SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-305

Gag Reflex and Prosthodontic Procedures - A Comparative Study


Suhas Manoharan1, Subhashree R2, M.P. Santhosh Humar3*

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
3 Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.


*Corresponding Author

Dr. M.P. Santhosh Kumar M.D.S,
Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Postcode 00077.
Tel: +919994892022
E-mail: santhoshsurgeon@gmail.com

Received: January 22, 2021; Accepted: February 28, 2021; Published: March 03, 2021

Citation: Suhas Manoharan, Subhashree R, M.P. Santhosh Humar. Gag Reflex and Prosthodontic Procedures - A Comparative Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(03):1705-1707. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000363

Copyright: M.P. Santhosh Kumar©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Gagging is a characteristic feature of the upper respiratory tract to keep check of any foreign body. Severe gagging can occur during dental and prosthodontic procedures, which may cause irritation to the clinician and patient leading to compromised quality of treatment. This study was aimed to assess the relationship between gagging and various prosthodontic procedures thereby to improve the overall quality of treatment provided. Fifty Patients undergoing various prosthodontics treatments in our institution were selected for the study. A self-structured questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence and severity of the gag reflex. Results revealed that females had more gagging during prosthodontic procedures compared to males. 40% of patients who underwent fixed partial denture fabrication and 41.67% who were treated for temporary partial denture construction expressed gagging. From the present study it is evident that increased awareness is necessary to manage patients with gagging as it is major road block in providing quality prosthodontic treatment.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Material and Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
7.References


Keywords

Gagging; Patient; Reflex; Prosthodontics; Dentures.


Introduction

Gagging is a characteristic feature of the upper respiratory tract to keep check of any foreign body. However, it can likewise be a procured reflex which is conditioned by different stimuli for example, visual, acoustic, olfactory or chemical. It is a natural and normal defensive mechanism. As a result of gagging, patients often complain of nausea and unpleasant sensations amid dental procedures making it a troublesome situation to oversee [1, 2]. Severe gagging may cause irritation of the clinician and patient leading to compromised quality of treatment.

The gag reflex is a self-defensive reaction for survival and is controlled by parasympathetic division of the autonomic nervous system which involves ejection of foreign bodies.Five locales in the oral cavity have been perceived as the major trigger zones for initiating gag reflex,namely base of the tongue, palate, fauces, uvula and posterior pharyngeal wall [3, 4]. Different dental procedures like making of maxillary and mandibular impressions, cavity preparation, checking of the posterior vibrating line for complete or partial dentures, crowns or root canal treatment for posterior teeth, taking intraoral radiographs particularly for the posterior teeth and extraction of third molars can cause overstated choking reflex [5, 6].

Gagging can cause unnecessary stress to both the operator and patient leading to reduced patient cooperation and reduced quality of treatment provided. Sometimes the reflex maybe triggered by fear, other psychologic factors or visual stimuli such as sight of impression material or a mouth mirror. Management of such patients having serious gag reflex can be challengingand proper knowledge regarding the reflex is vital to overcome it effectively [7]. Despite a range of strategies available no single method has been proved to completely stop the reflex. This study was done to assess and compare the gag reflex for various prosthodontic procedures among the Chennai population.


Materials And Methods

A descriptive study was conducted in the undergraduate clinic in Saveetha Dental College and hospital during the period November to December 2020. Fifty Patients undergoing various prosthodontics treatments were selected for the study. Detailed case history of the patient was taken. A self-structured questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence and severity of the gag reflex. Since, there is no scoring system to grade severity of gagging, the gagging reflex is graded based on patient feedback. If the patient expressed that they experienced occasional gag reflex during insertion or usage of the prosthesis it was classified as mild type of gagging. If the patient expressed gagging after prolonged usage of prosthesis it was classified as moderate type of gagging and if the patient experiences gagging immediately during prosthesis insertion it was classified as severe gagging. Data collected was tabulated and results obtained.


Results

Among 50 participants in our study, 27 were females and 23 were males in the age group of 25 -70 years. Out of the study group, only 38% of the patients experienced gag reflex among which 57% were females and 43% were males [Figure 1, Table 1]. Among thevarious prosthodontic procedures, 26.67% of patients treated for complete denture prosthesis, 40% of patients who underwent fixed partial denture fabrication and 41.67% of patients treated for temporary partial dentureconstruction expressed gagging [Figure 2, Table 2]. Also, it was seen that females had more gagging during prosthodontic procedures compared to males.



Figure 1. Gender-wise distribution of gag reflex.



Figure 2. Prosthodontic treatment-wise distribution of gag reflex.



Table 1. Distribution of gagging reflex among genders.



Table 2. Distribution of gagging reflex for prosthodontic procedures.


Discussion

The present study was done to establish a relationship between prevalence of gag reflex according to gender and type of prosthesis fabricated among the population residing in Chennai.Gag in dental terms is neural response initiated on touching the posterior pharynx or the soft palate. It involves uniform elevation of the soft palate, retraction of the tongue and contraction of the pharyngeal muscles. Gagging during dental procedures can cause lots of stress to both the clinician and the patient [8].

The management of gag reflex depends on treatment of the cause and not only symptomatic treatment. Exhaustive clinical examination, recording of legitimate patient history and proper discussion with the patient can be the key factors in understanding the aetiology of the gag reflex. The dental professional needs to characterize if the patient's concern is connected to natural aggravations, iatrogenic variables, anatomic or mental elements. It is imperative to perceive whether, single or numerous components are causing the issue [9]. Gagging can be of a lot of trouble to the patient and the disposition of the clinician towards the patient may impact theresult of treatment. The patient ought to be educated of the intraoral examination and methodology before the treatment furthermore, the clinician ought to continue just when assent has been given [10].

A patient wearing complete denture can have a gag issue because of different causes. Some of the causes might be identified with denture itself, while others can be psychogenic causes like declining to swallow the spit for the reason that the denture will oust. As a result, saliva pooling could trigger the gag reflex. But, in removable partial dentures, the denture-related mucosal disturbance in the oral cavity amid biting can likewise cause poor adaptation and stability of the dentures, leading to choking [11]. Therefore, awareness and knowledge regarding management of patients with gag reflex is essential. Proper history taking and conversations with the patient can give clues regarding the aetiology of gag reflex. The dental clinician needs to investigate and find factors responsible for this reflex during the time in the dental chair. Ramsay et al., [12] also suggested prior bad experiences may also be a factor causing gagging in patients even when there is no relevant triggering factor.

Various techniques can be used to manage gagging [13]. In a particular technique, a thin denture base is fabricated without any teeth and the patient is asked to use them for 5 minutes a day followed bygradually increasing them to develop resistance to the sensitivity. Psychological methods such as asking the patients to raise their feet alternatively may reduce gagging [14]. Therapies such as acupuncture, cognitive behaviour therapy and administration of certain drugs are known to decrease gag reflex [15]. With a rich case bank established over the last decades we have been able to publish extensively in our domain [16-19]. Further large scale multi-centric trials are required to establish the prevalence and causes of gagging reflex during the various prosthodontic procedures in our study population.


Conclusion

From the study it can be concluded that gag reflex is a major roadblock during prosthodontics procedures among the population in Chennai. Hence, increased awareness regarding the management of gag reflex is necessary. Proper patient-doctor communication and detailed history of the patient may help the clinician to plan the treatment and customize them according to the patient’s requirements.


References

  1. LINCOLN CW. Eradication of gagging reflex for full denture patients. J Oral Surg (Chic). 1952 Jan;10(1):8-9. PubmedPMID: 14898343.
  2. Cakmak YO, Ozdogmus O, Günay Y, Gürbüzer B, Tezulas E, Kaspar EC, et al. An earplug technique to reduce the gag reflex during dental procedures. ForschKomplementmed. 2014;21(2):94-8. PubmedPMID: 24851845.
  3. Warwicker C. The Clinical Management of the Gagging Patient. SAAD Dig. 2017 Jan;33:44-7. PubmedPMID: 29616756.
  4. Eachempati P, KumbargereNagraj S, Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, George RP, Soe HHK, Karanth L. Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 13;2019(11):CD011116. PubmedPMID: 31721146.
  5. Wright SM. The radiologic anatomy of patients who gag with dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Feb;45(2):127-33. PubmedPMID: 6937654.
  6. Means CR, Flenniken IE. Gagging--a problem in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1970 Jun;23(6):614-20. PubmedPMID: 4911058.
  7. Prashanti E, Sumanth KN, Renjith George P, Karanth L, Soe HH. Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 1;(10):CD011116. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 13;2019(11): PubmedPMID: 26423025.
  8. Conny DJ, Tedesco LA. The gagging problem in prosthodontic treatment. Part I: description and causes. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 May;49(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90381-5. PubmedPMID: 6343586.
  9. Ahmad N, Yunus N, Jafri Z. Etiology and management of gag reflex in the prosthodontic clinic: A review. Int J Oral Health Dent. 2015 Jan;1(1):25-8. PubmedPMID: 31255827.
  10. Schole ML. Management of the gagging patient. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1959 Jul 1;9(4):578-83.
  11. Dickinson CM, Fiske J. A review of gagging problems in dentistry: I. Aetiology and classification. Dent Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;32(1):26-8, 31-2. PubmedPMID: 15739661.
  12. Ramsay DS, Weinstein P, Milgrom P, Getz T. Problematic gagging: principles of treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Feb;114(2):178-83. PubmedPMID: 2880883.
  13. Saita N, Fukuda K, Koukita Y, Ichinohe T, Yamashita S. Relationship between gagging severity and its management in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Feb;40(2):106-11. PubmedPMID: 23231041.
  14. Eli I, Kleinhauz M. Hypnosis: a tool for an integrative approach in the treatment of the gagging reflex. Int J ClinExpHypn. 1985 Apr;33(2):99-108. PubmedPMID: 2862110.
  15. Fiske J, Dickinson C. The role of acupuncture in controlling the gagging reflex using a review of ten cases. Br Dent J. 2001 Jun 9;190(11):611-3. PubmedPMID: 11441900.
  16. Kumar MS. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards oral health among law students in Chennai. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016 Jul 1;8(7):650.
  17. Kumar MP. Dental management of patients on antiplatelet therapy: Literature update. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(3):26-31.
  18. Kumar S. Newer delivery systems for local anesthesia in dentistry. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(5):252-5.
  19. Malay KK, Duraisamy R, Brundha MP, Kumar MP. Awareness regarding anemia among 1 st year dental undergraduate students. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Aug 1;10(8).

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn