SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-3020

Relationship Between Arch Form And Periodontal Diseases – A Retrospective Study


Nor Syakirah binti Shahroom1, Sheeja S. Varghese2*, Iffat Nasim3

1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
2 Professor, Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
3 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.


*Corresponding Author

Sheeja S. Varghese,
Professor, Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Tel: +91 9884042252
E-mail: sheejavarghese@saveetha.com

Received: February 25, 2021; Accepted: March 04, 2021; Published: March 08, 2021

Citation: Nor Syakirah binti Shahroom, Sheeja S. Varghese, Iffat Nasim. Relationship Between Arch Form And Periodontal Diseases – A Retrospective Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(03):1906-1910. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000378

Copyright: Sheeja S. Varghese©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Background: Objectives: This study was done to assess the relationship between arch forms and periodontal diseases.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a dental hospital with a sample size of 3022 subjects of age from 6-84 years old. The data variables including socio-demographic, type of arch forms and periodontal disease present were retrieved from our record. Results were analyzed using SPSS Statistical software Version 20.

Results: Overall, there were 50.3% of U shaped, 32.5% of square-shaped and 17.2% of V-shaped arch. The V-shaped arch form was predisposed to periodontal disease followed by U shaped arch and square-shaped arch (p<0.05) which was statistically significant. In association with gender, there was a statistically significant difference between gender and periodontal diseases where males were more prevalent compared to females (p<0.05). There was found to be no statistically significant difference between dental arch forms with gender in which V-shaped and U-shaped were more common in females and square-shaped was more common in males (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that the V-shaped arch and males were prone to periodontal diseases. The study on the relationship of arch form and periodontal diseases helps in proper diagnosis and treatment planning among orthodontists and periodontists.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
7.References


Keywords

Arch Dimension; Arch Form; Crowding; Malalignment; Periodontal Disease.


Introduction

Dental arch dimensions including dental arch width, arch length and arch form play an important role in diagnosis, treatment planning and outcomes in orthodontic treatments [1]. There are several factors that may be affected by dental arch forms such as available space, smile aesthetics and potentially long term occlusal stability [2, 3]. During orthodontic treatment, maintaining the pre-treatment dental arch form may help to reduce crowding relapse and periodontal damage [4]. Dental arch forms may be varied based on ethnic groups and populations [5]. Several researchers had been trying to classify the dental arch forms. One of them was Chuck in 1934 had classified dental arch form in three forms, namely ovoid, tapered and squared shaped [6].

Dental arch continuity and integrity are a result of harmony between tooth size and arch dimensions [7]. The presence of any discrepancies between these elements may predispose to dental crowding or spacing [8]. Dental irregularity and crowding may lead to periodontal diseases which are greater in the anterior teeth region [8]. Several studies reported that there was a correlation between arch dimensions and crowding [1, 10] and there was a correlation between malposition of teeth with periodontal diseases [11, 12].

Periodontitis is an advanced form of periodontal disease which causes destruction to the soft and hard tissue component of the tooth-supporting structures leading to tooth mobility [13-19]. Aggressive periodontitis commonly affected younger age individuals [20]. Moreover, any type of tooth malposition such as crowding, rotated teeth, incisor proclination and mandibular molar tipping may result in early tooth loss due to the formation of periodontal pockets on the mesial surface of the tooth involved [21]. This condition should be treated by aligning the teeth which help to redirect the occlusal force and reduce the effect of occlusal trauma on periodontium [21]. Besides that, plaque accumulation due to difficulty in oral hygiene maintenance is one of the causative factors of periodontal diseases. Due to tooth malposition such as crowding, individuals may have difficult access to clean the interdental areas which leads to plaque accumulation and calculus formation. This will initially cause gingival inflammation or worsen it may trigger the adaptive immune mechanism causing the release of inflammatory mediators and cytokines causing destruction of the periodontal tissues [22-26].


Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients visiting the dental hospital from June 2019 till February 2020. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Saveetha Dental College with an ethical approval number SDC/ SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/0619-0320.

All available case sheets were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 3022 patients were selected in the study using consecutive sampling methods. Those who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. The inclusion criteria were patients with the arch form written in the orthodontic diagnosis section and a complete periodontal chart and the periodontal diagnosis were made approved by the respective specialists. The exclusion criteria were completely edentulous patients, incomplete diagnosis and patients with cleft lip or palate. All the data was included and cross-verified using photographs to minimize bias. The data were verified by the second reviewer.

Sociodemographic data (age and gender), type or arch form and presence of periodontal diseases were retrieved from our record. The type of arch form was observed and classified into: i) Ushaped, ii) V-shaped and iii) square shaped. The periodontal status of the patients was evaluated and diagnosed based on The American Academy of Periodontology Classification 1999. The periodontal diagnosis was divided into five: i) clinically healthy gingiva - 0-3mm probing depth and no bleeding on probing ii) localised chronic gingivitis - 0-3mm probing depth and bleeding on probing with less than 30% of sites are involved iii) generalised chronic gingivitis - 0-3mm probing depth and bleeding on probing with more than 30% of sites are involved iv) localised chronic periodontitis - >3mm probing depth with loss of attachment, mobility or furcation involvement less than 30% of sites are involved v) generalised chronic periodontitis - >3mm probing depth with loss of attachment, mobility or furcation involvement more than 30% of sites are involved.

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, New York USA). To analyze the association between gender and arch form, gender was the independent variable and arch form was the dependent variable. To analyze the association between gender and arch form with periodontal diseases, gender and arch form were the independent variables and periodontal diseases were the dependent variables. A Chi-square test was used to establish the association of the categorical variables.


Results

A total of 3022 patients with 1717 (57%) males and 1305 (43%) of females aged 6-84 years old were involved in this study. In the present study, we observed that there was a statistically significant association between arch form and periodontal status (p<0.05) as shown in Table 1. Periodontal disease was prevalent in patients with a narrow or V-shaped arch as shown in Figure 1. 115 (22.1%) of patients with V-shaped arch were diagnosed with generalised chronic periodontitis followed by U shaped arch with 245 (16.1%) and square-shaped arch with 150 (15.3%). Meanwhile, localised chronic periodontitis was commonly seen in patients with a square-shaped arch 154 (15.7%), V-shaped arch 200 (14.8%) and U shaped 77 (13.2%). Generalised chronic gingivitis and clinically healthy gingiva were higher among patients with U shaped arch with 866 (57%) and 117 (7.7%) respectively. Localised chronic gingivitis was higher among square-shaped arch 124 (12.6%) followed by V-shaped arch 31 (6%) and U shaped arch 91 (6%).

According to gender, periodontal diseases were prevalent in males compared to females and found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) as shown in Table 2. In this present study, males were prone to develop generalised chronic periodontitis with 336 (19.6%) compared to females 174 (13.3%) as shown in Figure 2. Meanwhile, females were commonly diagnosed with clinically healthy gingiva 105 (8%), generalised chronic gingivitis 719 (55.1%), localised chronic periodontitis 190 (14.6%) and localised chronic gingivitis 117 (9.0%) compared to males.

In this present study, females were more common with V-shaped 238 (18.2%) followed by U shaped 661 (50.7%) compared to males with 282 (16.4%) and 858 (50%) respectively as shown in Figure 3. In males, the square shape was more common with 577 (33.6%) compared to females with 406 (31.1%). There was no statistically significant association between gender and arch form (p>0.05) as shown in Table 3.



Figure 1. Image representing the association of arch form with periodontal status. X-axis represents the arch form and Y-axis represents the percentage of patients with respective periodontal status. The blue color for clinically healthy gingiva, green for localised chronic gingivitis, beige for generalised chronic gingivitis, purple for generalised chronic gingivitis with localised chronic periodontitis and yellow for generalised chronic periodontitis. The V-shaped arch forms are having a higher prevalence of generalised chronic periodontitis. (Chi-Square test, p<0.05).



Figure 2. Image representing the association of gender with periodontal status. X-axis represents gender and Y-axis represents the number of people with respective periodontal status. The blue color for clinically healthy gingiva, green for localised chronic gingivitis, beige for generalised chronic gingivitis, purple for generalised chronic gingivitis with localised chronic periodontitis and yellow for generalised chronic periodontitis. There is a significant increase in generalised chronic periodontitis in males compared to females. (Chi-Square test, p<0.05).



Figure 3. Image representing the association of gender with arch form. X-axis represents gender and Y-axis represents the percentage of patients with respective arch forms. The blue bar represents square arch, green bar represents U- shaped arch and light brown represents V-shaped arch. V-shaped arch form is common in females and a square-shaped arch form is common in males. But the difference was not significant (Chi-Square test, p>0.05).



Table 1. Shows the descriptive statistic of periodontal status based on arch forms. V-shaped arch form is showing a higher number of periodontitis patients than the other arch forms.



Table 2. Shows the descriptive statistic of periodontal status based on gender. Males are having significantly higher prevalence of periodontitis than females.



Table 3. Shows the descriptive statistics of arch forms based on gender. U shape arch was slightly more prevalent in males and V shape was slightly more in females. But the difference was not statistically significant.


Discussion

The overall objective of the present study was to evaluate the possible relationship between different types of arch forms and periodontal diseases. No previous study has associated arch forms with periodontal diseases.

The present study found that there was a statistically significant association between arch form and periodontal diseases (p<0.05). Patients with narrow or V-shaped arch form were predisposed to periodontitis. There was no previous study related to the arch form with periodontal diseases. However, a previous study reported that there was an association between arch dimension including arch width and crowding [27-29]. Mimoza Selmani et al reported that narrow arch forms are predisposed to crowding which results in difficulty in oral hygiene maintenance [30]. Thus, tooth malposition and malocclusion can be considered as a local predisposing factor of periodontal diseases that can initiate the accumulation of plaque. Crowding of the teeth causes difficult accessibility to tooth brushing and laborious cleaning of teeth is very much needed [31]. Plaque and calculus formation due to improper oral hygiene will cause initiation of gingival inflammation which may worsen and cause periodontal tissue destruction [22, 23]. Moreover, the present study also found that patients with clinically healthy gingiva and gingivitis were higher among patients with U shaped arch. This may be the fact that it was easy to maintain good oral hygiene with proper brushing techniques due to easy accessibility within interdental spaces.

In the present study, there was a statistically significant difference between gender and periodontal diseases (p<0.05). Periodontal diseases were common among males compared to females. Previous studies reported that males had a high risk of developing periodontitis [32, 35]. Eke et al., reported that recent evidence on periodontal risk assessment has revealed that gender plays a critical role in periodontal risk in which men are at higher risk for severe periodontitis compared to women [36]. Furthermore, smoking and diabetes also play a role in the disease process [36]. Studies also revealed that oral hygiene behaviors in males were poor compared to females [37-39]. This can be seen in the present study where females were prevalent in clinically healthy gingiva and gingivitis due to good oral hygiene maintenance. However, Merchant et al., reported that there was no association between oral hygiene practices and periodontitis in males [40].

The predominant arch form for females in the present study was V-shaped arch form (18.2%) and U shaped (50.7%). Previous studies reported that the square arch form was predominant in females followed by ovoid or U shaped arch form and tapering or V-shaped arch form [41, 42]. Meanwhile, Owais AI et al., reported that a square arch form was more common in females followed by V-shaped arch form and U shaped arch form [43]. Another study reported that the V-shaped arch form was more predominant in females which were similar to the present study [44].

The predominant arch form for males in the present study was square arch form with 33.6%. Similarly, a previous study reported that predominant arch form for males was square arch form 35.33%, followed by ovoid 34.67% and tapering 30% in which the value was greater than the present study [42]. Other studies reported contrary results with the present study in which the ovoid arch was predominant in males followed by tapering and square arch forms [41, 44, 45]. However, the present study revealed that there was no statistically significant association between gender and arch form which was contrary to the study done by Mohammad A et al., [41].

The study on the relationship between arch form and periodontal diseases revealed that a V-shaped/narrow/tapering arch form may lead to periodontitis due to tooth and arch form discrepancies which cause tooth malposition or crowding. Thus, the need for periodontics treatment to improve the periodontal health status should be done first followed by orthodontic treatment to maintain proper alignment of teeth for normal occlusion. There are various periodontal therapies aimed to eliminate the diseases and maintenance of periodontium [46-50].

Firstly, the limitation of this study was the presence of observer bias. Secondly, the etiological factors such as smoking habits, systemic diseases, genetics, medications and nutrition intake were not included in the study which can influence periodontal disease. However, due to the large sample size, the limitations did not affect the results much. Further study can be done to associate the relationship of arch forms with periodontal diseases along with other etiological factors and the association between orthodontics and periodontics in the treatment planning of periodontal diseases.


Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that there was a statistically significant association between arch form and periodontal disease. Periodontitis was prevalent in patients with a V-shaped arch form and clinically healthy gingiva and gingivitis were prevalent in patients with U-shaped arch form. Besides, periodontal diseases were prevalent in males compared to females. The study on the relationship of arch form and periodontal diseases helps in proper diagnosis and treatment planning among orthodontists and periodontists.


Acknowledgement

We thank Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai for the research support.


References

  1. Carter GA, McNamara Jr JA. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jul 1;114(1):88-99.
  2. Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin JL, Brunner F. Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jul 1;104(1):67-72.
  3. Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Sep 1;134(3):430-8.
  4. Sampson P, Little RM, Ĺrtun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 May 1;107(5):518-30.
  5. Defraia E, Baroni G, Marinelli A. Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Italian children born in the 1950s and the 1990s. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):446-51.Pubmed PMID: 16637725.
  6. Chuck GC. Ideal arch form. Angle Orthod. 1934 Oct;4(4):312-27.
  7. Faruqui S, Fida M, Shaikh A. Comparison of tooth and arch dimensions in dental crowding and spacing. POJ. 2012;4(2):48-55.
  8. Moorrees CF, Reed RB. Correlations among crown diameters of human teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 1964 Nov 1;9(6):685-97.
  9. Staufer K, Landmesser H. Effects of crowding in the lower anterior segment— a risk evaluation depending upon the degree of crowding. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2004 Jan;65(1):13-25.
  10. Gilmore CA, Little RM. Mandibular incisor dimensions and crowding. Am. J. Orthod. 1984 Dec 1;86(6):493-502.
  11. Hellgren A. The association between crowding of the teeth and gingivitis. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1956;32:134-40.
  12. Buckley LA. The relationship between malocclusion and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1972; 43: 415-417.
  13. Dombret J, Marcos E. Tooth mobility and containment. Rev Belge Med Dent. 1989 Jan 1;44(2):98-109.
  14. Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Doraiswamy JN, Malaiappan S. Herbs as an antioxidant arsenal for periodontal diseases. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 2016 Jan 27;5(1):92-6.Pubmed PMID: 27069730.
  15. Varghese SS, Thomas H, Jayakumar ND, Sankari M, Lakshmanan R. Estimation of salivary tumor necrosis factor-alpha in chronic and aggressive periodontitis patients. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Sep;6(Suppl 1):S152-6. Pubmed PMID: 26604566.
  16. Avinash K, Malaippan S, Dooraiswamy JN. Methods of Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells from Different Regions of Oral Cavity Using Markers: A Systematic Review. Int J Stem Cells. 2017 May 30;10(1):12-20. Pubmed PMID: 28531913.
  17. Khalid W, Varghese SS, Sankari M, Jayakumar ND. Comparison of Serum Levels of Endothelin-1 in Chronic Periodontitis Patients Before and After Treatment. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC78-ZC81.Pubmed PMID: 28571268.
  18. Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Jayakumar ND, Malaiappan S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and periodontitis–unwinding their linking mechanisms. J. Oral Biosci. 2016 Feb 1;58(1):23-6.
  19. Ramamurthy JA, Mg V. Comparison of effect of hiora mouthwash versus chlorhexidine mouthwash in gingivitis patients: a clinical trial. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018;11(7):84-88.
  20. Ramesh A, Ravi S, Kaarthikeyan G. Comprehensive rehabilitation using dental implants in generalized aggressive periodontitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Mar;21(2):160-163.
  21. Hallmon WW. Occlusal trauma: effect and impact on the periodontium. Ann Periodontol. 1999 Dec;4(1):102-8.
  22. Bahirrah S. Relationship of crowded teeth and Oral Hygiene among urban population in Medan. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci.2018 Mar 1;126(1): 012188.
  23. Bansal V, Bansal PV, Aggarwal S, Batra M, Gupta M. Tooth size in crowded and spaced dentition among western Uttar Pradesh population: a biometric study. Int. J. Sci. Study. 2013;1(03):81-8.
  24. Mootha A, Malaiappan S, Jayakumar ND, Varghese SS, Toby Thomas J. The Effect of Periodontitis on Expression of Interleukin-21: A Systematic Review. Int J Inflam. 2016;2016:1-8.Pubmed PMID: 26998377.
  25. Khalid W, Vargheese SS, Lakshmanan R, Sankari M, Jayakumar ND. Role of endothelin-1 in periodontal diseases: A structured review. Indian J Dent Res. 2016 May-Jun;27(3):323-33.Pubmed PMID: 27411664.
  26. Priyanka S, Kaarthikeyan G, Nadathur JD, Mohanraj A, Kavarthapu A. Detection of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and Torque Teno virus in subgingival and atheromatous plaques of cardiac patients with chronic periodontitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):456-460.Pubmed PMID: 29551863.
  27. Forsberg CM. Tooth size, spacing, and crowding in relation to eruption or impaction of third molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul 1;94(1):57-62.
  28. Howe RP, McNamara Jr JA, O'connor KA. An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. Am. J. Orthod. 1983 May 1;83(5):363-73.
  29. Mills LF. Arch width, arch length, and tooth size in young adult males. Angle Orthod. 1964 Apr;34(2):124-9.
  30. Selmani M, Gjorgova J. Relationship among lower arch length, arch width and arch perimeter in crowding and non-crowding groups. Balk J Dent Med. 2015 Mar 1;19(1):8-12.
  31. Boopana K, Jain RK, Mani G, Ganapathy D. Interarch and intra-arch relationship of anterior teeth with periodontal conditions. Drug invent. today. 2020 Apr 1;13(4):503-506.
  32. Bouchard P, Boutouyrie P, Mattout C, Bourgeois D. Risk assessment for severe clinical attachment loss in an adult population. J Periodontol. 2006 Mar;77(3):479-89.Pubmed PMID: 16512763.
  33. Singh AK, Chauhan R, Rani K, Singh K, Anand K, Barbie W. Prevalence of dental caries, gingival disease, and periodontal disease in Bihar population: A community-based research. SRM J. res. dent. sci. 2020 Jan 1;11(1):21.
  34. Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Thornton-Evans GO, Genco RJ. Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: 2009 and 2010. J Dent Res. 2012 Oct;91(10):914-20.
  35. Shiau HJ, Reynolds MA. Sex differences in destructive periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1379-89.Pubmed PMID: 20450376.
  36. Eke PI, Wei L, Thornton-Evans GO, Borrell LN, Borgnakke WS, Dye B, et al. Risk indicators for periodontitis in US adults: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2016 Oct;87(10):1174-85.
  37. Alcouffe F. Oral hygiene behavior: differences between men and women. Clin Prev Dent. 1989 May 1;11(3):6-10.
  38. Tseveenjav B, Suominen AL, Vehkalahti MM. Oral health-related behaviours among dentate adults in Finland: findings from the Finnish Health 2000 Survey. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012 Feb;120(1):54-60.
  39. Schulze A, Busse M. Gender Differences in Periodontal Status and Oral Hygiene of Non-Diabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Open Dent J. 2016 Jun 9;10:287-97.Pubmed PMID: 27347232.
  40. Merchant A, Pitiphat W, Douglass CW, Crohin C, Joshipura K. Oral hygiene practices and periodontitis in health care professionals. J. Periodontol. 2002 May;73(5):531-5.
  41. Mohammad A, Koralakunte PR. Gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth, arch and palatal forms in Saudi population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S486-90.Pubmed PMID: 26538903.
  42. Rai R. Correlation of nasal width to inter-canine distance in various arch forms. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Jun;10(2):123-7.Pubmed PMID: 21629456.
  43. Owais AI, Abu Alhaija ES, Oweis RR, Al-Khateeb SN. Maxillary and mandibular arch forms in the primary dentition stage. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun 1;13(2):330-5.
  44. Al-Zubair NM. Establishment of Yemeni dental arch form. Orthod. J. Nepal. 2013 Dec 31;3(2):22-6.
  45. Othman SA, Xinwei ES, Lim SY, Jamaludin M, Mohamed NH, Yusof ZY, et al. Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia. Korean J Orthod. 2012 Feb;42(1):47-54. Pubmed PMID: 23112931.
  46. Thamaraiselvan M, Elavarasu S, Thangakumaran S, Gadagi JS, Arthie T. Comparative clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of isolated gingival recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Jan;19(1):66-71.
  47. Panda S, Jayakumar ND, Sankari M, Varghese SS, Kumar DS. Platelet rich fibrin and xenograft in treatment of intrabony defect. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):550-554.
  48. Ravi S, Malaiappan S, Varghese S, Jayakumar ND, Prakasam G. Additive Effect of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Guided Tissue Regeneration in Treatment of Intrabony Defects in Patients With Chronic Periodontitis: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Periodontol. 2017 Sep;88(9):839-845.Pubmed PMID: 28474968.
  49. Ramesh A, Vellayappan R, Ravi S, Gurumoorthy K. Esthetic lip repositioning: A cosmetic approach for correction of gummy smile - A case series. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):290-294.Pubmed PMID: 31143013.
  50. Kavarthapu A, Thamaraiselvan M. Assessing the variation in course and position of inferior alveolar nerve among south Indian population: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Jul- Aug;29(4):405-409.Pubmed PMID: 30127186.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn