Age and Gender Association of Class III Malocclusion among Subjects Reporting to a University Hospital in Chennai City - A Retrospective Study
Jitesh S1, Dr. Ravindra Kumar Jain2*, Dr. Madhu Laxmi M3
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department Of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Ravindra kumar jain,
Associate Professor, Department Of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai
600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: +91 98847 29660
E-mail: ravindrakumar@saveetha.com
Received: July 30, 2021; Accepted: August 11, 2021; Published: August 18, 2021
Citation:Jitesh S, Dr. Ravindra Kumar Jain, Dr. Madhu Laxmi M. Age and Gender Association of Class III Malocclusion among Subjects Reporting to a University Hospital in Chennai City - A Retrospective Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):4128-4132. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000843
Copyright:Dr. Ravindra kumar jain©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Malocclusion is a misalignment or incorrect relation between the teeth of the two dental arches when they approach each other as the jaws close. Class III malocclusion is skeletally characterized by an overgrowth of the mandible (mandibular prognathism), an undergrowth of the maxilla (maxillary deficiency), or a combination of both. The aim of this study was to assess the age and gender association of Class III malocclusion in the outpatient population visiting a Private Dental college. This was a retrospective study done using case records of the outpatient population visiting a Private Dental college. Out of 86,000 patients who reported to dental college, 269 patients who had Class III malocclusion were included in the study. Data about type of class III and other associated factors was recorded and tabulated. Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics and Chi square tests were done. The male predominance (65.8%) was noted. Almost equal distribution among dental (53.5%) and skeletal(46.5%) was noted. Skeletal class III was more common in Adolescents and children compared to dental class III whereas dental Class III was common in adults. There was no statistically significant association between gender and class III malocclusion p value >0.05 and a statistically significant association was found between age group and type of class III malocclusion. Class III malocclusion was most commonly reported in the 19-30 years age group, P value <0.05.Within the limits of the present study, class III malocclusion was more prevalent in males than females and skeletal class III malocclusion was most common in children and adolescents whereas dental class III was common in Adults.
2.Introduction
3.Conclusion
4.References
Keywords
Dental; Malocclusion; Skeletal.
Introduction
Angle classification has prevailed over the last century as a simple,
quantifiable method to test malocclusion prevalence within populations.
However, what Angle defined as a “normal occlusion”
should, in fact, be considered the “ideal” occlusion given the strict
criteria he used in his classification. This ideal occlusion is rather
uncommon and has driven researchers to disagree on how much
deviation from the ideal should be accepted as normal [1, 2].
Class III malocclusion is characterized by an overgrowth of the
mandible (mandibular prognathism), an undergrowth of the maxilla
(maxillary deficiency), or a combination of both [3, 4] The
prevalence of Class III malocclusion has been described between
1% [5, 6] to over 10% [7], depending on ethnic background [5,
6], sex [7, 8] and age [9]. It has been reported that approximately
75% of Class III cases in male Caucasians have a skeletal origin
and are a result of mandibular prognathism or macrognathia
[10, 11]. The prevalence of Class III malocclusion among Caucasian
people ranges from 0.48% to 4% [5, 12, 13]. But compared
to Caucasian people the prevalence of class III malocclusion is
higher in Japanese population. It rises as high as 10% [14, 15]
Diagnosis and treatment of class III malocclusion are choked up
with contradiction in the type, timing and duration of treatment.
To know the exact aetiology of any dentofacial characteristics genetic
evaluation is mandatory. The effects of genetic association
in orthodontic treatment are poorly understood [16, 17].
Although there has been extensive literature concerning the genetic
basis of the dentofacial abnormalities and malocclusions,
data provided by these studies were quite sparse [18, 19]. Furthermore,
surveys dealing with genetics constituted only 0.5% of the
total in orthodontic journals since the 1980's [20, 21]. To date,
many investigations have focused largely on treatment modalities
and outcomes, with little being accomplished toward an understanding
of the aetiology of class III phenotype and potential
relationship between the genetic components or how genetic factors
may influence the response to treatment [22]. In spite of the
continually increasing data on malocclusion prevalence, little has
been done to consolidate this information in a comprehensive
and critical way [23, 24]. Although no protocol has been enacted
governing the methods of Angle class III malocclusion prevalence
studies, a review and meta- analysis of the available literature
will be helpful in establishing guidelines for future researchers
[25]. Previously our team has a rich experience in working on
various research projects across multiple disciplines [26, 40]. Now
the growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.
The aim of this study was to assess the age and gender association
of Class III malocclusion in the outpatient population visiting a
Private Dental college.
Materials and Methods
Study design and Study setting
The present hospital-based retrospective study was carried out using
digital case records of 269 patients who reported with Class
III malocclusion from 86,000 patients attending the dental college
from June 2019 to march 2020 seeking orthodontic treatment.
Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the
scientific Review Board of the hospital (SDC/SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/
0619-0320).
Sampling
Case records of 269 patients who reported with Class III malocclusion
were included in the study. Inclusion criteria was patients
with class III malocclusion visiting the dental college in the specified
period of time, patients referred for orthodontic correction
of Class III malocclusion. Cross verification of the data for errors
was done. Each case was verified for the general information of
the patients, whether its skeletal or dental malocclusion was identified
using the diagnosis mentioned in the case records and clinical
photographs. The exclusion criteria was other malocclusions
and missing or incomplete data.
Data collection and Tabulation
Exclusion criteria eliminated cases that had other malocclusions;
cases with no clinical photograph and cases that were not approved
by the concerned faculty in the hospital. A single calibrated
examiner evaluated the clinical photographs of 269 patients
and graded them based on skeletal and dental malocclusion. Data
was tabulated in excel and was imported to SPSS where the variables
were defined.
Results & Discussion
IBM SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive
analysis of the age group, gender, type of class III distribution
was done. Chi – square test was done for association between
age, gender and type of Class III. Results were tabulated and
represented graphically. A male dominance (65.8%) over females
(34.2%) was noted (Figure 1). In the type of Class III malocclusion,
almost equal distribution among dental (53.5%) and skeletal(
46.5%) was noted(Figure 2). There was no statistically significant
association between gender and class III malocclusion (Chi
square value - .934, DF - 1, p value = 0.33 (>0.05)) (Figure 4)
and a statistically significant association was found between age
group and type of class III malocclusion it was most commonly reported in the 19-30 years age group (Pearson’s Chi-Square value
- 15.797, DF-2, P = 0.01 (<0.05))(Figure 3). Skeletal class III was
more common in adolescents and children whereas dental Class
III was common in adults compared to skeletal. (Figure 3).
This study shows that in class III malocclusion 65.8% were more
prevalent in males than females (34.2%). Out of 269 subjects with
class III malocclusion, 125 (46.5%) were skeletal and 155 (53.5%)
were dental malocclusion .Skeletal class III malocclusion was
most common in children and adolescents, whereas dental class
III was common in Adults.
Onyeaso et al.(41)who reported that males were found to have
significantly more of classes II and III molar relationships than
females which supports this study where as Baccetti et al reported
that females were found to significantly more of classes III molar
relationships than females which contradicts our study study
(42). From other articles, Chinese and Malaysian groups showed
a much higher mean prevalence rate than other racial groups:
15.69% and 16.59%, respectively [43-45]. This is consistent with
previous reports of higher rates of Angle class III malocclusion
among Asian populations.
Baccetti et al reported that Class III malocclusion is associated
with a significant degree of sexual dimorphism in craniofacial especially
after the age of 13 and female subjects with Class III malocclusion
present with significantly smaller linear dimensions in
the maxilla, mandible, and anterior facial heights when compared
with male subjects during the circumpubertal and postpubertal
periods which supports our study[42].
Angle class III malocclusion rates among the three Middle Eastern
groups in this study are fairly similar. However, previous studies
indicated a wide range of rates from 1.3% in Israeli Arabs
to 15.2% in Iranians [46-48]. Additionally, many different rates
appear forIranians: 2.1%, 7.8%, 9.2%, and 15.2% [49]. However,
a 1969 study of Egyptians [50] showed a rate of 4%. Agreement
of previously reported Angle class III prevalence data appears to
be haphazard at best among Middle Eastern populations. Furthermore,
major discrepancies appear to exist among populations
within individual countries.
Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based
research and has excelled in various fields [51-61]. We hope this
study adds to this rich legacy.
The limitation in this study is its smaller sample size. A similar
study should be conducted on a larger scale involving a large
number of samples and twins for more reliable results. Hence,
further extensive studies should be done in this field of research.
Figure 1. Bar graph depicting gender distribution of the Class III malocclusion. X axis represents the gender and Y axis represents the percentage of the subjects in the present study; 177(66%) males, 92(34%) females.
Figure 2. Bar graph depicting the Classification of Class III malocclusion. X axis represents the type of malocclusion and Y axis represents the percentage of the subjects in the present study; 125(46.5%) skeletal and 144(53.5%) dental Class III malocclusion.
Figure 3. Bar graph representing the association between age groups and the type of Class III malocclusion. X axis represents the age group and Y axis represents the number of subjects with class III malocclusion. Chi square association was done and found to be significant. Pearson’s Chi-Square value - 15.797 , DF-2, P = 0.01 (<0.05), Statistically significant proving age association, both types of class III malocclusions were common in the age group of 19-30 yrs when compared to the other age groups.
Figure 4. Bar graph representing the association between the gender and the type of Class III malocclusion. X axis represents the gender and Y axis represents the total number of participants. More number of males reported with class III malocclusion. Association was tested by Chi square test and was found to be non-significant. Chi square value - .934, DF - 1, p value = 0.33 (>0.05) statistically not significant, hence class III malocclusion was not associated with gender.
Conclusion
Within the limits of the present study, class III malocclusion was
more prevalent in males than females but no significant difference
was noted. Both skeletal class III malocclusion and dental
class III were most common in the age group of 19-30 yrs and
in children skeletal class III was more common than dental class
III malocclusion.
References
-
[1]. Bray RJ. The maxillary midline diastema: Causes and treatment considerations.
American Journal of Orthodontics. 1978 Feb 1;73(2):221.
[2]. Tanaka OM, Morino AY, Machuca OF, Schneider NÁ. When the Midline Diastema Is Not Characteristic of the "Ugly Duckling" Stage. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:924743. Epub 2015 Aug 5. Pubmed PMID: 26345220.
[3]. Sen N, Isler S. Multidisciplinary Management of a Severe Maxillary Midline Diastema: A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar;28(3):239-243. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Pubmed PMID: 30350325.
[4]. Abraham R, Kamath G. Midline diastema and its aetiology--a review. Dent Update. 2014 Jun;41(5):457-60, 462-4. Pubmed PMID: 25073229.
[5]. Jaija AM, El-Beialy AR, Mostafa YA. Revisiting the Factors Underlying Maxillary Midline Diastema. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:5607594. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Pubmed PMID: 27239374.
[6]. Rao A, Jain A, BS S, Ym K. Management of an Unusual Midline Diastema with a Fixed Appliance: A Case Report. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018 Oct 1;9(10).
[7]. Rath A, Fernandes BA, Sidhu P, Hr P. Surgical management of wide intrabony defect underlying midline diastema using Whale's tail flap technique: A Case Report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;49:166-169. Epub 2018 Jul 11. Pubmed PMID: 30015214.
[8]. Kamble A, Shah P, Velani PR, Jadhav G. Laser-assisted multidisciplinary approach for closure and prevention of relapse of midline diastema. Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):461-464. Pubmed PMID: 28836541.
[9]. Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Pereira CC, Lima LR, Gurgel JA, Bramante FS, Pereira ALP, Lima DM, Bandeca MC. Two-Year Follow-up of Multidisciplinary Treatment Using Digital Smile Design as a Planning Tool for Esthetic Restorations on Maxillary Midline Diastema. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2017 Spring;28(1):67-70. Pubmed PMID: 29990406.
[10]. Radiographs in orthodontics [Internet]. Vol. 64, Dental Abstracts. 2019. p. 105–8. Available from:
[11]. Kumar P. Chapter-11 Treatment of Midline Diastema [Internet]. Immunology. 2007. p. 100–7. Available from:
[12]. Kumar P. Treatment of Midline Diastema [Internet]. Synopsis of Orthodontic Treatment. 2007. p. 100–100. Available from:
[13]. Ahal R. Chapter-53 Correction of Midline Diastema [Internet]. Practical Biotechnology. 2007. p. 640–7. Available from:
[14]. Singh G, Ahal R. Correction of Midline Diastema [Internet]. Textbook of Orthodontics. 2007. p. 640–640. Available from:
[15]. Bs P, Phulari BS, Modley D. Management of Midline Diastema [Internet]. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 2017. p. 406–406. Available from: [16]. Mody A. Policy Wounds Leave Behind Scar Tissue, 2011–2013 [Internet]. Oxford Scholarship Online. 2018. Available from:
[17]. Sebastian AA, Ahsan A, George AJ, Aby J. An unusual triad: Bilateral dilated odontoma, hypodontia and peg laterals. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Sep;10(5):674-7. Pubmed PMID: 24348628.
[18]. Jain AR. Prevalence of partial edentulousness and treatment needs in rural population of South India. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017 Jun;8(3):213- 7.
[19]. Varghese SS, Ramesh A, Veeraiyan DN. Blended Module-Based Teaching in Biostatistics and Research Methodology: A Retrospective Study with Postgraduate Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2019 Apr;83(4):445-450. Epub 2019 Feb 11. Pubmed PMID: 30745352.
[20]. Ashok V, Ganapathy D. A geometrical method to classify face forms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):232-235. Epub 2019 Jun 3. PMID: 31198677.
[21]. Padavala S, Sukumaran G. Molar incisor hypomineralization and its prevalence. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S246.
[22]. Ke Y, Al Aboody MS, Alturaiki W, Alsagaby SA, Alfaiz FA, Veeraraghavan VP, Mickymaray S. Photosynthesized gold nanoparticles from Catharanthus roseus induces caspase-mediated apoptosis in cervical cancer cells (HeLa). Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):1938-1946. Pubmed PMID: 31099261.
[23]. Ezhilarasan D. Oxidative stress is bane in chronic liver diseases: Clinical and experimental perspective. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;19(2):56-64. Epub 2018 May 28. Pubmed PMID: 29853428.
[24]. Krishnan RP, Ramani P, Sherlin HJ, Sukumaran G, Ramasubramanian A, Jayaraj G, Don KR, Santhanam A. Surgical Specimen Handover from Operation Theater to Laboratory: A Survey. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul- Dec;8(2):234-238. Pubmed PMID: 30693238.
[25]. Ezhilarasan D, Sokal E, Najimi M. Hepatic fibrosis: It is time to go with hepatic stellate cell-specific therapeutic targets. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Jun;17(3):192-197. Epub 2018 Apr 21. Pubmed PMID: 29709350. [26]. Pandian KS, Krishnan S, Kumar SA. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Mar- Apr;29(2):137-143. Pubmed PMID: 29652003.
[27]. Ramamurthy JA, Mg V. Comparison of effect of Hiora mouthwash versus Chlorhexidine mouthwash in gingivitis patients: A clinical trial. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018 Jul 7;11(7):84-8.
[28]. Gupta P, Ariga P, Deogade SC. Effect of Monopoly-coating Agent on the Surface Roughness of a Tissue Conditioner Subjected to Cleansing and Disinfection: A Contact Profilometric In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S122-S126. Pubmed PMID: 29962776.
[29]. Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball Headed Mini Implant. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZL02-ZL03. Epub 2017 Jan 1. Pubmed PMID: 28274084.
[30]. Paramasivam A, Vijayashree Priyadharsini J, Raghunandhakumar S. N6- adenosine methylation (m6A): a promising new molecular target in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Hypertens Res. 2020 Feb;43(2):153- 154. Pubmed PMID: 31578458.
[31]. Palati S, Ramani P, Shrelin HJ, Sukumaran G, Ramasubramanian A, Don KR, Jayaraj G, Santhanam A. Knowledge, Attitude and practice survey on the perspective of oral lesions and dental health in geriatric patients residing in old age homes. Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):22-25. Pubmed PMID: 32246676.
[32]. Samuel SR, Acharya S, Rao JC. School Interventions-based Prevention of Early-Childhood Caries among 3-5-year-old children from very low socioeconomic status: Two-year randomized trial. J Public Health Dent. 2020 Jan;80(1):51-60. Epub 2019 Nov 10. Pubmed PMID: 31710096.
[33]. Chu CH, Zhang CF, Jin LJ. Treating a maxillary midline diastema in adult patients: a general dentist's perspective. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Nov;142(11):1258-64. Pubmed PMID: 22041411.
[34]. Abdulateef DS, Ali AJ, Othman NF. The prevalence and etiology of maxillary midline diastema among orthodontic patients attending Shorsh Dental Clinic in Sulaimani City. Dent J. 2014;1:86-90.
[35]. Nagalakshmi S, Sathish R, Priya K, Dhayanithi D. Changes in quality of life during orthodontic correction of midline diastema. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S162-4. Pubmed PMID: 25210363.
[36]. Umanah A, Omogbai AA, Osagbemiro B. Prevalence of artificially created maxillary midline diastema and its complications in a selected nigerian population. Afr Health Sci. 2015 Mar;15(1):226-32. Pubmed PMID: 25834552.
[37]. Termeie DA, editor. Avoiding and Treating Dental Complications: Best Practices in Dentistry. John Wiley & Sons; 2016 Jun 13.
[38]. Vijayashree Priyadharsini J. In silico validation of the non-antibiotic drugs acetaminophen and ibuprofen as antibacterial agents against red complex pathogens. J Periodontol. 2019 Dec;90(12):1441-1448. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Pubmed PMID: 31257588.
[39]. J PC, Marimuthu T, C K, Devadoss P, Kumar SM. Prevalence and measurement of anterior loop of the mandibular canal using CBCT: A cross sectional study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):531-534. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Pubmed PMID: 29624863.
[40]. Ramesh A, Varghese S, Jayakumar ND, Malaiappan S. Comparative estimation of sulfiredoxin levels between chronic periodontitis and healthy patients - A case-control study. J Periodontol. 2018 Oct;89(10):1241-1248. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Pubmed PMID: 30044495.
[41]. Ramadurai N, Gurunathan D, Samuel AV, Subramanian E, Rodrigues SJL. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3543-3550. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Pubmed PMID: 30552590.
[42]. Sridharan G, Ramani P, Patankar S, Vijayaraghavan R. Evaluation of salivary metabolomics in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Apr;48(4):299-306. doi: 10.1111/jop.12835. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Pubmed PMID: 30714209.
[43]. Ezhilarasan D, Apoorva VS, Ashok Vardhan N. Syzygium cumini extract induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 Feb;48(2):115-121. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Pubmed PMID: 30451321.
[44]. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3275-3280. Epub 2020 Jan 18. Pubmed PMID: 31955271. [45]. Samuel SR. Can 5-year-olds sensibly self-report the impact of developmental enamel defects on their quality of life? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Mar;31(2):285-286. Epub 2020 May 29. Pubmed PMID: 32416620.
[46]. R H, Ramani P, Ramanathan A, R JM, S G, Ramasubramanian A, K M. CYP2 C9 polymorphism among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and its role in altering the metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Sep;130(3):306-312. Epub 2020 Jul 4. Pubmed PMID: 32773350.
[47]. Chandrasekar R, Chandrasekhar S, Sundari KKS, Ravi P. Development and validation of a formula for objective assessment of cervical vertebral bone age. Prog Orthod. 2020 Oct 12;21(1):38. Pubmed PMID: 33043408.
[48]. Vijayashree Priyadharsini J, Smiline Girija AS, Paramasivam A. In silico analysis of virulence genes in an emerging dental pathogen A. baumannii and related species. Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Oct;94:93-98. Epub 2018 Jul 7. Pubmed PMID: 30015217.