SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-2050

Association Between Periodontal Flap Design And Site Of Surgery - A Retrospective Study


Kadambari Sriram1, SheejaS.Varghese2*, Santhosh Kumar MP3

1 Saveetha Dental College and hospitals Saveetha University of Medical And Technical Science (SIMATS) Saveetha University. Chennai-600077, India.
2 Professor, Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Saveetha University of Medical And Technical Science(SIMATS) Saveetha University. Chennai-600077, India.
3 Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences,Saveetha University, Chennai 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India.


*Corresponding Author

SheejaS.Varghese,
Professor, Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Saveetha University of Medical And Technical Science(SIMATS) Saveetha University. Chennai- 600077, India.
E-mail: sheejavarghese@saveetha.com

Received: December 02, 2020; Accepted: January 21, 2021; Published: February 27, 2021

Citation: Kadambari Sriram, SheejaS.Varghese, Santhosh Kumar MP. Association Between Periodontal Flap Design And Site Of Surgery - A Retrospective Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(02):1805-1810. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000358

Copyright: SheejaS.Varghese©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Background: While non - surgical periodontal therapy remains the first line of treatment for periodontitis, there are limitations to what can be achieved by procedures like subgingival scaling and root planing. Flap surgery is done to access the tooth and the surrounding periodontium for better visualisation and instrumentation purpose. There are various techniques by which flap surgery is performed. Flap surgeries also provide access for osseous surgery and regenerative techniques.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the Site wise distribution of flap surgery techniques and the possible association between flap design and affected site.

Materials And Methods: The study is a Hospital based retrospective study, and included patients visiting a Dental hospital. A total of 731 patients who had undergone flap surgery were selected for the study. The Site wise distribution of flap technique was evaluated and tabulated in MS Excel. The data collected was imported to IBM SPSS Version 20.0 for analysis and results were obtained.

Results: The most frequently used or preferred Flap technique was found to be Kirkland Flap technique (72%). The association between Site and Flap technique was found to be statistically significant(Chi Square test,P<0.001). No significant association was found between gender and choice of flap technique(Chi Square test,P>0.001).

Conclusion: From the study it can be concluded that the most frequently used flap technique was Kirkland Flap. The Site of periodontal disease was found to have association with the choice of flap technique.

Clinical Significance: The clinical significance of this study was to report the influence of the site of surgery on the choice of Flap design.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Results and Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.References


Keywords

Flap Surgery; Flap Design; Kirkland Flap; Modified Widman Flap; Periodontitis.


Introduction

A periodontal flap is a section of gingiva and/or mucosa which has been surgically separated from the underlying tissues [1, 2]. Non surgical periodontal therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment of periodontitis, procedures like subgingival scaling and root planing however face certain limitations which are not encountered in flap surgery [3, 4]. Surgical periodontal treatment in its own right is also an important component of Periodontal therapy [5-7].

There are a number of periodontal surgical techniques and the choice of technique is influenced by the individual clinical situation[ 8]. Flap surgery not only allows for greater visualisation and instrumentation but also allows access for osseous and regenerative surgical techniques [9-11]. The various flap techniques include Modified Widman Flap, Kirkland Flap, Apically repositioned Flap, Coronally repositioned Flap, Papilla preservation flap,etc.

The choice of flap design not only affects the healing and functional outcome of the treatment but also plays a role in determining the aesthetic outcome of the treatment [12-14]. In regards to periodontal surgical therapy postoperative sensitivity and recession are also concerns along with post- operative appearance [15- 18]. Other elements which are evident in the design and execution of flap surgeries is the thickness of the gingival tissue to be positioned over denuded roots [19-21]. Smoking status, operator skills and patient compliance [22-24] also have an impact on the both the technique used as well as the outcome of the therapy.

While literature regarding the influence of tooth location on root coverage outcomes has been discussed [25], the association between site of periodontal disease and preference of flap design has not been much explored. The aim of the study was to assess the Site wise distribution of periodontal flap techniques and its association with the affected site.


Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, patients who underwent periodontal flap surgery in a Dental Hospital from June 2019 to March 2020 were included. Consecutive sampling method was used for the study. The study was approved by the scientific review board, and the ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical committee of the University with the following ethical approval number- SDC/ SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/0619-0320.

Patients of all age groups, both males and females were included in the study. All types of Flap surgery were taken into consideration and their digital case records including preoperative and Intra operative with digital photographs were retrieved. Only those case records which were approved by the specialists were included. Patients with systemic disease, with incomplete/censored, were excluded from the study. 731 samples which satisfied the criteria were included in the study. Variables such as age, gender, site of surgery(either quadrants or sextants mentioned in the case records) were extracted.

Statistical Analysis

The results obtained were tabulated and exported to IBM SPSS 20.0 for Statistical analysis. Descriptive Data analysis was done using percentage for Nominal and Qualitative data. The Gender and the site of surgery were considered as the independent variables while the Flap technique was considered as the dependent variables. Chi Square Test was used to evaluate the association between the Site of surgery and the type of Flap technique used and gender and the flap technique used. The p value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


Results

The present study included a total of 731 patients, of which 430 were males (58.7%) and 301 were females (41.3%) with an age range of 20-70 years.

On analysis the most commonly used flap technique was Kirkland flap(72%), followed by Modified Widman flap(18%), Papilla preservation flap (3.4%), Undisplaced flap (2.7%)(Figure 1). Overall the upper arch had more flap surgeries than the lower arch. Quadrant wise surgeries were more than the sextant wise surgeries. Irrespective of quadrant wise or sextant wise the most preferred technique was Kirkland technique except that Modified Widman flap was found to be most preferred in the second sextant (Figure 1). Papilla preservation flap was also found to be used mainly in the anterior region (Figure 1). On statistical analysis using chi square test there was significant association observed between Site of the surgery and Choice of flap technique (p<0.001). The two common techniques (Kirkland flap and Modified Widman flap) were analysed to see whether these have any association with the site of surgery (both quadrant wise and sextant wise) the results revealed a significant association (p<0.001) with the technique and the site (Table 2 and Table 3).

A greater frequency of periodontal flap surgeries was seen in males (58.7%) than in females (41.3%) from (Figure 5). But analysingstatistically no significant association was found between Gender and the choice of flap technique, p>0.05, Chi square test (Figure 4).



Figure 1. Age Distribution of Children in the study.



Figure 2. Shows Frequency distribution of teeth that received acrylic crowns.



Figure 3. Bar graph depicting Sextant wise distribution of the two major Flap techniques where red denotes Kirkland flap and green denotes Modified Widman Flap. X axis denotes the site of surgery(sextants) and Y axis denotes the number of surgeries for each technique. In almost all sextants Kirkland flap outnumbered Modified Widman flap except in Sextant 2 where both are almost equally preferred. On statistical analysis the difference was significant with P value <0.001.



Figure 4. Bar graph depicting Gender wise distribution of flap surgery by techniques, where red denotes male and blue denotes female ; X axis denotes the type of flap technique and Y axis denotes the number of patients with respective flap techniques in both Genders(Male and Female). Kirkland flap is the predominant flap in both genders.On statistical analysis, Pearson Chi-Square value=9.023a df=5, P value=.108 ,which is statistically not significant.



Figure 5. Bar graph depicting gender wise prevalence of flap surgery, red denotes female and blue denotes male.X axis denotes Gender and Y axis denotes the number of patients with flap surgery done in both Genders(Male and Female). The number of flap surgeries done is more in males (430) than in females (301).



Table 1. Table depicting the site wise distribution (Q for quadrant, S for sextant) of Flap technique with statistical analysis. Kirkland Flap (531) is observed to be the most commonly used Flap technique followed by Modified Widmanflap. Statistical analysis of association of Flap Technique with Site of surgery, P value <0.001, statistically significant by Chi Square Test shows that the site of surgery significantly influences the choice of flap technique.



Table 2. Table depicting the Quadrant wise distribution of Kirkland Flap and Modified Widman Flap with the statistical comparison. Kirkland Flap is the most preferred flap in all Quadrants. Statistical analysis of association of Quadrant wise surgeries with the two major Flap Technique, P value <0.0001, statistically significant by Chi Square Test shows that Kirkland flap is significantly more preferred than Modified Widman flap.



Table 3. Table depicting the Sextant wise distribution of Flap Technique with statistical comparison .Kirkland Flap is the preferred technique for all sextants than Modified Widman Flap except for the Second sextant where Modified Widman flap is slightly higher than Kirkland Flap. Statistical analysis of association of Sextant with Flap Technique. P value <0.001, statistically significant by Chi Square Test shows that Kirkland flap is done significantly more than Modified Widman flap in all sextants.



Table 4. Table depicting Gender wise distribution of Flap Technique with statistical comparison.Higher predominance of flap surgeries in males (430). In both the genders the Kirkland flap was the most preferred followed by Modified Widmanflap. Statistical analysis of association of Gender with Flap Technique showing there is no significant difference in the choice offlap techniques for males and females. P value = 0.108, not statistically significant by chi square test.


Discussion

In our study, the most commonly used flap technique was Kirkland flap followed by Modified Widman flap. Modified Widman flap was further found to be the most preferred flap technique in the second sextant. Results revealed Papilla preservation flap was also found to be used mainly in the anterior region. On analysis the association between Gender and choice of flap technique was not found to be statistically significant.Interestingly, a greater frequency of periodontal flap surgeries was seen in males than in females. A statistically significant association between Site distribution and Choice of flap seen both Quadrant wise and Sextant wise.

The Kirkland flap was found to be the most preferred Flap technique accounting for the majority (72%) of the cases with apically displaced flap and distal wedge procedure being the least frequently used. These findings are in line with previous literature by Kumar, which states that there is a significant trend towards the use of Kirkland flap technique. This can be attributed to the better aesthetics achieved in the Kirkland Flap technique [26]. The indications as well as the advantages of Surgical therapy in the treatment of periodontitis, where non Surgical therapy is limited has been stated in many previous studies [27, 28].

It is surprising to see that in the current study Modified Widman flap surgery was done more than the Kirkland flap in the second sextant (upper anterior) where esthetics is an important concern. In a study by Palmer et al, it was found that despite the effectiveness of Modified Widman flap at reducing probing depth, recession was observed in the long term which can however be minimised on maintenance of good plaque control [29]. This can be an explanation of the findings in the current study which show Modified widman flap being most preferred in the second sextant region. At the same time,in the current study Papilla preservation flap was found to have the most application in the upper anterior region. These findings are explained by the results of a study by Cohen, Takei et al which states that the papilla preservation technique enables better preservation of the papilla as well as enhanced esthetics and access to the roots for placement of graft material [30, 31]. The kirkland flap was found to be more preferred in the maxillary anterior region. The Kirkland Flap was also the most preferred flap in both males and females. The reason for this finding can be explained by the results of a study by Kolte et al, which found a predominantly thinner gingival phenotype in the anterior region, with the phenotype being thinner in females than in males [32].

Significant association between the Site and the Flap technique was found in the present study. This is in consensus with previous studies Huang et al., and Zucchelli et al who found that the tooth location or affected site influences the choice of treatment technique as well as the outcome [33, 34].

In the present study the association between gender and Flap technique was found to be statistically not significant. This was consistent with the findings of a previous study by Shiau et al, where no significant association was found between the need for treatment as well as technique employed and gender for patients with periodontitis [35].

The limitations of the study is that it is limited to the patients from one centre as well as certain factors like periodontal parameters, patient compliance, operator skill, etc.were not taken into consideration. It also has the inherent limitations of any retrospective study. But to a certain extent the larger sample size used in the study could overcome the shortcomings.The future scope of the study would involve assessment by taking consideration of patient and operator factors in the choice of flap technique and Randomized control trials among different flap techniques to evaluate its outcome on periodontal healing.


Conclusion

Within the limits of the present study it can be concluded that the most preferred Flap surgery technique was Kirkland flap. There was a significant association between the choice of flap technique and the Site of surgery.


Clinical Significance

The clinical significance of this study was to report the influence of the site of surgery on the choice of Flap design.


Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the administration of Saveetha University, Chennai for granting us the clearance to conduct this study.


Authors Contribution

Kadambari Sriram contributed to the acquisition of data, analysis, literature collection, and in drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Dr. Sheeja Varghese contributed in conception, study design,interpretation of data,formatting,manuscriptpreparation,s upervision and guidance.

Dr. Santhosh Kumar contributed to the editing, supervision and final approval of the submitted version of the manuscript.


References

  1. Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza's clinical periodontology. Elsevier health sciences; 2011 Feb 14:872.
  2. Thamaraiselvan M, Elavarasu S, Thangakumaran S, Gadagi JS, Arthie T. Comparative clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of isolated gingival recession. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2015 Jan;19(1):66-71.
  3. Drisko CH. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2001 Jan 1;25:77-88.
  4. Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Doraiswamy JN, Malaiappan S. Herbs as an antioxidant arsenal for periodontal diseases. J IntercultEthnopharmacol. 2016 Jan 27;5(1):92-6.Pubmed PMID: 27069730.
  5. Friedman N. Mucogingival surgery: The apically repositioned flap. J Periodontol. 1962 Oct;33(4):328-40.
  6. Ziada H, Irwin C, Mullally B, Byrne PJ, Allen E. Periodontics: 4. Surgical management of gingival and periodontal diseases. Dent Update [Internet]. 2007 Sep;34(7):390–2, 395–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ denu.2007.34.7.390.
  7. Ravi S, Malaiappan S, Varghese S, Jayakumar ND, Prakasam G. Additive Effect of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Guided Tissue Regeneration in Treatment of Intrabony Defects in Patients With Chronic Periodontitis: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Periodontol. 2017 Sep;88(9):839-845.Pubmed PMID: 28474968.
  8. Ramesh A, Ravi S, Kaarthikeyan G. Comprehensive rehabilitation using dental implants in generalized aggressive periodontitis. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2017 Mar;21(2):160-3.
  9. Badersten A, Nilvéus R, Egelberg J. Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy (IV). Operator variability. J ClinPeriodontol. 1985 Mar;12(3):190-200. Pubmed PMID: 3856574.
  10. Varghese SS, Thomas H, Jayakumar ND, Sankari M, Lakshmanan R. Estimation of salivary tumor necrosis factor-alpha in chronic and aggressive periodontitis patients. ContempClin Dent. 2015 Sep;6(Suppl 1):S152-6. Pubmed PMID: 26604566.
  11. Panda S, Jayakumar ND, Sankari M, Varghese SS, Kumar DS. Platelet rich fibrin and xenograft in treatment of intrabony defect. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):550-4.
  12. Rappaport NH, Netscher DT. Plastic surgery techniques applicable to periodontal flap surgery. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Jun;11:95-102.Pubmed PMID: 9567961.
  13. MYERS MB, COMBS B, COHEN G. WOUND TENSION AND WOUND SLOUGHS: A NEGATIVE CORRELATION. Am J Surg. 1965 Jun;109:711-4.Pubmed PMID: 14283327.
  14. Ramesh A, Vellayappan R, Ravi S, Gurumoorthy K. Esthetic lip repositioning: A cosmetic approach for correction of gummy smile - A case series. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):290-294.Pubmed PMID: 31143013.
  15. Preber H, Bergström J. Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following surgical therapy. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1990 May;17(5):324-8.
  16. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J ClinPeriodontol. 2008 Sep;35:136-62.
  17. Avinash K, Malaippan S, Dooraiswamy JN. Methods of Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells from Different Regions of Oral Cavity Using Markers: A Systematic Review. Int J Stem Cells. 2017 May 30;10(1):12-20. Pubmed PMID: 28531913.
  18. Mootha A, Malaiappan S, Jayakumar ND, Varghese SS, Toby Thomas J. The Effect of Periodontitis on Expression of Interleukin-21: A Systematic Review. Int J Inflam. 2016;2016:3507503.Pubmed PMID: 26998377.
  19. de Sanctis M, Clementini M. Flap approaches in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J ClinPeriodontol. 2014 Apr;41Suppl 15:S108-22.Pubmed PMID: 24640996.
  20. Khalid W, Varghese SS, Sankari M, Jayakumar ND. Comparison of Serum Levels of Endothelin-1 in Chronic Periodontitis Patients Before and After Treatment. J ClinDiagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC78-ZC81.Pubmed PMID: 28571268.
  21. Khalid W, Vargheese SS, Lakshmanan R, Sankari M, Jayakumar ND. Role of endothelin-1 in periodontal diseases: A structured review. Indian J Dent Res. 2016 May-Jun;27(3):323-33.Pubmed PMID: 27411664.
  22. Vidhya TM, Murugan T. Attitude of General Dental Practitioners towards Periodontal Treatment. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018;11(3):930-2.
  23. Ramesh A, Varghese SS, Jayakumar ND, Malaiappan S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and periodontitis–unwinding their linking mechanisms. J. Oral Biosci. 2016 Feb 1;58(1):23-6.
  24. Kavarthapu A, Thamaraiselvan M. Assessing the variation in course and position of inferior alveolar nerve among south Indian population: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Jul- Aug;29(4):405-409.Pubmed PMID: 30127186.
  25. Aroca S, Barbieri A, Clementini M, Renouard F, deSanctis M. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: Prognostic factors for achieving a complete root coverage. J ClinPeriodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):861-8.
  26. Kumar A. An Ode to Kirkland flap… Obituary to Modified Widman flap. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):373-374.Pubmed PMID: 30210183.
  27. Priyanka S, Kaarthikeyan G, Nadathur JD, Mohanraj A, Kavarthapu A. Detection of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and Torque Teno virus in subgingival and atheromatous plaques of cardiac patients with chronic periodontitis. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):456-460.Pubmed PMID: 29551863.
  28. Ramamurthy JA, Mg V. Comparison of effect of hiora mouthwash versus chlorhexidine mouthwash in gingivitis patients: a clinical trial. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018;11(7):84-8.
  29. Palmer RM, Floyd PD. Periodontology: a clinical approach. 6. Reconstructive periodontal treatment. Br. Dent. J. 1995 May 20;178(10):379-83.
  30. Takei H, Yamada H, Hau T. Maxillary anterior esthetics. Preservation of the interdental papilla. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 1989 Apr 1;33(2):263-73.
  31. Cohen DW, Ross SE. The double papillae repositioned flap in periodontal therapy. J. Periodontol. 1968 Mar;39(2):65-70.
  32. Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian SocPeriodontol. 2014 Jul;18(4):478-81.Pubmed PMID: 25210263.
  33. Huang LH, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J. Periodontol. 2005 Oct;76(10):1729-34.
  34. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C, et al. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: A multicenter reanalysis study. J Periodontol. 2019 Nov;90(11):1244-1251.Pubmed PMID: 31177536.
  35. Shiau HJ, Reynolds MA. Sex differences in destructive periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1379-89.Pubmed PMID: 20450376.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn