Commercially Available Probiotic Chocolate In India. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4393-4398. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000894
Copyright: Dr. Srisakthi Doraikannan©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: Chocolate is one of the most commonly consumed product in the world at all age groups. It is socially acceptable
by most of the consumers for its taste. If its in the form of a functional food with probiotic activity without altering the
taste, it becomes beneficial and can reach a wider population.
Aim: The aim of the study is to assess and compare the antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of commercially available probiotic
infused green tea, green coffee and slim tea.
Materials and Methods: Synthesis of probiotic medium is done by 2 gm of each sample was taken in 1 flask of 15 ml
peptone water and mixed well. Then it is inoculated in MRS agar plate and it is sealed in an anaerobic jar for 48 hours. Antimicrobial
activity is tested by agar well diffusion method against S.mutans and the zone of inhibition is measured. Antioxidant
activity is measured with DPPH and % of inhibition is measured.
Results: In the antimicrobial activity, in all the samples the activity increased with increasing concentration, but the maximum
was seen in cranberry orange probiotic chocolate. In antioxidant activity, all the samples showed antioxidant activity although
cranberry orange probiotic chocolate showed more antioxidant activity than peanut butter caramel chocolate.
Conclusion: In our study, Bacillus coagulans incorporated probiotic chocolate bars exhibited both antimicrobial and antioxidant
properties. Since there was a good antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, these can be incorporated as a potential
antibacterial agent for oral infections and as an antioxidant carrier in the local drug delivery.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Probiotic; Chocolate; Antimicrobial Activity; DPPH; Agar Well Diffusion Method; S.mutans.
Introduction
Chocolate is, in essence, composed of cocoa mass and sugar suspended
in a cocoa butter matrix [1]. Major types of chocolates are
dark, milk and white that differs in content of cocoa solid, milk
fat and cocoa butter in the formulation. Chocolates are semisolid
suspensions of fine solid particles of sugar and cocoa (and milk,
depending on type); making about 70% in total, in a continuous fat
phase [2]. Chocolate is consumed all over the world, by every age
group and every social class. The popularity of this food appears
to mainly associate with its potential to arouse sensory pleasure
and positive emotions [3]. Foods with positive acceptance have
been enriched with compounds that improve consumers health.
For example, reducing the fat content in the diet might decrease
the energy intake and therefore, contribute to the prevention of
obesity. There is an opportunity using indulgent foods, such as
chocolate to achieve this aim [4, 5].
Functional foods are those that provide basic nutrition and, at the
same time, promote health [6]. As the market for functional foods
continues to expand, research in the development of food products
containing probiotic bacteria also has grown [7]. There are
two dietary strategies to increase the beneficial microorganisms in
the instestine. The first one is by the consumption of probiotics
and the other one is by increasing the number of resident microorganisms
in the gut tract, using prebiotics [8]. Probiotics are
viable microorganisms that are beneficial to the host when administered
in appropriate quantities [9]. They may play an important
role in helping the body protect itself from infection, especially
along the colonized mucosal surfaces of the gastrointestinal tract [10]. Ouwehand, Salminen, and Isolauri affirmed that to be considered
a probiotic, the microorganism must have certain properties
and functions, like adhesion in the host epithelial tissue, acid
resistance and bile tolerance, pathogen elimination or reduction
in pathogen adherence, production of acid, hydrogen peroxide
and bacteriocin against the growth of pathogens, assurance and
improvement of gut microbiota balance [11].
The attention and stress was on the survival in the gut and temporary
colonization of gut mucosa surface. The species with beneficial
properties belong, generally, to the genera Bifidobacterium
and Lactobacillus [12]. Probiotic bacteria including bifidobacterial
and lactobacilli and Bacillus coagulans are natural inhibitors
of the human intestine. They beneficially affect human health by
improving the intestinal microorganisms and pH balance and the
defences against pathogens. Additional health benefits attributed
to probiotics are the stimulation of the immune system, blood
cholesterol reduction, vitamin synthesis, anti-carcinogenic and
anti-bacterial activities [13]. Other crucial criteria to determine
the efficacy and the efficiency of the product containing probiotics
are the acceptance of the product by the consumers and the
survival of probiotic microorganisms during its production . In
general, the food industry has applied the recommended level of
106 cfu g1 at the time of consumption for Lactobacillus acidophilus,
bifidobacteria and other probiotic bacteria [7].
A prebiotic is a non digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects
the human body by selectively stimulating the activity of certain
colon bacteria. This means that some dietary compounds are
resistant to digestive enzyme and are not absorbed in GIT including
small intestine. These compounds when go to large intestine
where most of the gut microbiota is present, these stimulate the
growth of some beneficial microorganisms in the gut especially
bifidobacteria [14]. Inulin is an oligosaccharide which is extracted
from plants like onions, asparagus root, Jerusalem artichoke tuber,
wheat, banana, Chinese chives, burdock, garlic, honey, oat, pine,
rye and chicory [15]. It is officially recognized as a natural food
ingredient and is classified as a dietary fibre in most European
countries [14]. Studies on humans have shown significant changes
in the composition of faecal microbiota, allowing the conclusion
that these oligosaccharides are prebiotics [16]. The other physiological
and nutritional effects associated with inulin are modulation
of calcium absorption and lipid metabolism, and a possible
role in reducing the risk of colon precancerous lesion.
The term synbiotic is used when a product contains both probiotic
and prebiotic ingredients. The synergism is attained in vivo
by the ingestion of lactobacilli and by the promotion of indigenous
bifidobacteria simultaneously [17]. For example a product
comprising of inulin or oligofructose and probiotic bifidobacteria
or L. paracasei, for example, can be considered as a symbiotic.
Synbiotic products have not been intensively studied to date. Roberfroid
suggested that these ingrediants can improve the survival
of bacteria when they pass into the small intestine and produce
benefits in the large bowel. It is not known if the individual advantages
might be additive or even synergistic [18].
Aerated dairy products have found to have great potential in the
market and attracts the customers who are interested in lighter
and healthier products [19]. Mousse is an aerated dessert with stabilized
foamy structure that is gaining popularity in the market
and produced on a large scale. The most popular mousse flavour
is chocolate, followed by orange, lemon, cranberry, peanut butter,
caramel and strawberry [20]. The large scale production of aerated
dairy desserts is delicate, requiring knowledge about the formation
and stabilization of foam, the use of functional ingredients
(emulsifiers, stabilizers), and the interaction and interference
of process parameters in the properties of the resulting product
[19]. The aim of this study is to assess the antimicrobial activity
and anti-oxidant potential of commercially available probiotic
chocolate in India.
Materials and Methods
Figure 1 shows the preparation of probiotic stains from commercially
available probiotic chocolate in two flavours. Peptone water
was used for preparation of extract.
Figure 2 shows the picture of anaerobic jar which was used to
store the culture plates after inoculation in MRS agar. The plates
were stored for 5-7 days in the anaerobic jar for probiotic bacteria
growth.
Figure 3 shows the subcultures of subcultures of the probiotic
stains inoculated on MRS agar. Subcultures were done thrice for
better isolation of the probiotic stains.
Figure 4 shows the supernatant obtained after centrifugation of
the samples. The supernatant were used for antimicrobial and antioxidant
properties.
Chocolate used: SIRIMIRI protein chocolate bars with probiotics.
Ingredients: Whey protein isolate, fructo-oligosaccharides, dark
chocolate (sugar, cocoa solids, lecithin), almond butter, milk protein
concentrate, honey, butter, , Jowar millet crisp, rock salt and
Bacillus Coagulans.
Chocolate 1: Dried cranberries and orange extract
Chocolate 2: Peanuts and caramel extract
Synthesis of probiotic chocolate medium: 5 gm of each chocolate
was taken in 2 tubes of 15 mL peptone water and mixed well.
Then it is kept in a shaker at 250 rpm for 24 hours. Then it is
inoculated in MRS agar plate and it is sealed in an anaerobic jar
for 48 hours.
The culture is sub-cultured thrice and centrifuged and the supernatant
was stored for further study.
Antimicrobial activity: Antibacterial activity of the supernatant
strains against oral pathogen was determined using the agar-well
diffusion method with some modifications of the protocol indicated
by Chellappa et al. [30] ( Streptococcus mutans).
The selected LAB isolates were inoculated from slants to fresh
MRS broth containing 1% glucose and incubated overnight at
37°C overnight active culture broth of each isolate was centrifuged
separately at 5000 rpm for 10 min at 4° cell-free supernatant
from each separate culture was collected as a crude extract
for the antagonistic study against selected oral pathogen. Pure
cultures of oral pathogen were inoculated from slants to brain
heart infusion broth. After 24-hour incubation at 37°C, a volume
of 100 µL of inoculum of each indicator bacteria was swabbed
evenly over the surface of nutrient agar plates with a sterile cotton
swab. plates were allowed to dry, and a sterile cork borer (diameter
5 mm) was used to cut uniform wells in the agar. Each well was
filled with 100 µL culture-free filtrate obtained from each of the
acid-bile-tolerant LAB isolates. After incubation at 37°C for 24 to
48 hours, the plates were observed for a zone of inhibition (ZOI)
around the well. )e diameter of the inhibition zone was measured
by calipers in millimeters, and a clear zone of 1 mm or more was
considered positive inhibition [31,,32]. Experiment was carried
out in triplicates, and the activity was reported as the diameter of
ZOI ± SD.
Antioxidant activity - DPPH assay
The 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) free radical
scavenging activity of the chocolate samples was determined to
assess its antioxidant potential. Various concentrations (10-50µg/
ml) of inoculated culture were mixed with 1ml of 0.1mM DPPH
in methanol solution and 450µl of 50mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH
7.4), and incubated for 30 min. After incubation, the reduction
in the number of DPPH free radicals was measured based on
the absorbance at 517nm. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard
controls and the percent (%) inhibition was calculated from the
following equation:
% Inhibition = [Absorbance of control–Absorbance of test sample/
Absorbance of control] ×100
Results
Figure 5 shows the antimicrobial action of probiotic stains against
the oral pathogen S. mutans. Agar well diffusion method was used to assess the activity with 3 various concentrations of 25 µL, 50
µL, and 100 µL,.
Figure 6 shows the antioxidant activity of peanut butter caramel
chocolate using DPPH assay. Various concentrations from 10 µL
to 50 µL were assessed for anti-oxidant potential.
igure 7 shows the antioxidant activity of cranberry orange chocolate
using DPPH assay. Various concentrations from 10 µL to 50
µL were assessed for anti-oxidant potential.
Graph 1 shows the antibiotic potential of the samples. It shows
that in the peanut butter caramel chocolate, 25µL, 50 µL and
100µL showed 9 nm, 10nm and 13 nm in the zone of inhibition;
in the cranberry orange chocolate, 25µL, 50 µL and 100µL showed
9 nm, 12 nm and 15 nm in the zone of inhibition although all the
samples had increased activity with increasing concentration, but
the maximum was seen in cranberry orange probiotic chocolate.
Graph 2 shows the antioxidant activity of the probiotic chocolates.
In the peanut butter caramel sample, 13%,29%,42%,55%
and 70% of inhibition was observed with increasing concentrations
of 10µL, 20 µL, 30 µL, 40 µL and 50 µL respectively. In
the cranberry orange sample, 26%,27%,42%, 47% and 65% of
inhibition was observed with increasing concentrations of 10µL,
20 µL, 30 µL, 40 µL and 50 µL respectively. Although cranberry
orange exhibited more anti oxidant activity at low concentration,
at higher concentrations, peanut butter caramel had more antioxidant
potent.
The growth of the probiotic stains were confirmed by subcultures
(figure 3). In the antimicrobial activity, in the peanut butter caramel
chocolate, 25µL , 50 µL and 100µL showed 9 nm, 10nm and
13 nm in the zone of inhibition; in the cranberry orange chocolate,
25µL , 50 µL and 100µL showed 9 nm, 12 nm and 15 nm
in the zone of inhibition although all the samples had increased
activity with increasing concentration, but the maximum was seen
in cranberry orange probiotic chocolate (figure 5 and graph 1).
In the antioxidant activity of the probiotic chocolates, the peanut
butter caramel sample had 13%,29%,42%,55% and 70% of inhibition
with increasing concentrations of 10µL, 20 µL, 30 µL, 40
µL and 50 µL respectively. In the cranberry orange sample2 had
6%,27%,42%,47% and 65% of inhibition with increasing concentrations
of 10µL, 20 µL, 30 µL, 40 µL and 50 µL respectively.
Although cranberry orange exhibited more antioxidant activity at
low concentration , at higher concentrations, peanut butter caramel
had more antioxidant potential (figure 6,7 and graph 2).
Discussion
Numerous methods have been explored to increase the viability
and activity of probiotics in commercial products: selection of
acid- and bile-resistant strains, stress adaptation, and incorporation
of micronutrients . An alternative solution is represented
by microencapsulation in sealed capsules of different materials,
which release their content under specific environmental conditions
[33]. Among these materials, lipids such as oil emulsions,
milk fat and water insoluble microcapsules appear to be of considerable value [34-36]. Probiotics are already incorporated into
a wide range of dairy products or fruit juice. Another way to increase
the efficacy of a probiotic bacteria would be to use a food
matrix which naturally contains a higher content of ingredients
with protective properties. As the lipid fraction of cocoa butter
was shown to be protective for bifidobacterial [37].
In a study conducted by S.Possemiers et al, association of a chocolate
coating with microencapsulated probiotic strains have been
proved to be an excellent solution to protect them from environmental
stress conditions [38]. Due to this, it has been attempted to
be a carrier in many ways for symbiotic activity [39, 40].
In our study, we have evaluated the anti microbial activity of probiotic
chocolate against the common oral pathogen S.mutans. .
Diseases such as dental caries and periodontal disease are directly
linked to oral microbiota [42]. Streptococcus mutans is the often
implicated initiator and plaque-resident bacterium, that begins
demineralization and the metabolism of simple carbohydrates
and produces a by-product which paves the way for tissue loss
and further bacterial action [42, 43]. It initiates the biofilm formation
by its adherence and accumulation on the tooth surface
which is promoted by its synthesis of insoluble, extracellular polysaccharides.
It also produces various bacteriocins that kill other
bacteria, as it has a high efficiency in catabolizing carbohydrates
and producing acids, and the ability to tolerate low pH [44].
Literature has shown that probiotic bacteria are not only associated
with intestinal microbiota but it can also affect oral health,
mucin production, competition with other flora and mucosal adherence.
[45, 46].
Chocolate might be more or less responsib
le for tooth decay than
any other carbohydrate containing foods such as bread, raisins,
crackers, and fruit. However, only chocolate which is usually consumed
as milk chocolate, candy bars contains large amount of
sugar and complex carbohydrates and causes tooth decay and
might inhibit the effect of antibacterial agents [47].
S. mutans being the arch enemy in thecaries development, more
efforts have been directed towards inhibiting the known mechanisms
of caries development such as; use of antimicrobial agents,
fluorides, polyphenols to reduce biofilm and acid production
done by S.mutans [46]. In our study , both the samples had antimicrobial
activity. Similar findings were found in few more studies
too[38, 46-48].
Chocolate has been used in antioxidant activity incorporating
it with nanoparticles or probiotics. Our study also proved that
probiotic chocolate had antioxidant activity. Similar findings were
also found in studies conducted by Abd El-Moneim M.R. Afif et
al and Dorota Najgebauer-Lejko et al [49, 50].
Conclusion
In our study , both the samples of probiotic chocolate exhibited
antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Cranberry orange exhibited
more antibiotic activity and peanut butter caramel had more
antioxidant potential at higher concentrations.
However , different stains of probiotic bacteria should be incorporated
and tested invitro for their further potential before in
vivo trials and commercial use.
References
-
[1]. ANDRAE-NIGHTINGALE LM, LEE SY, Engeseth NJ. Textural changes
in chocolate characterized by instrumental and sensory techniques. Journal
of Texture Studies. 2009 Aug;40(4):427-44.
[2]. Afoakwa EO. Chocolate science and technology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010 Feb 2.
[3]. El-Kalyoubi M, Khallaf MF, Abdelrashid A, Mostafa EM. Quality characteristics of chocolate–Containing some fat replacer. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2011 Dec 1;56(2):89-96.
[4]. Rezende NV, Benassi MT, Vissotto FZ, Augusto PP, Grossmann MV. Mixture design applied for the partial replacement of fat with fibre in sucrose-free chocolates. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2015 Jun 1;62(1):598-604.
[5]. Konar N, Toker OS, Oba S, Sagdic O. Improving functionality of chocolate: A review on probiotic, prebiotic, and/or synbiotic characteristics. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2016 Mar 1;49:35-44.
[6]. Halsted CH. Dietary supplements and functional foods: 2 sides of a coin? Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1001S-1007S. Pubmed PMID: 12663307.
[7]. Boylston TD, Vinderola CG, Ghoddusi HB, Reinheimer JA. Incorporation of bifidobacteria into cheeses: challenges and rewards. International Dairy Journal. 2004 May 1;14(5):375-87.
[8]. Ferreira CL, Teshima E. Prebióticos, estratégia dietética para a manutenção da microbiota colônica desejável. Biotecnologia Ciencia & Desenvolvimento. 2000 Sep;3:22-5.
[9]. FAO/WHO. Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation, Co´rdoba, Argentina. 2001.
[10]. Sanders ME. Probiotics: considerations for human health. Nutr Rev. 2003 Mar;61(3):91-9. Pubmed PMID: 12723641.
[11]. Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;82(1-4):279-89. Pubmed PMID: 12369194.
[12]. Isolauri E. The role of probiotics in paediatrics. Current Paediatrics. 2004 Apr 1;14(2):104-9.
[13]. Heenan CN, Adams MC, Hosken RW, Fleet GH. Survival and sensory acceptability of probiotic microorganisms in a nonfermented frozen vegetarian dessert. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2004 Jun 1;37(4):461-6.
[14]. Roberfroid M. Functional food concept and its application to prebiotics. Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Sep;34 Suppl 2:S105-10. Pubmed PMID: 12408452.
[15]. Bengmark S, García de Lorenzo A, Culebras JM. Use of pro-, pre- and synbiotics in the ICU--future options. Nutr Hosp. 2001 Nov-Dec;16(6):239-56. Pubmed PMID: 11840588.
[16]. Gibson GR. Dietary modulation of the human gut microflora using the prebiotics oligofructose and inulin. J Nutr. 1999 Jul;129(7 Suppl):1438S- 41S. Pubmed PMID: 10395616.
[17]. Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics--approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):361S-364S. Pubmed PMID: 11157342.
[18]. Bielecka M, Biedrzycka E, Majkowska A. Selection of probiotics and prebiotics for synbiotics and confirmation of their in vivo effectiveness. Food Research International. 2002 Jan 1;35(2-3):125-31.
[19]. Pires MH. Sobremesas lácteas aeradas: sistemas de estabilizaçao e tecnologia de aeraçao. Food Ingredients. 2004;6(31):74-7.
[20]. Early R, editor. Technology of dairy products. Springer Science & Business Media; 1998.
[21]. Khanafari A, HOSSEINI PS, TAJABADI EM. Investigation of probiotic chocolate effect on Streptococcus mutans growth inhibition.
[22]. Oliveira D, Antúnez L, Giménez A, Castura JC, Deliza R, Ares G. Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking. Food Res Int. 2015 Sep;75:148-156. Pubmed PMID: 28454942.
[23]. Rouhi M, Mohammadi R, Mortazavian AM, Sarlak Z. Combined effects of replacement of sucrose with d-tagatose and addition of different probiotic strains on quality characteristics of chocolate milk. Dairy Science & Technology. 2015 Mar 1;95(2):115-33.
[24]. Kemsawasd V, Chaikham P, Rattanasena P. Survival of immobilized probiotics in chocolate during storage and with an in vitro gastrointestinal model. Food Biosci. 2016; 16; 37-43.
[25]. Silva MP, Tulini FL, Marinho JF, Mazzocato MC, De Martinis EC, Luccas V, et al. Semisweet chocolate as a vehicle for the probiotics Lactobacillus acidophilus LA3 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BLC1: Evaluation of chocolate stability and probiotic survival under in vitro simulated gastrointestinal conditions. LWT. 2017 Jan 1;75:640-7.
[26]. Gadhiya D, Shah NP, Patel AR, Prajapati JB. Preparation and shelf life study of probiotic chocolate manufactured using Lactobacillus helveticus MTCC 5463. Acta Alimentaria. 2018 Sep;47(3):350-8.
[27]. Mirkovic M, Seratlic S, Kilcawley K, Mannion D, Mirkovic N, Radulovic Z. The Sensory Quality and Volatile Profile of Dark Chocolate Enriched with Encapsulated Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Bacteria. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 6;18(8):2570. Pubmed PMID: 30082608.
[28]. Peres J, Esmerino E, da Silva AL, Racowski I, Bolini H. Sensory Profile, Drivers of Liking, and Influence of Information on the Acceptance of Low- Calorie Synbiotic and Probiotic Chocolate Ice Cream. J Food Sci. 2018 May;83(5):1350-1359. Pubmed PMID: 29660810.
[29]. Eor JY, Tan PL, Lim SM, Choi DH, Yoon SM, Yang SY, et al. Laxative effect of probiotic chocolate on loperamide-induced constipation in rats. Food Res Int. 2019 Feb;116:1173-1182. Pubmed PMID: 30716903.
[30]. Chellapa LR, Shanmugam R, Indiran MA, Samuel SR. Biogenic nanoselenium synthesis, its antimicrobial, antioxidant activity and toxicity. Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials. 2020 Sep 9;9(3):184-9.
[31]. Lleó MM, Tafi MC, Canepari P. Nonculturable Enterococcus faecalis cells are metabolically active and capable of resuming active growth. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998 Aug;21(3):333-9. Pubmed PMID: 9841123.
[32]. Mir-Hoseini M. Study of effect of nisin and producer bacteria of nisin on Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus. Isfahan: University of Isfahan. 2004.
[33]. Anal AK, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2007 May 1;18(5):240-51.
[34]. Picot A, Lacroix C. Production of multiphase water-insoluble microcapsules for cell microencapsulation using an emulsification/spray-drying technology. Journal of food science. 2003 Nov;68(9):2693-700.
[35]. Picot A, Lacroix C. Encapsulation of bifidobacteria in whey protein-based microcapsules and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. International dairy journal. 2004 Jun 1;14(6):505-15.
[36]. Hou RC, Lin MY, Wang MM, Tzen JT. Increase of viability of entrapped cells of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus in artificial sesame oil emulsions. J Dairy Sci. 2003 Feb;86(2):424-8. Pubmed PMID: 12647948.
[37]. Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ, Forssell P, Myllärinen P. Effect of starch- and lipid-based encapsulation on the culturability of two Bifidobacterium longum strains. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007 May;44(5):500-5. Pubmed PMID: 17451516.
[38]. Possemiers S, Marzorati M, Verstraete W, Van de Wiele T. Bacteria and chocolate: a successful combination for probiotic delivery. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jun 30;141(1-2):97-103. Pubmed PMID: 20452073.
[39]. Halsted CH. Dietary supplements and functional foods: 2 sides of a coin? Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1001S-1007S. Pubmed PMID: 12663307.
[40]. Aragon-Alegro LC, Alegro JH, Cardarelli HR, Chiu MC, Saad SM. Potentially probiotic and synbiotic chocolate mousse. LWT-Food Science and technology. 2007 May 1;40(4):669-75.
[41]. Stamatova I. Probiotic activity of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in the oral cavity.
[42]. Forssten SD, Björklund M, Ouwehand AC. Streptococcus mutans, caries and simulation models. Nutrients. 2010 Mar;2(3):290-8. Pubmed PMID: 22254021.
[43]. Simon L. The role of Streptococcus mutans and oral ecology in the formation of dental caries.
[44]. Khanafari A, HOSSEINI PS, TAJABADI EM. Investigation of probiotic chocolate effect on Streptococcus mutans growth inhibition.
[45]. Reddy JJ, Sampathkumar N, Aradhya S. Probiotics in dentistry: review of the current status. Archives of Oral Research. 2010 Nov 29;6(3).
[46]. Haukioja A, Loimaranta V, Tenovuo J. Probiotic bacteria affect the composition of salivary pellicle and streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008 Aug;23(4):336-43. Pubmed PMID: 18582334.
[47]. Zyzelewicz D, Nebesny E, Motyl I, Libudzisz Z. Effect of milk chocolate supplementation with lyophilised lactobacillus cells on its attributes. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2010 Oct 14;28(5):392-406.
[48]. Dakshinamoorthy M, Subramanian MO, Padmavathi KE, Mahalakshmi KR, Arumugam KA, Paramasivam V. Effect of Probiotic Chocolate in the Reduction of Streptococcus Mutans Count. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal. 2016;9(3):1073-8.
[49]. Afify AE, Romeilah RM, Sultan SI, Hussein MM. ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS OF PROBIOTIC BACTERIA STRAINS. International Journal of Academic Research. 2012 Nov 1;4(6).
[50]. Najgebauer-Lejko D, Sady M. Estimation of the antioxidant activity of the commercially available fermented milks. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2015 Oct-Dec;14(4):387-396. Pubmed PMID: 28068044.