Gag Reflex and Prosthodontic Procedures - A Comparative Study
Suhas Manoharan1, Subhashree R2, M.P. Santhosh Humar3*
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
3 Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. M.P. Santhosh Kumar M.D.S,
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
Tel: +919994892022
E-mail: santhoshsurgeon@gmail.com
Received: January 22, 2021; Accepted: February 28, 2021; Published: March 03, 2021
Citation: Suhas Manoharan, Subhashree R, M.P. Santhosh Humar. Gag Reflex and Prosthodontic Procedures - A Comparative Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(03):1705-1707. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000363
Copyright: M.P. Santhosh Kumar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Gagging is a characteristic feature of the upper respiratory tract to keep check of any foreign body. Severe gagging can occur during dental and prosthodontic procedures, which may cause irritation to the clinician and patient leading to compromised quality of treatment. This study was aimed to assess the relationship between gagging and various prosthodontic procedures thereby to improve the overall quality of treatment provided. Fifty Patients undergoing various prosthodontics treatments in our institution were selected for the study. A self-structured questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence and severity of the gag reflex. Results revealed that females had more gagging during prosthodontic procedures compared to males. 40% of patients who underwent fixed partial denture fabrication and 41.67% who were treated for temporary partial denture construction expressed gagging. From the present study it is evident that increased awareness is necessary to manage patients with gagging as it is major road block in providing quality prosthodontic treatment.
2.Introduction
3.Material and Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
7.References
Keywords
Gagging; Patient; Reflex; Prosthodontics; Dentures.
Introduction
Gagging is a characteristic feature of the upper respiratory tract
to keep check of any foreign body. However, it can likewise be
a procured reflex which is conditioned by different stimuli for
example, visual, acoustic, olfactory or chemical. It is a natural and
normal defensive mechanism. As a result of gagging, patients often
complain of nausea and unpleasant sensations amid dental
procedures making it a troublesome situation to oversee [1, 2].
Severe gagging may cause irritation of the clinician and patient
leading to compromised quality of treatment.
The gag reflex is a self-defensive reaction for survival and is controlled
by parasympathetic division of the autonomic nervous
system which involves ejection of foreign bodies.Five locales in
the oral cavity have been perceived as the major trigger zones
for initiating gag reflex,namely base of the tongue, palate, fauces,
uvula and posterior pharyngeal wall [3, 4]. Different dental procedures
like making of maxillary and mandibular impressions, cavity
preparation, checking of the posterior vibrating line for complete
or partial dentures, crowns or root canal treatment for posterior
teeth, taking intraoral radiographs particularly for the posterior
teeth and extraction of third molars can cause overstated choking
reflex [5, 6].
Gagging can cause unnecessary stress to both the operator and
patient leading to reduced patient cooperation and reduced quality
of treatment provided. Sometimes the reflex maybe triggered
by fear, other psychologic factors or visual stimuli such as sight
of impression material or a mouth mirror. Management of such
patients having serious gag reflex can be challengingand proper
knowledge regarding the reflex is vital to overcome it effectively
[7]. Despite a range of strategies available no single method has
been proved to completely stop the reflex. This study was done
to assess and compare the gag reflex for various prosthodontic
procedures among the Chennai population.
Materials And Methods
A descriptive study was conducted in the undergraduate clinic in
Saveetha Dental College and hospital during the period November
to December 2020. Fifty Patients undergoing various prosthodontics treatments were selected for the study. Detailed case
history of the patient was taken. A self-structured questionnaire
was used to assess the prevalence and severity of the gag reflex.
Since, there is no scoring system to grade severity of gagging, the
gagging reflex is graded based on patient feedback. If the patient
expressed that they experienced occasional gag reflex during insertion
or usage of the prosthesis it was classified as mild type of
gagging. If the patient expressed gagging after prolonged usage
of prosthesis it was classified as moderate type of gagging and
if the patient experiences gagging immediately during prosthesis
insertion it was classified as severe gagging. Data collected was
tabulated and results obtained.
Results
Among 50 participants in our study, 27 were females and 23
were males in the age group of 25 -70 years. Out of the study
group, only 38% of the patients experienced gag reflex among
which 57% were females and 43% were males [Figure 1, Table 1].
Among thevarious prosthodontic procedures, 26.67% of patients
treated for complete denture prosthesis, 40% of patients who underwent
fixed partial denture fabrication and 41.67% of patients
treated for temporary partial dentureconstruction expressed gagging
[Figure 2, Table 2]. Also, it was seen that females had more gagging during prosthodontic procedures compared to males.
Discussion
The present study was done to establish a relationship between
prevalence of gag reflex according to gender and type of prosthesis
fabricated among the population residing in Chennai.Gag in
dental terms is neural response initiated on touching the posterior
pharynx or the soft palate. It involves uniform elevation of the
soft palate, retraction of the tongue and contraction of the pharyngeal
muscles. Gagging during dental procedures can cause lots
of stress to both the clinician and the patient [8].
The management of gag reflex depends on treatment of the
cause and not only symptomatic treatment. Exhaustive clinical
examination, recording of legitimate patient history and proper
discussion with the patient can be the key factors in understanding
the aetiology of the gag reflex. The dental professional needs
to characterize if the patient's concern is connected to natural aggravations,
iatrogenic variables, anatomic or mental elements. It is
imperative to perceive whether, single or numerous components
are causing the issue [9]. Gagging can be of a lot of trouble to the
patient and the disposition of the clinician towards the patient
may impact theresult of treatment. The patient ought to be educated of the intraoral examination and methodology before the
treatment furthermore, the clinician ought to continue just when
assent has been given [10].
A patient wearing complete denture can have a gag issue because
of different causes. Some of the causes might be identified with
denture itself, while others can be psychogenic causes like declining
to swallow the spit for the reason that the denture will oust.
As a result, saliva pooling could trigger the gag reflex. But, in removable
partial dentures, the denture-related mucosal disturbance
in the oral cavity amid biting can likewise cause poor adaptation
and stability of the dentures, leading to choking [11]. Therefore,
awareness and knowledge regarding management of patients
with gag reflex is essential. Proper history taking and conversations
with the patient can give clues regarding the aetiology of
gag reflex. The dental clinician needs to investigate and find factors
responsible for this reflex during the time in the dental chair.
Ramsay et al., [12] also suggested prior bad experiences may also
be a factor causing gagging in patients even when there is no relevant
triggering factor.
Various techniques can be used to manage gagging [13]. In a particular
technique, a thin denture base is fabricated without any
teeth and the patient is asked to use them for 5 minutes a day
followed bygradually increasing them to develop resistance to the
sensitivity. Psychological methods such as asking the patients to
raise their feet alternatively may reduce gagging [14]. Therapies
such as acupuncture, cognitive behaviour therapy and administration
of certain drugs are known to decrease gag reflex [15]. With
a rich case bank established over the last decades we have been
able to publish extensively in our domain [16-19]. Further large
scale multi-centric trials are required to establish the prevalence
and causes of gagging reflex during the various prosthodontic
procedures in our study population.
Conclusion
From the study it can be concluded that gag reflex is a major roadblock
during prosthodontics procedures among the population in
Chennai. Hence, increased awareness regarding the management
of gag reflex is necessary. Proper patient-doctor communication
and detailed history of the patient may help the clinician to plan
the treatment and customize them according to the patient’s requirements.
References
- LINCOLN CW. Eradication of gagging reflex for full denture patients. J Oral Surg (Chic). 1952 Jan;10(1):8-9. PubmedPMID: 14898343.
- Cakmak YO, Ozdogmus O, Günay Y, Gürbüzer B, Tezulas E, Kaspar EC, et al. An earplug technique to reduce the gag reflex during dental procedures. ForschKomplementmed. 2014;21(2):94-8. PubmedPMID: 24851845.
- Warwicker C. The Clinical Management of the Gagging Patient. SAAD Dig. 2017 Jan;33:44-7. PubmedPMID: 29616756.
- Eachempati P, KumbargereNagraj S, Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, George RP, Soe HHK, Karanth L. Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 13;2019(11):CD011116. PubmedPMID: 31721146.
- Wright SM. The radiologic anatomy of patients who gag with dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Feb;45(2):127-33. PubmedPMID: 6937654.
- Means CR, Flenniken IE. Gagging--a problem in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1970 Jun;23(6):614-20. PubmedPMID: 4911058.
- Prashanti E, Sumanth KN, Renjith George P, Karanth L, Soe HH. Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 1;(10):CD011116. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 13;2019(11): PubmedPMID: 26423025.
- Conny DJ, Tedesco LA. The gagging problem in prosthodontic treatment. Part I: description and causes. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 May;49(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90381-5. PubmedPMID: 6343586.
- Ahmad N, Yunus N, Jafri Z. Etiology and management of gag reflex in the prosthodontic clinic: A review. Int J Oral Health Dent. 2015 Jan;1(1):25-8. PubmedPMID: 31255827.
- Schole ML. Management of the gagging patient. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1959 Jul 1;9(4):578-83.
- Dickinson CM, Fiske J. A review of gagging problems in dentistry: I. Aetiology and classification. Dent Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;32(1):26-8, 31-2. PubmedPMID: 15739661.
- Ramsay DS, Weinstein P, Milgrom P, Getz T. Problematic gagging: principles of treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Feb;114(2):178-83. PubmedPMID: 2880883.
- Saita N, Fukuda K, Koukita Y, Ichinohe T, Yamashita S. Relationship between gagging severity and its management in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Feb;40(2):106-11. PubmedPMID: 23231041.
- Eli I, Kleinhauz M. Hypnosis: a tool for an integrative approach in the treatment of the gagging reflex. Int J ClinExpHypn. 1985 Apr;33(2):99-108. PubmedPMID: 2862110.
- Fiske J, Dickinson C. The role of acupuncture in controlling the gagging reflex using a review of ten cases. Br Dent J. 2001 Jun 9;190(11):611-3. PubmedPMID: 11441900.
- Kumar MS. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards oral health among law students in Chennai. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016 Jul 1;8(7):650.
- Kumar MP. Dental management of patients on antiplatelet therapy: Literature update. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(3):26-31.
- Kumar S. Newer delivery systems for local anesthesia in dentistry. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(5):252-5.
- Malay KK, Duraisamy R, Brundha MP, Kumar MP. Awareness regarding anemia among 1 st year dental undergraduate students. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Aug 1;10(8).