Awareness On Medicinal Applications Of Chitosan Nanoparticles Among Dental Students
Dhanraj Ganapathy1*, Martina Catherine2
1 Professor & Head of Department, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
2 Tutor, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dhanraj Ganapathy,
Professor & Head of Department, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Tel: 9841504523
E-mail: dhanrajmganapathy@yahoo.co.in
Received: September 12, 2021; Accepted: September 20, 2021; Published: September 21, 2021
Citation:Dhanraj Ganapathy, Martina Catherine. Awareness On Medicinal Applications Of Chitosan Nanoparticles Among Dental Students. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4367-4371. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000889
Copyright: Dhanraj Ganapathy©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: The development of advanced nanomaterials and technologies is essential in biomedical engineering to improve
the quality of life. Chitosan based nanomaterials are on the forefront and attract wide interest due to their versatile
physicochemical characteristics such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity, which play a promising role in
biological applications.
Aim: This survey was conducted for assessing the awareness about medicinal application of Chitosan nanoparticles amongst
dental students.
Materials and Method: A cross-section research was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire containing ten questions
distributed amongst 100 dental students. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about Chitosan nanoparticles therapy
in medical applications, their antibacterial properties, antifungal activities, wound healing properties and their role in targeted
drug therapy, The responses were recorded and analysed.
Results: 17% of the respondents were aware of the medicinal applications of Chitosan Nanoparticles. 13 % were aware of
antibacterial properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles, 12 % were aware of antifungal properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles,
10 % were aware of wound healing properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles and 9% were aware of their role in targeted drug
therapy.
Conclusion: There is limited awareness amongst dental students about use of Chitosan nanoparticles therapy in medical
applications. Enhanced awareness initiatives and dental educational programmes together with increased importance for curriculum
improvements that further promote knowledge and awareness of Chitosan nanoparticles therapy..
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Awareness; Chitosan; Nanoparticles; Students; Medicinal.
Introduction
In biomedical engineering, the development of new nanomaterials
and technologies is critical for improving quality of life.
The diverse physicochemical features of chitosan (Ch)-based nanomaterials,
such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, and nontoxicity,
which play a promising role in biological applications, are
attracting a lot of attention. Chitosan and its derivatives are used
in pharmaceuticals and biomedical engineering, among other applications
[1].
The use of nanomaterials in pharmacological and biomedical research
is currently gaining traction. Nanoparticles (NPs) with a
diameter of less than 100 nm have a superior ability to improve
patient compliance, biodistribution, and site-specific drug delivery
[2]. The biomedical and pharmaceutical industries use a variety
of sophisticated nanomaterials [3]. Magnetic nanoparticles, silicabased
nanomaterials, metal and metal-oxide nanomaterials, and
biological and carbon nanostructures are only a few examples of
sophisticated functional nanomaterials [4]. Nanomaterials are also
becoming a more ecologically friendly and cost-effective solution
for medicinal applications such as gene transport and transfection,
drug delivery carriers and antibacterial agents, wound healing,
nano systems against cancer, and therapeutic delivery systems
[5].
Biopolymers such starch, cellulose, silk fibroins, collagen, gelatin,
albumin, and chitosan (Ch)-based nanoparticles provide bio-compatibility, biodegradability, and low toxicity to synthetic NPs.
In a variety of biological and biomedical applications, such as
medication delivery, therapies, and gene delivery, biocompatible
nanomaterials with high specific surface area are desirable. Several
investigations have concentrated on advancements in this topic in
recent years, leading to replacement biocompatible nanomaterials
that take into account alternative resources, inventive features,
and constraints.
Ch is a non-toxic, biocompatible linear polysaccharide cationic
and hydrophilic polymer made from randomly dispersed -(1,
4)-linked d-glucosamine and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine units produced
by alkaline hydrolysis of chitin. Chitin is a naturally occurring
amino polysaccharide that is derived from the components
of fungal cell walls and some hard structures in invertebrates
and fish. Ch has a lot of hydroxyl and amine functional groups,
which can be used to react with cross-linking agents in order to do
chemical cross-linking in real time. Ch is not only biocompatible
and non-toxic, but it is also biodegradable into non-toxic oligosaccharides
by particular enzymes, making it suitable for therapeutic
application [6].
Ch-based nanomaterials have shown considerable promise in
biomedical applications such as antibacterial agents, membrane
separation, drug transport carriers, biomolecule monitoring sensing
materials, and tissue engineering [7]. Furthermore, Ch derivatives
and Ch nanoparticles (ChNPs) have shown to be effective
in ophthalmology, dentistry, bio-imaging, bio-sensing, and diagnostics
[8]. Ch, derivatives, and ChNPs are historically among the
most investigated natural biopolymer materials for biomedical
purposes. Our research experience has prompted us in pursuing
this research [9-20]. This survey was conducted for assessing the
awareness about medicinal application of Chitosan nanoparticles
amongst dental students.
Materials and Methods
A cross-section research was conducted with a self-administered
questionnaire containing ten questions distributed amongst 100
dental students. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about
Chitosan nanoparticles therapy in medical applications, their antibacterial
properties, antifungal activities, wound healing properties
and their role in targeted drug therapy, The responses were
recorded and analysed.
Results
17% of the respondents were aware of the medicinal applications
of Chitosan Nanoparticles (Fig 1). 13 % were aware of antibacterial
properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles (Fig 2), 12 % were
aware of antifungal properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles (Fig
3), 10 % were aware of wound healing properties of Chitosan
Nanoparticles (Fig 4) and 9% were aware of their role in targeted
drug therapy (Fig 5).
Discussion
Furthermore, Ch-derivatives and ChNP composites are being
developed to improve the original Ch's performance, such as
minimising agglomeration and increasing overall stability. For example,
gene transfer of DNA and RNA into mammalian cells
can be utilised to treat diseases by expressing new proteins or preventing the production of existing proteins [21]. Because of
its biocompatibility and biodegradability, Ch is utilised as a polycationic
non-viral vector for gene transfer; nevertheless, chemical
alterations to its structure are required to successfully and practically
transfect under physiological settings. To counter this, encapsulated
ChNPs are created utilising a new synthesis approach
that does not require chemical modifications or organic solvents.
These biocompatible Ch nanocomposites were used to create excellent
gene delivery vehicles for in vivo applications, providing
fresh insights into the field of non-viral gene therapy [22]. Ch
structural modification or additive inclusion is another effective
way to improve the polyplex's stability in biological fluids while
also improving focused cell distribution [23].
Ch's antibacterial action is influenced by environmental parameters
such as medium pH, pathogen type, and structural features
such as acetylation degree, MW, concentration, and source of Ch.
The quantity of Ch binding to the bacterial cell wall is similarly
dependent on the same parameters, according to the researchers
[24]. Low pH raises the positive charge of the Ch polymer,
increasing its affinity for the bacterial cell wall. This is most likely
owing to the polymer's increasing amount of protonated amino
groups, where the positively charged –NH3+ groups encourage
attachment to the bacteria's negatively charged membrane components
[25]. Because Ch is a cationic polyelectrolyte polymer, it
has antibacterial properties. Low-molecular-weight Ch can pass
through microbial cellular areas, bind to DNA, and restrict DNA
interpretation and mRNA activities, but high-MW Ch can combine
with the negatively charged components of microbial cellular
areas [14]. It generates an impenetrable coating around the cell,
alters its permeability, and prevents transit into it. Microbes can
rapidly attach to the exterior of ChNPs in as little as 30 minutes,
indicating that ChNPs have antibacterial potential [26].
The antimicrobial activity of Ch also depends on the type of microorganism
[27]. Due to Gram-negative bacteria's hydrophilicity
and negative charge on their cell surface, ChNPs have more
advanced interactions with them than Gram-positive bacteria, resulting
in higher antibacterial activity against them. Staphylococcus
aureus, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, Listeria monocytogenes,
Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and
Lactobacillus brevis are among the Gram-positive bacteria that
the polymer can kill. Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, Salmonella
typhimurium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae, and Enterobacter
aerogenes are also susceptible to Ch [28].
The risk of bacterial colonisation of biomedical equipment is a
major concern for the biomedical and clinical science areas. Antimicrobial
coatings are made from a variety of nanomaterials to
overcome this problem. Because of their non-cytotoxicity, biocompatibility,
and good antibacterial capabilities, Ch-based nanoparticles
are already used in a variety of healthcare and industrial
applications [29]. Various Ch-based antibacterial nanocomposites
have been created to improve stability, antibacterial activity, and
application. [30]. Several other investigations have found that other
Ch nanocomposites, such as diisocyanate, quaternized, metal
oxide, and carboxymethyl modified Ch nanocomposites, had
improved antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gramnegative
bacteria. Antibacterial coatings made from the synthetic
nanocomposites can be used in a variety of biomedical applications
[31].
Because of the effects of MW and the degree of acetylation of
Ch, the antifungal action of Ch differs depending on the fungus.
Ch has antifungal properties against a variety of phytopathogenic
fungus, including Botrytis cinerea, which is found in cucumber
plants [32], This activity, which inhibits growth, spore germination,
and tube elongation, is thought to be fungistatic rather than
fungicidal. The mechanism of action involves cell wall morphogenesis,
which directly inhibits cell proliferation. Furthermore, Ch
is thought to act faster on fungi than bacteria [33]. Because of the
quantity of free amino groups that contribute to antimicrobial action,
deacetylation (DA) of Ch has an impact on its antimicrobial
activity. When a result, it's thought that activity rises as DA falls
[34].
Electrospun fibres made of cross-linked collagen and Ch were
found to increase wound healing and tissue regeneration when
compared to gauze and collagen dressings in a study by Chen et
al., [35]. Qasim et al. produced an electrospun Ch fibre with polyethylene
oxide for periodontal disease, reporting that the fibres could be used as surface layers that mimicked local tissue structure
while also regenerating the wound site [36]. Sponges are flexible
materials with strong fluid absorption and hydrophilicity, but
they are mechanically weak when it comes to maintaining their
shape until new tissue grows. As a result, they can be utilised as
burn dressings. We created and characterised a Ch–gelatin sponge
wound dressing. The sponge outperformed penicillin in antibacterial
activity against E. coli K88 and cefradine in antibacterial
activity against Streptococcus [37].
There have been numerous published uses for Ch-based nanosystems
in cancer delivery, including breast, colon, lung, brain,
and other malignancies [38]. In 2011, Venkatesan et al., published
encouraging results from mouse–human xenograft models for the
use of a hydroxyapatite–Ch nanosystem as a transporter and delivery
agent for celecoxib and other medicines, with the goal of
treating colon cancer [39]. Xu et al., also announced possible results
for a ChNP modified with tripolyphosphate (TPP) to deliver
interleukin-12 in 2012. (IL-12) [40].
ChNPs have a variety of biomedical applications. They can be
used to distribute doxorubicin (DOX), an anticancer medication
used to treat a variety of cancers, in a regulated manner. DOX
is a drug that is commonly used to treat cancers such acute leukaemia,
lymphomas, soft-tissue and osteogenic sarcomas, paediatric
malignancies, and adult solid tumours like breast and lung
carcinomas. Methotrexate, cisplatin, ifosfamide, vincristine, and
etoposide are some of the other medications that are used alongside
it [41].
Nanoparticles are constructed into drug delivery platforms for
the treatment of a wide range of disorders, as well as scaffolds for
tissue engineering, in the field of drug delivery and therapeutics.
Because of its cationic functionality and aqueous media solubility,
chitosan is one of the most widely used natural polymers in
the field of drug administration [42]. Ch is easily eliminated after
administration by renal clearance; however, this only applies to Ch
with a suitable molecular weight. For Ch with a very big molecular
weight, enzyme degradation is required. The most widely used
applications of Ch nanoparticles in drug delivery aim to reduce
drug side effects, control drug delivery rate, and ensure that only
the targeted area is treated [43].
ChNPs have attracted attention as a therapeutic delivery item
because of their utility in storing protein treatments, as well as
genetic and unfavourable tumour chemical therapeutics, via oral,
nasal, and intravenous routes. Due to the positive charge of NPs,
which gives them the advantage of high affinity for negatively
charged cell membranes, the impacted site-specific delivery of
this Ch medicinal conveyance entity is unusually greater [44]. The
hydrophobic property of Ch has an impact on how well hydrophilic
medicines are encapsulated in ChNPs. ChNPs also have the
advantage of increasing drug permeability across absorptive epithelia
by breaking intercellular tight junctions by transporting tight
junction proteins from the plasma membrane to the cytoskeleton.
[45]. Ch's anti-inflammatory properties are derived from its acid
hydrolysis to glucosamine hydrochloride and its derivatives. The
structural units of proteoglycans are monosaccharides present in
connective tissues and cartilage. Damaged or inflamed tissues can
be repaired and regenerated by absorbing these monosaccharides.
[46].
Because the NPs are absorbed into the cells via endocytosis, they
can transfer biologically active molecules into cells without jeopardising
the cargo or the cell's integrity [47]. At concentrations
of 100 L/mL, Ch–DNA complexes of 50–100 nm in size were
efficiently transfected into HeLa cells within an hour of exposure
without causing cellular damage. At the same doses, the control
polyethylenimine–DNA complexes were found to cause cytotoxicity.
This is a significant benefit since the introduction of biopharmaceuticals
necessitates benign delivery systems that can preserve
delicate biologics like proteins and DNA from enzymatic
and chemical degradation [48]. ChNPs can interact with negatively
charged DNA and create a polyelectrolyte complex during
gene delivery. When DNA was incorporated in these complexes,
nuclease degradation was found to be inefficient, resulting in improved
transfection efficiency [49].
ChNPs have shown promise as drug delivery vehicles and diagnostic
materials in vivo. However, understanding how NPs interact
with cells and organs is critical for ensuring their safety in
clinical and environmental settings. In our and other laboratories,
zebrafish embryos were employed as an in vivo model to assess
nanoparticle biocompatibility. The zebrafish model can be used to
evaluate nanoparticle toxicity on various levels, including mortality,
teratogenic impact, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and genotoxicity.
This model has been used in a number of investigations on
Ch nanotoxicology. The toxicities of different sizes of ChNPs,
were investigated using zebrafish embryos and observed some
mild toxic changes [50].
Conclusion
There is limited awareness amongst dental students about use of
Chitosan nanoparticles therapy in medical applications. Enhanced
awareness initiatives and dental educational programmes together
with increased importance for curriculum improvements that further
promote knowledge and awareness of Chitosan nanoparticles
therapy.
References
-
[1]. Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review
on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and
regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018 Apr 3;9:1050-1074. Pubmed
PMID: 29719757.
[2]. Jin S, Ye K. Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery and gene therapy. Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Jan-Feb;23(1):32-41. Pubmed PMID: 17269667.
[3]. Chan WC, editor. Bio-applications of Nanoparticles. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009 Sep 29.
[4]. Abdal Dayem A, Hossain MK, Lee SB, Kim K, Saha SK, Yang GM, Choi HY, Cho SG. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Biological Activities of Metallic Nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):120. Pubmed PMID: 28075405.
[5]. Hirakawa K, Hirano T. Singlet oxygen generation photocatalyzed by TiO2 particles and its contribution to biomolecule damage. Chemistry Letters. 2006 Aug;35(8):832-3.
[6]. Behnam MA, Emami F, Sobhani Z, Dehghanian AR. The application of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in the photo-thermal therapy of melanoma cancer model. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018 Nov;21(11):1133-1139. Pubmed PMID: 30483386.
[7]. Chakraborti S, Chakraborti T, Das SK, Chattopadhyay D. Oxidative Stress in Lung Diseases: Volume 1. Springer Nature; 2019. 491 p.
[8]. Schins RP. Mechanisms of genotoxicity of particles and fibers. Inhal Toxicol. 2002 Jan;14(1):57-78. Pubmed PMID: 12122560.
[9]. Hemalatha R, Ganapathy D. Disinfection of Dental Impression- A Current Overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016 Jul;8(7):661–4.
[10]. Ramya G, Pandurangan K, Ganapathy D. Correlation between anterior crowding and bruxism-related parafunctional habits. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Oct 15;12(10).
[11]. Anjum AS, Ganapathy D, Kumar K. Knowledge of the awareness of dentists on the management of burn injuries on the face. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Sep 1;11(9).
[12]. Inchara R, Ganapathy D, Kumar PK. Preference of antibiotics in pediatric dentistry. Drug Invent Today. 2019 Jun 15;11:1495-8.
[13]. Philip JM, Ganapathy DM, Ariga P. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of a polyvinyl acetate-based resilient liner following various denture base surface pre-treatment methods and immersion in artificial salivary medium: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):298-301. Pubmed PMID: 23293485.
[14]. Gupta A, Dhanraj M, Sivagami G. Implant surface modification: review of literature. The Internet Journal of Dental Science. 2009;7(1):10.
[15]. Indhulekha V, Ganapathy D, Jain AR. Knowledge and awareness on biomedical waste management among students of four dental colleges in Chennai, India. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):32-41.
[16]. Mohamed Usman JA, Ayappan A, Ganapathy D, Nasir NN. Oromaxillary prosthetic rehabilitation of a maxillectomy patient using a magnet retained two-piece hollow bulb definitive obturator; a clinical report. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:190180. Pubmed PMID: 23533823.
[17]. Ganapathy DM, Joseph S, Ariga P, Selvaraj A. Evaluation of the influence of blood glucose level on oral candidal colonization in complete denture wearers with Type-II Diabetes Mellitus: An in vivo Study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Jan;10(1):87-92. Pubmed PMID: 23878569.
[18]. Menon A, Ganapathy DM, Mallikarjuna AV. Factors that influence the colour stability of composite resins. Drug Invention Today. 2019 Mar 1;11(3).
[19]. Dhanraj G, Rajeshkumar S. Anticariogenic Effect of Selenium Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Brassica oleracea. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2021 Jul 10;2021.
[20]. Ganapathy D, Department of Prostodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, – C, India. Nanobiotechnology in combating CoVid-19 [Internet]. Vol. 16, Bioinformation. 2020. p. 828–30. Available from:
[21]. Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:942916. Pubmed PMID: 24027766.
[22]. Thannickal VJ, Fanburg BL. Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2000 Dec 1;279(6):L1005-28. [23]. Snezhkina AV, Kudryavtseva AV, Kardymon OL, Savvateeva MV, Melnikova NV, Krasnov GS, Dmitriev AA. ROS Generation and Antioxidant Defense Systems in Normal and Malignant Cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019 Aug 5;2019:6175804. Pubmed PMID: 31467634.
[24]. Foster HA, Ditta IB, Varghese S, Steele A. Photocatalytic disinfection using titanium dioxide: spectrum and mechanism of antimicrobial activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jun;90(6):1847-68. Pubmed PMID: 21523480.
[25]. Sakai H, Ito E, Cai RX, Yoshioka T, Kubota Y, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration change of T24 cell under irradiation in the presence of TiO2 ultrafine particles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Nov 11;1201(2):259-65. Pubmed PMID: 7947940.
[26]. Kubota Y, Shuin T, Kawasaki C, Hosaka M, Kitamura H, Cai R, Sakai H, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A. Photokilling of T-24 human bladder cancer cells with titanium dioxide. Br J Cancer. 1994 Dec;70(6):1107-11. Pubmed PMID: 7981061.
[27]. Yang CC, Wang CX, Kuan CY, Chi CY, Chen CY, Lin YY, Chen GS, Hou CH, Lin FH. Using C-doped TiO2 Nanoparticles as a Novel Sonosensitizer for Cancer Treatment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;9(9):880. Pubmed PMID: 32957611.
[28]. Canaparo R, Foglietta F, Giuntini F, Francovich A, Serpe L. The bright side of sound: perspectives on the biomedical application of sonoluminescence. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;19(9):1114-1121. Pubmed PMID: 32685951.
[29]. Sioutas C, Delfino RJ, Singh M. Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and implications in epidemiologic research. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):947-55. Pubmed PMID: 16079062.
[30]. Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, Oberley T, Sioutas C, Yeh JI, Wiesner MR, Nel AE. Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett. 2006 Aug;6(8):1794-807. Pubmed PMID: 16895376.