SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-2042

Prevalence Of Insulin Use Among Completely Edentulous Patients- A Hospital Based Retrospective Study


Dhanraj Ganapathy1*, Jagadish Rajkumaar2, Subhashree3, Rakshagan4

1 Professor and Head Department of prosthodontics Saveetha Dental College Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha university Chennai, India.
2 Saveetha Dental College Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha University Chennai, India.
3 Senior Lecturer Department of Prosthodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science Saveetha University Chennai -77, India.
4 Senior Lecturer Department of Prosthodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha University Chennai -77, India.


*Corresponding Author

DhanrajGanapathy,
Professor and Head Department of prosthodontics Saveetha Dental College Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha university Chennai, India.
E-mail: dhanraj@saveetha.com

Received: December 02, 2020; Accepted: January 21, 2021; Published: February 27, 2021

Citation: Dhanraj Ganapathy, Jagadish Rajkumaar, Subhashree, Rakshagan. Prevalence Of Insulin Use Among Completely Edentulous Patients- A Hospital Based Retrospective Study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(03):1771-1774. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000350

Copyright: DhanrajGanapathy©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

The term diabetes means a combination of genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorders in which the glucose intolerance is seen. There are two major variants of diabetes which are type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is seen predominantly all around the world. The study was done under a university setting. The sample collection was done from june 2019- april 2020. The inclusion criteria included completely edentulous patients with insulin and other medication for diabetes. The data were further analyzed and the corresponding results were concluded. Males showed high prevalence of diabetes medication (51.6%) and females (48.4%). Metformin was seen in increased numbers 8% than insulin 3%. And most of the patients 77.4% were under medication but were not aware of the medication. With in the limits of the study we conclude that more prevalence of diabetic medication was seen in male. Metformin was seen most predominant in both males and females But there also lies a major number of people who aren't aware of the name of their medication.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Method
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
7.References


Keywords

Diabetes; Insulin; Metformin; Edentulism.


Introduction

The term Diabetes means a combination of genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorders in which the glucose intolerance is seen [14]. There are two major variants of diabetes which are type 1 and type 2 diabetes [6][28, 29]. Type 2 diabetes is seen predominantly all around the world [24]. In type 1 diabetes the islet of Langerhans cells undergo destruction and in the type 2 diabetes the insulin action is impaired with at least some preservation of insulin [35, 24]. Metformin is the drug which is prescribed initially for patients diagnosed with diabetes and the course is followed by insulin incase of uncontrolled diabetes [34].

Diabetes is known to cause dysfunction of the salivary glands causing hyposalivation [23] and polyurea states [20] and increased polymorphonuclear [37] leukocytes which leads to an immunocompromised state [19] which can cause opportunistic infections like oral candidiasis [31], denture stomatitis, rhomboid glossitis, atrophic glossitis and angular cheilitis. And majority of the complete denture wearers reported altered taste sensation [9], Neurosensory disorders and burning mouth syndrome [13]. The ultimate goal of any prosthodontic procedure of a diabetic dental patient require thorough understanding of the disease [7][27, 17, 2, 8] and acquaintance with its clinical manifestations [32, 38, 1, 16, 5, 18]. This article focuses on some of the medication patterns observed in the completely edentulous patients.


Materials and Method

The study is done under a university setting. The similar characteristics of the study is that it is done with the available data and under similar ethnicity of the population. The disadvantage of the study can be that the geographic location is similar. The study was approved by the institutional ethics board. Two reviewers are involved in the study. The samples were taken from patients who had checked in the clinic from June 2019 to April 2020. Total number of sample size includes 93 patients who have undergone the treatment. The case sheets were verified with the help of photographs. To minimise the sampling bias, we included all the data available and there was no sorting of data done. Internal validity of the study was non-probability inclusion. The external validity of the study includes homogenisation and replication of experimentation. Data collection was done from the dental archives of the patient management software system patented by Saveetha Dental College. The data was obtained from the category of removable prosthesis, complete denture and the data was tabulated. Data was verified by one external reviewer. The data was imported to SPSS and the variables were verified. Chi-square test was done on the data obtained using SPSS software by IBM. Gender and ethnicity were considered as independent variables. Systemic diseases of patients who have inserted complete denture and medication were considered as dependent variables. Type of analysis which was done was correlation and association.


Results

Males showed high prevalence of diabetes medication (51.6%) and females (48.4%). Metformin was seen in increased numbers 8% than insulin 3%. And most of the patients 77.4% were under medication but were not aware of the medication. The chi square analysis revealed an insignificant P value of 0.593 (Tables 1, 2 and Figures 1, 2).



Table 1. Gender and Medication.



Table 2. Chi-Square Tests.



Figure 1. Graph shows the percentage of male and female distribution (X axis= Males and females of the study,Y axis= percentage ). There was no significant difference statistically between the number of males and females in our sample and P value was >0.05.



Figure 2. Graph shows the frequency of medication among the male and female patients of the study (X axis= Medication between males and females of the study,Y axis= frequency).


Discussion

There are a very few studies done to find out the prevalence of diabetes medication among completely edentulous patients. Studies regarding case reports and systemic disorders and their comorbidity to complete dentures were available [25, 3, 36, 4, 30, 12].

Lee et al reported in his study that most of the denture wearers in his study were under diabetes medication and males showed a high predominance over the females [7, 15, 21]. This is in consensus with our study.

Studies on the relationship between diabetes and complete edentulism are sparse. One study investigating the relationship of edentulism to diabetes reported that edentulous patients had 1.82 times greater risk of having diabetes than the dentate patient. A cross-sectional study reported that functionally edentulous (6 or fewer teeth) older men had 4.06 times greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes, regardless of age or race, than those with partial or complete dentitions. A large portion of denture wearing diabetic population remains undiagnosed of their underlying systemic condition posing them to increased risk of developing oral diseases and denture-related complications.

A study done by hussian et al suggests that females show a higher predominance over the males [7, 15, 21] and this is in contradiction with our study.

Soric MM et al reported that there is high prevalence of metformin medication and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients [30]. This is in acceptance with our study.

Hoffman et al reported high prevalence of insulin medication[25, 30] and this is in contradiction with our study.

The vulnerability to periodontal conditions is the most widely recognized oral complexity of diabetes. Although essentially identified with the nearness of dental plaque, periodontitis seems, by all accounts, to be identified with a few neurotic occasions related with diabetes. There is proof that administration of periodontal conditions in patients with inadequately controlled diabetes may really help improve glycemic control [26]. Tooth misfortune is an unavoidable aftereffect of periodontal malady. An investigation by Kapp reported that the quantity of missing teeth was essentially higher in patients with DM than the controls, in spite of the fact that the recommended reason was the absence of oral wellbeing mindfulness and deficient metabolic control [10].

Besides, on the grounds that inadequately controlled diabetes can cause a noteworthy illness and mortality, dental specialists can direct their patients about improving glucose guideline [22], keeping up oral and wholesome wellbeing, performing day by day glucose checking tests and seeing clinical experts for routine consideration and coming to the complications caused by diabetes in complete denture patients they are Abutment Failure [39]. Tissue abrasions are more likely in denture wearers. Erythematous candidiasis is associated with the use of upper total denture or prosthesis (denture stomatitis) [33]. Oral carrier rate and density of C. albicans in denture wearers of diabetic group were higher. Increased residual ridge resorption. Mucostatic impressions should be made.

One may conclude by saying that the patients need more awareness of the medication they are taking because a larger population of our study were not aware of the type and name of the medication they were uptaking.

Few limitations of the study might be that the study is single centered with less sample size, similar ethnicity and geographic location.

To improve the significance of the study. The study should be done with a larger sample size so that the results are reliable.


Conclusion

The purpose of the study was to gain more information on the medication pattern of diabetic dental patients who are completely edentulous. With in the limits of our study the present study reveals more predominance of diabetic medication seen among males and a majority of the population not knowing the medication. Metformin was seen as the prevalent drug among both males and females.


References

  1. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali SA, Kumar Sivakumar JS, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant Crowns under Fatigue Loads: An In vitro Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S154-S160. Pubmed PMID/ 29284956
  2. Jain AR, Nallaswamy D, Ariga P, Ganapathy DM. Determination of correlation of width of maxillary anterior teeth using extraoral and intraoral factors in Indian population: A systematic review. World J Dent. 2018 Jan;9:68-75.
  3. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly Patient: A Clinical Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):279-82. Pubmed PMID/ 26199531
  4. Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all ceramic restoration in rural population. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 28;9(10):1691-3.
  5. Basha FY, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral hygiene status among pregnant women. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Jul 31;11(7):3099-102.
  6. Chow CK, Raju PK, Raju R, Reddy KS, Cardona M, Celermajer DS, Neal BC. The prevalence and management of diabetes in rural India. Diabetes care. 2006 Jul 1;29(7):1717-8.
  7. Dowey JA. The problems of dental disease for the diabetic patient. Practical Diabetes International. 1999 Sep;16(6):185-6.
  8. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019 Jun;28(3):289-295.Pubmed PMID/ 31124826
  9. Frier BM. Morbidity of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin- Pract. 2004 Sep;65Suppl 1:S47-52.Pubmed PMID/ 15315871.
  10. Fuji S, Rovó A, Ohashi K, Griffith M, Einsele H, Kapp M, et al.. How do I manage hyperglycemia/post-transplant diabetes mellitus after allogeneic HSCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Aug;51(8):1041-9. Pubmed PMID/ 27042848
  11. Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of resin bonded luting agents influencing marginal discrepancy in all ceramic complete veneer crowns. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016 Dec;10(12):ZC67.
  12. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of coated surfaces influencing screw loosening in implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017 Nov;8(6):496-502.
  13. Gao J, Chen L, Zhou J, Peng J. A case-control study on etiological factors involved in patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009 Jan;38(1):24-8. Pubmed PMID/ 19192047.
  14. Huang Y, Karuranga S, Malanda B, Williams DRR. Call for data contribution to the IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition 2019. Diabetes Res ClinPract. 2018 Jun;140:351-352. Pubmed PMID/ 29871760
  15. Hussain S, Qamar MR, Iqbal MA, Ahmad A, Ullah E. Risk factors of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2013 Apr;29(2):536.
  16. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. ContempClin Dent. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):272-278. Pubmed PMID/ 28839415
  17. Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D. Periodontal health status of three different groups wearing temporary partial denture. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017 Dec 1;10(12):4339-42.
  18. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on gingiva. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 May 30;11(5):2121-6.
  19. Kidambi S, Patel SB. Diabetes mellitus: considerations for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;139 Suppl:8S-18S. Pubmed PMID/ 18809649
  20. Lalla E, Lamster IB. Assessment and management of patients with diabetes mellitus in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;56(4):819-29. Pubmed PMID/ 23017553
  21. Lee JH, Han JS, Han K, Lee SY. Association between Diabetes and the Use of Removable Dental Prostheses among the Korean Population. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Oct 28;34(41):e262.PubmedPMID/ 31650717
  22. Mathieu C, Rudofsky G, Phillip M, Araki E, Lind M, Arya N, et al. Longterm efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (the DEPICT-2 study): 52-week results from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes ObesMetab. 2020 Sep;22(9):1516-1526. PubmedPMID/ 32311204
  23. McKenna SJ. Dental management of patients with diabetes. Dent Clin North Am. 2006 Oct;50(4):591-606.PubmedPMID/ 17000275
  24. Mohan V, Sandeep S, Deepa M, Gokulakrishnan K, Datta M, Deepa R. A diabetes risk score helps identify metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk in Indians - the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES-38). Diabetes ObesMetab. 2007 May;9(3):337-43. Pubmed PMID/ 17391160
  25. Murata GH, Duckworth WC, Hoffman RM, Wendel CS, Mohler MJ, et al. Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a critical review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;58(10):551-9.PubmedPMID/ 15589062.
  26. Ostrovsky DA, Ehrlich A. Tailored Text Message-Based Self-Management Program May Improve Glycemic Control in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes. Explore (NY). 2018 Nov;14(6):460-461.PubmedPMID/ 30409706
  27. Selvan SR, Ganapathy D. Efficacy of fifth generation cephalosporins against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 28;9(10):1815-8.
  28. Ship JA. Diabetes and oral health: an overview. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003 Oct 1;134:4S-10S.
  29. Snehalatha, C. Epidemiology of Diabetes in Developing Countries: The Scenario in Asia, RSSDI Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. 2014: 142–142.
  30. Soric MM, Moorman JM, Boyle JA, Dengler-Crish CM. Prevalence and Predictors of Metformin Prescribing in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Jul;36(7):715-22. PubmedPMID/ 27208803
  31. Soysa NS, Samaranayake LP, Ellepola AN. Diabetes mellitus as a contributory factor in oral candidosis. Diabet Med. 2006 May;23(5):455-9.PubmedPMID/ 16681553.
  32. Subasree S, Murthykumar K. Effect of aloe vera in oral health-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 May 1;9(5):609.
  33. Sugio CY, Garcia AA, Albach T, Moraes GS, Bonfante EA, Urban VM, et al. Candida-Associated Denture Stomatitis and Murine Models: What Is the Importance and Scientific Evidence?. Journal of Fungi. 2020 Jun;6(2):70.
  34. Tseng KH. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2006: response to the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov 1;29(11):2563-4.
  35. Varon F, Mack-Shipman L. The role of the dental professional in diabetes care. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2000 Feb 15;1(2):1-27. Pubmed PMID/ 12167887
  36. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger J ClinPract. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):260-4. PubmedPMID/ 24553044
  37. Vernillo AT. Dental considerations for the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Oct;134 Spec No:24S-33S.PubmedPMID/ 18196670.
  38. Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Nov 28;9(11):2067-70.
  39. Wilcox G. Insulin and insulin resistance. Clinical biochemist reviews. 2005 May;26(2):19.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn