SciDoc Publishers | Open Access | Science Journals | Media Partners


International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-08-2032

Decision Analysis on Management of Periapical Cyst


Vijayapriyangha Senthilkumar1, Sindhu Ramesh2*, Iffat Nasim3

1Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
2 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.


*Corresponding Author

Sindhu Ramesh,
Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Tel: +919840136543
E-mail: drsinsushil@gmail.com

Received: January 25, 2021; Accepted: February 14, 2021; Published: February 26, 2021

Citation:Vijayapriyangha Senthilkumar, Sindhu Ramesh, Iffat Nasim. Decision Analysis on Management of Periapical Cyst. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;08(02):1649-1653. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000340

Copyright: Sindhu Ramesh©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Periapical lesions develop as asequelae to pulpal diseases. They occur often with acute pulpal pain and are diagnosed by radiographic examination. These untreated or infected pulpal infections lead to other periapical lesions like periapicalgranuloma, cyst, abscesses etc. the incidence of periapical cyst is about 6 to 55% among periapical lesions. The periapical cyst is the common to three fourth of all the cysts in the jaws. These are generally asymptomatic and are diagnosed during routine radiographic investigations. Removal of the necrotic pulp , inflamed tissue and proper sealing of the root canal will allow the tooth to heal under uninfected conditions. The aim of this paper is to give a summary of various methods of management of periapical cyst both by non-surgical and surgical approach.



1.Abstract
2.Introduction
3.Techniques
4.Decision Tree for the Management of Periapical Cyst
5.Non Surgical Management
6.Surgical Management
7.Conclusion
8.References


Keywords

Periapical; Surgical; Non surgical; Decompression; Apexum.


Introduction

The infection of dental pulp occurs as a result of Infections of the dental pulp occur as consequence of dental caries, operative dental procedures and trauma and involve a mixed, mostly Gramnegative, anaerobic bacterial flora [1, 2]. These infections often cause total pulpal necrosis and it stimulate an immune response in the periapical region, which is commonly referred to as a periapical lesion. The periapical lesions can be classified mostly as granuloma, radicular cyst or abscess [3, 4]. Radicular cysts or apical granuloma cannot be differentiated based on the radiographic evidence alone [5, 6]. Various studies have shown that with a radiographic lesion size of 200 mm2 or larger, the incidence of cysts is equal to or greater than 92% [7]. If the lesion is away from the apex and with an intact epithelial lining (apical true cyst), it may have developed into a self-perpetuating entity that may not heal when treated non-surgically [8]. On other occasions, a large periapical lesion may have a direct communication with the root canal system (apical pocket cyst or bay cyst) and respond favourably to non-surgical treatment [9, 10]. Few clinical studies have shown that even simple non surgical treatment with proper infection control will promote the healing of large periapical lesions [11, 12]. In the past even smaller periapical cyst are treated with surgery but in the recent years due to greater awareness of the complexities of root canal systems has led to various newer techniques, materials and instruments. Therefore, fewer patients need periapical surgery. An awareness on morphology of root canal and a careful interpretation of preoperative radiographs are necessary for adequate access and infection control in endodontic therapy. Mandibular incisors are often anatomically complex, with 45% displaying second canals, such teeth with anatomical complexes may fail to respond to treatment if important anatomy is missed [13].

We have numerous highly cited publications on well designed clinical trials and lab studies [14-30]. This paper suggests that non surgical and surgical removal of periapical cyst of pulpal origin is not mandatory, and that, irrespective of the size of the lesion, every effort should be made to treat such lesions by conservative as well as by surgical means.


Decision Tree for the Management of Periapical Cyst

The decision tree for the management of periapical cyst were given in figure 1 and figure 2.


Figure 1. Decision tree for periapical cyst – non surgical management.



Figure 2. Decision tree – surgical management.


The decision on management of periapical cyst can be of two types;

1. Non-surgical management
2. Surgical management


Non Surgical Management

Many radicular cysts are symptomless and are discovered when regular periapical radiographs are taken of teeth with non vital pulps. Over the years, these cyst may regress, remain static or grow in size. The treatment of the cysts can be either nonsurgical management or surgical management being either enucleation or marsupialization. Nevertheless, no matter what choice it might be, the treatment option should be kept as conservative as possible [31]. The basic premise of any non surgical endodontic treatment is to have a conventional orthograde approach.

The ultimate goal of endodontic therapy should be to return the involved teeth to a state of health and function without surgical intervention [32]. All inflammatory periapical lesions should be initially treated with conservative nonsurgical procedures [33]. Surgical intervention is recommended only after nonsurgical techniques have failed. Besides, surgery has many drawbacks, which limit its use in the management of periapical lesions [34]. Various studies have reported a success rate of up to 85% after endodontic treatment of teeth with periapicallesions [10, 35]. There is also a report where non surgical endodontic therapy has shown 94.4% of complete and partial healing of periapical lesions.

The periapical cyst management can be categorised based on the size of lesion according to CBCT periapical index (PAI index).

Management of Cyst according to PAI Index Score

If the PAI index score of the cyst falls under 0 to 3 it can be treated by non surgical method. patient is having pain root canal treatment is initiated. If exudate is present, the drainage of exudate is done and cleaning and shaping of the canal to be done. Intracanal medicaments are to be kept after cleaning and shaping procedures. If the symptoms persist the surgical management is carried out or if the tooth is asymptomatic obturation is done and follow up is done. If the PAI index score is 4 and with swelling and sinus tract opening root canal procedure should be done with the previously mentioned criteria. Incision and drainage of the swelling without sinus opening should be done. The methods of non surgical treatment are:

Aspiration Irrigation Technique

In this aspiration irrigation technique, an 18-gauge needle attached to a 20 ml syringe is used to penetrate the buccal mucosa and aspirate the cystic fluid. Other syringe filled with saline is then used to rinse the bony lesion. The new needle is then inserted through the buccal wound and passed out through the palatal tissue creating a pathway for the escape of the irrigant [36]. Accumulation of cystic fluid within a confined bony cavity leads to increased hydrostatic pressure, which causes additional osteoclastic activity and growth of the cyst [37]. This aspiration leads to decreased hydrostatic pressure, which slows the osteoclastic activity and enlargement of the defect. The gentle irrigation cleanses the bony defect and initiates bleeding and subsequent clot formation, which could be the start of the healing mechanism. The disadvantage of this technique is the creation of buccal and palatal wounds that may cause discomfort to the patient [38].

Intra canal Medicament

Intra canal medicament play a vital role in healing of periapical cyst because of their bactericidal effects. Most commonly used intracanal medicaments are calcium hydroxide, triple antibiotic paste . Calcium hydroxide is an antibacterial agent and used for only 15 days, following which it is irrigated out of the canal using sodium hypochlorite. The demineralized, freeze dried bone allograft is then packed in the periapical area to form an apical matrix, with the help of finger pluggers. The demineralized bone matrix also acts as an osteoconductive and as an osteoinductive material. MTA is then compacted over the matrix, forming a 5 mm apical plug [39].

If lesions are disinfected properly, repair of damaged tissues can be expected. Metronidazole is the first choice because it has a wide antibacterial spectrum against anaerobes.However, some bacteria are resistant to metronidazole, and hence, ciprofloxacin and minocycline are added to the mix.The combination of drugs has been shown to penetrate efficiently through dentine from the prepared root canals especially from the ultrasonically irrigated root canals [40]. The commercially available drugs are powdered and mixed in a ratio of 1:3:3 (3 Mix) and mixed either with macrogol- propylene glycol (3 Mix-MP) or a canal sealer (3 Mix-sealer). A 1:1:1 ratio of the drug combination has also been used [41]. Although the volume of the drugs applied is small in this therapy, care should be taken to check if the patients are sensitive to chemicals or antibiotics. A disadvantage of the triple antibiotic paste is discoloration of tooth induced by minocycline. Cefaclor and fosfomycin are proposed as possible alternatives for minocycline, in terms of their antibiotic effectiveness, but further clinical studies are needed to demonstrate their efficacy in the root canal [42].

Apexum Procedure

Apexum method is based on a device that removes the chronically inflamed periapical tissues through a root canal access by a procedure that is minimally invasive compared with open-flap apical surgery. There is possibility of providing some of the benefits of apical surgery by the new technology (Apexum Ablator; Apexum Ltd, Or- Yehuda, Israel) without the drawbacks of the conventional surgical procedure. This advancement may allow for the application of such a protocol in many cases in which healing time is a critical factor.

This procedure uses two sequential rotary devices, the Apexum- NiTi Ablator and Apexum PGA Ablator (Apexum Ltd, Or Yehuda, Israel), designed to extend beyond the apex and mince the periapical tissues on rotation in a lowspeedhandpiece, followed by washing out the minced tissue [43]. A clinical trial reported that there is significantly faster periapical healing in the Apexumtreated group (95%) than in the conventional root canal treatment group (39%) at six months, with significantly less postoperative discomfort or pain. However, whether the procedure was able to remove all the periapical inflammatory tissue was beyond the scope of the study conducted, further studies regarding this procedure are in progress.

Decompression Technique

The decompression technique involves placement of a drain into the lesion, regular irrigation, periodic length adjustment, and maintenance of the drain, for various periods of time.The drain could either be ‘I’ shaped pieces of rubber dam, polyethylene tube along with a stent, hollow tubes, a polyvinyl tubing, suction catheter or a radiopaque latex tubing [44]. The advantages of this decompression technique are; it is a simple procedure, it minimizes the risk of damaging adjacent vital structures, and is easily tolerated by the patient. However, there are several disadvantages being noted; patient compliance is very essential, inflammation of the alveolar mucosa, persistence of the surgical defect at site, development of an acute or chronic infection, displacement or submergence of the drainage tube [45].


Surgical Management

The surgical management of periapical cyst would be a choice only if the symptoms doesn’t subside even after all the non surgical treatment fails. This surgical management can be done only with cyst enucleation and marsupialization or apicectomy and surgery with grafting materials for better healing of cyst.

Cyst Enucleation and Marsupialization

The treatment objective is restoring the morphology and function of the affected region. There are two basic surgical procedures, namely marsupialization (decompression) andenucleation. Marsupialization, is a simple procedure, consists of surgically producing a - window in the cystic wall to relieve intra-cystic tension and after this, the cystic cavity slowly decreases in size. The cavity is then lightly packed with paraffin gauze until the line of junction between the cystic lining and the oral mucosa has healed. Three to six months later, enucleation should be performed [46].

Enucleation with primary closure is the treatment of choice [47]. It is a one-stage surgical treatment followed by periodic radiographic evaluation at regular intervals to observe the progress of bone regeneration of the defect. The routine surgical treatments for radicular cyst include total enucleation of small lesions, marsupialization for decompression of larger cysts or a combination of these techniques. Surgical intervention is necessary, that the clinician must decide whether to raise a flap and completely enucleate the lesion or to try “decompression” first. If the marsupialization with decompression is attempted first, the size of the lesion will be reduced, which will make it less difficult to remove, with less risk of damage to the associated teeth and vital structures.

Apicectomy

In most of the large cystic lesions, the marsupialization and enucleation is sufficient after endodontic treatment. Apicectomy is needed only in case of swelling. After complete ennucleation of the cyst the apical 2-3mm is cut off and retrograde filling is done with biocompatible materials like glass ionomer, biodentine, MTA etc. After apicectomy and retrograde filling, the placement of graft can be decided based on the defect.

Grafting Materials in Management of Cyst

Bone Graft: The bone regeneration following periapical surgery can be facilitated by placing bone graft into the periapical defect. Different types of bone grafts are available for dental surgical procedure. These include autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts. The ideal bone replacement material should be clinically and biologically inert, noncarcinogenic, easily maneuverable to suit the osseous defect, and should be dimensionally stable. It should serve as a scaffold for bone formation and slowly resorb to permit replacement by new bone [48]. Based on the defect and bone loss in the affected region the bone grafts, PRF etc can be used. Endodontic regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues [49].

Blood: A blood clot is composed of insoluble fibrin and many growth factors/cytokines such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TGF-b, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endothelial growth factor, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and basicfibroblast growth factor (FGF).

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) first generation platelet concentrate was proposed as a method of introducing concentrated growth factors PDGF, TGF ß, and IGF 1 to the surgical site, enriching the natural blood clot in order to promote wound healing and stimulate bone regeneration. The PRP is an autologous volume of plasma with 4-5 fold increase in platelet concentration, is a proven source of growth factors like PDGF, TGF, IGF, VEGF, EGF, Platelet derived angiogenesis factor and Platelet factor IV. PRP has been used for tissue regeneration in combination with autogenous bone grafts in maxillofacial surgery.


Conclusion

Management of periapical cyst depends on the size of the lesion and presence of exudate and swelling. Depending on these the cyst treatment can be carried out whether to go for non-surgical or surgical management. Periapical cysts are mostly tried to manage in conservative method , non-surgical. Only in large infected cystic lesion cases the surgical management is to be considered. Various techniques mentioned in this paper can be used for the management of cyst.


References

  1. Sundqvist G. Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the root canal flora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994 Oct;78(4):522-30.Pubmed PMID: 7800383.
  2. Sundqvist G. Ecology of the root canal flora J Endod. 1992 Sep 1;18(9):427- 30.
  3. Ishida T. Pathology of periapical lesions. Oral Radiology.1998; pp.35–39. doi:10.1007/bf02348648
  4. Bhaskar SN. Oral surgery--oral pathology conference No. 17, Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Periapical lesions--types, incidence, and clinical features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966 May;21(5):657-71.Pubmed PMID: 5218749.
  5. Farhadi F, Mirinezhad SS, Zarandi A. Using Periapical Radiography to Differentiate Periapical Granuloma and Radicular Cysts. AVICENNA J DENT RES. 2016 Jun 11;8(2):7.
  6. Çaliskan MK, Kaval ME, Tekin U, Ünal T. Radiographic and histological evaluation of persistent periapical lesions associated with endodontic failures after apical microsurgery. Int Endod J. 2016 Nov;49(11):1011-1019.Pubmed PMID: 26384024.
  7. Zain RB, Roswati N, Ismail K. Radiographic evaluation of lesion sizes of histologically diagnosed periapical cysts and granulomas. Ann Dent. 1989 Winter;48(2):3-5, 46.Pubmed PMID: 2604372.
  8. Nair PN. New perspectives on radicular cysts: do they heal? Int Endod J. 1998 May;31(3):155-60.Pubmed PMID: 10321160.
  9. Caliskan MK. Prognosis of large cyst-like periapical lesions following nonsurgical root canal treatment: a clinical review. Int Endod J. 2004 Jun;37(6):408-16.Pubmed PMID: 15186249.
  10. Saatchi M. Healing of large periapical lesion: a non-surgical endodontic treatment approach. Aust Endod J. 2007 Dec;33(3):136-40.Pubmed PMID: 18076582.
  11. Shah N. Nonsurgical management of periapical lesions: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988 Sep;66(3):365-71.Pubmed PMID: 3174072.
  12. Bhangale AP, Gulve MN. Non-surgical management of a periapical cyst: A case report. Dental Poster Journal. 2021;pp. 1–2. doi:10.15713/ins.dpj.098
  13. Miyashita M, Kasahara E, Yasuda E, Yamamoto A, Sekizawa T. Root canal system of the mandibular incisor. J. Endod. 1997 Aug 1;23(8):479-84.
  14. Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of a paste containing bioactive glass and a topical cream containing casein phosphopeptide- amorphous calcium phosphate: An in vitro study. Pesqui. Bras. Odontopediatria Clín. Integr. 2019;19.
  15. Nandakumar M, Nasim I. Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):516-520.Pubmed PMID: 30294113.
  16. Rajakeerthi R, Nivedhitha MS. Natural Product as the Storage medium for an avulsed tooth–A Systematic Review. Cumhur. Dent. J. 2019;22(2):249- 56.
  17. . Manohar MP, Sharma S. A survey of the knowledge, attitude, and awareness about the principal choice of intracanal medicaments among the general dental practitioners and nonendodontic specialists. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):716-720.Pubmed PMID: 30588997.
  18. Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):40-47.Pubmed PMID: 30820081.
  19. Teja KV, Ramesh S, Priya V. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene expression in inflammation: A molecular study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2018 Nov;21(6):592.
  20. Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):2-9.Pubmed PMID: 29628639.
  21. Poorni S, Srinivasan MR, Nivedhitha MS. Probiotic Streptococcus strains in caries prevention: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar- Apr;22(2):123-128.Pubmed PMID: 31142979.
  22. Jenarthanan S, Subbarao C. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of diclofenac sodium administered using different delivery routes in the management of endodontic pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2018 May-Jun;21(3):297-301.Pubmed PMID: 29899633.
  23. . Malli Sureshbabu N, Selvarasu K, V JK, Nandakumar M, Selvam D. Concentrated Growth Factors as an Ingenious Biomaterial in Regeneration of Bony Defects after Periapical Surgery: A Report of Two Cases. Case Rep Dent. 2019 Jan 22;2019:7046203.Pubmed PMID: 30805222.
  24. Govindaraju L, Neelakantan P, Gutmann JL. Effect of root canal irrigating solutions on the compressive strength of tricalcium silicate cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):567-571.Pubmed PMID: 27469101.
  25. Khandelwal A, Palanivelu A. Correlation between dental caries and salivary albumin in adult population in Chennai: An in vivo study. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2019 Apr 30;22(2):228-33.
  26. Ramarao S, Sathyanarayanan U. CRA Grid - A preliminary development and calibration of a paper-based objectivization of caries risk assessment in undergraduate dental education. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):185-190. Pubmed PMID: 31142991.
  27. Siddique R, Nivedhitha MS. Effectiveness of rotary and reciprocating systems on microbial reduction: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):114-122.Pubmed PMID: 31142978.
  28. Janani K, Sandhya R. A survey on skills for cone beam computed tomography interpretation among endodontists for endodontic treatment procedure. Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):834-838.Pubmed PMID: 31939356.
  29. Senthilkumar V, Subbarao C. Management of root perforation: A review. J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. Apr-Jun 2017;7(2).
  30. Senthilkumar V, Ramesh S. Systematic review on alternative methods for caries removal in permanent teeth. J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):2-9. Pubmed PMID: 33223633.
  31. Mumford JM, Melville TH. Conservative Treatment of Periapical Lesions. Int. Endod. J. 1970 Apr;4(2):23-7.
  32. Fernandes M, de Ataide I. Nonsurgical management of periapical lesions. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):240.
  33. Maiolo K. Conservative Endodontic Treatment Of A Large Periapical Lesion. Australian Endodontic Newsletter.2010; pp. 16–19. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4477.1996.tb00014.x
  34. Alghamdi F, Alhaddad AJ, Abuzinadah S. Healing of Periapical Lesions After Surgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2020 Feb 7;12(2):e6916.Pubmed PMID: 32190471.
  35. Obada DN. Nanosurgical treatment for anterior teeth with large periapical lesion. Oral Health and Dental Management.2018. doi:10.4172/2247- 2452-c6-081
  36. Hoen MM, LaBounty GL, Strittmatter EJ. Conservative treatment of persistent periradicular lesions using aspiration and irrigation. J Endod. 1990 Apr;16(4):182-6.Pubmed PMID: 2074410.
  37. Toller PA. Newer concepts of odontogenic cysts. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1(1):3- 16.Pubmed PMID: 4634126.
  38. Fernandes M, De Ataide I. Non-surgical management of a large periapical lesion using a simple aspiration technique: a case report. Int Endod J. 2010 Jun;43(6):536-42.Pubmed PMID: 20536582.
  39. Chhabra N, Singbal KP, Kamat S. Successful apexification with resolution of the periapical lesion using mineral trioxide aggregate and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Apr;13(2):106-9.Pubmed PMID: 20859486.
  40. Hoshino E, Kurihara-Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M, Kota K, et al. Invitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J. 1996 Mar;29(2):125-30.Pubmed PMID: 9206436.
  41. Vijayaraghavan R, Mathian VM, Sundaram AM, Karunakaran R, Vinodh S. Triple antibiotic paste in root canal therapy. J. pharm. bioallied sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S230.
  42. Kim JH, Kim Y, Shin SJ, Park JW, Jung IY. Tooth discoloration of immature permanent incisor associated with triple antibiotic therapy: a case report. J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):1086-91.Pubmed PMID: 20478471.
  43. Metzger Z, Huber R, Slavescu D, Dragomirescu D, Tobis I, Better H. Healing kinetics of periapical lesions enhanced by the apexum procedure: a clinical trial. J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):153-9.Pubmed PMID: 19166763.
  44. Lakshmanan CD. Treatment of periapical lesions (hollow tube technique). J Br Endod Soc. 1972 Autumn;6(3):63-6.Pubmed PMID: 4534636.
  45. Mejia JL, Donado JE, Basrani B. Active nonsurgical decompression of large periapical lesions--3 case reports. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Nov;70(10):691- 4.Pubmed PMID: 15530268.
  46. Bodner L, Bar-Ziv J. Characteristics of bone formation following marsupialization of jaw cysts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 May;27(3):166-71. Pubmed PMID: 9693529.
  47. Ettl T, Gosau M, Sader R, Reichert TE. Jaw cysts–Filling or no filling after enucleation? A review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep 1;40(6):485-93.
  48. Patel B. Apexogenesis, apexification, revascularization and endodontic regeneration. InEndodontic Treatment, Retreatment, and Surgery. 2016 (pp. 205-223). Springer, Cham.
  49. von Arx T, Cochran DL. Rationale for the application of the GTR principle using a barrier membrane in endodontic surgery: a proposal of classification and literature review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Apr;21(2):127-39.Pubmed PMID: 11829387.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn