Two-stage Treatment of TMJ Ankylosis by Distraction Osteogenesis followed by Interpositional Arthroplasty

Introduction

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis refers to immobility of the joint and is characterized by the formation of an osseous, fibrous, or fibro-osseous mass fused to the cranial base [1]. A typical ‘bird face’ appearance is noted in cases of bilateral ankylosis with onset during childhood [2]. Restriction of mandible movement in pediatric patients frequently leads to physical and psychological impairments, including speech impairment, difficulty in chewing and swallowing, rampant caries, poor oral hygiene, facial deformity and airway obstruction. Furthermore, the condition of micrognathia is thought to cause obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) due to airway obstruction due to glossoptosis and reduced oropharyngeal space [3].

Several surgical methods have been applied to treat patients with micrognathia and repair their bone defects. However, mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has additional advantages over other methods [4]. MDO is able to correct the micrognathia and relieve the airway obstruction due to its ability to stretch the tongue and muscles attached to the mandible forward [5]. The present study reports on a case of micrognathia and OSAS due to bilateral TMJ ankylosis in early childhood. TMJ management combined with simultaneous MDO was used for the treatment of this patient and the 4-year follow-up indicated optimal results.

Case Report

Case Presentation

A 12year-old Female patient presented with an abnormal mandible, limited mouth opening . The cause of the TMJ ankylosis was unkown. The TMJ exhibited no condylar mobility. A typical ‘bird face’ appearance with serious mandible retrognathism and significant convex facial profile was noted (Fig. 1). Radiological examinations confirmed a condyle deformity and the mandible was apparently underdeveloped downward and forward. Cephalometric analysis indicated a severe skeletal Class II malocclusion with an angle that reflects the maxillary protrusion, formed by the sella turcica point, nasion point and upper alveolar point (SNA), of 79.5°; an angle that reflects the mandibular protrusion, formed by sella turcica point, nasion point and inferior alveolar point (SNB), of 60.1°; and an angle that reflects the relative protrusion of maxilla and mandible, formed by the upper alveolar point, nasion point and inferior point (ANB) of 19.4°. A severely hypoplastic mandible and chin with a facial angle of 67.8° and a Y-axis angle of 73.1° were also observed. The diagnosis was TMJ ankylosis, micrognathia and. Calculation of the pharynx diameters was accomplished by using the software Mimics Research version 20.0 (Materialise Corp.). The same slice was identified by the lower border of the second cervical centrum, which was the middle part of the oropharynx and the narrowest point of the pharyngeal airway in this patient. Repeated evaluations were performed for a total of three or four times for each measure to obtain the average value and statistical analysis was not applicable to this study.

Treatment Procedure

The protocol by Kaban et al [6] was followed during the initial surgery. The first step was TMJ arthroplasty by condylectomy and simultaneous MDO, with bilateral coronoidectomy if required. During the procedure, the surgeons concluded that the normal TMJ architecture and intact disc had not been retained and that the ankylotic mass was fused to the skull base. Subsequently, a specimen of 15 mm in length of the ankylosed condyle was excised at the level below the condyle neck. The maximal opening measured 35 mm after completion of the excision. To avoid recurrence of ankylosis, a Dacron patch (Chester Healthcare Technology Co., Ltd) was sutured to the soft tissue. The use of a temporalis muscle fascia flap was avoided following condylectomy. An individualized 3D-printed model (Cibei Medical Treatment Appliance Co., Ltd) was constructed prior to the surgery and the osteotomy line was accurately designed on the mandible model in order not to injure the teeth buds. The osteotomy line was designed on the mandible angle to create a transport disc so that distractors were able to vertically lengthen the ramus height and sagittal plane, leading to a concomitant extension of the mandibular body. Cutting guides were also designed to fit on the mandible model in order to reproduce the planned osteotomy. Therefore, the parallel placement of the distraction devices was ensured by the same slots, which were designed on the cutting guides and devices. During the surgery, the corresponding screw holes were initially drilled on the bone in order to determine the positions of the distractors. Subsequently, the corticotomy was achieved in the mandibular angle. Finally, the internal distractors (Cibei Medical Treatment Appliance Co., Ltd) were fixed to the transport disc and mandibular body with screws, lengthening the ramus height and mandibular body.

After a latency period of 3 days, the distractors were activated three times daily by a 0.4-mm turn. The duration of distraction lasted for 13 days until the anterior overjet disappeared and the anterior teeth exhibited a 2-mm crossbite. The total extracted length was 15.6 mm. Physical training was initiated from the day when distractors were applied and a T-shaped opener was provided to the patient in order to aid with the training of the mouth opening. The patient's snoring symptoms were relieved immediately following surgery. Airway enlargement was evident on CT scans after the distraction period (Fig. 2D). The transverse view of CT scans indicated that the pharynx diameters were increased to 23.95 mm (width) and 7.70 mm (length). These were considerably greater than those determined prior to the operation (13.08×2.12 mm).

Treatment and outcomes at the 1-year follow-up

No complications of toothache, wound infection or loosing of devices were reported. During removal at 1 year, it was noted that the distractors were still fixed in a good position and the screws were stable. According to the surgery record, the actual regeneration length was 15.5 mm. The patient reported significant improvement with sleep problems as a result of the increase in the oropharyngeal airway. The distractors were removed following the consolidation period. The ‘bird face’ appearance was improved (Fig. 1B-E). Cephalometric measurements demonstrated that the SNB was increased to 67.0°, the ANB was decreased to 13.1°, the facial angle was increased to 73.6° and the Y-axis angle was decreased to 70.4°. CT scans indicated further enlargement of the upper airway diameters that were estimated at 23.95 mm in width and 7.70 mm in length (Fig. 2F). However, the maximal incisal opening (MIO) returned to 11 mm at 1 year following condylectomy, since the patient was unwilling to endure the pain during mouth opening exercises. In order to obtain a larger opening capacity, a coronoidectomy was performed and the passive MIO reached to 30 mm following the completion of the surgery. Mouth-opening exercises were strongly recommended for the patient.

Discussion

The present study describes a case of pediatric bilateral TMJ ankylosis and severe secondary micrognathia and OSAS. In this patient, TMJ ankylosis occurred at a young age as a result of mandibular trauma and caused severe facial deformity and airway obstruction. In addition to the growth, the patient was burdened with severe functional and aesthetic malformations that may adversely affect his social and psychological development [7]. Therefore, it has been proposed that early treatment of ankylosis is necessary to avoid secondary deformities [6, 7]. In the present case, condylectomy was performed at the age of 5. The patient was of sufficient age to cooperate with post-operative physiotherapy. However, the patient's MIO indicated limited improvement following treatment, due to poor compliance. Therefore, the study suggested that, although early surgical treatment is essential for pediatric patients with ankylosis, patient compliance, family support and the financial burden should also be considered during the selection of the appropriate time for surgical correction. Early post-operative exercise, active physiotherapy and stringent follow-up are essential to prevent post-operative shrinkage and adhesions in TMJ ankyloses. The motivation to perform active mouth opening training and tolerance of discomfort are considered key factors in determining successful maintenance of postoperative mouth opening [8].

The purpose of MDO in the present case study included the correction of craniofacial deformities and the resolution of OSAS. The mandibular lengthening obtained by gradual distraction may result in expansion of the mandibular bony tissue and in proportional and harmonic modification of the muscles and the surrounding soft tissues [9]. However, whether distraction should be performed at the time of TMJ management remains controversial. Certain surgeons prefer to first restore the jaw movements and address the secondary facial deformities afterwards [10], whereas others perform the distraction first, followed by TMJ management at the second stage [11]. The selection of different surgical methods is based on specific factors. Lopez and Dogliotti [10] suggested that the MDO should be performed following arthroplasty, as the growth potential of the mandible is only realized when the ankylosis has been relieved. However, Sadakah et al [11] recommended postponing the release of the ankylosed joint following bilateral distractions, since it is more advantageous in preventing rotation and upward movement of the condylar segment during the course of the distraction. In contrast to this type of treatment, it has been proposed by surgeons to attempt simultaneous correction of all deformities by performing distraction during ankylotic mass removal following the introduction of distraction osteogenesis for mandibular lengthening [12]. Simultaneous arthroplasty and MDO enable the production of a neocondyle and allow for concomitant correction of facial malformations. The treatment outcomes of pre-arthroplastic distraction and simultaneous arthroplastic distraction have been previously compared and it was concluded that the two methods were effective in correcting the aesthetics of the patients and functional movement of the TMJ [13]. Papageorge and Apostolidis [14] were the first to perform simultaneous gap arthroplasty and MDO for the treatment of micrognathia in ankyloses of the TMJ in 1999; as a result, mouth opening was improved and facial deformity was corrected. Eski et al [15] reported on three patients with TMJ ankylosis associated with facial asymmetry, who were treated with gap arthroplasty and simultaneous distraction. As a result, TMJ ankylosis was released and bone regeneration was achieved [15]. This method used for TMJ ankylosis resulted in reduced treatment time and economic burden of the patients, whereas it eliminated the requirement for additional surgery. However, the shortcomings of this procedure are that following release of the ankylotic block, the changes in the mandibular position cannot be completely controlled during the distraction period [12]. It must be emphasized that the selection of the surgical procedure depends on the specific condition of the patient, including the type of ankylosis, the severity of mandible dysplasia, the airway obstruction, the patient's age and the family's financial status. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required.

Precision device placement is vital to avoid iatrogenic deformities or surgical failure. In the present case, the accurate osteotomy was guaranteed by using a 3-D printed pre-operative model and a surgical cutting guide. Improvements in the appearance and airway obstruction were apparent. However, it has been reported that the distracted mandible exhibits a period of relapse and usually does not exhibit a ‘catch-up’ growth compared with the residual somatic growth of the face [16]. To achieve optimal appearance and respiratory function, mandibular distraction may be combined with other surgical techniques, e.g. instance genoplasty [17]. Mandibular distraction may further correct the 3-D skeletal deficiencies in patients with micrognathia deformity and achieve an ideal surgical effect.

×

Figure 1:

Close

Figure 1.

Conclusion

In conclusion, TMJ management with simultaneous mandible distraction is an effective method to improve mandibular movement restrictions, airway obstructions and micrognathia. MDO has a versatile role in the treatment process. Patients with childhood onset require early surgical treatments to avoid secondary malformations. However, poor compliance with post-surgical physiotherapy is likely to lead to a limited range of motion following surgery.