SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-9010

Effectiveness Of Anti-Inflammatory Properties Of Combination Of Bromelain,Trypsin And Rutoside With Combination Of Diclofenac And Serratiopeptidase Following Surgical Removal Of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Randomised Double Blinded Clinical Trial


Vivek D. Menon1, M R Muthusekhar2*

1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, TamilNadu, India.
2 Professor and Head of Department, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.


*Corresponding Author

Dr. M R Muthusekhar,
Professor and Head of Department, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, 162, PH Road, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: Muthusekar@saveetha.combr/>
Received: June 16, 2021; Accepted: August 29, 2021; Published: September 03, 2021

Citation:Vivek .D. Menon, M R Muthusekhar. Effectiveness Of Anti-Inflammatory Properties Of Combination Of Bromelain,Trypsin And Rutoside With Combination Of Diclofenac And Serratiopeptidase Following Surgical Removal Of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Randomised Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(9): 4217-4221. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000859

Copyright:Dr. M R Muthusekhar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Background: The surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most performed Dento-alveolar procedures, associated with varying degrees of postoperative discomfort. Pharmacologic strategies for minimizing the clinical manifestations of surgical injury are therefore, logically directed at blocking the formation or inhibiting the effects of mediators of acute inflammation. NSAIDs are being used very extensively all over the world but their chronic use may lead to side effects such as gastric ulcers and liver kidney damage. Considering these facts, the use of drugs of natural origin with lesser hazards is a positive alternative. Bromelain, Rutoside and Trypsin are known to have a very promising role in relieving inflammation and promote wound healing.

Materials and Methods:The study was conducted on 60 patients of either sex between the age group of 18-40 years who required surgical removal of mandibular impacted 3rd molars. Group 1:- comprising 15 patients received the drug combination of bromelain 90mg, trypsin 48mg, rutoside 100mg(Phlogam)for three times a day for three days. Group 2:- comprising 15 patients received diclofenac 50 mg and serratiopeptidase 10 mg(Lyser -D) for three times a day for three days. Measurement of facial swelling, was made pre operatively and on the first, third and seventh postoperative day. Pain was evaluated from the patient's response to visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: Group 2 with Diclofenac and serratiopeptidase (Lyser-D) showed a significant reduction in pain score when compared with Group 1 (Phlogam)at all time intervals. Significant difference was seen in reduction of facial swelling in Group 1 (Phlogam) when compared to Group 2(Lyser -D).

Conclusion: Bromelain and other proteolytic enzymes can be considered as an effective alternative to NSAIDs in reducing the postoperative sequelae associated with surgical extraction of third molars and causing less health hazards. Diclofenac offers superior analgesia when compared to Bromelain.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References


Keywords

Mandibular Third Molar Surgery; Trypsin; Bromelain; Rutoside; Diclofenac Sodium; Serratiopeptidase; Swelling; Trismus; Pain.


Introduction

Surgical removal of mandibular third molar teeth under local anaesthesia is widely administered and is typically related to postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, as direct and immediate consequences of the surgery [1]. Postoperative pain following third molar surgery results from trauma to bone and soft tissue. Management of post¬operative pain may be a challenging task for the surgeons in these patients [2].

Mandibular third molar surgeries are widely used, validated and a highly standardized model as acute pain model for evaluating analgesic efficacy of the drug utilized in acute pain control [3]. It allows examination of the peripheral and central nervous system pathways involved within the pathophysiology of pain and its treatment after acute tissue injury. Analgesics like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug drugs Opioids are commonly used for postoperative pain management.

In order to avoid or minimize post-surgical complications, like pain, swelling, and trismus, surgeons have either modified surgical techniques, like using lasers and cryotherapy, or advised the patients to use proteolytic enzymes, like trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain, serratiopeptidase, and bromelain (pineapple enzyme), alongside routine antibiotics, analgesics, and corticosteroids [4]. The advantages of administering enzymes after surgical procedures demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo are anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and fibrinolytic, thereby minimizing postoperative complications [5].

The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare the anti- inflammatory properties of combination of bromelain, trypsin and rutoside (Phlogam) with the combination of diclofenac and serratiopeptidase (Lyser-D) following surgical removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molar in terms of reducing postoperative pain, facial swelling and improvement in mouth opening.

Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various research projects across multiple disciplines [6-20]. Now the growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.


Materials and Methods

The study was carried out in an institutional setting with the advantage being a large data availability and the disadvantage being assessment of patients belonging to a similar geographic location. A retrospective study was done using the case records of patients visiting University hospital from June 2019 - February 2020. Prior permission to use the data for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University (SDC/SIHEC/2020/ DIASDATA/0619-0320).

A total of 38 case sheets containing information on benign migratory syndrome were retrieved and the demographics of the data analysed. The collected data was subjected to photographic cross verification. The data collected was statistically analysed using SPSS Version 20.0. Descriptive statistics and chi square tests were performed. A p value of less than 0.05% was considered to be statistically significant.

Sixty outpatients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, for surgical extraction of impacted third molars were randomly selected for a double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of combination of Trypsin, Bromelain, Rutoside and Diclofenac sodium, Serratiopeptidasecombination. Patients above 25 years requiring mandibular third molar surgery with ASA Physical status I and II were selected for the study. Patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2 were randomly assigned with the assigned code Group 1(Phlogam) and Group 2(Lyser-D).

Inclusion criteria

• Patients in the age group of 17-45 years
• Patients with unilateral/bilateral impacted mandibular third molars diagnosed for surgical extraction.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with known severe systemic diseases contraindicating tooth extraction.
• Known mentally challenged patients, and patients who are unable to communicate.
• Pregnant and lactating women
• Patients on anticoagulant therapy
• Patients allergic to bromelain
• Immunocompromised patients.

All drugs were dispersed in the form of packets. Patients were taken up for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar under standardized local anaesthetic technique and surgical procedure. The study being Double-blinded, the operating surgeon was not aware of the drug dispensed by the controller to the patient’s postoperatively neither did the patients nor the investigators aware of the drug given. The codes of the drugs were disclosed to the investigator by the controller after the pain assessment. Post-operatively pain assessment was done with the help of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).Swelling was assessed by means of twopoint measurement of soft tissue(tragus-pogonion distance). All the parameters were assessed on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day postoperatively and using the above-mentioned methods the results of the two groups were compared and statistically analysed. Paracetamol 500mg combination was given as a rescue medication. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 15.0 Statistical Analysis Software. The values were represented in mean ± SD.

Surgical Procedure

Isolation of the surgical field was accomplished. Patients were administered local anaesthetic 2% Lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 epinephrine and the area was anesthetized using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique. Ward’s incision was placed using a standard No.15 blade and muco-periosteal flap was then raised. Bone guttering and tooth sectioning was then completed using a No.702 SL (Surgical Length) Taper Fissure Crosscut Carbide bur.Tooth was then elevated and extracted from the socket, the extraction socket was irrigated with saline and primary closure of the surgical wound was done with 3-0 silk suture. After surgery Post extraction instructions were given to the patients, Antibiotics prescribed, and the coded study drugs were given to the patients immediately after surgery postoperatively. Patients were recalled after seven days for suture removal. The individual parameters such as swelling, pain, trismus were recorded on 1st day,3rd and 7th day postoperatively.


Results

Of all the 60 patients studied divided into 2 groups, we found that in Group 1 (PHLOGAM), 30 patients with a mean age of 27.4 years, included 20 males (66.7%) and 10 females (33.3%) who received the tablet orally immediately after surgery and 12 hours after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar surgery. In Group 2 (Lyser-D) 30 patients with a mean age of 31.6 years, included 17 females (56.7%) and 13 males (43.3%),as shown in Fig 1, received the tablet combination of diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase orally immediately after surgery and 12 hours after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The mean value of swelling for Group 1 pre operatively was found to be 14.57cm (SD: 0.94),on day one mean distance was 15.36 cm (SD: 0.89), on day 3 mean distance was 15.13 cm (SD: 0.99), and on day 7 mean distance was 14.64 cm (SD: 0.95).The mean value of swelling for Group 2 pre operatively was found to be 14.57cm(SD:0.94),on day 1 mean distance was 16.53 cm (SD: 0.96), on day 3 mean distance was 16.13 cm (SD: 1.03), and on day 7 mean distance was 15.57 cm (SD: 0.93).Swelling was more in Combination of Diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase when compared to combination of Rutoside, Bromelain and Trypsin, as shown in Table 1.Mean value of pain was more in group 1(Phlogam) compared to group 2 (Lyser - D), as shown in Table 2.



Figure 1. Gender distribution in the present study.



Table 1. Swelling measurements on pre op, 1st, 3rd and 7th day.



Table 2. VAS score on 1st, 3rd and 7th day post operatively.


Discussion

The common problems patients complain of after the surgical removal of impacted teeth are pain, swelling, and trismus. Various measures like application of ice, analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents, and proteolytic enzymes are practiced attenuating these complications. Bromelain may be a blend of enzymes extracted from the stem and fruit of pineapple, pineapple , and is understood for its proteolytic action [6]. It belongs to a family of sulfhydryl proteolytic enzymes, which also contain components like acid phosphatase, peroxidase, many protease inhibitors, and organically bound calcium [7]. It is prepared by centrifugation, ultrafiltration, and lyophilisation of fruit juice .In the past, studies were conducted to work out the effect of orally administered bromelain in reducing the postsurgical complications; these studies suggested few mechanisms of actions like the subsequent Altering pain mediators like bradykinin Inhibiting the synthesis of pro¬inflammatory prostaglandins, mainly PGE2 Its fibrinolytic action aids within the reabsorption of oedema into the blood circulation Overall, it had been found to be effective in reducing pain, swelling, and healing time [8]. However, its actions are found to vary in several persons and different tissues within the same person.

Several clinical studies are administered to work out the therapeutic uses of bromelain, and it's been found to be effective in minimizing the severity of angina and transient ischemic attack, osteoarthritis, autoimmune diseases, diarrhoea, cancer (by activating apoptosis), renal diseases, and respiratory diseases like asthma, sinusitis, and eosinophilia. The opposite significant advantage of bromelain is that it enhances the permeability of antibiotics like penicillin and tetracycline, thereby increasing their absorption. Even though studies have shown bromelain to possess exceptionally low toxicity, its Ige mediated allergenic potential can't be underestimated. it is recommended to administer bromelain before food and daily dosage should be 750–1000 mg/day in divided doses.

The aim of present study is to evaluate and compare the anti- inflammatory properties of combination of bromelain, trypsin and rutoside (Phlogam) with the combination of diclofenac and serratiopeptidase (Lyser-D) following surgical removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molar in terms of reducing postoperative pain, facial swelling and improvement in mouth opening.

Hozt et al. [9] during a test study measured the space between tragus and pogonion to estimate swelling after administration of placebo and bromelain (80 mg thrice daily for six days) after the extraction of third molars. They found a discount in swelling. We also found equivalent results, however, the dose administered in our study was 200 mg twice each day (400 mg).

Inchingolo et al. [10] and de la Barrera-Nunez et al. also found a discount in postoperative swelling after the extraction of third molars by using bromelain. They used bromelain in doses of 240 mg for six days and 150 mg for 3 days. Majid et al. [11] compared the efficiency of bromelain and diclofenac sodium after surgical removal of lower third molars and found significant reduction in pain in both the groups. They supported the effectiveness of bromelain in reducing postoperative pain, swelling, and postoperative life.

In our study we found thatSwelling was more in Combination of Diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase when compared to combination of Rutoside,Bromelain and Trypsin. The mean value of trismus that was measured was more in Diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase when compared to Combination of Trypsin, Bromelain and Rutoside respectively. Mean value of pain was more in group 1(Phlogam) compared to group 2 (Lyser - D) We recommend further such studies on a larger sample size and using placebo as controls to determine the effectiveness of bromelain in reducing pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars, so that we can utilize its multi therapeutic benefits. There is also a need to conduct studies comparing different routes of administration as well as different doses of bromelain in altering pain and swelling after third molars removal.

Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based research and has excelled in various fields [27-37].


Conclusion

Bromelain and other proteolytic enzymes can be considered as an effective alternative to NSAIDs in reducing the postoperative sequelae associated with surgical extraction of third molars and causing less health hazards. Diclofenac offers superior analgesia when compared to Bromelain.


References

    [1]. ANI,Newer covid symptoms you should know. Mint. 2021, April, 10.
    [2]. Corchuelo J, Ulloa FC. Oral manifestations in a patient with a history of asymptomatic COVID-19: Case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:154- 157.Pubmed PMID: 32882435.
    [3]. Dos Santos JA, Normando AG, da Silva RL, De Paula RM, Cembranel AC, Santos-Silva AR, et al. Oral mucosal lesions in a COVID-19 patient: New signs or secondary manifestations?. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 1;97:326-8.
    [4]. Froum, S. Top 5 oral manifestations of COVID-19. Perio-Impant Advisory. 2020, December 3.
    [5]. Halboub E, Al-Maweri SA, Alanazi RH, Qaid NM, Abdulrab S. Orofacial manifestations of COVID-19: a brief review of the published literature. Braz Oral Res. 2020 Oct 30;34:e124.Pubmed PMID: 33146320.
    [6]. Haseltine, W. A. What Are The 677 Mutations? New Covid-19 Variants Found In The US. Forbes. 2021, February 19.
    [7]. Harris, K. (2021, January 22). Is my sore throat COVID-19 or not? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.osfhealthcare.org/blog/is-my-sore-throatcovid- 19-or-not/
    [8]. How Many New Coronavirus Variants Are There? (2021, March 12). Retrieved from https://www.healthline.com/health/how-many-strains-of-covid- are-there#bottom-line
    [9]. IANS, (2021, February 23). India detects over 24,000 mutations in 7,000 variants of Covid. The Economic Times. https://health.economictimes. indiatimes.com/news/diagnostics/india-detects-over-24000-mutations-in- 7000-variants-of-covid/81169132
    [10]. Iranmanesh B, Khalili M, Amiri R, Zartab H, Aflatoonian M. Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: A review article. Dermatol. Ther. 2020 Jan;34(1):e14578.
    [11]. Lozada-Nur F, Chainani-Wu N, Fortuna G, Sroussi H. Dysgeusia in COVID- 19: possible mechanisms and implications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Sep;130(3):344.
    [12]. Lubell, J. Is the Presence of Enanthem a Clue for COVID-19?. Medscape. 2020, July 24.
    [13]. Pandey, K. How are symptoms of new COVID-19 strains and variants different from original coronavirus?. Timesnownews.com. 2021, April 8.
    [14]. Singh CV, Jain S, Parveen S. The outcome of fluticasone nasal spray on anosmia and triamcinolone oral paste in dysgeusia in COVID-19 patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May 1;42(3):102892.
    [15]. World Health Organization. (2020-a, April 23). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 94.
    [16]. World Health Organization. Archived: Who timeline-covid-19. 2020-b, April 27.
    [17]. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19) . 2020-c, November 10.
    [18]. World Health Organization. The effects of virus variants on COVID-19 vaccines. 2021.
    [19]. World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Retrieved April 28, 2021, fromhttps://covid19.who.int/
    [20]. Zahra SA, Iddawela S, Pillai K, Choudhury RY, Harky A. Can symptoms of anosmia and dysgeusia be diagnostic for COVID-19?. Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01839.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn