Analysis Of Posterior Teeth Receiving Crowns Following Root Canal Treatment - Retrospective Study
Sahil Choudhari1*, S Haripriya2, Jaiganesh Ramamurthy3
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
(SIMATS), Chennai - 77, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai - 77, India.
*Corresponding Author
Manish Ranjan,
Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS),
Chennai - 77, India.
E-mail: manish@saveetha.com
Received: April 15, 2021; Accepted: July 22, 2021; Published: August 03, 2021
Citation:Shree Ranjan, Manish Ranjan. Comparative Evaluation Of Marginal Adaptability Of Custom Cast Post Using Different Pattern Material - An In Vitro Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(8):3659-3665. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000749
Copyright: Manish Ranjan©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Introduction: Marginal adaptability is of key concern while determining the longevity of a post and core in endodontically
treated teeth. The present study compares the two commonly used materials used for fabrication of patterns for custom cast
post
Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptability of custom cast post using inlay wax pattern and resin pattern.
Materials and Methods: 10 single rooted teeth were selected for each group for the study. Teeth were decoronated. The
teeth were mounted on wax occlusal rim and were scanned with CBCT in all the planes. Root Canal treatment was done and
the canal were prepared for post space.10 Patterns were fabricated with inlay wax and resin pattern respectively and custom
made cast post was done for the study once again CBCT was taken to find out the marginal adaptability of cast post to the
tooth surface.
Conclusion: The marginal adaptation was analysed in the coronal ,middle and the apical third of the prepared post space of
teeth. It was found that the marginal adaptation of cast post was more in the coronal and middle third of post space with cast
post made by resin pattern compared to the one made with inlay wax pattern.
2.Introduction
6.Conclusion
8.References
Keywords
Custom Cast Post; Pattern Resin; Inlay Wax; Marginal Adaptability
Introduction
Custom cast post compared to the other prefabricated post improve
the strength of the root canal treated tooth.The cast post
and core is custom fitted to the prepared root canal space and
designed to resist torsional forces.It has been reported that if a
canal requires extensive preparation , a well adapted cast post and
core will be more retentive than a prefabricated post that does not
match the canal configuration.Post and cores can be fabricated
either intraorally on the tooth or indirectly on the die.The final
instrument used to prepare the post space corresponds to the size
and shape of the final post. Hence an index of the same is made
with vinyl polysiloxane impression material and used to fabricate
a wax pattern [1]. Using an indirect technique, posts prepared
with acrylic resin may become locked into the cast undercuts. Use
of wax for the post fabrication reduces this problem however
insertion and removal of wax may cause distortion or breakage
of the pattern. The material used in the technique is inlay wax.
The advantages of this technique include the precise fit of the
post into the post space along with less chairside time, as the wax
pattern is not fabricated inside the patient's mouth.If the selected
post closely fits or conforms to the canal shape and size , it may
be a more conservative option because less dentin removal is required,
thus enhancing fracture resistance of the tooth, as well as
retention of the post [2].
The accuracy of wax patterns is of major importance for obtaining
a well fitting casting [3]. However, dental waxes have greater
coefficient of thermal expansion, which may be a major contributing
factor to the inaccuracy of the final restoration. Dimensional
changes in wax pattern occur on the die and during removal
of pattern from the die [1]. It is observed that pattern removed from die after initial carving and remodeling at the margin after
replacement on the die has a more acceptable fit. The fabrication
of acceptable wax patterns is an important variable that can affect
marginal fit throughout the casting procedure. Proper manipulation
with a thorough understanding of its properties and nature
will help in fabrication of acceptable wax patterns. Generally the
basic constituents of dental waxes come from three main sources,
Mineral- eg. Paraffin wax, microcrystalline wax or ceresin, Insecteg.
Beeswax, Vegetable - Carnauba wax, Candelila wax, Resins and
gums [4].
Paraffin waxes are mixtures of chiefly straight-chain saturated
hydrocarbons which crystallize in plates or needles. Litene and
barnsdahl have better micro-hardness than other hydrocarbon
waxes. Montan waxes are obtained from various lignites, but unlike
the other mineral waxes they are mixtures of long-chain esters
accompanied by high molecular weight alcohols, acids and
resins. As a result, montan wax is hard and brittle`. Carnauba and
ouricury waxes are composed of a mixture of straight-chain esters,
alcohols, acids and hydrocarbons [5]. They are characterized
by high hardness, brittleness, and high melting points. Candelilla
wax, although a plant wax, contains 40-60 percent paraffin hydrocarbon
accompanied by esters, alcohols and acids. Japan wax is
primarily a fat containing glycerides of palmitic, stearic and other
higher molecular weight acids10. Beeswax, which is a complex
mixture of esters, consists mainly of myricylpalmitate plus saturated
and unsaturated hydrocarbons and organic acids. It is supplied
in a number of grades, the bleached type being of higher
purity.[6] The selection of waxes, therefore, include a wide range
of sources, composition and properties. Properties of these waxes
will control to a great extent the combination used for various
applications in dentistry.
The paraffin wax exhibits a setting range between 51.50 C- 53.00C.
This is the lowest setting range amongst the mineral waxes .Barnsdahl
had the highest setting range 85.00 C - 87.00 C. Ceresin is an
exception , with the setting range between 52.00 C - 73.00 C. Both
yellow and bleached beeswax has a setting range between 61.00 C
-63.00 C51.In the direct method, a resin pattern is produced by
placing a preformed plastic "burnout" post into the post space
and a resin material is used to build up the tooth to the proper
dimensions [7].
When this is completed, the pattern post and core is removed
from the tooth structure and sent to the dental lab. The technician
will make a duplicate of the post and core using metal alloys.
Acrylic dental resins are a group of resins made by polymerizing
esters of acrylic or methyl methacrylate acids. Methyl methacrylate
resin is a thermoplastic acrylic resin that is used by mixing
liquid methyl methacrylate monomer with polymer powder
which can then be packed into a mold [8]. Acrylic pattern resins
are autopolymerizable polymers used for the fabrication of dental
patterns, Resistance to Flow is important for pattern fabrication.
The resistance to flow of acrylic pattern resins can be controlled
by combining the powder and liquid components until the desired
viscosity is obtained. The resistance to flow is higher in resins
compared to waxes.• Dimensional Stability is controversial with
regards to acrylic resins. [9]
Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various
research projects across multiple disciplines [10-24]. Now the
growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.
Materials and Methods
The study involved the selection of 20 single rooted teeth, 10
samples for each group. The group 1 consisted of a custom cast
post made of resin pattern and the group 2 also consisted 10 teeth
for inlay wax. The teeth were mounted on wax occlusal rim and
were scanned with CBCT in all the planes. The teeth were decoronated
for the study so that custom cast posts can be fabricated.
The measurements were made with the help of Carestreamkodak
9300 premium 3d CBCT software. The findings were tabulated in
the excel sheet and further were imported to IBM SPSS statistical
software version 22.0. The statistical analysis was carried out using
the values obtained. The statistical test preferred was Anova
tests and t tests.
Results And Discussion
The marginal fit is important for long term success of cast restorations.
Deficiencies can result in damage to the teeth and periodontal
structures. Retention of plaque leads to marginal inflammation
as well as gingival recession. Insufficient marginal fit can
cause secondary caries below the margins of the crown. These
defects are frequent reasons for failure of the restorations. Marginal
gap is defined as “the perpendicular measurement from the internal surface of the casting to the axial wall of the preparation
at the margin” (Holmes, J. et al 1989) [25]. Gap measurements
at the margin of restorations are frequently used to quantify fit
(Groten, M. et al 2000) [26]. A study by Iglesias et al showed that
marginal gaps ranged from 7 to 23 microns and that resin patterns
had statistically smaller gaps than inlay wax patterns. Studies have
shown that there is a wide range of acceptable values for the upper
limit (50 to 150 microns) of a clinically acceptable marginal
gap (Groten M. et al, 2000) [26]. At this time, there is no clinical
evidence for a minimally acceptable marginal gap, however, acceptable
marginal discrepancies of inlays are 20 microns at the
occlusal surface and 74 microns at the gingival margin have been
reported (Iglesias, A. et al 1996) [27]. Marginal gap differences
less than 10 to 15 microns do not require intervention (Groten
M. et all, 2000). Finally, the presence of a marginal gap provides
space for cement between the internal surface of the casting and
the prepared surface of the tooth. The ideal dimension for the
cement space has been suggested at 20 to 40 microns for each
wall of the restoration (Rosenstiel, S.F. 2001) [28]. According to
the American Dental Association, the average space required for the cement ranges up to 25 microns thus a marginal gap of less
than 25 microns is clinically acceptable. It was observed in a study
that marginal gaps for samples prepared with both direct & indirect
methods ranged from 7 to 46 µm and are within the range
of clinical acceptability. In current study, patterns were fabricated
using the two test materials (Inlay Wax and Resin pattern) on each
of the ten natural prepared teeth. In Indirect technique, the property
of wax flow is less critical, also the pattern may be removed
from the die at a lower temperature and with greater ease.The
wax was melted using a wax melting pot (Dentsply) at 50°C to
maintain the same consistency throughout. A metallic sprue was
fixed to the floor of the preparation using a small amount of
the test wax. The sprue provides structural support for the wax
pattern and enables its removal from the preparation when set
[29]. A PK Thomas waxing instrument was used to retrieve the
semi-solid wax from the heater and apply it to the preparation
to build up the pattern .The wax pattern was built up incrementally
and once solidified, the pattern was finished and polished.
Examining the marginal fit of patterns on the natural tooth before
investing allows evaluation of pattern material at this stage
of fabrication. The marginal gaps were measured on the prepared
natural teeth 1 hour after its fabrication. Removal of pattern from
the teeth causes dimensional changes in average elevations of
29 to 56 µm depending on the load applied before removal.In
the direct method, a resin pattern is produced by placing a preformed
plastic "burnout" post into the post space and a resin material is used to build up the tooth to the proper dimensions.
When this is completed, the pattern post and core is removed
from the tooth structure and sent to the dental lab. Acrylic dental
resins are a group of resins made by polymerizing esters of
acrylic or methyl methacrylate acids. Methyl methacrylate resin is
a thermoplastic acrylic resin that is used by mixing liquid methyl
methacrylate monomer with polymer powder which can then be
packed into a mold .Acrylic pattern resins are autopolymerizable
polymers used for the fabrication of dental patterns,Resistance to
Flow is important for pattern fabrication. The resistance to flow
of acrylic pattern resins can be controlled by combining the powder
and liquid components until the desired viscosity is obtained.
The resistance to flow is higher in resins compared to waxes.• Dimensional
Stability is controversial with regards to acrylic resins.
Reports range from 0.2 to 9% in dimensional changes over time
period (Powers, J.M. et al. 2006)[30]. This factor is affected by the
composition and processing of the material. According to several
studies, the most accurate acrylics were produced using either a
chemically activated pour resin or a microwave-activated resin. A
visible light-activated resin was more accurate than a conventional
heat-activated resin (Powers, J.M. et al. 2006).
Polymerization Shrinkage [31] has been shown to be one of the
key elements that affect in the fit accuracy of acrylic resins. Mojon
et al compared two acrylic pattern resins and found that after
24 hours, the volumetric shrinkage was 7.9% for DuraLay resin
and 6.5% for Palaver G resin. This study showed that regardless
of the type of resin used, polymerization shrinkage is observed.
Cahi et al studied the dimensional stability of an autopolymerizing
acrylic resin, a light-curing resin, and wax. They found that
light-curing resin showed less shrinkage than autopolymerizing
resin, however, the difference was not significant. Both the autopolymerizing
and the light-curing resin exhibited less contraction
than wax (Cahi, E. et al 2000).
Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based
research and has excelled in various fields [32-42].
Table 1. Shows the distribution of teeth receiving crown following root canal treatment. Only 22.6% of teeth received crown following root canal treatment and the remaining 77.4% did not receive crown following endodontic treatment.
Table 2. Shows the distribution of teeth receiving crown following root canal treatment. Only 22.6% of teeth received crown following root canal treatment and the remaining 77.4% did not receive crown following endodontic treatment.
Table 3. Shows the distribution of teeth receiving crown following root canal treatment. Only 22.6% of teeth received crown following root canal treatment and the remaining 77.4% did not receive crown following endodontic treatment.
Table 4. Shows the distribution of teeth receiving crown following root canal treatment. Only 22.6% of teeth received crown following root canal treatment and the remaining 77.4% did not receive crown following endodontic treatment.
Table 5. Shows the distribution of teeth receiving crown following root canal treatment. Only 22.6% of teeth received crown following root canal treatment and the remaining 77.4% did not receive crown following endodontic treatment.
Conclusion
The marginal adaptability of pattern resin is better in the coronal
and the middle third of the root and in the apical region inlay wax
has better marginal adaptability.
References
- Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of a paste containing bioactive glass and a topical cream containing casein phosphopeptide- amorphous calcium phosphate: An in vitro study. Pesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clinica integrada. 2019;19.
- . Manohar MP, Sharma S. A survey of the knowledge, attitude, and awareness about the principal choice of intracanal medicaments among the general dental practitioners and nonendodontic specialists. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):716-720. Pubmed PMID: 30588997.
- Teja KV, Ramesh S, Priya V. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene expression in inflammation: A molecular study. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov- Dec;21(6):592-596. Pubmed PMID: 30546201.
- Nandakumar M, Nasim I. Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):516-520. Pubmed PMID: 30294113.
- Ramanathan S, Solete P. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):869-72. Pubmed PMID: 26718293.
- Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resinmodified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):510-515. Pubmed PMID: 30294112.
- Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J. 2015 Aug;41(2):78-87. Pubmed PMID: 25195661.
- Janani K, Palanivelu A, Sandhya R. Diagnostic accuracy of dental pulse oximeter with customized sensor holder, thermal test and electric pulp test for the evaluation of pulp vitality: an in vivo study. Brazilian Dental Science. 2020 Jan 31;23(1):8-p.
- Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):40-47. Pubmed PMID: 30820081.
- Ravinthar K. Recent advancements in laminates and veneers in dentistry. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Feb 1;11(2):785-7.
- Kumar D, Antony SD. Calcified canal and negotiation-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Aug 1;11(8):3727-30.
- Rajakeerthi R, Nivedhitha MS. Natural Product as the Storage medium for an avulsed tooth–A Systematic Review. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2019;22(2):249-56.
- Noor SS. Chlorhexidine: Its properties and effects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 1;9(10):1755.
- Teja KV, Ramesh S. Shape optimal and clean more. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):235.
- Jose J, Subbaiyan H. Different treatment modalities followed by dental practitioners for ellis class 2 fracture–A questionnaire-based survey. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2020 Feb 18;14(1).
- Lazarski MP, Walker WA 3rd, Flores CM, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. Epidemiological evaluation of the outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment in a large cohort of insured dental patients. J Endod. 2001 Dec;27(12):791-6. Pubmed PMID: 11771594.
- Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1995 Feb;21(2):57-61. Pubmed PMID: 7714437.
- Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Jun;51(6):780- 4. Pubmed PMID: 6376780.
- Stavropoulou AF, Koidis PT. A systematic review of single crowns on endodontically treated teeth. J Dent. 2007 Oct;35(10):761-7. Pubmed PMID: 17822823.
- Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Hayden WJ, Felton DA. General dentists' patterns of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Jun;126(6):775-9. Pubmed PMID: 7797734.