SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-509

Antifungal Potential Of Chlorhexidine, Honey And Propolis Against Oral Candida Albicans - An In Vitro Study


Abdul Rhman Alkhaled1*, Faekbadr2

1 Master Student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Tishreen University, Syria.
2 Assistant Professor in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Tishreen University, Syria.


*Corresponding Author

Abdul Rhman Alkhaled,
Master Student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Tishreen University, Syria.
Email Id: abdulrhman.alkhaled@tishreen.edu.sy

Received: April 02, 2021; Accepted: May 05, 2021; Published: May 08, 2021

Citation: Abdul Rhman Alkhaled, Faekbadr. Antifungal Potential Of Chlorhexidine, Honey And Propolis Against Oral Candida Albicans - An In Vitro Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(5):2385-2389. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000469

Copyright: Abdul Rhman Alkhaled©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Oral washes are good alternatives to lotions of chemical composition like chlorhexidine, and because of this there has been an increase in interest in natural alternatives such as honey and propolis, which have proven their effectiveness over time.

Aim: The study aimed to study the effect of oralwashes honey 50%, chlorhexidine 0.12% and propolis 5% on oral Candida albicans.

Materials and Methods: The sample included 60 syrian children (30 males - 30 females), between (6-12) years This study continued from September 2020 until February 2021, a saliva smear was taken for each child Before oral washing with research materials and swab after oral rinsing using 10 ml of solution for 30 seconds, then cultivating it in the laboratory where it is grown on SabouraudActidione Agar and conducting a count of the results and comparing the averages before and after and the effect of each substance on the oral oral Candida albicans.

Results: after one minute of using the mouthwashes the rate of decrease in Candida albicans bacterial colony count was statistically significant in the chlorhexidine mouthwash as it was 85.27%, in the propolis mouthwash it was 90.43% , and in the honey mouthwash it was 81.00%.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the efficacy of oral chlorhexidine, propolis and honey mouthwashes on oral oral Candida albicans where the largest decrease effect was in propolis, then chlorhexidine, then honey, This indicates that the three substances are effective in reducing oral Candida albicans, which is why it is recommended to use them when needed to reduce oral Candida albicans.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials And Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
7.References


Keywords

Mouthwashes; Candida Albicans; Honey; Propolis; Chlorhexidine.


Introduction

Candida is the main causative agent of Candidiasis, especially Candida albicans, and most studies have indicated that Candida albicans comprises more than (60%) of the isolated species from Candida infections [7].

Budtz-Jorgensen and Lombardi [9] noted that the adhesion of this Candida to Mucosa has an effective effect in causing injury and this is considered a preliminary step, and it seems that there is a close relationship between the adhesion of different types of Candida and their ability to cause infection.

Candida in humans is due to induction of hypersensitivity, or due to the secretion of potent toxins [9].

Sato et al 1997 reported that Candida albicans is an important factor in causing Denture stomatitis [28].

It is noteworthy that the infection caused by these types of bacteria is increasing in various parts of the world. Ashman and et al 1999 stated that Candida albicans are present in coexistence in our human societies, yet they are considered an opportunistic pathogen to cause fungal infections in the oral mucous membrane (Oral thrush) [3].

Oral candida is one of the most common types of oral flora found in the form of flora Oral normal in 50% of healthy people(8).

For a long time, chlorhexidine has been the most widely used oral washes for reducing plaque and gingivitis, and there is no difference between an alcohol-based or a water-based lotion, and it is considered the gold standard among oral washes [11].

Chlorhexidine was developed over 50 years ago and first appeared in Imperial Laboratories in Britain in 1940 and was marketed in 1953 as an antiseptic ointment for skin wounds [16]. It was also used previously in treating skin, eye and throat infections in humans [4].

Several studies have proven that it is Bactericidal in high concentrations and Bacteriostatic in low concentrations [21].

Chlorhexidine has been shown to have the greatest immediate effect on bacterial elimination, mainly in vivo as compared to other oral antiseptics [5].

It used in patients with mental and physical disabilities to improve gingival health [27], And in immunosuppressed patients exposed to oral infections, especially Candida albicans [4].

Chlorhexidine is considered a broad-spectrum antibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and some viruses, and it has an active effect against Streptococcus mutans [15].

Honey is one of the most used substances in complementary medicine, because it has a sweet taste and in recent times it has been used in medicines or as pharmaceutical alternatives and has attracted the interest of scientists and researchers at all levels [24]. It is believed that honey can be used as a topical wound treatment [25].

In a review presented by Yaghoobi and his colleagues, they concluded that honey contributed to wound healing because it is considered an anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and antioxidant [33].

And many studies have determined that honey has anti-fungal properties [22], Honey not only prevents the fungus from growing, it also reduces the production of mycotoxins [26].

Canonico has found that honey can be an alternative to the antifungal medication in treating Candida albicans. Honey's antifungal activity depends on changes in the cell life cycle, cell membrane, mitochondrial function, and DNA [12].

Propolis is a fixative and supportive gummy resin for filling holes and openings in the Beehive, which bees collect from tree buds [1].

Propolis is a mixture of resin gum materials with a dark brown or greenish color and a fragrant smell, collected by bee from trees and pollen grains for some plants and kneaded with wax and add some salivary and waxy secretions to it, then the substance turns into propolis [23].

Propolis is mainly a bacteriostatic inhibitor and bactericidal in high concentrations, and its effectiveness is against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [10].

Where propolis was used in most of the research related to the maintenance of oral health, either in the form of alcoholic extract, water-based oral mouthwashes, or in toothpastes [32].

Barrientos et al., 2013 confirmed the promising efficacy of propolis in the prevention of dental caries and some diseases of the oral cavity, when they demonstrated the bio-efficacy of the ethanoli extract and metanoli of the Chilean propolis samples against the bacteria that cause caries , Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans [6].

Capistrano et al. (2013) found that Brazilian green propolis has a similar effect to miconazole in the treatment of Candida albicans associated with stomatitis caused by Removable denture [13].


Materials And Methods

Aim of study : Study of the effect of mouthwashes chlorhexidine 0.12% - honey 50% - propolis 5% on oral Candida albicansin children.

The study included 60 children (30 males - 30 females) who had good oral health and did not suffer from: gingivitis , wear fixed or movable braces, and take antibiotics.

Inform consent was taken from the volunteers before starting the study according to a special form designed for the research that includes details of the research and the materials used in the research.

We used local products that are widespread in pharmacies. The children were divided into 3 groups, each group containing 20 children (20 chlorhexidine - 20 honey - 20 propolis).

Saliva collection mechanism: (19)

The child was brought to the clinic and the guardian requested the following:

1. Avoid food with a high content of acids and sugars 60 minutes before work in order to cause it to reduce the pH of saliva, which leads to an increase in bacterial growth.
2. Avoid foods and drinks containing caffeine for 12 hours before work.
3. That the sample be collected between 9 - 12 p.m.
4. Emphasis on not brushing the teeth on the same day in order to preserve the oral flora and not to have bleeding that affects the accuracy of reading the results.
5. Do not use any oral rinse or paste containing chlorhexidine 7 days before the start of the clinical procedures.

A first saliva sample was taken before using rinsing by using a sterile salivary swab for this procedure. The swab included passing the swab head over the vestibular surfaces of the teeth, the palate, the floor of the mouth, and the vestibule of the cheek. Then , the child was asked to rinse his mouth with solution using 10 ml of solution for a period of time [30] seconds, After that, we took a second swab for the child, similar to its procedures for the first one, and the child's data were recorded on it (name - age - gender - swab before/after) on each cotton swab and sent to the bacterial culture laboratory at Hama National Hospital - Hama city - syria, to start the laboratory work procedures.

• Chlorhexidine sample ( 20 children ) The product used is a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution ready for use, produced by a national company.
• Propolis sample ( 20 children ) The product used is a 5% propolis solution ready for use, produced by a national company
• Honey sample ( 20 children ) The honey was 100% concentrated from the packing of a national company. We drew 5 ml of honey and added it to 5 ml of distilled water in a sterile sample collection package, and we mixed it and then gave it to the child to rinse with it.

Procedures for bacterial culture in the laboratory:

Sampling extension:Wedilate the saliva samples in two stages to reduce the bacterial load for ease of counting, provided that the real concentration of germs is calculated later as follows: Stage one: Use of 10000 microliter (10 ml) of salin by disposable one use syringe and put it in the glass tube. Then , we remove 100 micron. Thus, we get 9900 microliter in the tube. Then we add 100 micron of the saliva sample by micropipett. Finally we get dilate of saliva sample in 1/100 radio; 10-2. Then we mixed the homogenous dilate saliva sample on viberator for 30 seconds . Stage two: Repeate the previous stages but by adding 100 microliter of dilate solution to 9900 microliter from the saline in the other glass tube and the ratio became 1/10000 and then repeate this homogenoue process by viberator.

Bacterial culture:

Culture medium: Sabouraud Actidione Agar Culture method: we take 10 microliter of dilate solution by micropipette. And then we spread it on the surface of culture medium in Petri dish by sterilize platin loop tool in way that we get a distinct bacterial colony. And placed upside down within the incubator At 27 ° C for 48.

Bacterial appearance: The colonies appear white, flat or domed, increasing their surface over time.

Colonies counting: we count the colonies by using An Electron microscope, After the colonies counting is complete. This number presents the number of colonies in 10 dilate microliter .Thus, we multiply this number with 10000 which is the dilation ratio then we divide the number by 1000 to get the final number of bacterial colonies in ml (CFU/ml).

Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed using the statistical analysis program SPSS, version 13.00, at a confidence level of 95% (P <0.05 (We used Paired sample T test to compare the variable means of the values of the studied variables.


Results

Tables 1-3.

As for Figure No. (2), it shows the percentage values of the amount of decrease in number of Candida albicans between the two times (before using the substance and after using the substance) between the three experimental groups.



Figure 1. Mean of the number of Candida albicans in the research patients.



Figure 2. The percentages of the amount of decrease in number of Candida albicans between the two times (before using the substance and after using the substance) between the three experimental groups.



Table 1. Statistical measures of the number of Candida albicans in the research patients.



Table 2. Results of using Paired Samples T Test when comparing the arithmetic means of the number of Candida albicans before and after the experiment.



Table 3. The percentages of the amount of decrease in number of Candida albicansbetween the two times (before using the substance and after using the substance) between the three experimental groups.


Discussion

Over the last few years,, the search for new antifungal drugs has increased due to lack of effectiveness, side effects, and interactions with other drugs taken by patients. In addition, as the lesions continue to recur, the antifungal drugs used seem to be resistant to pathogens. This fact has prompted people to seek a new antifungal agent based on natural compounds such as honey and propolis [34].

Candida albicans has a excessive acid tolerance and is able to generating acids even under low pH conditions. that may favor the fungus in the microbial shifts associated with Tooth decay [14], so We did this study because the presence of C. albicans has been increasingly related to dental caries.

Julie's et al 2006. they was found that honey cannot be used in vivo on a large scale, as they was found that honey is limited to topical treatments, and it cannot be used to treat candidaemia, which is the most dangerous form of candidiasis [20].

In Sayyadi et al., 2020 study, they compared the ethanolic and aqueous extract of Iranian propolis against oral candidiasis isolated from oral in chemotherapy treated patients. The aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Iranian propolis showed antifungal activity against each of C. albicans isolated from patients, but the ethanolic extract was more effective than the aqueous extract [29].

In Christian's study, the aims of this study were to evaluate the antifungal activity of six commercial propolis extracts against Candida have been isolated from the oral cavity from patients have Removable dentures, The results in this study show that all the propolis extracts that were evaluated are able to inhibit Candida development [18].

In the Freires study, to evalute the antifungal activity of two varieties of Brazilian propolis, it was found that Brazilian propolis has strong activity against Candida and should be considered promising candidates for the treatment of oral and systemic candidiasis [17].

In Shrestha al 2011 study, mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine were able to kill all strains of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis in shorter times compared to mouthwashes containing thymol [30].

We disagreed with the Talebi et al 2014 study because this study showed that the chemical mouthwash had a better effect than the herbal mouthwash [31].

In Aroonrerk's et al 2007 study of 6 commercial mouthwashes containing fluoride (FLO), cethylpyridinium chloride (CPC), chlorhexidinegluconate (CHX), triclosan (TRI) and herbal extracts: Twin Lotus (TLO) and Herbric concentrated (HBC) ,They found that CHX and triclosan mouthwashes were effective in reducing oralCandida activities, This differs with our study where natural mouthwashes (propolis) was better than CHX in eliminating Candida albicans [2].

We disagreed with Where it was concluded that propolis exhibited weaker antifungal activity against oral fungi while only honey produced from Trigona spp. Had strong antifungal activity compared to other honey against the fungi of mouth involved in denture stomatitis [34].


References

  1. Arbia A, Babbay B. Management strategies of honey bee diseases. Journal of Entomology. 2011;8(1):1-5.
  2. Aroonrerk N, Dhanesuan N. Candida inhibitory effects of six commercial mouthwashes. Annals of microbiology. 2007 Sep;57(3):449-52.
  3. Ashman RB, Papadimitriou JM, Fulurija A. Acute susceptibility of aged mice to infection with Candida albicans. J Med Microbiol. 1999 Dec;48(12):1095-1102. Pubmed PMID: 10591163.
  4. Balagopal S, Arjunkumar R. Chlorhexidine: the gold standard antiplaque agent. Journal of Pharmaceutical sciences and Research. 2013 Dec 1;5(12):270.
  5. Balbuena L, Stambaugh KI, Ramirez SG, Yeager C. Effects of topical oral antiseptic rinses on bacterial counts of saliva in healthy human subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 May;118(5):625-9. Pubmed PMID: 9591860.
  6. Barrientos L, Herrera CL, Montenegro G, Ortega X, Veloz J, Alvear M, et al. Chemical and botanical characterization of Chilean propolis and biological activity on cariogenic bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Braz J Microbiol. 2013 Oct 30;44(2):577-85. Pubmed PMID: 24294257.
  7. Bodey GP. Candidiasis in cancer patients. The American journal of medicine. 1984 Oct 1;77(4D):13-9.
  8. Brawner DL, Cutler JE. Oral Candida albicans isolates from nonhospitalized normal carriers, immunocompetent hospitalized patients, and immunocompromised patients with or without acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1335-41. Pubmed PMID: 2666442.
  9. Budtz-Jörgensen E, Lombardi T. Antifungal therapy in the oral cavity. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Feb;10:89-106. Pubmed PMID: 9567939.
  10. Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol. 1998 Apr;36(4):347-63. Pubmed PMID: 9651052.
  11. . Calvo-Guirado JL, Fernandez Dominguez M, Aragoneses JM, Martinez Gonzalez JM, Fernández-Boderau E, Garcés-Villalá MA, et al. Evaluation of new seawater-based mouth rinse versus chlorhexidine 0.2% reducing plaque and gingivitis indexes. a randomized controlled pilot study. Applied Sciences. 2020 Jan;10(3):982.
  12. . Canonico B, Candiracci M, Citterio B, Curci R, Squarzoni S, Mazzoni A, et al. Honey flavonoids inhibit Candida albicans morphogenesis by affecting DNA behavior and mitochondrial function. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(4):445-56. Pubmed PMID: 24810344.
  13. Capistrano HM, de Assis EM, Leal RM, Alvarez-Leite ME, Brener S, Bastos EM. Brazilian green propolis compared to miconazole gel in the treatment of Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:947980. Pubmed PMID: 23737855.
  14. Eidt G, Andrade CG, Negrini TC, Arthur RA. Role of Candida albicans on enamel demineralization and on acidogenic potential of Streptococcus mutans in vitro biofilms. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Sep 9;27:e20180593. Pubmed PMID: 31508792.
  15. Ellepola AN, Samaranayake LP. Adjunctive use of chlorhexidine in oral candidoses: a review. Oral Dis. 2001 Jan;7(1):11-7. Pubmed PMID: 11354914.
  16. Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Jun;112(6):863-9. Pubmed PMID: 2940282.
  17. Freires IA, Queiroz VCPP, Furletti VF, Ikegaki M, de Alencar SM, Duarte MCT, et al. Chemical composition and antifungal potential of Brazilian propolis against Candida spp. J Mycol Med. 2016 Jun;26(2):122-132. Pubmed PMID: 26916845.
  18. Herrera CL, Alvear M, Barrientos L, Montenegro G, Salazar LA. The antifungal effect of six commercial extracts of Chilean propolis on Candida spp. Ciencia e investigación agraria. 2010 Apr;37(1):75-84.
  19. Hibel LC, Granger DA, Kivlighan KT, Blair C. Individual differences in salivary cortisol: associations with common over-the-counter and prescription medication status in infants and their mothers. Horm Behav. 2006 Aug;50(2):293-300. Pubmed PMID: 16682032.
  20. Irish J, Carter DA, Shokohi T, Blair SE. Honey has an antifungal effect against Candida species. Med Mycol. 2006 May;44(3):289-91. Pubmed PMID: 16702110.
  21. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997 Oct;15:55-62. Pubmed PMID: 9643233.
  22. Khan SU, Anjum SI, Rahman K, Ansari MJ, Khan WU, Kamal S, et al. Honey: Single food stuff comprises many drugs. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018 Feb;25(2):320-325. Pubmed PMID: 29472785.
  23. Menezes H. Própolis: uma revisão dos recentes estudos de suas propriedades farmacológicas. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2005 Jul;72(3):405-11.
  24. Molan PC, Betts JA. Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update. J Wound Care. 2004 Oct;13(9):353-6. Pubmed PMID: 15517742.
  25. Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:2. Pubmed PMID: 11405898.
  26. . Oryan A, Alemzadeh E, Moshiri A. Biological properties and therapeutic activities of honey in wound healing: A narrative review and meta-analysis. J Tissue Viability. 2016 May;25(2):98-118. Pubmed PMID: 26852154.
  27. RONCATI, M., POLIZZI, E., CINGANO, L. & LUCCHESE, A. J. D. C. An oral health aid for disabled patients. 2013;81, 447-452.
  28. Sato M, Tsuchiya H, Akagiri M, Takagi N, Iinuma M. Growth inhibition of oral bacteria related to denture stomatitis by anti-candidal chalcones. Aust Dent J. 1997 Oct;42(5):343-6. Pubmed PMID: 9409052.
  29. . Sayyadi F, Mahdavi S, Moghadamnia AA, Moslemi D, Shirzad A, Motallebnejad M. The effect of aqueous and ethanolic extract of Iranian propolis on Candida Albicans isolated from the mouth of patients with colorectal malignancy undergone chemotherapy: An in-vitro study. Caspian J Intern Med. 2020 Winter;11(1):62-66. Pubmed PMID: 32042388.
  30. Shrestha A, Rimal J, Rao A, Sequeira PS, Doshi D, Bhat GK. In vitro antifungal effect of mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine and thymol. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2011 Mar 1;6(1):1-5.
  31. Talebi S, Sabokbar A, Riazipour M, Saffari M. Comparison of the in vitro Effect of Chemical and Herbal Mouthwashes on Candida albicans. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 Dec 1;7(12):e12563. Pubmed PMID: 25741429.
  32. Wieckiewicz W, Miernik M, Wieckiewicz M, Morawiec T. Does propolis help to maintain oral health? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:351062. Pubmed PMID: 23365605.
  33. Yaghoobi R, Kazerouni A, Kazerouni O. Evidence for Clinical Use of Honey in Wound Healing as an Anti-bacterial, Anti-inflammatory Anti-oxidant and Anti-viral Agent: A Review. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2013 Aug;8(3):100-4. Pubmed PMID: 24624197.
  34. Yusoff NY, Mohamad S, Abdullah HN, Rahman NA. Antifungal activity of Malaysian honey and propolis extracts against pathogens implicated in denture stomatitis. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2016 Dec 19 (Vol. 1791, No. 1, p. 020006). AIP Publishing LLC.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn