Endodontic Treatment of Uncommon Morphology of Two-Rooted Mandibular Canine: A Case Report
Almohareb Rahaf1, Aljamie Manar2*, Reem Barakat3
1 Assistant Professor in Endodontics, Clinical Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
2 Resident in Endodontics, Dentistry Department, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
3 Clinical Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Princess NourahBint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
*Corresponding Author
Aljamie Manar,
Resident in Endodontics, Dentistry Department, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: manaraljamie@hotmail.com
Received: May 17, 2021; Accepted: August 11, 2021; Published: August 20, 2021
Citation:Almohareb Rahaf, Aljamie Manar, Reem Barakat. Endodontic Treatment of Uncommon Morphology of Two-Rooted Mandibular Canine: A Case Report. Int J Dentistry
Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):4133-4135. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000844
Copyright:Aljamie Manar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Effective root canal treatment is highly dependent on the clinician’s knowledge and ability to manage abnormal anatomic differences. One root with one canal is the usual appearance of the mandibular canine. This report presents the endodontic management of an uncommon occurrence where the mandibular canine has two roots and two canals.Thirty-year-old Saudi female referred from the prosthodontic clinic for root canal treatment of the lower left canine. All steps were performed within the current state-of-the-art practices in endodontics, starting with appropriate clinical and radiographical interpretation and diagnosis, proper anaesthesia, rubber dam isolation, and dental microscopic and ultrasonic endodontic tips usage to ease access cavity preparation, and canal localization. Distinct debridement and accurate instrumentation of the two root canal systems followed by 3D obturation was performed to promote the effective treatment of such structural abnormalities. A 6-month follow up using CBCT confirmed root anatomy uniqueness in addition lack of pathology.
2.Introduction
3.Conclusion
4.References
Keywords
Anatomical Aberrations; Mandibular Canine; Root Canal Morphology; Two Roots.
Introduction
Canines are the “cornerstone” of the mouth, and the reason behind
this is their efficiency inmastication, stability of dental arch,
and natural facial expression support [1].
The organization and number of root canals in the permanent
mandibular canine has high variation among different studies.
While the prevalence of a single-rootedmandibular canine withtwo
canalsis approximately 15% [2-5], that of tworootedcanines
with twocanals was reported to be only 5% [6, 7].
Successful root canal treatment aims to eradicate microorganisms
from the entire root canal system, complete sealing of the canal
space, and preserve periapical tissue integrity. This demands a full
understanding of root canal morphology [8, 9].
The case report below outlines how a mandibular canine with
unusual morphology including two canals in two separated roots
can be managed.
Case Report
Thirty-year-old Saudi female was referred to the Endodontics
clinics at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Dental
College, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for endodontic management of
the left mandibular canine.The patient was medically fit, unaware
of any allergies nor taking any medications. Clinical examination
revealed a defective restoration with recurring caries. Thermal
pulp vitality tests yielded a negative response, whileresponse topalpation
and percussion were normal. Periodontal pocket depth
was within normal. Radiographic evaluation revealed normal periapical
tissue, however, a loss of the continuity within the middle
third of the canal spacewas noticed (Figure 1), arousing the suspicion
of atypical canal anatomy [10]. Based on the findings, the
diagnosis was necrotic pulp with normal apical tissue, therefore, a
primary root canal treatment was indicated. The tooth would be
restored with post and core followed by crown by the referring
prosthodontist.
After patient consent was obtained, local anaesthesia was given
with epinephrine using infiltration technique. Rubber dam isolation
with clamp no.(9) was placed, and caries and defective restoration
were removed. Access cavity was performed using long
neck round carbide bur: Mueller bur, size Blue (Brasseler; Savannah,
USA). The pulp chamber floor was inspected under the Dental
operating microscope (DOM) (Global Dental Microscopes
A6, Global Surgical Corporation, USA)using a magnification factor
of 1.25 which renders x8 magnification. Two orifices were
found buccally and lingually. Preparation of a straight-line access
was achieved using diamond-coated ultrasonic tips with a taper of
5%: Endo Success ET18D(Satelec;Merignac, France) under the
DOMwhich helped prevent extreme removal of tooth structure.
The orifices were enlarged using orifice openers: Pre-Race 30/0.06
(FKG dentaire S.A., La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), then size
15 k-files(Medin, A.S. Czechia)wasused with an electronic apex
locator Root ZX II (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan) to determine working
length which wasverified radiographically (Figure 2a-d).
Instrumentation was accomplished to size 35/0.04 Profile rotary
system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Sodium hypochlorite
5.25% and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)
17% were used for irrigation combined with the use of the EndoActivator
system kit (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland). Paper
points were used to dry the canals, then Gutta-percha cones (size
35/0.04) along with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues,
Switzerland) were used in continuous wave compaction
technique to seal the two root canal systems threedimensionally.
Periapical radiographs were captured to verify final quality of obturation.
The access cavity was sealed using Glass ionomer cement (GC
Fuji II LC, United states). Then the patient was referred to the
prosthodontic clinic to continue with the prosthetic treatments.
The 6-month follow-up radiograph revealed cast post and core
with a temporary crown. Upon clinical and radiographic examinations
(Periapical radiographs andCone Beam Computed
Tomography(CBCT)), the tooth demonstrated absence of tenderness
or pain and normal periapical tissues (Figure 3a-d).
Discussion
The key to successful root canal treatment depends on appropriate
diagnosis, thorough cleaning, shaping, and tight seal obturation.
Inadequate performance of any step will lead to postoperative
complications, discomfort, and disease. Thus, the clinician must
be familiar with any peculiar anatomy and interpret the preoperative
radiographs exhaustively by taking multiple angles [11, 12].
Several authors studied the structure of the root canal of mandibular
canine. Vaziri et al [13] noted the existence of mandibular
canines with one root and two canals to be 12% using stereomicroscope.
Han et al [14] reported the prevalence of the existence a
two-rooted mandibular canine to be 6.5% using CBCT.Moreover,
Monsarra et al [11] documented the incidence of the same to be
2.5%.Bizarre anatomy like three canals in two or three roots also
have been recorded [15, 16].
In Saudi Arabia, Aldahman et al [17] in 2019 reported the incidence
of having one root with single canal 95.4% and single root
with two canals to be 4.6%, while having two roots and two canals
was only 0.2% using CBCT.
This case presented one such rare occurrence. Pre-operative xrays
alluded to the existence of unusual pulp canal anatomy which
helped prepare the clinician mentally. The fast break of the root
canal that appears in the radiograph indicates a cleave in the root
canal. Inserting a gutta-percha cone or file in the canal that appears eccentric will confirm the presence of this condition [10].
The use of CBCT is a well-designed method to study the root
canal morphology because of its ability to produce a 3D image
with no superimposition and complete morphologic details [17].
CBCT is considered an effective tool in endodontic diagnosis and
follow-up [18].
Inadequate access preparation causes difficulty in locating all
canals which can lead to incomplete removal of bacteria and
non-success of the endodontic treatment [19]. Hoen& Pink [20]
recorded that 42% of endodontically failing teeth had missed
canals.A dental operating microscope is a vital instrument in endodontics
for the diagnosis of different anomalies in the root canal
anatomy [21, 22].
The use of an electronic apex locator gives correct working length
during root canal treatment [23]. Root ZX considered precise
electronic apex locators used for measurement of the root canal
working length [24].
None of the available irrigation techniques completely eliminate
the smear layer existing on the root canal system walls, especially
apically. However, combining the conventional needle irrigation
with EndoActivator was more productive at smear layer removal
than conventional needle irrigation alone [25]. The use of nickeltitanium
(NiTi) endodontic rotary files enables the shaping of the
canals in a shorter time compared to the conventional manual
files, despite the complexities of the case [26].
Figure 1. Multiple angulations of preoperative periapical radiographs of the left mandibular canine.
Figure 3. Postoperative follow-up at six months a) Periapical radiograph b) CBCT sagittal view c) CBCT coronal view d) CBCT axial view.
Conclusion
Despite the limitation of literature reports about the incidence of
mandibular canines with twodistinct roots, clinicians must have
accurate knowledge and full consideration of theunusual alterations
in root canal morphology that can lead to successful endodontic
treatment.
Acknoledgment
This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research
at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the
Fast-track Research Funding Program.
Conflicting Interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest
associated with this publication and there has been no significant
financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
References
-
[1]. Andrei OC, Margarit R, Gheorghiu IM. Endodontic treatment of a mandibular
canine with two roots. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011 Jan 1;52(3):923-
6.
[2]. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972 Jan;33(1):101-10.Pubmed PMID: 4500261.
[3]. Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973 May 1;35(5):689-96.
[4]. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 Nov 1;58(5):589-99.
[5]. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974 Aug 1;89(2):369-71.
[6]. Pécora JD, Sousa Neto MD, Saquy PC. Internal anatomy, direction and number of roots and size of human mandibular canines. Braz Dent J.1993;4(1):53-7. PMID: 8180486.
[7]. Ouellet R. Mandibular permanent cuspids with two roots. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995 Feb 1;61(2):159-61.
[8]. Sjögren UL, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the longterm results of endodontic treatment. J. Endod. 1990 Oct 1;16(10):498- 504.
[9]. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top. 2005 Mar;10(1):3-29.
[10]. Jeong JW, Zegar Z, Liu RY, Makins SR. Radiographic Indications of Vertucci Type V Configuration in the Distal Root of Mandibular Molars: A Case Series. J Endod. 2019 Apr;45(4):453-458.PubmedPMID: 30770281.
[11]. Monsarrat P, Arcaute B, Peters OA, Maury E, Telmon N, Georgelin-Gurgel M, et al. Interrelationships in the Variability of Root Canal Anatomy among the Permanent Teeth: A Full-Mouth Approach by Cone-Beam CT. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):1-13.Pubmed PMID: 27764246.
[12]. Roy DK, Cohen S, Singh VP, Marla V, Ghimire S. Endodontic management of mandibular canine with two roots and two canals: a rare case report. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Feb 8;11(1):8-11. Pubmed PMID: 29422108.
[13]. Bakianian Vaziri P, Kasraee S, Abdolsamadi HR, Abdollahzadeh S, Esmaeili F, Nazari S, et al. Root Canal Configuration of One-rooted Mandibular Canine in an Iranian Population: An In Vitro Study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008 Winter;2(1):28-32.Pubmed PMID: 23285327.
[14]. Han T, Ma Y, Yang L, Chen X, Zhang X, Wang Y. A study of the root canal morphology of mandibular anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1309-14. Pubmed PMID: 25043332.
[15]. Heling I, Gottlieb-Dadon I, Chandler NP. Mandibular canine with two roots and three root canals. Dent Traumatol. 1995 Dec;11(6):301-2. [16]. Orguneser A, Kartal N. Three canals and two foramina in a mandibular canine. J Endod. 1998 Jun;24(6):444-5.Pubmed PMID: 9693593.
[17]. Al-Dahman Y, Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular canines in a Saudi subpopulation. Saudi Endod. J. 2019 May 1;9(2):113- 118.
[18]. Vier-Pelisser FV, Pelisser A, Recuero LC, Só MV, Borba MG, Figueiredo JA. Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis, planning and follow up of a type III dens invaginatus case. Int. Endod. J. 2012 Feb;45(2):198-208.
[19]. Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):144-147.Pubmed PMID: 27011754.
[20]. Hoen MM, Pink FE. Contemporary endodontic retreatments: an analysis based on clinical treatment findings. J. Endod. 2002 Dec 1;28(12):834-6.
[21]. Ashwinkumar V, Nandini S, Velmurugan N. Endodontic management of three-canalled mandibular lateral incisor using dental operating microscope. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jul;11(4):490-4.Pubmed PMID: 25584063.
[22]. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J. Endod. 2008 Jan 1;34(1):87-9.
[23]. Sharma MC, Arora V. Determination of working length of root canal. Med J Armed Forces India. 2010 Jul 1;66(3):231-4.
[24]. Prasad AB, Srivastava H, Srivastava AA, Raisingani D. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators to determine working length in the presence of various irrigants. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016 Sep 19;26(5):457-62.
[25]. Karade P, Johnson A, Baeten J, Chopade R, Hoshing U. Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Using EndoActivator and EndoUltra Activation Systems: An Ex Vivo SEM Analysis. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018 Apr;39(4):e9- e12.Pubmed PMID: 29600868.
[26]. elvas JB, de Carvalho FM, Marques AA, Sponchiado EC Jr, Garcia Lda F. Endodontic Treatment of Maxillary Premolar with Three Root Canals Using Optical Microscope and NiTi Rotatory Files System. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:1-4.Pubmed PMID: 24367728.