Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitude of Child Abuse among School Children in Chennai City - A Cross Sectional Study
Suba Arockiaraj1, Trophimus Gnanabagyan Jayakaran2*, Chithra Sivakumar3
1 Intern, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai – 600089, Tamilnadu, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai– 600089, Tamilnadu, India.
3 Intern, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai – 600089, Tamilnadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Trophimus Gnanabagyan Jayakaran,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai– 600089, Tamilnadu,
India.
Tel: 9600164837
E-mail: trophy.2000@gmail.com
Received: July 28, 2021; Accepted: August 30, 2021; Published: September 04, 2021
Citation: Suba Arockiaraj, Trophimus Gnanabagyan Jayakaran, Chithra Sivakumar. Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitude of Child Abuse among School Children in Chennai City - A Cross Sectional Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9):4280-4283. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000871
Copyright: Dr. Gowrish S©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background: Child abuse is a major public health problem impairingthe health and welfare of children and adolescents
worldwide. Child abuse can happen at home, in organizations, schools or communities the child interacts, which can affect a
child’s personal, social or psychological development leaving the child with psychological scars for lifetime. Sparse information
is available about the knowledge of school children about Child abuse.
Aim: To assess the knowledge and attitude of Child Abuse among school children in Chennai City.
Methods: Thestudy was conducted among 172school goingchildren between 12 and 14 years whowere asked to complete
a11-item structured questionnaire consisting of questionsregarding their knowledge and attitude on Child abuse.
Results: Out of 172 children, 65% were awareabout child abuse but only 10% of them knew about its signs and symptoms.
Physical abuse(68.2%) was regarded as the most common type of abuse. Majority of children (91.7%) wanted more information
and education on child abuse.
Conclusion: School children lack the knowledge about the signs and symptoms, and theprevention of child abuse. Thus there
is a need of gaining more information about Child abuse.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
Child Abuse; Physical Abuse; Emotional Abuse; Child Helpline.
Introduction
Childhood is the formative period in human life, where most of
the personality development takes place during this golden period.[
1-3] A Child’s mind is very soft, receptive and plastic with fine
and long-lasting impressions.[4] During childhood, an individual
may encounter certain unforgettable trauma of which child abuse
being one of it.[5]
Child abuse or maltreatment is any kind of physical, sexual, and/
or psychological maltreatment or neglect of a child or children,
especially by parent or caregiver.[6] Child abuse may include any
act or failure to act by a parent or a caregiver that results in actual
or potential harm to a child, and can occur in a child’s home, or
in the organizations, schools or communities in which thechild
interacts.[6]
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines child abuse and
maltreatment as “all forms of physical and/or emotional ill-treatment,
sexual abuse, neglect or negligent treatment or commercial
or other exploitation, resulting in actual or potential harm to the
child’s health, survival development or dignity in the context of a
relationship of responsibility, trust or power.[7] According to the
WHO an estimate of 40 million children worldwide are victims
of child abuse every year.[8]
In India about 37% of children belong to the age under 18 years. [9] In 2007 the Ministry of Women and Child Development conducted
a National Survey on child abuse in India and reported
that 53% of the children experienced sexual abuse and 20% reported
severe sexual abuse.[10] It is studied, that children who are
abused showed less confidence and low self-esteem and decline
in the intellectual functioning due to their attachment disturbance
and subsequent lack of emotion competence in many situations.
[11] Child abuse cases remain unreported for numerous reasons
such as lack of awareness, fear of being accused, parental desire
to curb publicity, fear to handle police and court cases.[4]
In literature there are numerous studies conducted about the
knowledge and awareness of Child abuse among medical professionals,
school teachers and parents in India, [4, 6, 12-14] but
there are no studies conducted among school children in Chennai.
Child abuse and its threats can be prevented by understanding
the knowledge of children about it and hence the aim of the present
study is to assess the knowledge and attitude of Child Abuse
among school children in Chennai city.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Sample
The present study is a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey
conducted among children attending Government schoolsin
Chennai, which was carried out in January 2020. The study group
was a convenience sample of 172 children, between 12-14 years.
Thesample size was calculated based on previous studies with a
power of 80% using the Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics
for Public Health, OpenEpi, Version 3 software.
Data Collection Tool
A11-item structured questionnaire was formulated consisting of
questions regarding the knowledge and awareness on child abuse
among children.The questionnaire was framed in English and was
validated by a group of experts in the field.
Data Collection Procedure
Consent was obtained from the parents and school authorities
prior to commencement of data collection. The purpose of the
study was explained and the confidentiality of the data was assured.
The questionnaire was distributed among 172 government
school children. The questions were explained to the children in
Tamil language for better understanding. The questionnaires once
filled were collected, tabulated and passed in a blind manner to a
statistician for the analysis of the results.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used to analyse the
statistical differences in response.
Results
Out of 172 children, 93 (54%) were girls and 79 boys (46%) [Table
1]. 65% of the children were aware about child abuse, but only
10% of them knew about its signs and symptoms which was statistically
significant. Physical abuse was the most common type of
abuse according to the children (68.6%) which was not statistically
significant. 80.3% of the children did not encounter any form of
child abuse which was statistically significant. 69.2% of the children
were not aware about the prevention of child abuse. 91.8%
of the children wanted more education and information on child
abuse, which was statistically significant [Table 2].
Discussion
Child maltreatment is a critical public health issue, withlifelong
health consequences not only for the victim but also to theirfamily.[
15] Childhood maltreatment can affect the long-term wellbeing
to a large extent,[16] and children who have suffered abusive
parenting are at a high risk of becoming abusive parents in future.
[17]
This survey was conducted among school children to assess the
knowledge and awareness about child abuse. Understanding the
knowledge of children in this aspect would help correcting the
voids present and raise social awareness about its reporting and
prevention. The present study reported that 65% of the children
were aware of child abuse, but only 10% of them were aware
about its signs and symptoms which include anger, unusual fears,
bruise and scars. Jasmine KP et al., in their study among higher
secondary school children showed that 18% had high awareness,
56% had average awareness and 26% had low awareness on child
abuse.
Physical abuse (68.2%)was regarded as the most common type of
abuse in the present study, followed by emotional abuse (22.6%),
neglect (5.7%) and sexual abuse (3.1%). 41% of the children
chose to report to their parents during an event of abuse. Salzinger
et al., reported that physically abused children were observed
to be more disliked and less popular when compared to
their non-abused counterparts.[18] The relationship of physically abused children with their friends were found to demonstrate
less intimacy, more conflict, and more negative effect than nonabused
children.[19] In the present study 55.2% of the children
agreed that beating was a form of physical abuse, which is in accordance
with a study done by Stephen SS et al., who reported
that 95.3% of children were aware that being hit by the stick,
belt, whip etc., is unacceptable.[3] Bussien et al., reported contrary
results stating that most of the children thought that their abuse
was a normal proceeding.[20]
A large number (80.3%), in the present study responded that
they did not personally encounter any form of abuse. Adolescents
often did not report their abuse for reasons like shame,
fear of the consequences, threat by the abuser and causing distress
to their parents, hence they preferred to maintain it a secret
and assumed that managing the situation was their own responsibility.[
21] Children also would approach an adult if they were
abused, as adults would believe the allegations made by them.[3]
In the present study, children responded that they would report
to their parents (39.5%), Child help line (28.5%), police (22.1%)
and teachers (9.9%) if they were abused. Child helpline play an
integral role in helping children deal with issues like violence at
home, bullying, health, abuse, sexuality, and also make referrals
in case of emergencies.[22] Child helplines are relatively easy and
cost-effective to establish when compared to other formal child
protection reporting centres like schools, police, child protection
authorities or health care centres. Child helplines provide a confidential
channel for children to speak openly and receive advice
without confronting the formalities of a child protection system.
[23] Child helplines also present the opportunity to capture cases
of violence from particularly vulnerable populations of children
who have very limited access to, or are afraid to reach out to, formal
reporting centres.[23] Data reveal that over 3 million counselling
contacts were received by child helplines from 84 countries/
territories in 2017 and 2018, out of which the most common
reason for call was abuse and violence in Africa, America and
Caribbean region. It was the second most commonly cited reason
in the Middle East and North Africa and third in Europe
and the Asia-Pacific region.[23] In the present study 54.1% of
the children were unaware about the child helpline. Crisma et al.,
reported that adolescents were either ignorant about the existence
of social and health services and the type of help they provide or
had wrong information about these services.[21]
This study reported that 69.2% of the children were not aware
about the prevention of child abuse. Organizations like American
Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), and the HarvardCenter on the Developing Child directly associate child maltreatment prevention to
strengthening families, improving developmental outcomes, and
promotion of child and family safety, stability and nurturance.[24]
Majority of the children (91.7%) wanted more information and
education on child abuse. Children participating in school-based
child abuse programs had a better knowledge on it.[25] Rispens
et al., in their study concluded that programmes which focus on
skill training, allowing sufficient time for children to integrate selfprotection
skills into their cognitive repertoire were preferred by
school children.[26]
Conclusion
Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that
school children lack the knowledge about the signs and symptoms,
the prevention and the reporting personal after an abuse.
There is also a need in gaining more information andknowledge
about Child abuse. This can be achieved by including topics on
child abuse in their school curriculum and conduction schoolbased
child abuse awareness programmes.
Author Contributions
Author 1 (SubaArockiaraj) – Conception of topic, data collection
and manuscript preparation. Author 2 (TrophimusGnanabagyan-
Jayakaran) -Conception of topic, study design, reviewed and edited
the manuscript.Author 3 (Chithra Sivakumar)– Study design,
data collection and manuscript preparation. All the authors have
equally contributed in developing the manuscript.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the support rendered
by the Head Master of Government Higher Secondary School,
Porur, Chennai and all the faculty from the Department of Pediatric
and Preventive Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram,
Chennai.
References
-
[1]. Caspi A, Roberts BW, Shiner RL. Personality development: Stability and
change. Annu Rev Psychol 2005;56:453-84.PubmedPMID: 15709943.
[2]. Cohen P. Child development and personality disorder. PsychiatrClin North Am 2008;31:477-93, vii.Pubmed PMID: 18638647.
[3]. Stephen SS, Krishnan G, Pinni J, Moses J. Knowledge and awareness of child abuse and neglect among children in Pondicherry.Int J Forensic Odontol 2019;4:50-3.
[4]. Jasmine KP, Hameed A. Child abuse awareness among higher secondary school students. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education 2016;6(4):75-79.
[5]. Evans R, Garner P, Honig AS. Prevention of violence, abuse and neglect in early childhood: a review of the literature on research, policy and practice. Early Child Dev Care. 2014;184:9–10 1295-1335.
[6]. Sharma Y, Mathur K. Assessment of knowledge and attitude about child abuse amongst parents visiting rural tertiary care hospital in central India. J Family Med Prim Care2019;8:3525-30.PubmedPMID: 31803646.
[7]. Bailhache M, Leroy V, Pillet P, Salmi LR. Is early detection of abused children possible?: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused children. BMC Pediatr 2013;13:202.PubmedPMID: 24314318.
[8]. World Health Organization. Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Making the Links Between Human Rights and Public: Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
[9]. Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India. Census of India New Delhi2011 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in.
[10]. KackerLoveleen, VardanSrinivas, Kumar P. Study on Child Abuse: India 2007 Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India, 2007.
[11]. Alshawi AF, Lafta RK. Relation between childhood experiences and adults’ self-esteem: A sample from Baghdad. Qatar Med J. 2014;2014:1-10.PubmedPMID: 25745597.
[12]. Shankar P, Agrawal A, Akash BK, Kumar M. Assessment of knowledge and attitude about child abuse amongst parents visiting a tertiary care hospital in Bengaluru, India. Int J ContempPediatr 2020;7:1105-9.
[13]. Saxena Y, Nanjundappa V, Sreedhar S, Reddy C. Assessment of child abuse at ground and grassroot level: a KAP study among anganwadi workers and auxiliary nurse midwives in Bangalore. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2015;4:669-673.
[14]. Preethy NA, Somasundaram S. Awareness of child abuse and neglect among working parents in Chennai, India: A knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:602-8.PubmedPMID: 32318389.
[15]. Rees CA. Understanding emotional abuse. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Jan;95(1):59–67.PubmedPMID: 20040686.
[16]. Hendaus MA, Al-Khuzaei AM, Samarah O, Hamad SG, Selim BA, El Ansari W. Child abuse and neglect in a rapidly developing country: Parents' perspectives. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:3053-9.PubmedPMID: 32984172.
[17]. Plate RC, Bloomberg Z, Bolt DM, Bechner AM, Roeber BJ, Pollak SD. Abused children experience high anger exposure. Front Psychol 2019;10:440. PubmedPMID: 30890983.
[18]. Salzinger S, Feldman R. S, Hammer M, Rosario M. The effects of physical abuse on children's social relationships. Child Development 1993;64(1):169–187.PubmedPMID: 11771909.
[19]. Parker JG, Herrera C. Interpersonal processes in friendship: a comparison of abused and nonabused children’s experiences. DevPsychol 1996;32:1025– 38.
[20]. Bussien T. Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention. New York: MacMillan; 2011.
[21]. Crisma M, Bascelli E, Paci D, Romito P. Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: Fears, needs and impediments to disclosure. Child Abuse Negl 2004;28:1035-48.PubmedPMID: 15519434.
[22]. Van Dolen W, Weinberg CB. An Empirical Investigation of Factors Affecting Perceived Quality and Well-Being of Children Using an Online Child Helpline. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 21;16(12):2193. PubmedPMID: 31234285.
[23]. Petrowski N, Cappa C, Pereira A, Mason H, Daban RA. Violence against children during COVID-19: Assessing and understanding change in use of helplines. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 2):104757.PubmedPMID: 33593632.
[24]. Lane WG. Prevention of child maltreatment. PediatrClin North Am. 2014 Oct;61(5):873-88. PubmedPMID: 25242703.
[25]. Davis MK, Gidycz CA. Child sexual abuse prevention programs: A meta-analysis. J Clin Child Psychol 2000;29:257-65.PubmedPMID: 10802834.
[26]. Rispens J, Aleman A, Goudena PP. Prevention of child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analysis of school programs. Child Abuse & Neglect 1997;21(10):975-98.