SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-7042

Comparison of Post Extraction Healing in Diabetic Patients with two different Blood Glucose Levels - A Case Control Study


Aishwarya.S1, Senthil Murugan.P2*, Suresh. V3

1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai - 600 077, TN, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, 162, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, India.


*Corresponding Author

Senthil Murugan. P,
Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, 162, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tel: +91 9790869469
E-mail: senthilmuruganp.sdc@saveetha.com

Received: May 28, 2021; Accepted: June 16, 2021; Published: July 07, 2021

Citation:Aishwarya.S, Senthil Murugan. P, Suresh. V. Comparison of Post Extraction Healing in Diabetic Patients with two different Blood Glucose Levels - A Case Control Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(7):3124-3128.doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000636

Copyright:Senthil Murugan. P©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterised by an inability to regulate blood glucose level due to insulin deficiency or resistance. In dentistry, diabetics are considered to have increased healing problems related to dental extractions, periodontal surgery and wearing ill-fitting dentures.Therefore, management and treatment of diabetic patients undergoing oral surgical procedures are more difficult. Delayed angiogenesis, decrease in blood flow, compromised innate immunity, decrease in the production of growth factor and psychological stress have been reported as factors causing delay in the healing of extraction sockets in diabetic patients. So the aim of the study is to compare the post extraction healing in diabetic patients with two different glucose levels.It is a university setting retrospective study. The details of the 86,000 patient records were reviewed and analyzed, out of which 112 diabetic patients who had undergone extraction between June 2019 to March 2020 were included in this study after fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criterias. Age, gender, number of extractions, teeth number, blood glucose level [<200/>200] mg/dl, were included and evaluated. These datas were entered in SPSS. The data was analysed through chi square test.It was observed that there is a significant difference between post extraction healing and blood glucose levels among the diabetic patients.Within the limitations, patients with RBS level greater than 200 mg/dl had slower healing rate compared to patients with RBS level less than 200mg/dl.So this study will help the fellow dentists to be cautious in performing dental extractions in uncontrolled diabetic patients.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
6.Conclusion
8.References


Keywords

Blood Glucose Level; Extraction Socket; Insulin Dependent Diabetes; Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes.


Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterised by an inability of the body to regulate blood glucose level due to insulin deficiency or resistance [19]. Type I diabetes or insulin dependent diabetes is characterised by deficiency of insulin production and Type II diabetes or non insulin dependent diabetes is characterised by relative insulin deficiency and tissue insulin resistance [16]. It is also characterised by abnormal carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism. As a result, this leads to hyperglycemia that causes microvascular complications and a variety of clinical neuropathic complications [2, 20]. Studies have reported that half of the diabetic patients require surgery while the remaining two thirds of the patients who require surgery experience some complications relating to infection [6, 30].

The most common dental complications experienced by diabetic patients are due to extraction, periodontal surgeries and ill fitting dentures [5, 10]. Some well known oral surgical complications include poor regeneration of soft tissues and delay in osseous tissue healing [3, 24]. Diabetes is associated with increased skeletal complications such as lowering the bone mineral density and increasing the risk of bone fracture [51]. There is high level risk for osteopenia, osteoporosis, poor osseous healing, and impaired bone regeneration [41].

Mozatti M. et al reported, a delay in wound healing of oral ulcers and extraction sockets in diabetic patients is due to inactive or static blood flow, low growth factors and antibodies production, questionable immunity,poor angiogenesis and psychological stress [27]. This study purely concentrates on diabietic patients with two different blood glucose levels i.e. patients with Blood Glucose Level <200mg/dl and patients with Blood Glucose Level >200mg/dl and the rate of healing of the extraction socket. Therefore, management and treatment of diabetic patients undergoing oral surgical procedures are more difficult. Delayed angiogenesis, decrease in blood flow, compromised innate immunity, decrease in the production of growth factor and psychological stress have been reported as factors causing delay in the healing of oral ulcers [3, 32]. In most cases, diabetes makes the patient susceptible to oral and dental problems and complications, including various soft tissue injuries and inflammatory conditions [26, 28]. Previously our team has a rich experience in working on various research projects across multiple disciplines [18, 21, 47, 14, 38, 17, 46, 12, 9, 34, 55, 33, 45, 15, 52]. In this study, we are intended to compare the rate of healing of post extraction sockets among type 1 diabetes patients between two different blood glucose levels.


Materials And Methods

Study setting

This study is a university setting, conducted in Saveetha Dental college, Predominantly, the pros of the study include flexibility and less time consumption. The cons of the study is limited to certain populations. 112 Diabetic patients were included in this study. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee [IEC]. The ethical approval number for the present study is SDC/SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/0619-0320. Two examiners were involved in the study.

Sampling

The details of the 86,000 patient records were reviewed and analyzed, out of which 112 diabetic patients who had undergone extraction between June 2019 to March 2020 were included in this study. Cross verification of data for error was done by presence of additional reviewers and by photographic evaluation. Simple random sampling was done to minimise the sampling bias. It was generalised to the south Indian population.

Data collection/tabulation

Records of all patients who had diabetics and underwent extraction were collected from initial to last in the chronological order. The data verification was done based on age, sex, Blood Glucose Level, number of extraction sites and postop review of extracted site for healing were recorded and the data were tabulated. The data was entered in the excel sheet in a methodical manner and was imported to SPSS. Incomplete or censored data was excluded from the study.

Analysis

IBM SPSS 2.0 software, was used for data analysis Independent variables include age, gender and dependent variable include no of extraction, RBS analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Descriptive statistics includes the frequency of distribution of age, sex and inferential statistics includes the chisquare test.


Results And Discussion

On analysing the age group, 46 patients who were greater than 60 years had undergone extraction out of which 61.4% of them had satisfactory healing, 77.8% of the patients belonging to the age group of 51-60 years had satisfactory healing while 85.19% of patients who come under 41-50 years have satisfactory healing. From this we can observe that healing occurs at a faster rate in younger diabetic patients when compared to older patients. It is observed that the rate of healing is slower as the age increases in diabetic patient group population. As we can see in the graph, as the age increases, the rate of healing decreases, the bar chart shows gradual increase in the number of unsatisfactory healing with increase in age, It is evident that there is no significant difference between age and rate of healing since there is only diminutive difference in the healing range and age groups.Not statistically significant as Chi square value is 3.530 and p value 0.317 [P>0.05] [Figure 1].

The relation between gender and healing of socket is given in [ Figure 2]. Out of 63 males, 66.67% of them showed satisfactory healing likewise out of 42 females,85.17% showed satisfactory healing. From this we can contemplate that females have a higher healing rate than males. There is a significant difference observed in our study between gender and healing in diabetic patients as the finding is statistically significant p<0.05.

[Table 1] revealed correlation between number of extraction sites and rate of healing. There is no significant difference observed between the number of extraction sites and rate of healing because the finding is not statistically significant p value >0.050. The relationship between the Blood Glucose Level and healing, 84.15% of patients whose Blood Glucose Level is less than 200 mg/dl had satisfactory healing while only 39% of patients with Blood Glucose level greater than 200 mg/dl showed satisfactory healing. There is a significant difference between healing and Blood Glucose Level observed in this study as the parameter observed is statistically significant [p<0.05] [ Figure 3].



Figure 1: The bar chart showing association of age and healing of socket. ( x axis ; age group, y axis : count/rate of healing ).As we can see in the graph, patients aged greater than 60 years who had undergone extraction , 29.5% of them had satisfactory healing, 20 % of them belonging to the age group of 51-60 years had satisfactory healing while 21.9 % of patients who come under 41-50 years have satisfactory healing.It is evident that there is no significant difference between age and rate of healing since there is only diminutive difference in the healing range and age groups. Not statistically significant as Chi square value is 3.530 and p value 0.317 [P>0.05]



Figure 2. Bar chart showing association of gender and healing of the socket. X axis represents Gender group and Y axis represents the healing rate.Out of 60% of males,40% of them showed satisfactory healing and out of 40% of females 34.29% showed satisfactory healing. From this we can contemplate that females have a higher healing rate than males. There is a significant difference between gender and healing in diabetic patients which is also statistically significant. p Value 0.029. and chi square value was 4.786 [p<0.05].



Figure 3. Bar chart represents association between random blood sugar and healing of extraction, we can observe that RBS < 200 mg/dl had comparatively higher healing than RBS > 200mg/dl.X axis represents the RBS level group and Y axis rate of healing count. 65.71% of patients whose Blood Glucose Level is less than 200 mg/dl had satisfactory healing while only 8.57% of patients with Blood Glucose level greater than 200 mg/dl showed satisfactory healing.There is a significant difference between healing of extraction socket and Blood Glucose Level observed in this study as the parameters observed were statistically significant p=0.000 and chi square was 19.05 [p<0.05].



Table 1: The reveals correlation between number of extraction sites and rate of healing. There is no significant difference observed between these two parameters. This finding is not statistically significant as p value 0.594 [p >0.050].


Discussion

The hyperglycemia in diabetic patients can pave way to reduce leukocyte count and have deleterious effects on vascular epithelium and healing potential [2]. Stratton et al , reported each 1% decrease in HbA1C level leads to 37% decrease in micro vascular complications [P<0.001] [49]. Because of micro vascular and macro vascular changes and immune deficiency in diabetes, risk of infection will increase.

In this study, we can contemplate that there is significant association between the blood glucose level and the rate of healing of extraction socket P value [<0.05]. Also it is observed that females had a higher healing rate compared to males and the rate of healing decreases with increase in age.

Infections is the major risk factor for uncontrolled diabetic patients [43, 35], the underlying cause of uncontrollable diabetes is still not clear. There are few possible explanations that can resolve these doubts.

a) Insufficient insulin levels can slower the rate of healing [5, 1]

b) Healing of tooth sockets requires repair and regeneration of tissues, this is controlled and regulated by specific molecules like TGF- B, VEGF, BMP, PGF [9].Uncontrollable diabetes, the healing is prolonged due to delayed onset of cell proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation [56, 46].

c) Poor blood circulation is commonly seen in uncontrollable diabetic patients. This leads to delay in delivery of nutrients and oxygenated blood to the surgical site resulting in slower healing rate [4, 29].

d) When fasting blood glucose level > 240 mg/dl, the body starts metabolizing fat at a higher rate, converting fatty acids to ketone [7, 38]. High ketone levels cause diabetic ketoacidosis leading the blood to become acidic. These ketone bodies interfere in the healing process inhibiting the secretion of nitric oxide and macrophages [31, 50, 36].

Our present study showed that diabetic patients had normal healing in both different blood group levels but the healing occurs at a slower pace in patients with Blood Glucose Level>200 mg/ dl compared to patients with Blood Glucose Level <200 mg/dl. This result is in consistent with the study conducted by Huang et al, where he determined differences in wound healing in Type II diabetic patients and reported that healing is normal after the tooth extraction [1].

The study conducted by Jarbassiet al, have also reported that diabetic patients with high Blood Glucose Level showed lack of healing at the end of 7th day, however there was no abnormalities or complications seen in the patients [2]. However we cannot completely neglect the risk of complications of post extraction in diabetic patients.Devlin et al ,reported that blood clot in uncontrolled diabetic patients are weaker leading to more chance of alveolar destruction [11, 52] Our institution is passionate about high quality evidence based research and has excelled in various fields [53, 37, 40, 39, 48, 13, 25, 44, 42, 8, 54].


Conclusion

In this study we can contemplate that healing of the extraction socket occurs at a slower pace in patients with Blood Glucose Level>200mg/dl compared to patients with Blood Glucose Level <200mg/dl. However there were no complications in post extractions were noted.However a surgeon needs to always be aware of postoperative complications in extraction sockets healing such as alveolar osteitis [dry socket] ,cellulitis, gangrenous osteitis ,suppurative osteitis and osteomyelitis and more importantly mucormycosis which may be fatal if not intervened immediately.


References

  1. Lagerström LO, Nielsen IL, Lee R, Isaacson RJ. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with the high-pull headgear-activator combination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jun;97(6):495-504.Pubmed PMID: 2353679.
  2. Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball Headed Mini Implant. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZL02-3.
  3. Rubika J, Felicita AS, Sivambiga V. Gonial angle as an indicator for the prediction of growth pattern. World J Dent. 2015;6(3):161-3.
  4. Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Shanthasundari KK. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation). Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):305-12. Pubmed PMID: 23059564.
  5. Angelillo JC, Dolan EA. The surgical correction of vertical maxillary excess (long face syndrome). Ann. Plast. Surg. 1982 Jan 1;8(1):64-70.
  6. Bansal AK, Sharma M, Kumar P, Nehra K, Kumar S. Long face syndrome: A literature review. J. dent health oral disord. ther. 2015;2(6):00071.
  7. Viswanath A, Ramamurthy J, Dinesh SP, Srinivas A. Obstructive sleep apnea: awakening the hidden truth. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-7. PMID: 25511335.
  8. Bailey LJ, Haltiwanger LH, Blakey GH, Proffit WR. Who seeks surgicalorthodontic treatment: a current review. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Winter;16(4):280-92.Pubmed PMID: 12390006.
  9. Dinesh SP, Arun AV, Sundari KK, Samantha C, Ambika K. An indigenously designed apparatus for measuring orthodontic force. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Nov;7(11):2623-6.Pubmed PMID: 24392423.
  10. Felicita AS. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor - The sling shot method. Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jul;30(3):265- 269.Pubmed PMID: 29942113.
  11. . Cardoso Mde A, Castro RC, Li An T, Normando D, Garib DG, Capelozza Filho L. Prevalence of long face pattern in Brazilian individuals of different ethnic backgrounds. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):150-6.Pubmed PMID: 23739865.
  12. Willems G, De Bruyne I, Verdonck A, Fieuws S, Carels C. Prevalence of dentofacial characteristics in a belgian orthodontic population. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Dec;5(4):220-6.Pubmed PMID: 11800434.
  13. Samantha C, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Sivamurty G, Dinesh S. Comparative evaluation of two Bis-GMA based orthodontic bonding adhesives-A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC40-4.
  14. Krishnan S, Pandian S, Kumar S A. Effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement-an update. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZE01-5. Pubmed PMID: 26023659.
  15. Kamisetty SK, Verma JK, Arun, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Kumar A. SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZC04-8.Pubmed PMID: 26501002.
  16. Ramesh Kumar KR, Shanta Sundari KK, Venkatesan A, Chandrasekar S. Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):479-85.Pubmed PMID: 21967934.
  17. Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction - A case report. Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):185-193.Pubmed PMID: 29033530.
  18. Alteneiji M, Liaw JJ, Vaid NR, Ferguson DJ, Makki L. Treatment of VME using extra-alveolar TADs: Quantification of treatment effects. Semin Orthod. 2018 Mar 1;24(1):123–34.
  19. Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion--a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:4.Pubmed PMID: 26780464.
  20. Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep- Oct;22(5):47-55.Pubmed PMID: 29160344.
  21. Jain RK, Kumar SP, Manjula WS. Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZC21-4.Pubmed PMID: 25177631.
  22. Hafeez N. Accessory foramen in the middle cranial fossa. Res J Pharm Technol. 2016;9(11):1880-2.
  23. Krishnan RP, Ramani P, Sherlin HJ, Sukumaran G, Ramasubramanian A, Jayaraj G, et al. Surgical Specimen Handover from Operation Theater to Laboratory: A Survey. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec;8(2):234-238. Pubmed PMID: 30693238.
  24. Somasundaram S, Ravi K, Rajapandian K, Gurunathan D. Fluoride Content of Bottled Drinking Water in Chennai, Tamilnadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC32-4.Pubmed PMID: 26557612.
  25. Kumar S, Rahman R. Knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding biomedical waste management among undergraduate dental students. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017 Aug 1;10(8):341.
  26. Gurunathan D, Shanmugaavel AK. Dental neglect among children in Chennai. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct 1;34(4):364.
  27. Sneha S. Knowledge and awareness regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis among undergraduate dental students. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016 Oct 1:154-9.
  28. Dhinesh B, Lalvani JI, Parthasarathy M, Annamalai K. An assessment on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of single cylinder diesel engine powered by Cymbopogon flexuosus biofuel. Energy Convers Manage. 2016 Jun 1;117:466-74.
  29. Choudhari S, Thenmozhi MS. Occurrence and Importance of Posterior Condylar Foramen. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016;8:11–43.
  30. Paramasivam A, Vijayashree Priyadharsini J, Raghunandhakumar S. N6- adenosine methylation (m6A): a promising new molecular target in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Hypertens Res. 2020 Feb;43(2):153- 154.Pubmed PMID: 31578458.
  31. Wu F, Zhu J, Li G, Wang J, Veeraraghavan VP, Krishna Mohan S, et al. Biologically synthesized green gold nanoparticles from Siberian ginseng induce growth-inhibitory effect on melanoma cells (B16). Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):3297-3305.Pubmed PMID: 31379212.
  32. Palati S, Ramani P, Shrelin HJ, Sukumaran G, Ramasubramanian A, Don KR, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and practice survey on the perspective of oral lesions and dental health in geriatric patients residing in old age homes. Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):22-25.Pubmed PMID: 32246676.
  33. Saravanan M, Arokiyaraj S, Lakshmi T, Pugazhendhi A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Phenerochaete chrysosporium (MTCC-787) and their antibacterial activity against human pathogenic bacteria. Microb Pathog. 2018 Apr;117:68-72.Pubmed PMID: 29427709.
  34. Govindaraju L, Gurunathan D. Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective Clinical Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31-ZC34.Pubmed PMID: 28511505.
  35. Vijayakumar Jain S, Muthusekhar MR, Baig MF, Senthilnathan P, Loganathan S, Abdul Wahab PU, et al. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Following Isolated Lefort One Osteotomy for the Correction of Vertical Maxillary Excess: A Prospective Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Mar;18(1):139-146.Pubmed PMID: 30728705.
  36. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Jan;51(1):24-8.Pubmed PMID: 6583388.
  37. Vijayashree Priyadharsini J. In silico validation of the non-antibiotic drugs acetaminophen and ibuprofen as antibacterial agents against red complex pathogens. J Periodontol. 2019 Dec;90(12):1441-1448.Pubmed PMID: 31257588.
  38. Pc J, Marimuthu T, Devadoss P, Kumar SM. Prevalence and measurement of anterior loop of the mandibular canal using CBCT: A cross sectional study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr 6;20(4):531-4.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn