Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey of Dental Students and Dental Practitioner about COVID 19
J Jayaindhraeswaran1*, Senthil Nathan P2, Arun M3
1 Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
2 Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
3 Senior lecturer, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
J Jayaindhraeswaran,
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
Tel: 7200500633
E-mail: eshwaran.jjjj@gmail.com
Received: April 25, 2021; Accepted: July 09, 2021; Published: July 21, 2021
Citation:J Jayaindhraeswaran, Senthil Nathan P, Arun M. Comparing The Effectivenes Of Chlorhexidine Gel And Metronidazole Gel In Management Of Dry Socket. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(7):3457-3459.doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000705
Copyright: J Jayaindhraeswaran©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Aim: To compare and analyse the effectiveness of the intra alveolar application of chlorhexidine gel and metronidazole gel
in management of dry socket.
Materials And Method: In vivo, single blind ,randomised control through comparative protective study was conducted in the
Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Around 30 patients were included in study irrespective of their gender, race and
they had undergone extraction of third molar successively. Patients were in the age group of 18-40 years. The patients were
divided into two groups of 15 patients each based on study material used. Patient were evaluated for mouth opening, facia size
during pre-operative study, followed by 3rd and 7th day post operatively.
Result: The study clearly shows us a reasonable improvement in the mouth opening and swelling after placement of metronidazole
gel.In addition to effectiveness there is decrease in post extraction pain particularly due to usage of metronidazole gel.
Conclusion: This study particularly emphasise upon usage of metronidazole gel because of its effectiveness in reducing post
operative complication like pain, swelling and reduction in mouth opening. This tangible improvement signifies and highlights
the use of metronidazole in the prevention of dry socket after third molar extraction.
2.Introduction
6.Conclusion
8.References
Keywords
Chlorhexidine Gel; Dry Socket; Third Molar Extraction; Metronidazole Gel.
Introduction
Dry socket or alveolar osteitis is a very painful per se, self limiting
condition which is relatively common complication following the
tooth extraction process. Dry socket was first described in 1896
by Crawford. According to Blum, Dry socket is defined as pain
near the extraction socket after post operation, which increase in
intensity at any time between the first and third day after extraction
of third molar. This particular complication which occur due
to partially or totally disrupted blood clot within socket and also
with or without halitosis. This incidence varies between 20% to
30% after extraction of impacted third molar and 1% to 80% for
all dental extraction. The onset of dry socket occur 1 to 3 days
after toothextraction. Etiology of dry socket has not been firmly
known as of now, two main theories have been proposed for the
ethology of dry socket. Current cure resides with antibacterial
agents, antiseptics, antifibrinolytics, anti inflammatory agents. Antiseptics
such as chlorhexidine rinses proved to be highly efficient
in dry socket prevention and its complication.
The study was prospective ,blind study done to assess and compare
the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel and metronidazole gel
placed directly into surgical socket after removal of extraction
third molar.
Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various
research projects across multiple disciplines (Govindaraju
and Gurunathan 2017; A. Christabel et al. 2016; Soh and Narayanan 2013; Mehta et al. 2019; Ezhilarasan, Apoorva, and Ashok
Vardhan 2019; Campeau et al. 2014; Kumar and S 2016; S. L.
Christabel 2015; Kumar and Rahman 2017; Sridharan, Ramani,
and Patankar 2017; Ramesh et al. 2016; Thamaraiselvan et al.
2015; Thangaraj et al. 2016; Ponnulakshmi et al. 2019; “Fluoride,
Fluoridated Toothpaste Efficacy and Its Safety in Children - Review”
2018) Now the growing trend in this area motivated us to
pursue this project.
Materials and Methods
This study involved both male and female patients, who were under
went molar extraction with difficulty score ranging between 7
to 10 in Pederson difficulty index.
Inclusion Criteria
All the patient in the age group of 18-40 years, requiring extraction
of 3 rd molar.
Exclusion Criteria
• Patients with immuno compromized patients
• Pregnancy patients and oral contraceptive
• Patients allergic to chlorhexidine and metronidazole
• Patients with hard or soft tissue pathology
• Patients who are addicted or abuse alcohol and tobacco.
Study Design
Study conducted based on 30 participants and they were divided
into two groups based on the material applied in the dry socket
.All the patients underwent extraction with the same techniques.
All the necessary procedures were done with the help of local anesthesia
i.e, with 2% lignocaine by the same practitioner to eliminate
any bias in the procedure. Patients were reviewed on the 3rd
day and second review on 7th day post operation.
Discussion
The most common and painful complication in the healing process
of the extraction wound is Dry socket. Alveolar osteitis is
an acute non purulent inflammatory process. It is localised in the
dental alveolus that creates a delay in wound healing. Its characters
include late onset with intense and irradiating pain.The main characteristic
of the extraction socket is the denuded appearance. The
interior bone exposed in the oral cavity which is whitish. Most
crucially it is hypersensitive to contact. Most literature supports that dry socket occurs very infrequently in childhood and that incidence
increase with increase in patients age. In this study, there
exist no correlation between gender, age, site of extraction and
dry socket.
In 1977, Legarth performed a study to see the effect of 0.2%
chlorhexidine on dry socket prevention and noted a 45% decrease
in dry socket in a group of 60 patients.The bio adhesive 0.2%
chlorhexidine gel directly placed into socket will have more direct
action on the alveolus.
Various studies have been done to see the major role of metronidazole
in the prohibition of dry socket. And its results were
found, which says prophylactic metronidazole was found to be
effective means of preventing dry socket after regular dental extraction.
The antimicrobial activity of metronidazole has been proposed
is due to the reduction of nitro group to a more reactive amine
group. This amine group attacks the microbial DNA thus inhibiting
further synthesis and causing degradation of existing DNA
.From the mentioned mechanism of action use of ornidazole as
local drug delivery may be an advantageous form of treatment
since it would probably eliminate side effects.
By taking into account clinical evaluation and statistical analysis
we found that in patient were intra alveolar metronidazole gel
was placed there was significant decrease in pain on the 3rd day
post operative and 7 th day post operative day. Mouth opening
and facial swelling was also reasonable post operative. At the end
comparison of chlorhexidine gel and metronidazole gel irrespective
of Peterson difficulty index score for mouth opening, facial
size and pain, there is statistically significant ,from this it can be
concluded that metronidazole gels are effective in reducing post
extraction complications.
Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based
research and has excelled in various fields ( (Jayaseelan Vijayashree
Priyadharsini 2019; Pc, Marimuthu, and Devadoss 2018; Ramesh
et al. 2018; Ramadurai et al. 2019; Sridharan et al. 2019; Ezhilarasan,
Apoorva, and Ashok Vardhan 2019; Mathew et al. 2020;
Samuel 2021; R et al. 2020; Chandrasekar et al. 2020; J. Vijayashree
Priyadharsini, Smiline Girija, and Paramasivam 2018)
Conclusion
This study indicates that irrespective of difficulty index, metronidazole
gel is effective in decreasing the post operative complications
which includes pain, swelling and reduction in mouth opening.
The limitation of the present study is small sample size.
References
- Peterson D. Dry Socket. Br J Dent 2003; 194: 453-5.
- Nusair YM, Younis MH. Prevalence, clinical picture, and risk factors of dry socket in a Jordanian dental teaching center. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 1;8(3):53 -63. Pubmed PMID: 17351682.
- Peterson LJ, Ellis E lll, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 4th ed. USA: Mosby 2003; 236-7.
- Rood JP, Murgatroyd J. Metronidazole in the prevention of ‘dry socket’. British journal of oral surgery. 1979 Jul 1;17(1):62-70.
- Bonine FL. Effect of chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of dry socket in impacted mandibular third molar extraction sites. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Feb;79(2):154-7; discussion 157-8. Pubmed PMID: 7614176.
- Amaratunga NA, Senaratne CM. A clinical study of dry socket in Sri Lanka. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Oct;26(5):410-8. Pubmed PMID: 3056513.
- Anand SC, Singh VD, Goel M, Verma A, Rai B. Dry socket an appraisal and surgical management. The Internet Journal of Dental Science. 2007;13(1):53-8.
- Alexander RE. Dental extraction wound management: a case against medicating postextraction sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 May;58(5):538- 51. Pubmed PMID: 10800910.
- Birn H. Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis (“dry socket”). International journal of oral surgery. 1973 Jan 1;2(5):211-63.
- Blum IR. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;31(3):309-17. Pubmed PMID: 12190139.