Overjet in Adolescents with Class II Division 1 Malocclusion- A Retrospective Cross Sectional Study
Vaishnavi Sivakali Subramanian1, Harish Babu2*, Aravind Kumar S3
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil
Nadu, India.
2 Reader, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha
University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS),
Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
VHarish Babu,
Reader, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077,
Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: +91 9710404482
E-mail: harish.ortho@gmail.com
Received: July 30, 2021; Accepted: August 11, 2021; Published: August 19, 2021
Citation:Vaishnavi Sivakali Subramanian, Harish Babu, Aravind Kumar S. Overjet in Adolescents with Class II Division 1 Malocclusion- A Retrospective Cross Sectional Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):4049-4053. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000827
Copyright: Harish Babu©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Overjet is the horizontal distance between labial surfaces of maxillary and mandibular incisors. Normal overjet is 2 - 3 mm. Overjet greater than 3 mm and less than 1 mm are considered as sagittal discrepancies. An increased overjet is commonly seen in Class II malocclusions and is one of the most common complaints among patients reporting for orthodontic treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the severity of overjet in adolescents with class II division1 malocclusion. Patient records from Saveetha Dental College were retrieved and screened for data on Class II div I malocclusion. Patients aged from 12 to 18 with Class II div I malocclusion were included in the study. 210 records were randomly selected based on inclusion criteria .Severity of overjet was assessed from photographic records and categorised as Group A (N=79) (severe), Group B(N= 61) (moderate)and Group C (N=70) (mild). The tabulated data was imported into SPSS and analysed. The results of the study showed that 37.62% of the entire sample population had severe overjet. Among the genders 22.38% of males and only 15.24% of females had severe overjet. Severe increase in overjet was seen in 13 year olds. Pearson's chi square value of 0.359 and p value (0.836) showed poor association between gender and overjet. Pearson's chi square value of 14.66 and p value (0.145) showed poor association between age and overjet. From the results of the study it can be concluded that severe increase in overjet is seen only in 37.62% of the sample population without any association with gender or age.
2.Introduction
3.Conclusion
4.References
Keywords
Class II Malocclusion; Class II Division 1; Malocclusions; Overjet.
Introduction
Class II Div I malocclusion is found among 15% of the world
population and is often complicated by the presence of underlying
skeletal discrepancy between maxilla and mandible [49].
Proclination of maxillary incisors is a common complaint among
these patients. Severe overjet of 6mm and more is a common
feature in 14-15% of 10 year old children [18, 47] with Class II
div I malocclusion. Increased overjet in Class II div 1 patients are
usually a result of habits and imbalance of muscular forces due
to lip trap.
An increased overjet makes anterior teeth more susceptible to
trauma and contributes to incompetency of lips. Increased visibility
of incisors can adversely influence the psychosocial wellbeing
of an adolescent. The most common presenting complaint of
patients with Class II div I malocclusion is an increased overjet.
An increase in overjet in a child is first observed by parents once
the incisors have erupted. Incompetency of lips, lip apart posture
while sleeping and hypotonic upper lip are accompanying signs of
overjet increase in growing children. Peer pressure at school and
unesthetic facial appearance drive parents towards the orthodontist
for correction of this anomaly.
Increased overjet may also have underlying skeletal causes. Increased
proclination of upper incisors alone may not be the only
contributing factor. Sagittal discrepancy between maxilla and
mandible as in skeletal class II patterns is another leading cause
for increased overjet in adolescents.
Habits play an important role in the development of this anomaly.
Pressure from thumb sucking can lead to labial movement
of upper incisors and lingual movement of lower incisors. Imbalance
between perioral muscles and the tongue lead to sagittal
and transverse anomalies of the dentition. A hypotonic upper lip
along with a curled lower lip trapped between upper and lower
incisors can further worsen overjet.
Early treatment has been suggested to reduce the incidence of
incisal trauma to upper permanent incisors in paticuts with large
overjet and incompetent lip closure [2, 21, 48].
Correction of class II division 1 malocclusion with functional appliances
is a common treatment approach in young patients [6].
The functional appliance shifts the mandible into a protrusive position,
generating muscle actions that create the forces needed to
correct the dental arch relationship and aiming to improve the
patients facial profile [3, 16]. Activator is a widely used functional
appliance that prevents the mandible from sliding backward and
transfers the forces to the maxilla, which is essentially the anchorage
unit for the anteriorly displaced mandible[17, 46].
Timing of treatment in Class II div I patients may vary according
to parent awareness, social and demographic factors, Orthodontist
and patient compliance. This leads to a proportion of patients
left untreated well into their adolescence. Previously our team has
a rich experience in working on various research projects across
multiple disciplines [1, 10, 15, 19, 24, 25, 29, 30-32, 36, 43, 50,
53]. Now the growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue
this project.
This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the variations in severity
of overjet among class II division 1 adolescent patients reporting
to an institution for orthodontic treatment.
Materials and Methods
Study setting:
This study is in an institutional setting at Saveetha Dental College.
Digital patient records of 86000 patients over a six month
period from 1st June 2019 to 31st March 2020 were retrospectively
screened for patients with Class II div I malocclusion.
Approval was obtained from the institutional Scientific Review
Board and Ethical committee (SDC/SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/
0619-0320). Two examiners were involved in the study.
Sampling
Over 86000 Patient records from August 2019 to February 2020
were reviewed and screened for patients with Class II div I malocclusion.
Filters were appropriately used so that only adolescent
patients in the age group of 12 to 17 were included in the study.
Patients with a history of orthodontic treatment and active periodontal
disease were excluded from the study. A total of 210 patient
case sheets were randomly selected based on these criteria.
Cross verification of data for error was done by presence of additional
reviewers and by photographic evaluation. Simple random
sampling was done to minimize sampling bias. Photographic
evaluation of overjet of patients was done by a single investigator
and the samples were divided into three groups. Group A had
patients with severe overjet, Group B had patients with moderate
overjet and Group C had patients with mild overjet.
Data collection/ Tabulation:
Data was methodically tabulated on MS Excel worksheet and imported
into IBM SPSS for statistical analysis.
Analysis:
The Pearson’s chi square test for independence was done to observe
for any association between gender, age and severity of
overjet.
Results & Discussion
Out of 210 patients, 125 patients were male and 85 patients were
female. 37.62% of the patients had severe overjet, 33.8% of mild
overjet and 29.8% of moderate overjet. On analysing severity
among each gender, 22.38% of samples with severe overjet were
males 15.24% of samples with severe overjet were females. 11.9%
of samples with severe overjet were 13 year olds and only 1.9%
of samples with severe overjet were 16 year olds. Chi square test
for association between gender and severity of overjet showed a
p value of 0.836 (p value >0.05 is statistically insignificant). Chi
square test for association between age and severity of overjet
showed a p value of 0.145 (p value >0.05 is statistically insignificant).
Increased consciousnesses about ones well-being among the adolescent
population and increasing awareness of parents towards
orthodontic treatment have led to an increasing number of patients
reporting for orthodontic treatment. Adolescent patients contribute to the major number of cases in any orthodontic practise.
With the pubertal growth spurt and subsequent waning of
growth velocity occurring in this age group, orthodontic treatment
for this age group has always been of importance for researchers
and clinicians. The most common presenting complaint
among this age group is increased overjet and the one of the common
malocclusions is Class II dv I.
Previously investigators have conducted various studies related to
orthodontic diagnosis and treatment and their association with
mini implants [20, 44, 53]. GMP based orthodontic bonding adhesives
[41], bisphosphonates [26] forces and apparatus used in
forces determination [7, 12, 14], recycling methods and sleep apnea
[22, 54], craniofacial relation [13, 40], enamel conditioning
[38] dilacerated and impaction tooth [14].
+
This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern
of distribution of overjet magnitude among adolescent patients contribute to the major number of cases in any orthodontic practise.
With the pubertal growth spurt and subsequent waning of
growth velocity occurring in this age group, orthodontic treatment
for this age group has always been of importance for researchers
and clinicians. The most common presenting complaint
among this age group is increased overjet and the one of the common
malocclusions is Class II dv I.
Previously investigators have conducted various studies related to
orthodontic diagnosis and treatment and their association with
mini implants [20, 44, 53]. GMP based orthodontic bonding adhesives
[41], bisphosphonates [26] forces and apparatus used in
forces determination [7, 12, 14], recycling methods and sleep apnea
[22, 54], craniofacial relation [13, 40], enamel conditioning
[38] dilacerated and impaction tooth [14].
This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern
of distribution of overjet magnitude among adolescent patients with Class II div I malocclusion. The objective of the study was
to statistically test for any association between gender, age and
overjet magnitude.
The results of this study show that in the sample population chosen,
37.62% of the population had severe overjet. Overjet above
6 mm have been reported in 14-15% of the population in scandinavian
children [18, 47]. The results of this study show results in a
higher proportion of adolescents having severe increase in overjet
which do not agree with results from previous studies. The most
number of samples which showed severe overjet were aged 13.
This result could substantiate the cause for early intervention in
correction of increased overjet in Class II div I patients. Early
correction of class II malocclusion in Sweden is often undertaken
by GP after consultation with an orthodontist [33].
Growth modification therapies in the early correction of class II
malocclusion have been investigated in 3 studies. These studies
concluded that early treatment does provide correction of incisal
relationship mainly due to dentoalveolar changes [23, 28]. Only
40% of the patients with a full class II relationship were corrected
to class I during treatment and in the follow-up period relapse occurred
in 10 percent [5]. Both increased overjet and lip incompetence
are considered significant risk factors for dental trauma on
the maxillary mirrors [2, 5, 21, 48]. Early treatment provided for
class II division1 can reduce the risk of dental trauma in maxillary
anteriors due to severe proclination. Our institution is passionate
about high quality evidence based research and has excelled in
various fields [4, 9, 27, 34, 35, 37, 42, 45, 51, 52]. We hope this
study adds to this rich legacy.
Gender and age were poorly associated with severity of overjet
among the sample population. Severity of the overjet did not
show any pattern of distribution among males or females of any
age.
Figure 1: Bar graph shows the age distribution among the samples chosen. The X axis represents the age and the Y axis represents the percent of samples. Red represents age of 12, green represents 13, blue represents 14 years, purple represents 15 years, yellow represents age 16 and orange represents age 17. It can be inferred that most number of patients reported for correction of increased overjet at the age of 13.
Figure 2: Bar Graph shows the proportion of patients according to severity of overjet. The X axis represents the Groups based on severity of overjet and the Y axis represents the percent of samples in each group (green-severe), (blue-moderate), (red-mild). It can be inferred from the graph that the maximum number of patients in the sample population had severe overjet.
Figure 3: The Bar Graph shows the gender distribution among the sample population chosen. The X axis represents gender and the Y axis represents the proportion of the specific gender in the samples chosen (male-blue) (females-red). From the graph it can be inferred that male adolescent patients are more likely to report for treatment of increased overjet than females.
Figure 4: Bar Graph shows association between gender and severity of overjet. The X axis represents gender and the Y axis represents the number of patients. Severity of the overjet is color coded as red- mild, blue- moderate and severe-green. Chi square analysis resulted in a p value of 0.836 (p value>0.05, statistically insignificant). From the graph it can be inferred that even though there was no statistically significance, severe overjet was maximum in males than in females.
Figure 5: Bar graph shows the association between age and severity of malocclusion. The X axis represents age and the Y axis represents the number of patients. The severity of malocclusion was color coded as red- mild, blue-moderate and green-severe. The Chi square test resulted in a p value of 0.145 (p value > 0.05 considered as statistically insignificant). From the bar graph it can be inferred that severe overjet were highly prevalent in 13 year old patients and least prevalent in 16 year old patients. However this is statistically insignificant.
Conclusion
Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that a
major proportion of adolescent patients with Class II div I malocclusion
have moderate to severe overjet. Age or gender was not
associated with the severity of the overjet.
References
-
[1]. Sheik R, Nasim I. Newer root canal irrigants-A review. Research J. Pharm.
and Tech. 2016;9(12):1451-6.
[2]. Becker GL, Cohen S, Borer R. The sequelae of accidentally injecting sodium hypochlorite beyond the root apex: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Oct 1;38(4):633-8.
[3]. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod. 1985 Dec 1;11(12):525-8.
[4]. Sabala CL, Powell SE. Sodium hypochlorite injection into periapical tissues. J Endod. 1989 Oct 1;15(10):490-2.
[5]. Rajarajan G, Priyadorshini SP, Subbarao C. Effect of Different Irrigating Solutions in the Removal of Smear Layer from the Root Canal. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019;12(3):1115-8.
[6]. Caliskan M K, Turkun M, Alper S. Allergy to sodium hypochlorite during root canal therapy: a case report. Int Endod J.1994; 27: 163-167.
[7]. Clarkson RM, Moule AJ. Sodium hypochlorite and its use as an endodontic irrigant. Aust. Dent. J. 1998 Aug;43(4):4.
[8]. Sim TP, Knowles JC, Ng YL, Shelton J, Gulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. Int Endod J. 2001 Mar;34(2):120-32.Pubmed PMID: 11307260.
[9]. Pradhan MS, Gunwal M, Shenoi P, Sonarkar S, Bhattacharya S, Badole G. Evaluation of pH and Chlorine Content of a Novel Herbal Sodium Hypochlorite for Root Canal Disinfection: An Experimental In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S74-S78.Pubmed PMID: 29962768.
[10]. Baskaran K, Raj JD, Yang JN. Comparative Study of Cleaning Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017;10(1):75-7.
[11]. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int. Dent. J. 2008 Dec;58(6):329-41.
[12]. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Sforza D, Visai L. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite-based irrigating solutions. Int J Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;33(9):654-9.
[13]. Zand V, Lotfi M, Soroush MH, Abdollahi AA, Sadeghi M, Mojadadi A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Solution on Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm. Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):315-319.Pubmed PMID: 27790262.
[14]. Deliverska E. Oral mucosa damage because of hypochlorite accident–a Case report and literature review. J. IMAB - Annu. Proceeding Sci. Pap. 2016 Aug 12;22(3):1269-73.
[15]. Kamdar RS, Pradeep S. Chemomechanical agents used in caries excavation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016;9(10):1765-7.
[16]. Patel E, Gangadin M. Managing sodium hypochlorite accidents: the reality of toxicity. S. Afr. dent. j. 2017 Jul;72(6):271-4.
[17]. Mathew ST. Risks and management of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics. J. oral hyg. health. 2015 May 26;3:178.
[18]. H. R. Spencer, V. Ike, P. A. Brennan. Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics - potential complications and their management. Br. Dent. J.. 2007;202(9): 555-9.
[19]. Bither R, Bither S. Accidental extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic treatment: a case report. J. Dent. Oral Hyg. 2013 Mar 31;5(3):21-4.
[20]. Ehrich DG, Brian Jr JD, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod. 1993 Apr 1;19(4):180-2.
[21]. Kaufman AY, Keila S. Hypersensitivity to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1989 May 1;15(5):224-6.
[22]. Hales JJ, Jackson CR, Everett AP, Moore SH. Treatment protocol for the management of a sodium hypochlorite accident during endodontic therapy. Gen Dent. 2001 May 1;49(3):278-81.
[23]. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, Yanai-Inbar I. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. J Endod. 1991 Nov;17(11):573-4.Pubmed PMID: 1812208.
[24]. Crane A B. A practicable root canal technique. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger. 1920.
[25]. Doumani M, Habib A, Doumani A, Kinan M. A Review: Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) Accident Between Diagnosis And Management. IOSRJDMS. 2017;16( 9) : 78-81.