Prevalence Herpes Labialis among South Indian Population: an Institutional Study
Jembulingam Sabarathinam1, Manjari Chaudhary2*, Madhulaxmi M3
1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, TamilNadu, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr Manjari Chaudhary,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha
University, 162, PH Road, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: +91 7044455554
E-mail: manjaric.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: July 30, 2021; Accepted: August 11, 2021; Published: August 19, 2021
Citation:Jembulingam Sabarathinam, Manjari Chaudhary, Madhulaxmi M. Prevalence Herpes Labialis among South Indian Population: an Institutional Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):4036-4039. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000824
Copyright: Dr. Manjari Chaudhary©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Herpes labialis is the most commonly occurring infection in the orofacial region in the form of cold sores and fever blisters. Most of the patients often have episodes of relapse. Herpes labialis is often characterised by a common set of symptoms which includes rashes over the lips areas, erythematous blisters and burning pain. Herpes labialis is caused by herpes simplex-1 virus while rarely caused by herpes simplex 2 virus. The diagnosis of herpes labialis is often limited to taking patients history and performing physical examinations. A primary infection is often characterised by small clusters of blisters or ulcers (2mm to 10mm) in front of the lip, tongue, mouth characterised by presence of fever. This study was aimed to assess the prevalence of herpes labialis and its association with age among the patients reporting to a private institutional set up in Chennai. The study was conducted among 44,000 patients attending the outpatient department of a private institution in chennai during a time period of 6 months between June 2019 to December 2019. The patient records were assessed and tabulated in MS-Excel. The data was analysed by SPSS software and the results were interpreted. The prevalence of herpes labialis was 0.14% among the study population attending the outpatient department of a private institution. Male predilection was observed. Within the limitations of our current study, it is concluded that there is a reduced prevalence of herpes labialis in the study population.
2.Introduction
3.Conclusion
4.References
Keywords
Gender Predilection; Herpes Labialis; Prevalence; South Indian.
Introduction
Herpes labialis is the most commonly occurring infection in the
orofacial region in the form of cold sores and fever blisters [1].
Most of the patients often have episodes of relapse [2]. Herpes
labialis is often characterised by a common set of symptoms
which includes rashes over the lips areas, erythematous blisters
and burning pain. Herpes labialis is a contagious disease even
though it heals within 10 days, it can still spread to a person who
is still not immune to the disease [3] nor being infected before the
recent infection unlike other white and red lesions of the oral cavity,
carcinoma and pericoronitis [4-13]. In addition, Herpes labialis
through orogenital contact can lead to genital herpes [14].
Herpes labialis is caused by herpes simplex-1 virus while rarely
caused by herpes simplex 2 virus [15]. The primary infection most
commonly occurs before the second decade of life, while 80%
of the antibodies can be found in the adolescents probably due
to increasing socioeconomic status. Recently there has been an
increased prevalence of herpes labialis caused by genital ulcers.
[14, 16, 17].
The virus remains latent in the ganglion of the sensory nerves,
where stimulus such as sunlight, menstruation, fever and respiratory
infection reactivates [18] the virus which affects the mucosa
of the hard palate and lips only [19] in contrast to the primary infection.
The number of relapses rapidly decreases above 35 years
of age [20].
The diagnosis of herpes labialis is often limited to taking patients
history and performing physical examinations. A primary infection
is often asymptomatic while when symptoms occur, it most
commonly includes small clusters of blisters or ulcers (2mm to
10mm) in front of the lip, tongue, mouth characterised by presence of fever [21].
The occurrence of relapse is often characterised by burning skin
rashes around the mouth which manifest as papules, macules,
crusts and vesicles. Many of the dental surgeons miss diagnose
herpes labialis which could pave the way for surgeons to get infected
without precautions.
Henceforth the current study aims to assess the prevalence of
herpes labialis and its gender association among the patients reporting
to an institutional set up in Chennai, TamilNadu which
is a tertiary health center with advanced diagnostic aids [22-26].
Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various
research projects across multiple disciplines [27-41]. Now the
growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.
Materials and Methods
This study was performed in a private institution in Chennai,
among the outpatients during a time period of 6 months from
June 2019 to December 2019. The total sample size was 44,000.
Patient records were assessed and interpreted for the number of
people who were diagnosed with herpes labialis in a private institution
in chennai. Incomplete data without diagnostic notes and
photographs were excluded from the study.
Institutional ethical committee clearance was obtained for data
retrieval and usage as needed for the study (SDC/SIHEC/2020/
DIASDATA/0619-0320).The verification of the details was done
with the presence of two reviewers to reduce observer’s bias. The
verification process was done with the help of diagnostic notes
and Photographs. The data obtained was tabulated in MS-Excel
software with parameters which include age, gender, presence of
herpes labialis and etiology. The data was interpreted using IBM
SPSS (version 20) and the results were tabulated and interpreted.
Results & Discussion
The prevalence of Herpes labialis in our current study was 0.14%
where 44,000 individuals participated during the time period of 6
months from June 2019- December 2019.
Among the patients diagnosed with herpes labialis, patients were
aged between 6-66 years with a mean age of 41 years. (Figure
1).There was a male predilection (53%) while females had 47%
(Figure 2).
There was no association between the age groups and gender in
patients with herpes labialis. There was no statistical significance
(p-0.996)( p value>0.05) (Figure 3). This could be due to the unequal
distribution of cases among various age groups.
The prevalence of herpes labialis in our current study was 0.14%
over a period of 5 months, which consisted of patients aged between
6 years to 66 years with the mean age of 41 years affected
by the disease. There was a male predilection which was not statistically
significant. There was no correlation between age and
gender to the prevalence of herpes labialis.
Van der Linden MW et al., [1] reported that the prevalence of
herpes labialis was 2.5% among the Netherland population when
the Netherland institute of public health and institute of environment
undertook a study. 1.6 per 1000 patients were diagnosed
with herpes labialis. The results of our current study contradicts
the previous study as there was an increased prevalence of herpes
labialis. The variations of the results could be due to geographically
isolated population, short term analysis of the current study.
Graham worrall et al., [42] in the BMJ clinical evidence journal
suggested that the prevalence of herpes labialis was 1% among
the population of the United kingdom with no gender predilection.
The results of our current study is in favour of the previous
study in relation to the gender predilection but contradicts with a
10 fold increase in the prevalence.
Jun A et al., [2] reported that out of 10532 patients participating
in the study among 21 different countries and 43 institutions, the
prevalence of herpes labialis was 15% approximately with a mild
male prediction (33%). He also reported that there is significant
difference in the presence of ulcers and profession. This implicates
that increase in stress, increases the occurrence or prevalence
of the ulcers. The present study is in contradiction with
the previous study due to increased prevalence of herpes labialis
while in agreement with the gender predilection of the previous
studies.
Jenifer kula et al., [43] in 2015 suggested that the prevalence of
herpes labialis in 402 individuals consisting of mainly high concentration
of women was 28%, while most of the lesions were
associated with stress and lowered immunity. Above mentioned
study contradicts the results of our current study where the prevalence
is only 0.14%.
Amadori et al., [44]reported that there was a prevalence of 11%
of herpes labialis among 170 teenagers in the Italian population
which was statistically not significant and also reported that systemic
diseases do not have any association with herpes labialis or
HSV infections.The previous literature contradicts the results of
our current study.
Ali riza et al., [45] reported that there is a 2% prevalence of herpes
labialis among the Turkish population with a female predilection(
68%) which contradicts our present study which has reduced
the prevalence and had no gender predilection. This might be due
to the reduced population or sample size of the previous study
which had only 5000 samples. Our institution is passionate about
high quality evidence based research and has excelled in various
fields [46-56]. We hope this study adds to this rich legacy.
Figure 1: Bar graph depicts the percentage of patients diagnosed with herpes labialis among various age groups; where Y axis shows the percentage of patients diagnosed with herpes labialis and X axis shows the various age groups. Majority of the patients diagnosed with herpes labialis are between the age 20-50 years (Red) when compared to other age groups such as below 20 years (Orange) and above 50 years (Yellow).
Figure 2: Bar graph depicts the percentage of males and females diagnosed with herpes labialis; where Y axis shows the percentage of patients diagnosed with herpetic ulcer and X axis shows the gender of patients. Males (Blue) experienced a slight increase in frequency of herpes labialis in comparison to females (Green).
Figure 3: Bar graph depicts association between the age group and gender; where Y axis shows the percentage of patients diagnosed with herpes labialis and X axis shows the various age groups. Chi square test was done and association was found to be statistically not significant ; Pearson’s value:0.009, DF:2, p value: 0.996 (>0.05). Even though the majority of patients diagnosed with herpes labialis was under the age group 20-50 years among which males (Blue) experienced higher prevalence than females (Green) in comparison to other age groups.
Conclusion
The present study can be concluded that there was male gender
predilection towards prevalence of herpes labialis which occurs
in ages and predominantly affects the population during the first
four decades of life. There was a decreased prevalence of herpes
labialis indicating that the population of south India did not
seek professional help for the treatment of herpes labialis, which
implicates that knowledge and awareness of herpes labialis was
less among the study population and more awareness need to be brought about by medical camps amongst the population in order
to curb the disease and limit its spread.
References
-
[1]. Sheik R, Nasim I. Newer root canal irrigants-A review. Research J. Pharm.
and Tech. 2016;9(12):1451-6.
[2]. Becker GL, Cohen S, Borer R. The sequelae of accidentally injecting sodium hypochlorite beyond the root apex: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Oct 1;38(4):633-8.
[3]. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod. 1985 Dec 1;11(12):525-8.
[4]. Sabala CL, Powell SE. Sodium hypochlorite injection into periapical tissues. J Endod. 1989 Oct 1;15(10):490-2.
[5]. Rajarajan G, Priyadorshini SP, Subbarao C. Effect of Different Irrigating Solutions in the Removal of Smear Layer from the Root Canal. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019;12(3):1115-8.
[6]. Caliskan M K, Turkun M, Alper S. Allergy to sodium hypochlorite during root canal therapy: a case report. Int Endod J.1994; 27: 163-167.
[7]. Clarkson RM, Moule AJ. Sodium hypochlorite and its use as an endodontic irrigant. Aust. Dent. J. 1998 Aug;43(4):4.
[8]. Sim TP, Knowles JC, Ng YL, Shelton J, Gulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. Int Endod J. 2001 Mar;34(2):120-32.Pubmed PMID: 11307260.
[9]. Pradhan MS, Gunwal M, Shenoi P, Sonarkar S, Bhattacharya S, Badole G. Evaluation of pH and Chlorine Content of a Novel Herbal Sodium Hypochlorite for Root Canal Disinfection: An Experimental In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S74-S78.Pubmed PMID: 29962768.
[10]. Baskaran K, Raj JD, Yang JN. Comparative Study of Cleaning Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017;10(1):75-7.
[11]. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int. Dent. J. 2008 Dec;58(6):329-41.
[12]. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Sforza D, Visai L. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite-based irrigating solutions. Int J Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;33(9):654-9.
[13]. Zand V, Lotfi M, Soroush MH, Abdollahi AA, Sadeghi M, Mojadadi A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Solution on Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm. Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):315-319.Pubmed PMID: 27790262.
[14]. Deliverska E. Oral mucosa damage because of hypochlorite accident–a Case report and literature review. J. IMAB - Annu. Proceeding Sci. Pap. 2016 Aug 12;22(3):1269-73.
[15]. Kamdar RS, Pradeep S. Chemomechanical agents used in caries excavation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016;9(10):1765-7.
[16]. Patel E, Gangadin M. Managing sodium hypochlorite accidents: the reality of toxicity. S. Afr. dent. j. 2017 Jul;72(6):271-4.
[17]. Mathew ST. Risks and management of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics. J. oral hyg. health. 2015 May 26;3:178.
[18]. H. R. Spencer, V. Ike, P. A. Brennan. Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics - potential complications and their management. Br. Dent. J.. 2007;202(9): 555-9.
[19]. Bither R, Bither S. Accidental extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic treatment: a case report. J. Dent. Oral Hyg. 2013 Mar 31;5(3):21-4.
[20]. Ehrich DG, Brian Jr JD, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod. 1993 Apr 1;19(4):180-2.
[21]. Kaufman AY, Keila S. Hypersensitivity to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1989 May 1;15(5):224-6.
[22]. Hales JJ, Jackson CR, Everett AP, Moore SH. Treatment protocol for the management of a sodium hypochlorite accident during endodontic therapy. Gen Dent. 2001 May 1;49(3):278-81.
[23]. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, Yanai-Inbar I. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. J Endod. 1991 Nov;17(11):573-4.Pubmed PMID: 1812208.
[24]. Crane A B. A practicable root canal technique. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger. 1920.
[25]. Doumani M, Habib A, Doumani A, Kinan M. A Review: Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) Accident Between Diagnosis And Management. IOSRJDMS. 2017;16( 9) : 78-81.