Knowledge, Attitude And Practices Onuse Of Probiotics For Oral Health Among Indian Population - A Cross Sectional Study
Saravanan Poorni1*, Nivedhitha2, Ramanujam Padmapriya3, Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan4
1 PhD Scholar, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University and Professor, Department
of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hosptal, Chennai India.
2 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai India.
3 Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hosptal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hosptal, Chennai, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Saravanan Poorni MDS,
PhD Scholar, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University and Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry
and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hosptal, Chennai India.
Tel: 0091-4427435059
E-mail: 161703003.sdc@saveetha.com
Received: February 04, 2021; Accepted: March 03, 2021; Published: March 06, 2021
Citation: Saravanan Poorni, Nivedhitha, Ramanujam Padmapriya, Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan. Knowledge, Attitude And Practices Onuse Of Probiotics For Oral Health Among Indian Population - A Cross Sectional Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(03):1765-1768. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000375
Copyright: Saravanan Poorni©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practices on use of Probiotics for oral health among Indian population.
Materials And Methods: This descriptive cross sectional study was designed as an online questionnaire based study consisting
of 28 close ended questions on probiotics in oral health. The questionnaire was standardized and randomly circulated
online. 315 completed responses were collected, recorded, tabulated and scored. The data thus obtained was interpreted using
SPSS software version 22.
Results: Results revealed that there was significant difference in the knowledge levels between age groups, between gender
and attitude, per capita income and attitude. Female participants were more aware of probotics than males. Participants in the
higher economic range, graduates and post graduates showed greater positive knowledge, attitude and practice on probiotics.
Conclusion: The basic knowledge on probiotics is good among the Indian population. However more information regarding
probiotics in oral health needs to be augmented to strengthen oral homeostasis and enhance overall wellbeing.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.References
Keywords
Homeostasis; Oral Health; Oral Infections; Probiotics.
Introduction
Human oral microbiome comprises of about 700 currently recognized
bacterial species, the majority of whichare niche-adapted
oral cavity commensals. It also includes a variable subset of potentially
pathogenic species [1]. Disturbances in the homeostasis
or oral dysbiosis caused by overgrowth of one or more pathogenic
bacterial species leads to establishment of oral infections.
Strengtheningof oral homeostatic mechanisms is one way to reduce
oral infections [2]. Several methods aim at attaining this. One
such method is the use of probiotics which is defined as ‘live
microorganisms, which when administered in adequate amounts,
confer a health benefit on the host.’ They are generally consumed
as fermented foods such as yogurts, however, probiotics supplements
are now being formulated in the form of tablets, capsules,
granules and liquids [3].
The use of probioticshas been an imperative aspect in dentistry
ever since the oral infections played a pivotal role among other
infections in humans.Specific strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium
species are the most commonly used probiotic strains
for oral infections. Several review papers have researched on the
role of various probiotic strains for prevention of oral diseases,
including dental caries [4, 5].
A large number of probiotic products are now commercially
available that includes dairy as well as non-dairy products and
dietary supplements [6-8]. Although there is growing evidence
for the benefits of probiotics on oral health, the lack of knowledge
on probiotics by the general public and poor awareness of their beneficial effects hasresulted in under consumption of these
products [9]. Literature search showed that there is paucity in the
studies that have focused on consumers’ perception on use of
probiotics to improve oral health and there was a lacunae of this
data among Indian population. Thus the current cross sectional
study was undertaken that aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude
and practices on use of probiotics for oral health among Indian
population.
Materials And Methods
This descriptive cross sectional study was designed to assess the
knowledge, attitude and practicesrelated to use of probiotics for
oral health among Indian population. Ethical approval from the
Institutional Review Board at Sri Venkateswara Dental College
was obtained before study initiation. The study adheres to the
provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. An online questionnaire
was developed in a standardized manner, using an accepted
measure development methodology and distributed among the
general public in various parts of India. The study was conducted
from February 2019 to April 2019.
Development of Questionnaire and Validation
Standard methodology of questionnaire development was used
that included item development, content and face validation, pilot
testing, and test-retest validation.Item development was donein
a multi-step process after reviewing the related publications in
Medline using Pubmed. The first part of the questionnaire on
general information included questions addressing the demographics
such as age gender, educational qualification, occupation
and per capita income. The second part comprised of 28 questions
pertaining to the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) on
use of probiotics. The KAP questions wereframed mainly asclose
ended questions usinga preformed scale.
Face and content validation of the item were done by circulating
the questionnaire among the experts in the field. The significance
and relevance ofeach question in assessing the KAP werereviewed.
Relevant corrections and suggestions from each expert
were considered with modifications of indefinite and unfamiliar
terms.The questionnaire was pretested among 10 randomly selected
individuals. Feedback regarding the clarity, wordings and
difficulty in filling the questionnaire were collected. Corresponding
changes weremade to keep the questions simple and specific.
For testing and retesting the questionnaire, the questionnaire was
tested among 10 Individuals. The participants were requested
to complete the questionnaire without accessing to any external
knowledge sources. Any difficulties in answering the questionswere
collected. Retest was conducted to assess test retest reliability
after one day with the same members. To analyze the reproducibility
of KAP questions, paired ‘t’ test was used and ‘p’ value
of less than 0.05 was considered as significant difference between
test and re-test responses.The final questionnaire was developed
based on the expert’s consensus with four main sections: General
information, knowledge, attitudes and practices related to use of
probiotics for oral health. The final questionnaire had 10 questions
on general information, 10 knowledge questions, 10 attitude
questions and 08 practice related questions.
Data Collection and Analysis
The questionnaire developed was distributed randomly online to
around 400 individuals. Sampling technique used was convenient
sampling. The acceptance to fill in the survey form was considered
as the consent to participate in the study. All individuals participating
in the survey were requested to complete the questionnaire
as per their convenience.
The response from the participants were then computed into a
Microsoft excel worksheet. For each question, correct answers
were scored as 1 while the incorrect and not sure answers were
scored as 0. Individual scores were summed upto yield a total
score. Data were then analyzed using SPSS (Statistical package for
social sciences, software Version 22; Chicago, IL, USA).Descriptive
statistical analysis was done for all variables. Mean percentage
scores, standard deviation (± SD), and frequency distribution
were calculated for knowledge, attitudes and practices related to
use of probiotics for oral health. Chi square test was used to assess
the significant effect of each demographic variable.
Results
316 individuals completed the survey by entering all the mandatory
fields and submitting the survey form online. The response
rate was 63.2%.
Among the 316individuals who completed the survey, 56.6% were
males, 43% were females and 0.4% preferred not to reveal their
gender. Majority of the population were under the age range of
18-35 years (50%) and 47.5% were between 35.1- 65 years. About
66.1% of the participants were married and a huge majority of
50.3% possessed a post graduate/professional degree.15.8% of
the population were unemployed and among the employed, a
predominant portion (38%) were professionals, 16.1% were managers,
4.4% were sales and service workers, 2.8% were students,
2.5% pursued clerical support jobs and 2.2% were technicians
and associate professionals. 81.2% were non health field workers.
Among the 18.8% employed in health field, 37.1% were dentists,
24.2% in medical services and the others in applied medical sciences.
The per capita income of 63% of the participants was Rs
47,000 and above.
Table 1 shows the association between the demographics of the
study population with knowledge, attitude and practice expressed
in terms of p value. There is a significant difference in the knowledge
levels between different age groups. Comparison of attitude
scores among gender was found to be highly significant. Comparison
of attitude scores based on per capita income was also
found to be highly significant.
Table 1. Shows the association between demographic details and knowledge, attitude and practice expressed in terms of p value.
Discussion
Probiotic bacteria are live microbial food supplements that beneficially
affect the host by improving its intestinal balance.[10,
11]. Recently, numerous research papers and studies focusing
on the effect of probiotics for oral health are being published.
Unfortunately, these products are underutilized due to a lack of
public familiarity with probiotic products and low awareness of
their benefits.Some studies have shown a high level of awareness, knowledge and consumption of probiotic supplements in countries
with advanced healthcare delivery systems [12-14]. However,
this maynot be the case in developing countries like India. Data
on the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to use of probiotics
for oral health among Indian population is currently unavailable.
Hence the current study intended to provide such information
and to provide a comprehensive overview which can help the
planning and evaluation of the use of probiotics for oral health.
With probiotics gaining great momentum in dentistry, it is important
that the general population is aware of the use of probiotics
in oral health for its efficient utilization. The present study was
conducted among the general public and questions pertaining to
knowledge, attitude and practice on the use of probiotics in oral
health were assessed. The results revealed that though a huge majority
of the population (71.8%) accepted that probiotics would
confer good general health when consumed, only 43.7% were
aware of the fact that probiotics can be used to address issues on
oral health. This is however much higher compared to the study
conducted among the Rio population where only 7.86% were
aware that probiotics could cause a reduction in caries.(15)77.5%
of our population were aware that milk, yoghurt and cheese are
some of the richest sources of probiotics. This knowledge could
be attributed to the power of marketing dairy products labeled
with benefits of probiotics in them. Further, a massive 61.4% of
the population also believes that the variety of products containing
probiotics can be increased.
Females have better awareness of probiotics compared to males.
This is in concordance with a similar study conducted among the
Saudi public where females had greater knowledge and awareness
levels than males [16]. Men and women exhibit considerably
dissimilar behavior towards healthy food and lifestyle. Men
show reduced eagerness towards dietary guidelines than women.
One probable justification for this might be that women are more
knowledgeable about food and nutrition and are more interested
when it comes to physical appearance and health than men.
This is however in contrary to the study by Payahoo et al., [17]
where male students had higher knowledge levels than female
students. Married respondents showed better knowledge, attitude
and practice compared to unmarried participants. 31.3% of the
participants with per capita income of Rs 47,000 and above exhibit
good knowledge, 35.8% show good attitude and 44% show
good practice. This reveals the bearing economic status has on
the awareness of probiotics in the population. Graduates and
post graduates showed higher positive knowledge, attitude and
practice on probiotics, considering the quality of education and
training they receive.
The current study clearly revealed that the participants had a basic
knowledge of probiotics. However, 77.8% still admit that information
about probiotics is less among the public and 85.1%
are willing to know more information on probiotics if given to
them. This reinforces the positive attitude the society has towards
health. With public awareness on health and nutrition increasing
day by day, it is important to bridge the gap between medical literature
and consumer awareness. Increased accessibility to health
promoting channels and media would be the best way to achieve
this. This would bring out knowledgeable individuals who are
concerned about the health and lifestyle of themselves and the
society as a whole.
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that there
exists good basic knowledge, attitude and practice towards probiotics
among the Indian population, however its importance in
oral health has to be further reinforced. With abundance of information
on probiotics available in literature, it becomes imperative
that it is made accessible to the general community for better
upliftment and promotion of heath and lifestyle.
Compliance With Ethical Standards
The authors declare that the paper has complied with the ethical
standards as per the guidelines of the journal.
References
- Aas, JA, Paster, BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I , Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J ClinMicrobiol.2005;43:5721–5732.Pubmed PMID:16272510.
- Araya M, Morelli L, Reid G, Sanders ME, Stanton C, PineiroM. et al. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Report of a Joint FAO/ WHO Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food, London, Ontario, Canada, April 30 and May 1. Geneva: World Health Organization.2002.
- Ramanujam P, PoorniS, Srinivasan MR, Sureshbabu NM. Probiotics in caries prevention.Indian J Nutr Diet. 2019; 56(1):84-91.
- Saha S, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Tabrizian M, Prakash S. Probiotics as oral health biotherapeutics. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2012 Sep 1;12(9):1207-20.
- Twetman S, Keller MK. Probiotics for caries prevention and control. Adv Dent Res. 2012 Sep;24(2):98-102. Pubmed PMID: 22899689.
- Douglas LC, Sanders ME. Probiotics and prebiotics in dietetics practice. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Mar;108(3):510-21. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):1381. Pubmed PMID: 18313433.
- Kasimoglu A, Göncüoglu M, Akgün S. Probiotic white cheese with Lactobacillus acidophilus. International Dairy Journal. 2004 Dec 1;14(12):1067-73.
- Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LP, Spier MR, Medeiros AB, Yamaguishi CT, Lindner JD, et al. The potential of probiotics: a review. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 2010 Dec 15;48(4):413-34.
- Stanczak M, Heuberger R. Assessment of the knowledge and beliefs regarding probiotic use. American Journal of Health Education. 2009 Jul 1;40(4):207-11.
- Rasic JL. The role of dairy foods containing bifido and acidophilus bacteria in nutrition and health. N Eur Dairy J .1983;4:80-8.
- Doron S, Gorbach SL. Probiotics: their role in the treatment and prevention of disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006;4:261-75.Pubmed PMID:16597207.
- Braun LA, Tiralongo E, Wilkinson JM, Spitzer O, Bailey M, Poole S, et al. Percep-tions, use and attitudes of pharmacy customers on complementary medicines and pharmacy practice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010; 10:38. Pubmed PMID:20646290.
- Bridgman SL, Azad MB, Field CJ, Letourneau N, Johnston DW, Kaplan BJ, et al. Maternal perspectives on the use of probiotics in infants: a crosssectional survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014; 14:366. Pubmed PMID:25267264.
- Owens C, Toone T, Steed-Ivie M. A Survey of Dietary Supplement Knowledge, Attitudes, and Use in a Rural Population. J Nutr Food Sci. 2014; 4: 304.
- Viana J, da Cruz A, Zoellner S, Batista R. Probiotic foods: Consumer Perception and Attitudes. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2008; 43(1): 1577-1580.
- Faden AA, Alotaibi AFM, Alnofaie HS, Alsuhaibani NN, Al-Dosary SN. Assessment of Saudi Public Knowledge, Attitude and Awareness Towards Oral Benefits of Probiotics: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11(4).
- Payahoo L, Nikniaz Z, Mahdavi R, Asghari Jafar Abadi M. Perceptions of medical sciences students towards probiotics. Health promotion perspectives. 2012; 2: 96-102.Pubmed PMID:24688923.