A Systematic Review Of Three Decades Of Prevalence Of Oral Soft Tissue Infections And Conditions Among Adult HIV Patients in India
Shrikanth Muralidharan1*, Arunkumar Acharya2, Pramila Mallaiah3, Shanthi Margabandhu4
1 Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Madha Dental College, India.
2 Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Navodaya Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry, MR Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
4 Public Health Dentist, Private Practitioner, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Shrikanth Muralidharan,
Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Madha Dental College, India.
Tel: 918308008831
E-mail: Shrikanthmuralidharan23@gmail.com
Received: February 05, 2021; Accepted: October 01, 2021; Published: October 21, 2021
Citation: Shrikanth Muralidharan, Arunkumar Acharya, Pramila Mallaiah, Shanthi Margabandhu. A Systematic Review Of Three Decades Of Prevalence Of Oral Soft Tissue Infections And Conditions Among Adult HIV Patients in India. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(10):4774-4778. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000968
Copyright: Shrikanth Muralidharan©2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Oral lesions are a cue for decreased immunity among HIV positive patients. There is no cumulative data available related to the prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions among the HIV positive patients. Hence the present review was carried out to assess the various oral lesions reported among adult HIV patients across India. Two search engines were used- Google Scholar and PubMed, with key words of HIV/AIDS, Soft tissue, oral cavity, India, adults for searching the articles from January 1990 to December 2019. After initial review, 21 articles that fulfilled the criteria were included in the review. We used 9 parameters to access the quality of the reports. Most common lesion reported was that of oral candidiasis. Not all articles reported about sample size determination or of sampling design and technique. Other lesions like hyperpigmentation, gingivitis and periodontitis were also found to be highly prevalent. Most reports were from South India. Further epidemiological data is required from different regions for using it to develop planning and execution related to oral health care for the HIV positive patients in India.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
3.Results
4.Discussion
5.Conclusion
5.References
Keywords
HIV; Oral Cavity; Infections; Periodontitis; Oral Mucosa; India.
Introduction
Oral lesions are a frequent finding and present early stages of
decreased immunity in HIV positive individuals. This serves as
a cue for further evaluation needed to underline the depleting
immunity. Thus the mouth not only serves as an indicator but
also reflects the response to the treatment being provided. Most
of the lesions associated with HIV are found even in individuals
with compromised immunity due to other reasons (like on steroids
or in diabetes mellitus) but certain lesions are characteristic
hall marks of HIV/AIDS. [1-4] There is still uncertainty with regards
to the exact mechanism of how HIV infection may affect
the oral cavity at large. HIV is majorly spread due to the mucosal
surface response of the host, which when compromised assists
in acquisition and rapid spread of the virus. A breakdown of the
same barrier can serve dual purposes of facilitating the spread
as well as translocating the microbial products for further infection
and inflammation. It is suggested though that, as a response
to the infection, the immunological changes alters the physical
barriers in the oral cavity also and assists in further destruction.5
It also serves as a reservoir for further spread in the form of
bacteraemia and septicaemia. The EEC Clearing house classification
provided the common manifestation of oral lesions in HIV
affected individuals.[1] Multiple studies in literature have reported
the oral side effects of HIV as well as that of ART drugs which
includes erythema multiforme, hyperpigmentation, xerostomia,
parotid lipomatosis, cheilitis, perioral parathesis, taste alterations,
facial oedema and ulcers.[6-11] Thus oral cavity in the literal sense
serves as a mirror of systemic health and conditions. There is no
data reported till now on the epidemiology of oral lesions and
HIV across India. This s review paper brings forward a systematic
view of the papers reported in dental literature regarding the
prevalence of various lesions across Indian HIV population.
Materials and Methods
We carried out a literature search using PubMed and Google
scholar to access articles from January 1990 to December 2019.
All freely available full text articles were selected. The key words
used for searching the articles were- India, HIV, AIDS, Soft tissue,
oral cavity. The inclusion criteria were-
1. All Indian based studies, reporting epidemiological data related
to HIV and oral soft tissues diseases or conditions
2. All participants on ART
The initial review was done by the first author based on the title
and the abstract. Later a full text review was done for the entire
article. The search overall revealed 21 articles that were found eligible.
The data extraction was done by the first author based on
the following 09 criteria for qualitative assessment of the articles-
1. Study setting-College, hospital, NGO, home or any other place.
2. Aim and objectives clearly mentioned.
3. Sample size Formula and estimation process clearly stated.
4. Sample design mentioned which type of sampling design was
followed.
5. Criteria/index used for recording.
6. Calibration of the examiners with the Kappa statistics for reliability
and validity.
7. Clearly stated if generalizability is possible or not. If not, stated
reasons for the same.
8. Clearly mentioned if the participants were on ART/HAART
or just positive.
9. Clearly stated the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
After data extraction, all the 21 articles were independently reviewed
by the rest of the authors and any discrepancy was solved
by discussion and by generating a common consensus. The PRISMA
guidelines was followed for reporting (Figure 01). The entire
process of review and report generation was done in one month
(January 2020).
Results
Of the 21 articles found eligible for study, majority were from the
South part of the country. All the studies focussed on the presence
of oral candidiasis except for the study by Krishna et al. [12]
For the ease of reporting, we have not classified the candidiasis,
but presented the overall percentage. We also classified any form
of gingivitis (either bleeding on probing, de-squamative gingivitis
and liner erythema gingivitis) as one category of gingivitis. Any
such form of periodontitis was also considered under periodontitis.
Most of the studies were reports by dental specialists only. Two
studies [13, 14] reported oral manifestations as a part of the general
physical examination. They were not exclusively concentrating
on the oral lesions only. Kumar et al focussed only on oral
candidiasis and no other oral lesions as such.[15] Only one study
among the 21 reported that soft tissue lesions have no co relation
with CD4 count or with ART therapy duration. [16] Rest
of the studies reported of an inverse relationship between the
CD4 count and the oral manifestations. Hence considering local
factors like plaque and oral hygiene practices along with medications
apart from ART/HAART should be taken into consideration
(Table 01).
Quality assessment of the articles:
The above mentioned 09 parameters were used for quality assessment
of the articles (Table 02).
Extrapolation of the data was mentioned by only 2 studies. [16,
22] The most common classification scale used was of the EC
clearinghouse for soft tissue manifestation of HIV/AIDS and
that by the World Health Organization Oral health Assessment
1997. Studies by Annapurna, [22] Krishna, [12] Muralidharan [16]
and Dongade [30] only reported of sample size estimation and
the way the samples were calculated. Even though we did not
develop a scoring or a rating scale for the studies, overall quality
development suggests poor patterns of reporting or at times
selective reporting of the data. Not all studies have reported of
periodontitis and gingivitis while reporting the lesions. Hence a
major part of the information that can be useful for planning and
execution is missing with the studies.
Discussion
Unlike the west, we don’t have a fixed pattern of assessment and
reporting of data. All authors have used different standardized criteria for examination and classification. There is no common
consensus or direction in Indian scenario for reporting data in
such special groups. Also there is no equitable reporting. Most
of the people covered are from the south of India. No stringent
sampling technique is followed. Studies have reported if the participants
were on ART/ HAART. Unfortunately no studies have
been performed on those on second line ART. This is a big lacuna
that needs to be addressed. As stated in before, even the ART
drugs have ill effects on the oral mucosa, which may manifest in
a number of ways. There is no co relation mentioned across the
studies related to etiological factors for the conditions. The data
presented does not actually represent the current status across the
whole of India. It is always possible that some of the participants
may be from risky professions like truck drivers, professional sex
workers or intra venous drug abuse users. But no report of such
profession risk with oral health has been mentioned in any of the
articles. No study mentions about oral sex. It is necessary to record
such data also because this may be one risk factor for infection
transmission. It is unexplored at least in the Indian scenario.
Surprisingly, the north east zone hardly finds mention in the oral
diseases reporting. The South of India has a multitude of medical
and dental institutions that boasts of post -graduation and further
studies in dental and allied streams. Hence it is quite possible that
this may lead to number of studies from this particular region of
India.
The data overall does not serve the purpose of assisting in planning
any comprehensive treatment procedures. The arena of
managing HIV/AIDS has seen a tremendous change in the last
decade. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment is the key for a sustainable
institution and continuation of ART. With an improvement
in the life and awareness upsurge, as dentists there is always
a big challenge to the rising risks related to oral health among
the patients. These highly significant and characteristic features
are not just to be recorded but also to be tackled. A national data
centre for collection of the oral lesions and also a plan to tackle
the same is essential. While oral lesions may not be deadly like in
case of HIV associated Tuberculosis or Hepatitis infections, they
still alter the health slowly and gradually. As the patients undergo
regular physical evaluation and drug regime revisions for systemic
illness, a similar policy for an oral check-up and preceding
treatment is essential. Training and sensitization for health care
workers like nursing staff and multi-purpose health workers and
counsellors is required for a greater out reach. India is a diverse
country with a number of factors that affect health seeking behaviour
patterns of the people. In a sensitive case like HIV which
is already stigmatized in the society, dentists can play a pivotal
role for providing health care as well as basic counselling. This
expands our role as well as opens up newer avenues for the dental
expertise to explore.
The review has certain limitations. We used only two search engines.
Also unreported data related to conference proceedings
or from NACO (National AIDS Control Organization) was not
conceded. We may have missed a few articles with richer data that
did not appear across indexed journals. Further reviews are needed
to cover those grey areas of literature too.
Conclusion
There is a high prevalence of oral candidiasis even among HIV
positive patients on ART. More data to compile is available only
from South India. Rest regional data is sparse. A range of soft
tissue lesions are prevalent and in higher proportions. This can
serve as a step to analyse the need to have a nation-wide data and
intervention strategies for tackling HIV/ AIDS associated opportunistic
infections.
References
-
[1]. Shetty S, Kattappagari KK, Hallikeri K, Krishnapilli R. Evaluation of oral
lesions in HIV seropositive individuals and its correlation with CD4+ Tlymphocytic
count. Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences. 2016
Apr 1;5(2):123.
[2]. Chaurasia A. CD4+ counts and Oral Lesions in HIV infected/AIDS patientsan Indian Perspective. Juniper online Journal of Case Study. 2017;1(5):1-2.
[3]. Denny CE, Ramapuram J, Bastian TS, Ongole R, Binnal A, Natarajan S. Oral lesions in HIV/AIDS patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. World Journal of Dentistry. 2016 Apr 1;7(2):95-9.
[4]. Arirachakaran P, Hanvanich M, Kuysakorn P, Thongprasom K. Antiretroviral Drug-Associated Oral Lichenoid Reaction in HIV Patient: A Case Report. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:291072. Pubmed PMID: 20671969.
[5]. Heron SE, Elahi S. HIV Infection and Compromised Mucosal Immunity: Oral Manifestations and Systemic Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2017 Mar 7;8:241. Pubmed PMID: 28326084.
[6]. Leao JC, Ribeiro CM, Carvalho AA, Frezzini C, Porter S. Oral complications of HIV disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009 May;64(5):459-70. Pubmed PMID: 19488613.
[7]. Jayakaran TG. The effect of drugs in the oral cavity-A review. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research. 2014 Feb 1;6(2):89.
[8]. Max B, Sherer R. Management of the adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy and medication adherence. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;30 Suppl 2:S96-116. Pubmed PMID: 10860894.
[9]. Scully C, Bagan JV. Adverse drug reactions in the orofacial region. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Jul 1;15(4):221-39. Pubmed PMID: 15284187.
[10]. Shrivastava S, Ts B, Singh A, Singh S. ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY ON ORAL TISSUES IN HIV POSITIVE INDIVIDUALS. Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology Journal. 2013 Jan 1;4(1).
[11]. Yuan A, Woo SB. Adverse drug events in the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Jan;119(1):35-47. Pubmed PMID: 25442252.
[12]. Krishna AB, Gannepalli A, Baghirath PV, Khaled S, Shailaja S, Anuradha C. Age-related - oral manifestations and co-morbidities in human immunodeficiency virus-infected/acquired immune deficiency syndrome adults in Hyderabad, India. Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):351-5. Pubmed PMID: 26481879.
[13]. Chakraborty N, Mukherjee A, Santra S, Sarkar RN, Banerjee D, Guha SK, et al. Current trends of opportunistic infections among HIV-seropositive patients from Eastern India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008 Jan;61(1):49-53. Pubmed PMID: 18219134.
[14]. Saha K, Firdaus R, Santra P, Pal J, Roy A, Bhattacharya MK, et al. Recent pattern of Co-infection amongst HIV seropositive individuals in tertiary care hospital, Kolkata. Virol J. 2011 Mar 14;8:116. Pubmed PMID: 21396133. [15]. Kumar S, Gowda S, Basavarajaiah. Incidence of Oral candidiasis among HIV infected. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2013;3(12):1-6.
[16]. Muralidharan S, Acharya AK, Margabandhu S, Kalekhan S, Ahsan S, Kulkarni D. Prevalence of Periodontitis and Soft Tissue Lesions among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Raichur Taluk, Karnataka, India. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):42-46. Pubmed PMID: 29358533.
[17]. Panda S, Kamei G, Pamei M, Sarkar S, Sarkar K, Singh ND, et al. Clinical features of HIV infection in drug users of Manipur. Natl Med J India. 1994 Nov-Dec;7(6):267-9. Pubmed PMID: 7841877.
[18]. Shrimali Lalit. A Study Of Oral Manifestation Of HIV / AIDS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2010;1:8-12.
[19]. Bodhade AS, Ganvir SM, Hazarey VK. Oral manifestations of HIV infection and their correlation with CD4 count. J Oral Sci. 2011 Jun;53(2):203- 11. Pubmed PMID: 21712625.
[20]. Hegde MN, Hegde ND, Malhotra A. Prevalence of oral lesions in HIV infected adult population of Mangalore, Karnataka, India. Biodiscovery. 2012 Oct 23;4:e8935.
[21]. Rao UK, Ranganathan K, Kumarasamy N. Gender differences in oral lesions among persons with HIV disease in Southern India. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012 Sep;16(3):388-94. Pubmed PMID: 23248472.
[22]. Annapurna CS, Prince CN, Sivaraj S, Ali IM. Oral manifestations of HIV patients in South Indian population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S364-8. Pubmed PMID: 23066291.
[23]. Jindwani K, Singh K, Dadlani H. A study of oral lesions among HIV positives in a tertiary care hospital.
[24]. Kumar S, Mishra P, Warhekar S, Airen B, Jain D, Godha S. Oral Health Status and Oromucosal Lesions in Patients Living with HIV/AIDS in India: A Comparative Study. AIDS Res Treat. 2014;2014:480247. Pubmed PMID: 25215229.
[25]. Sanadhya YK, Sanadhya S, Nagarajappa R, Jain S, Aapaliya P, Sharma N. Correlation between oral lesions and opportunistic infections among human immunodeficiency virus - infected individuals in Indian population. Int Marit Health. 2014;65(3):124-30. Pubmed PMID: 25471161.
[26]. Ravi JR, Rao TR. Estimation of prevalence of periodontal disease and oral lesions and their relation to CD4 counts in HIV seropositive patients on antiretroviral therapy regimen reporting at District General Hospital, Raichur. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):435-9. Pubmed PMID: 26392694.
[27]. Patil N, Chaurasia VR, Babaji P, Ramesh D, Jhamb K, Sharma AM. The effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on the prevalence of oral manifestation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Karnataka, India. Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):47-52. Pubmed PMID: 25713484.
[28]. Hegde V, Shetty PJ, Alva S, Chengappa SK. Assessment of dental caries experience, periodontal status, and oral mucosal lesions among human immunodeficiency virus seropositives with and without antiretroviral therapy: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry. 2016 Jan 1;14(1):46.
[29]. Usha H, Naik B. Comparison of oral lesions in HIV patients with and without highly active antiretroviral therapy visiting government hospitals in Bengaluru city. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2017;4(20):1141-1147.
[30]. Dongade S, Sermadi ZM, Manjunath R, Priyadarshini C, Jayapala MS. Prevalence of oral manifestations among hiv-positive patients undergoing antiretroviral treatment visiting Chamarajanagar district hospital: A crosssectional study. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology. 2017 Oct 1;29(4):288.