Pain Perception and Discomfort after Placement of Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
Abdulrahman Alshammari1*, Naif Alamer2, Ayed Alzuayzi2, Nasser Alateeq3, Mohammed Alsaleh4
1 University of Ha'il, College of Dentistry, Preventive Department, Division of Orthodontic, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
2 General Dentist, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
3 Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
4 University of Ha'il, College of Dentistry, Restorative Department, Division of Prosthodontics, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Abdulrahman Alshammari,
Assistant Professor, Consultant Orthodontist, University of Ha'il, College of Dentistry, Preventive Department, Division of Orthodontic, 55424 Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Tel: +966598092207
E-mail: Abra.alshammari@uoh.edu.sa
Received: April 10, 2020; Accepted: July 20, 2020; Published: August 08, 2020
Citation:Abdulrahman Alshammari, Naif Alamer, Ayed Alzuayzi, Nasser Alateeq, Mohammed Alsaleh. Pain Perception and Discomfort after Placement of Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020;7(8):785-789. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-20000154
Copyright: Abdulrahman Alshammari©2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Aims: To investigate the patient pain experience and discomfort following placement of fixed orthodontic appliances, and
evaluate the contributing and relieving factors for this pain.
Background: Patient discomfort and pain are important considerations at the outset of orthodontic treatment. They can
negatively affect compliance and in certain cases, contribute to treatment avoidance. Various pain relief methods are available
for orthodontic pain, including chewing gum and paracetamol. Nevertheless, relatively few studies have comparatively
examined their efficacy.
Material & Methods: 92 patients (47 female and 45 male) aged 12 years and above were recruited from private-sector and
public-sector orthodontic clinics. 13-item questionnaires were used to gather demographic data, to assess pain and its causes
(e.g., site of pain, frequency, and severity), and to learn about the patients use of pain relief medications.
Results: 84.8% experienced pain following the insertion of a braces, and the pain was most often felt in the evening when
compared to the morning (p < 0.05). 47.8% of the patients took at least one type of pain relief medication to mitigate their
pain and discomfort.
Conclusion: In view of the finding that 84.8% of the patients included in this study experienced pain following the placement
of a fixed orthodontic appliance, it is important for further studies to explore novel and effective ways to relieve pain
in the population.
Clinical Significance: Orthodontic pain is not uncommon in Orthodontic practice and this pain can be relieved by over
counter pain killer.
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusions
7.References
Keywords
Orthodontic Pain; Over-Counter Pain Killer; Visual Analogue Scale; Fixed Appliances; Discomfort.
Introduction
With improper function and appearance of the teeth, orthodontic
treatment often becomes necessary [1]. However, before receiving
orthodontic treatment, patient anxiety over the level of discomfort
and pain they experience can represent major concerns
[2]. In certain cases, this can reduce compliance, while in other
cases can lead to the avoidance of treatment [3]. Approximately
8% of patients who have ended their treatment draw attention to
pain as the primary contributing factor [4].
Oedema, ischemia, and inflammation in the compressed periodontal
ligaments are the main causes of orthodontic pain [5].
Hyperalgesia of the periodontal ligament is a disorder that arises
when continuous pushing occurs almost immediately following
the placement of an arch wire. A well-documented relationship
exists between periodontal ligament pain and prostaglandin,
where prostaglandin has been found to contribute to hyperalgesia
by increasing the level of sensitivity to noxious agents (e.g.,
serotonin, acetylcholine, substances P, bradykinin, and histamine).
Agents of this kind change the nature of the blood flow to the
periodontal ligament [6].
Patients typically experience pain in the initial two hours following
the application of orthodontic force, and this increases over time.
It tends to become most severe during the night and morning
of the second day following treatment, after which it reduces for
a period of 3-7 days [6-11]. Various studies have reported that
discomfort and pain are the least favourable dimensions of orthodontic
treatment [12]. For 91% of patients in one study, pain
and discomfort were experienced after the placement of a fixed
appliance, while 39% reported discomfort on each session involving
the activation and changing of arch wires [13]. In Scheurer
et al.’s study, 65% of the patients experienced pain after 60 minutes,
while 95% experienced pain after 24 hours [14]. 25% of
the included patients still felt pain after 7 days. In view of these
findings, it is clear that orthodontists should take concrete and
evidence-based measures to mitigate pain following the insertion
of fixed orthodontic appliances.
Over the counter analgesics (OTCs), including non-steroidal antiinflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g., aspirin and ibuprofen) and
paracetamol, constitute the most prevalent type of pain relief. In
contrast to paracetamol, which owes its pain relief function to
the inhibition of cycloxogenase-3 in the spinal cord and brain,
NSAIDs operate in a peripheral manner through the inhibition
of prostaglandin synthesis [15, 16]. The literature indicates that
it is possible to prescribe ibuprofen and paracetamol before and
after the activation of an orthodontic appliance, both of which
are associated with effective pain relief [17, 18].
The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of patients
presenting with complaints about discomfort and pain following
the placement of fixed orthodontic appliances for the first
time, and to understand the contributing and relieving factors for
this pain.
Materials and Methods
As a cross-sectional, survey study, the ethical approval was sought
and granted from Ethical Committee to undertake the research
#H-2019-019 . The participants were patients from private-sector
and public-sector orthodontic clinics . The inclusion criteria were
as follows: not taking any chronic medications; at least 12 years
old; receiving treatment for a fixed orthodontic appliance; and
previous medical history indicating good health. No patients were
excluded based on the types of brackets, arch wire ligation approaches,
and type of aligning wires used. Patients who satisfied
the inclusion criteria were informed about the study’s objectives
and process using both written and oral means. Each patient was asked to sign a consent form before participating.
The target population in this study were patients attending private-
sector or public-sector orthodontic clinics between September
2018 and February 2019. A minimum required sample size
of 100 participants was decided based on a previous study, which
had a sample size of 82 [11], and the recognition that sample attrition
may reduce the number of participants over time.
The survey instrument, a 13-item questionnaire, was written in
Arabic and evaluated in terms of content and face validity. The
first section of the questionnaire collected information from the
participants about their gender and age, while the second section
focused on the frequency, severity, and site of pain. The visual
analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure pain severity. The VAS
format consists of a 10 cm horizontal unmarked line between two
end-point of pain with 0 cm indicating no pain and 10 cm indicating
intolerable pain. Finally, the third section of the questionnaire
asked the patients to note down whether or not they took analgesics
and which medication types they used.
Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data from the first
part of the questionnaire, while independent t-tests and the chi
square test for independence were applied to analyse the rest of
the data. A p-value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically
significant. The data analysis process was conducted using SPSS
v. 25 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA).
Results
92 participants from the original 100 completed the questionnaire
(45 male, 48.9%, and 47 females, 51.1%). 69.6% (n = 64) were
aged over 18 years, while 30.4% (n = 28) were aged 12-18 [ Table
1].
84.8% experienced pain following the placement of braces, while
15.2% did not experience pain [Figure 1]. The mean VAS score
was 5.646, and the standard deviation was 2.835. 29.3% (n = 27)
of the patients felt the most pain in the period from 4 to 8 hours
following the placement of the braces, while 26.1% (n = 24) experienced the most pain between 1-4 hours. 17.4% (n = 16) and
15.2% (n = 14) experienced the most severe pain after 8-24 hours
and during the second day, respectively [Figure 2]. 40.2% and
54.3% experienced the most pain in the morning and evening, respectively,
while 5.4% experienced the most pain during both the
morning and the evening [Figure 3]. Finally, as shown in [ Table
2], 55.6% and 10.1% of the participants experienced an increase
in pain after chewing with the anterior and posterior teeth, respectively,
and 14.1% experienced an increase in pain with speech.
Figure 1. Shows 84.8% of the sample felt pain after having the braces while 15.2% didn’t feel any pain after fixed appliances installed.
Table 2. Shows 55.6% of 99 responsesthat the chewing increases the pain, 20.2% (ant. biting), 14.1% (speech) and 10.1% (post. Biting).
52.2% and 47.8% did not take painkillers or took at least a single
type of pain killer, respectively. 39 patients used medication in
total, 46.2% (n = 18) of whom used NSAIDs, 38.5% (n = 15)
paracetamol, and 7.7% (n = 3) both. Additionally, 7.7% (n = 3) of
the patients used other medication, and 5 of the participants did
not write down the name of their medication [Figure 4].
No significant difference was observed between the public and
private sectors in terms of the VAS scale (p > 0.05). Additionally,
no relationship was observed between the type of sector and the
use of painkillers (p = 0.8).
Discussion
In this survey study, 84.8% of adolescent and adult patients indicated
that they experienced pain following the placement of a
fixed orthodontic appliance, consistent with other study [19]. 87%
stated that they experienced pain during the study period, which
is comparable to findings reported elsewhere in the literature. For
example [13], reported that 91% of patients experienced different
levels of discomfort after the placement of a fixed orthodontic
appliance. In the study conducted by [14], 65% of the patients reported
the onset of pain after 60 minutes, while 95% experienced
pain after 24 hours. 25% of the patients still felt pain within 7 days.
In this study, the mean VAS score was 5.6 ± 2.8, which reflects the
low-to-moderate levels of pain that are typically experienced in
routine orthodontic settings. This result is comparable to several
reported elsewhere in the literature, which have indicated that the
VAS score was not greater than 5.2 [20] or 4.9 [21].
Although 26.1% of the patients experienced the most severe pain
between hours 1 and 4 after brackets bonding, 29.3% experienced
the most severe pain between hours 4 and 8. In turn, the proportion
of patients experiencing the most severe pain began to decline
(17.4% after 8-24 hours, 15.2% on the second day, and 12%
on the third day). These results are consistent with those reported
elsewhere in the literature [6-11, 20-22], which indicate that the
onset of pain intensity occurs in the first two hours following the
application of orthodontic force, after which it tends to increase
until the night and morning of the second day, and subsequently
decline.
In this study, patients experienced an increase in pain during
mastication (55.6%), biting with the anterior and posterior teeth
(20.2% and 10.1%, respectively), and speaking (14.1%). This is
consistent with [14], which indicated that the patients’ pain intensity
scores were greater for the anterior teeth when compared
to the posterior teeth during biting. However, dissimilar to this
study’s results [14], reported that incising food resulted in a slightly
higher level of pain when compared to chewing. Additionally,
[10] reported consistent results in finding that 33% of patients reported
pain while eating on the first day following the placement
of orthodontic device, and 71% of patients had to change their
food consistency (which subsequently decreased on a daily basis).
52.2% of this study’s patients did not take medications for pain relief, whereas 47.8% took at least one types of painkiller. One
way to account for this result is that, given the generally low severity
of the pain arising from routine orthodontic treatments,
most patients do not require pain relief medications. In the study
conducted by [20], the impact of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and
lactose were the same as a placebo in lowering pain following the
initial placement of an orthodontic appliance. The researchers
also reported that the mean VAS score was less than 5.2. In [14],
the researchers found that most patients did not require painkillers
following the placement of the orthodontic appliance, and
that analgesic consumption declined following the third day after
treatment. In [19], the researchers reported that 27% of the
participants used analgesics to relieve pain following separator
placement, and since 87% reported pain, this indicates low pain
intensity.
In this study, NSAIDS were used by 46.2% (n = 18), while paracetamol
was used by 38.5% (n = 15). Additionally, 7.7% (n = 3)
of the patients used both types of analgesics. Comparing these
results directly against those reported elsewhere in the literature is
not possible due to the differences in study designs, as well as the
pain management methods used.
Finally, heterogenous bracket systems constitute a noteworthy
limitation of this study, and this is also the case for the aligning
arch wires used in each of the research settings. However, different
clinics were incorporated into the study to increase the representativeness
and generalisability of the results.
Conclusions
84.8% of the included patients (n = 92) experienced pain following
the installation of a fixed orthodontic appliance, and 55.6% experienced an increase in pain on mastication. 54.3% experienced
the most severe pain during evenings as opposed to mornings,
and NSAIDs were associated with the greatest utility in relieving
pain for 46.2% of patients.
References
- Littlewood S, Mitchell L. An Introduction to Orthodontics (5th Edition) 2019.
- O'Connor PJ. Patients' perceptions before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2000; 34(10): 591-2. PMID: 11314173.
- Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment--effects on compliance and prediction of patients' adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22(3): 307-15. PMID: 10920563.
- Patel V. Non-completion of active orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19(1): 47-54. PMID: 1562578.
- Furstman L, Bernick S. Clinical considerations of the periodontium. Am J Orthod. 1972;61(2):138-55. PMID: 4500502.
- Erdinc AM, Dincer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(1):79-85. PMID: 14994886.
- Jones M, Chan C. The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 102(4): 373-81. PMID: 1456222.
- Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L. Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 1998; 59(6): 331-9. PMID: 9857602.
- Farzanegan F, Zebarjad SM, Sanaz Alizadeh, Farzaneh Ahrari. Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(2):169-73. PMID: 22284284.
- Asiry MA, Albarakati SF, Marwah S Al-Marwan, Rana R Al-Shammari. Perception of pain and discomfort from elastomeric separators in Saudi adolescents. Saudi Med J. 2014;35(5):504-7. PMID: 24825814.
- Alqahtani N, Alwakeel A, Alzamil A, Alturki S, Aldawsari G, Aljabaa A, et al. Comparison of two analgesics used for pain relief after placement of orthodontic separators. Saudi Pharm J. 2017;25(8):1169-74.
- Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985;12(4):179-88. PMID: 3863673.
- Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21(1):31-5. PMID: 8432102.
- Scheurer PA, Firestone AR, Burgin WB. Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18(4):349- 57. PMID: 8921656.
- Kehoe MJ, Cohen SM, K Zarrinnia, A Cowan. The effect of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and misoprostol on prostaglandin E2 synthesis and the degree and rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(5): 339- 49. PMID: 8893104.
- Bradley RL, Ellis PE, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ibuprofen and paracetamol in the control of orthodontic pain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(4):511-7. PMID: 17920505.
- Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: from causes to management--a review. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(2):170-9. PMID: 17488999.
- Xiaoting L, Yin T, Yangxi C. Interventions for pain during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):925-32. PMID: 20578865.
- Bergius M, Broberg AG, Magnus Hakeberg, Ulf Berggren. Prediction of prolonged pain experiences during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(3):339.e1-8. PMID: 18331926.
- Salmassian R, Oesterle LJ, W Craig Shellhart, Sheldon M Newman. Comparison of the efficacy of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in controlling pain after orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):516-21. PMID: 19361739.
- Alshammari AK, Huggare J. Pain relief after orthodontic archwire installation- a comparison between intervention with paracetamol and chewing gum: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(5):478-85. PMID: 30590573.
- Benson PE, Razi RM, Al-Bloushi RJ. The effect of chewing gum on the impact, pain and breakages associated with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012;15(3):178-87. PMID: 22812440.