SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-7062

Evaluation Of Surface Tension And Antioxidant Properties Of Essential Oils


KrishnaKanth Jaju1, Iffat Nasim2*

1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
2 Professor and HOD, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


*Corresponding Author

Iffat Nasim,
Professor and HOD, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: iffatnasim@saveetha.com

Received: May 04, 2021; Accepted: July 09, 2021; Published: July 15, 2021

Citation:Krishnakanth Jaju, Iffat Nasim. Evaluation Of Surface Tension And Antioxidant Properties Of Essential Oils. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(6):3219-3222.doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000656

Copyright:Iffat Nasim©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the antioxidant property and surface tension of oils used during instrument retrieval. Materials And Methods: Four solutions were prepared: corn oil, soya oil, orange oil and liquid EDTA. 100 ml of each solution was prepared and assessed for antioxidant activity and surface tension property.

For antioxidant property - DPPH assay was used. In different test tubes the respective oils were mixed with ethanol solution at different concentrations (10–50 µg/ml) Then 0.8 ml of 100 mM tris HCl buffer was added to them and pH was adjusted to 7.4. Then DPPH (500 mM in 1.0 ml ethanol) solution was added to the above mixtures.

Absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 517 nm UV-Visible Spectrophotometer The surface tension of four liquids was measured using a goniometer.

Results: Orange oil showed more surface tension when compared with Corn Oil, EDTA & Soya Oil. EDTA showed the highest antioxidant property compared to corn oil, soya oil, orange oil.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study it was seen that EDTA has better antioxidant property compared to other three groups. Orange oil has more surface tension when compared to other three groups. However, more clinical trials need to be done to get conclusive results.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
6.Conclusion
8.References


Keywords

Surface Tension; Antioxidant Activity; DPPH Assay; Corn Oil; EDTA; Orange Oil; Soya Oil.


Introduction

Oxygen is an essential element which is important for life and it plays an important role in promotion and deterioration of human health. Gershman’s free radical theory of oxygen toxicity in 1954 threw light on the toxicity of oxygen due to its partially reduced form[1]. When cells use oxygen to generate energy in the form of ATP in the mitochondria, free radicals are created [1, 2]. A free radical is defined as “any species capable of independent existence that contains one or more unpaired electrons. They are a family of highly reactive and diverse species, capable of extracting electrons and thereby oxidizing a variety of bio molecules vital to cell and tissue function, which not only includes oxygen free radicals, but also nitrogen and chlorine species[1, 3]. In recent years, the term “reactive oxygen species” (ROS) has been adopted to include molecules such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hypochlorous acid (HOCI) and singlet oxygen (O2), which though, not radical in nature, are capable of radical transformation in the extra- and intracellular environments[1-4] Antioxidants are defined as “those substances which when present at low concentrations, compared to those of an oxidizable substrate, will significantly delay or inhibit oxidation of that substrate[ 5].

Oxidative stress is defined as “disturbance in the pro oxidant - antioxidant balance in favour of former, leading to potential damage”[6]. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various chronic and degenerative conditions including cancer, arthritis, aging, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases[6, 7].

Antioxidants are capable of deactivating free radicals before they attack human cells. Humans do generate highly complex antioxidant systems (enzymatic and non enzymatic), which work synergistically and in combination with each other to prevent cells or organs against free radical[6-8].

Another important aspect of root canal treatment is disinfection which involves mechanical preparation of the canal along with chemical debridement. This includes irrigation of the canal[9]. Irrigation of the canal involves various properties of the irrigant such as nature of the irrigant, viscosity, surface tension and various other flow characteristics. Irrigants must be used with the aim of complete debridement of the canal. To achieve this, the irrigant must be in contact with the dentinal wall[10]. The intimacy of this contact is dependent on the wettability of the irrigant which is solely a subvariant of surface tension. The surface tension is defined as “the force between molecules that produces a tendency for the surface area of a liquid to decrease”[11]. The irrigants for endodontic use should have very low surface tension. By improving the wettability, an irrigant solution could enhance better antimicrobial activity by increasing its protein solvent capability even in the uninstrumented areas of the root canal[12].

Liquid EDTA is normally used in a concentration of 17% and is frequently used as an irrigant in root canal treatment. Its main activity is toward smear layer removal because of its chelating power which makes it effective in removing the inorganic component of dentin[13]. But it is ineffective in removing the smear layer and also has high surface tension and it is unable to reach bacteria in the depth of the dentinal tubules. A quaternary ammonium bromide has been added to EDTA solutions to reduce surface tension and increase penetrability of the solution[14]. Natural products have shown reliable outcomes in various aspects of endodontic therapy. They have been gaining popularity due to their lower immunogenicity, easy availability and less harmful effects. One of such many natural products are corn oil and orange oil[15].

Orange oil, Corn oil is said to have superior antioxidant property due to the presence of flavonoids. The surface tension of the oil changes with the amount of heat applied to the oil[16]. Warming of the liquid decreases the viscosity and thereby increases the surface tension. Soya bean oil is rich in Vitamins A,E which are antioxidants[17]. Hence soya bean oil and corn oil being natural products and also potent antioxidants can be employed as irrigants[18]. The purpose of this study is to assess the surface tension and antioxidant property of soya bean oil, Orange oil, Liquid EDTA and corn oil used as lubricants during instrument retrieval. Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various research projects across multiple disciplines [19–33]. Now the growing trend in this area motivated us to pursue this project.


Materials and Methods

Sample Preparation

Four oils namely : corn oil, soya oil, orange oil and liquid EDTA were taken. 100 ml of each solution was used and assessed for antioxidant activity and surface tension property.

DPPH Assay

In different test tubes the respective oils were mixed with ethanol solution at different concentrations (10–50 µg/ml) Then 0.8 ml of 100 mM tris HCl buffer was added to them and pH was adjusted to 7.4. Then DPPH (500 mM in 1.0 ml ethanol) solution was added to the above mixtures.

Contact Angle Goniometer

The surface tension of four liquids was measured using a goniometer. In goniometer contact angle is observed and measured from the 2-D side view image of drops on the solid surface using ossilla software.

Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. There was no statistically significant difference between different oils - ANOVA, with 95% confidence intervals. p value was more than 0.05.


Results and Discussion

The surface tension values exhibited by the different essential oils and EDTA are as follows:

Orange oil-718.1 N/m
EDTA- 692.1 N/m
Soya oil- 677.6 N/m
Corn oil- 616.3 N/m

Orange oil showed more surface tension when compared with EDTA, Corn Oil & Soya Oil .

EDTA showed the highest antioxidant property compared to corn oil, soya oil, orange oil. Corn oil and soya oil contain polyphenols as flavonoids which are important for antioxidant activity. Orange oil contains ascorbic acid which is a potent antioxidant. EDTA activates antioxidant enzymes and reduces the activity of reactive oxygen species

Irrigation is an important aspect of endodontic therapy. The use of proper irrigants enable to clean those parts of the canal space which are inaccessible to clean via mechanical debridement such as isthumi, accessory canals, fins and so on[34]. Properties of irrigants such as viscosity, surface tension, density influence the flow of irrigant into the canal space.The irrigant must be in contact with the dentinal wall in order to exert its function. This depends on the surface tension of the liquid[35].

Surface tension is defined as the force between molecules that produces a tendency for the surface area of a liquid to decrease. Surface tension of the liquid limits the ability of the irrigant to penetrate into the intricacies of the canal space. The efficiency of the iriigant depends on the lower surface tension[35, 36].

Another important property of the irrigant is its antioxidant property. Antioxidant activity is mainly due to its free radical scavenging ability[37]. This property ensures thorough debridement of the canal space.Antioxidant activity is determined by various assays and one such being DPPH assay[38].

The results of the present study showed that EDTA showed the highest antioxidant property compared to corn oil, soya oil, orange oil. Corn oil and soya oil contain polyphenols as flavonoids which are important for antioxidant activity. Orange oil contains ascorbic acid which is a potent antioxidant. EDTA activates antioxidant enzymes and reduces the activity of reactive oxygen species. The results of surface tension measured by the goniometer showed that orange oil showed the greatest surface tension values compared to other essential oils. The least value was shown by corn oil. An irrigant efficacy is determined by its lower surface tension. The lower the surface tension the higher is its ability to penetrate into the canal walls and clean the inaccessible areas[39] .

From the above results it can be inferred that corn oil has the lowest surface tension activity compared to other essential oils while EDTA exhibited highest antioxidant activity.

The above properties of the irrigants help the clinician mainly during instrument retrieval. The lower surface tension of the irrigant displaces the instrument from the canal and allows the instrument to wiggle which helps in easy retrieval of the instrument and high antioxidant property will reduce the bacterial load. Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based research and has excelled in various fields [40–50].



Figure 1. This graph depicts the percentage of DPPH radical scavenging action. Results are expressed as Mean±SEM. There was no statistically significant difference between different oils - ANOVA, with 95% confidence intervals. p value was more than 0.05.



Figure 2. Bar graph depicts the surface tension assay results. Results are expressed as newtons/meters. Orange Oil had the highest surface tension value 718 N/m, Corn Oil had the least value 616 N/m.


Conclusion

Within the limitations of the study it was seen that EDTA has better antioxidant properties compared to other three groups. Orange oil has more surface tension when compared to other three groups. However, more clinical trials need to be done to get conclusive results.


References

  1. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69. Pubmed PMID: 11696906.
  2. Stenudd C, Nordlund A, Ryberg M, Johansson I, Källestål C, Strömberg N. The association of bacterial adhesion with dental caries. J Dent Res. 2001 Nov;80(11):2005-10. Pubmed PMID: 11759011.
  3. Jalalian E, Mostofi SN, Shafiee E, Nourizadeh A, Nargesi RA, Ayremlou S. Adhesion of streptococcus mutans to Zirconia, Titanium alloy and some other restorative materials:“An in-vitro study”. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine. 2015 Apr 1;3(2):13-20.
  4. Bin AlShaibah WM, El-Shehaby FA, El-Dokky NA, Reda AR. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):206-11. Pubmed PMID: 23263423.
  5. Hatta H, Tsuda K, Ozeki M, Kim M, Yamamoto T, Otake S, et al. Passive immunization against dental plaque formation in humans: effect of a mouth rinse containing egg yolk antibodies (IgY) specific to Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 1997;31(4):268-74. Pubmed PMID: 9197932.
  6. Pannu P, Gambhir R, Sujlana A. Correlation between the salivary Streptococcus mutans levels and dental caries experience in adult population of Chandigarh, India. Eur J Dent. 2013 Apr;7(2):191-195. Pubmed PMID: 24883025.
  7. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Mar;29(3):257-62. Pubmed PMID: 11896842.
  8. Shillingburg HT, Sather DA. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics [Internet].
  9. Messer LB, Levering NJ. The durability of primary molar restorations: II. Observations and predictions of success of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1988 Jun;10(2):81-5. Pubmed PMID: 3269527.
  10. Gibbons RJ, van Houte J. Bacterial adherence and the formation of dental plaques. InBacterial adherence 1980 (pp. 61-104). Springer, Dordrecht.
  11. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, García-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):173-6. Pubmed PMID: 16158808.
  12. Kim DH, Kwon TY. In vitro study of Streptococcus mutans adhesion on composite resin coated with three surface sealants. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2017 Feb 1;42(1):39-47.
  13. Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Crielaard W, Ten Cate JM. Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Mar-Apr;16(2):86-94. Pubmed PMID: 19089197.
  14. Loesche WJ. Microbiology of Dental Decay and Periodontal Disease. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology [Internet]. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 2011.
  15. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D. Microbial evaluation of plaque on 3M ESPE and kids stainless steel crown in primary molars. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation. 2016 Jul 1;1(2):60.
  16. Myers DR. A clinical study of the response of the gingival tissue surrounding stainless steel crowns. ASDC J Dent Child. 1975 Jul-Aug;42(4):281-4. Pubmed PMID: 1099129.
  17. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):282-8. Pubmed PMID: 7937261.
  18. Ram D, Peretz B. Composite crown-form crowns for severely decayed primary molars: a technique for restoring function and esthetics. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000 Summer;24(4):257-60. Pubmed PMID: 11314407.
  19. Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 1999 Nov- Dec;21(7):445-8. Pubmed PMID: 10633519.
  20. Reeves WG. Restorative margin placement and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Dec;66(6):733-6. Pubmed PMID: 1805020.
  21. Kawashima M, Hanada N, Hamada T, Tagami J, Senpuku H. Real-time interaction of oral streptococci with human salivary components. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2003 Aug;18(4):220-5. Pubmed PMID: 12823797.
  22. Nyvad B, Kilian M. Comparison of the initial streptococcal microflora on dental enamel in caries-active and in caries-inactive individuals. Caries Res. 1990;24(4):267-72. Pubmed PMID: 2276164.
  23. Wan AK, Seow WK, Walsh LJ, Bird PS. Comparison of five selective media for the growth and enumeration of Streptococcus mutans. Aust Dent J. 2002 Mar;47(1):21-6. Pubmed PMID: 12035953.
  24. Pedrini D, Gaetti-Jardim Júnior E, de Vasconcelos AC. Retention of oral microorganisms on conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2001 Jul-Sep;15(3):196-200. Pubmed PMID: 11705266.
  25. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):379-85. Pubmed PMID: 12716328.
  26. Myers DR, Schuster GS, Bell RA, Barenie JT, Mitchell R. The effect of polishing technics on surface smoothness and plaque accumulation on stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1980 Dec;2(4):275-8. Pubmed PMID: 6941003.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn