International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-07-11023

Association between Dental Caries Prevalence And Dental Fluorosis


Jitesh. S1, Jessy2*, Madhulaxmi Marimuthu3

1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
3 Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.


*Corresponding Author

Dr. Jessy,,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Tel: +91 886161 46189
E-mail: jessyp.sdc@saveetha.com

Received: October 07, 2020 Accepted: November 22, 2020; Published: November 25, 2020

Citation: Jitesh. S, Jessy, Madhulaxmi Marimuthu. Association between Dental Caries Prevalence And Dental Fluorosis. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020;7(11):1080-1083. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-20000214

Copyright: Jessy© 2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the association between dental fluorosis and caries risk at different levels of dean fluorosis score. This retrospective study was done using case records of patients visiting Private Dental College and Hospital. Patients with dental fluorosis 18years to 35 years old were included in this study. Patients who were medically compromised and with other developmental anomalies of teeth were excluded from the study. The data on patient age, gender, Dean’s fluorosis score and DMFT score were retrieved from case sheets and tabulated. Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS version 20.0, Descriptive statistics and Chi square tests were done.The results proved that there is a significant association found between DMFT and Dean’s fluorosis score(p<0.05).Thus the patients with following Dean fluorosis score, questionable,very mild and mild had lesser DMFT scores when compared to patient with moderate and severe score. Within the limits of the present study. It can be concluded that there was a strong positive association between dental fluorosis and dental caries, the more severe the fluorosis level, more is the caries rate.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Results and Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.Author Contribution
7.Acknowledgements
8.References

Keywords

Association; Dental Fluorosis Index; Dental Caries; DMFT Score.


Introduction

Dental caries is an ancient disease, dating back to the time agriculture was replaced by hunting and gathering as the primary food source. Still the prevalence and severity were much less than what we see today. Recent reports demonstrate a decline in dental caries, mainly due to the use of fluorides in different forms [1]. The use of fluoride is the only known practical measure for controlling dental caries at the population level. However, the ingestion of fluoride during the development of teeth is associated with an increased risk of development of enamel fluorosis.

Endemic fluorosis resulting from high fluoride concentration in groundwater is a public health problem in India. The available data suggest that 15 States in India are endemic for fluorosis (fluoride level in drinking water >1.5 mg/l), five of these have category III (>50% of the districts affected) which includes Gujarat [2]. The Assam region of North East India has also been recognized as a fluoride-affected area. It is still a disease of high propensity in many developing and developed countries like India and countries in Africa.

Human clinical treats may not be feasible because of ethical and many other practical obstacles. Endemic fluoride belt serve as laboratories to study the effect of dental fluorosis on dental caries [3]. In the early 1950’s it was predicted that about 10% of the population would have experience milder forms of enamel fluorosis in the population with introduction of water fluoridation [4]. This is considered a trade-off, as dental caries was a widespread disease in 20th century [5] and inverse relationship between mottled enamel and caries was evident from Deans ecological studies of 1930’s [6]. The question is to whether enamel fluorosis have any beneficial effect in today’s caries activity in India, however, has not been answered properly, It is important to investigate the relationship between enamel fluorosis and dental caries.

Fluoride intake during the tooth development will result in dental fluorosis, which has a wide range of clinical signs. Advanced stages - stained, pitted, porous enamel [2]. “Fluoride is often termed as a double edge weapon”. It offers caries protection whereas excessive consumption may lead to chronic fluoride toxicity, which manifest as skeletal/ dental fluorosis [7].

The association between enamel fluorosis and caries risk has been investigated in many literatures [8]. Previously our team had conducted numerous clinical trials [9-23] over the past 5 years. Now we are focusing on epidemiological surveys. The idea for this survey stemmed from the current interest in our community. Hence,the aim of this study was to assess the association of dental caries prevalence and dental fluorosis.


Materials and Method

Study Setting & Design

It is a university setting study, conducted by Private Dental College and Hospitals. Ethical approval (SDC/SIHEC/2020/DIASDATA/ 0619-0320) was obtained from the Institutional ethical committee. Number of people involved in this study were 2 examiners. Patients with fluorosis reported to saveetha dental college and hospital were included in the study. Those patients who were medically compromised were excluded.


Sampling

The data were collected from June 2019 to March 2020. Patients with dental fluorosis 18 years to 35 years old were included in this study. Patients who were medically compromised and with other developmental anomalies of teeth were excluded from the study. Out of 2000 patient case sheets reviewed, 130 patients were included in this study after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria and elimination of the incomplete records. Telephonic and photographic cross verification was done by 2 examiners.


Data Collection

The data was collected by reviewing the case sheets of patients visited Saveetha dental college and hospitals for the past one year, DMFT score, dean's fluorosis score were retrieved. Data was verified by two external examiners. Data was tabulated in excel and was imported to SPSS where the variables were defined.


Analysis

IBM SPSS version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis was used, Chi-Square test was performed to compare the association between Dean’s fluorosis and DMFT index. Dependent and independent variables were set.


Results and Discussion

The positive effects that fluoride has on dental caries reduction are well documented. The results revealed that most of the population were affected with very mild and mild categories as the most prevalent cases. These results reveal the existence of a relationship between fluorosis and caries, which was of benefit to children with fluorosis ranging from very mild and mild.Patient with fluorosis of moderate to severe levels had a higher proportion of caries, which is due to advancing demineralisation and greater inclination for lesions.

In the present study overall prevalence of dental fluorosis patients in the study population based on gender was represented in figure1 males (68.5%)were more prevalent to dental fluorosis than females(31.5%) (Figure 1) which is in accordance to the previous studies conducted by Michel E that males were more prevalent to dental fluorosis [24]. In contrast Singh and singh [25] and sukhabogi [26] found out that females were more prevalent than males.Dean’s fluorosis index measures severity of dental fluorosis on a scale ranging from 0 to 4. (0 -normal, 0.5- questionable, 1 - very mild, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe). The severity of dental fluorosis in the study population was represented in figure 2 which showed questionable (6.9%), very mild (7.7%), mild (50.8%), moderate (29.2%), severe (5.4%).

As far as association between fluorosis and dental caries is concerned,both positive [27, 28] and negative relationship [29] have been documented. It was identified that teeth with moderate and severe fluorosis had dental caries more frequently than no mild fluorosis [27, 28] where similar results were proved in this present study.

Our results proved that there is a significant association found between DMFT and Dean’s fluorosis score (p<0.05). Thus the patients with following Dean fluorosis score, questionable,very mild and mild had lesser DMFT scores when compared to patient with moderate and severe scores (Figure 3). This was supported by another study [30] which states that F content in the surface decreases the susceptibility to the dental caries thereby decreasing the DMFT score significantly [31, 9-23].


Figure 1. Bar diagram depicts the gender distribution of the population of the present study. X axis represents the gender and Y axis represents the percentage distribution of the present study.Out of 130dental fluorosis patients, 89(68.46%) were males and 41(31.54%) were females.



Figure 2. Pie chart depicts the Dean’s fluorosis index score distribution out of 130 patients, 9(6.9%) were questionable(red), 10(7.7%) were very mild(green), 66(50.8%) were mild(white), 38(29.2%) were moderate(violet), 7(5.4%) were severe(yellow).



Figure 3. Bar chart depicts the association between DMFT score and Dean’s index. X axis represents DMFT index and Y axis represents the total number of fluorosis patients in the present study. There is a significant association between dean score and DMFT index(Pearson Chi-Square=279.748 , p value= 0.000(<0.05) ; statistically significant).Mild and very mild score of fluorosis had resistant to decay or with reduced DMFT scores when compared to moderate and severe which showed increased incidence of dental caries.


The use of fluoride is considered an important factor in the prevention and management of dental caries, inhibiting demineralization and stimulating remineralization. Due to the widespread of other fluoride sources a decline in dental caries and an increase in the prevalence of dental fluorosis have been documented in communities.

Some studies stated an increase in prevalence of dental fluorosis. Enamel is susceptible when its pre-eruptive maturation has not been completed [32]. Historically, a predominance of very mild and mild forms of dental fluorosis has been considered a minor consequence in relation to the substantial protection against dental caries [33] which is in accordance to the present study.

The degree and extent of the porosity depends on the concentration of fluoride in the tissue fluids during tooth development. The structural arrangement of the crystals appears normal, but the width of the inter crystalline spaces is increased, causing pores. With increasing severity of fluorosis, the fluoride concentration throughout the enamel, the depth of enamel involvement, and the degree of porosity of the enamel also increases.

Fluorine is often called a two-edged sword. Prolonged ingestion of fluoride through drinking water in excess of the daily requirement is associated with dental and skeletal Fluorosis. Similarly, inadequate intake of fluoride in drinking water is associated with dental caries. Excess of fluoride consumption leads to mottled enamel which also in turn increases the risk of dental caries.Dental caries was low with a predominance of tooth decay. We conclude that it is useful to continue using fluoride products, which have proven beneficial in reducing caries.

Dental caries prevalence is more as the severity of dental fluorosis increases. Dental fluorosis is a hypocalcified condition which is prone to caries and destruction [34]. Mann et al proved that statistically significant association between caries prevalence and fluorosis [35]. Also another study proved by Nelly Molina-Frechero et al., 2012 questionable and very mild fluorosis teeth were resistant or had a lesser degree of decay [36] which is in accordance with our study.

The limitations of the study include geographic isolation subject to error/bias and sample size. Extensive study to be done in larger sample size, improve the way of diagnosing the dental fluorosis and various treatment modalities for the same. Exposure to different sources of fluoride, was a risk factor for the development of fluorosis and a benefit with regard to dental caries.

Conclusion

Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that there was a strong positive association between dental fluorosis and caries prevalence, the more severe the fluorosis level, the more is the caries rate. Also the present study proved Mild and very mild fluorosis had resistance to decay or lesser DMFT scores when compared to moderate and severe which showed increased incidence of dental caries.


Acknowledgement

The authors of this study would like to express their gratitude towards everyone who facilitated and enabled us to carry out this study successfully.


References

  1. Pizzo G, Piscopo MR, Pizzo I, Giuliana G. Community water fluoridation and caries prevention: a critical review. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Sep;11(3):189-93.Pubmed PMID: 17333303.
  2. Susheela AK. A treatise on fluorosis. New Delhi: Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation; 2007.
  3. Sharma A, Sharma R, Kumar N. Prevalence and association of dental caries and dental fluorosis in fluoride endemic region of Mewat district, Haryana, India. Int. J. Oral Health Dent. 2019;5(1):23-31. =
  4. Burt BA, Eklund SA, Ismail AI. Dentistry, Dental Practice, and the Community. Saunders; 1999. 384 p.
  5. Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis; United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002.2005.
  6. Dean HT. Endemic fluorosis and its relation to dental caries.1938.
  7. Shekar C, Cheluvaiah MB, Namile D. Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis among 12 and 15 years old school children in relation to fluoride concentration in drinking water in an endemic fluoride belt of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Public Health. 2012 Apr-Jun;56(2):122-8. Pubmed PMID: 22910620.
  8. Eklund SA, Burt BA, Ismail AI, Calderone JJ. High-fluoride drinking water, fluorosis, and dental caries in adults. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Mar 1;114(3):324-8.
  9. Jeevanandan G. Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth - Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZR03- ZR05.Pubmed PMID: 28511532.
  10. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):376-379.Pubmed PMID: 28932150.
  11. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth among Indian dentists: a questionnaire survey. J Int Oral Health. 2017 Mar 1;9(2):45.
  12. Somasundaram S, Ravi K, Rajapandian K, Gurunathan D. Fluoride Content of Bottled Drinking Water in Chennai, Tamilnadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC32-4.Pubmed PMID: 26557612.
  13. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278.Pubmed PMID: 30003514.
  14. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC55-ZC58.Pubmed PMID: 29207834.
  15. Ravikumar D, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Evaluation of knowledge among general dentists in treatment of traumatic injuries in primary teeth: A cross-sectional questionnaire study. Eur J Dent. 2017 Apr;11(2):232-7.
  16. . Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79.Pubmed PMID: 30804311.
  17. Christabel SL, Gurunathan D. Prevalence of type of frenal attachment and morphology of frenum in children, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. World J Dent. 2015 Oct;6(4):203-7.
  18. Packiri S, Gurunathan D, Selvarasu K. Management of paediatric oral ranula: a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZE06-9.
  19. Gurunathan D, Shanmugaavel AK. Dental neglect among children in Chennai. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct 1;34(4):364.
  20. Govindaraju L, Gurunathan D. Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective Clinical Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31-ZC34.Pubmed PMID: 28511505.
  21. Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):67-70. Pubmed PMID: 29657527.
  22. Ramakrishnan M, Bhurki M. Fluoride, Fluoridated Toothpaste Efficacy And Its Safety In Children-Review. Int. J. Pharm.Res.. 2018 Oct;10(04):109-14.
  23. Nair M, Jeevanandan G, Vignesh R, Subramanian EM. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with k-files, kedo-s files and mtwo files in deciduous molars-a randomized clinical trial. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2018 Oct 24;21(4):411-7.
  24. Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MG, Crosato E. Relationship between dental fluorosis and quality of life: a population based study. Braz Oral Res. 2005 Apr-Jun;19(2):150-5.Pubmed PMID: 16292450.
  25. Singh DK, Singh RP. Prevalence of dental caries in school going children of Patna. J Indian Dent Assoc. 1981;53:267.
  26. Sukhabogi JR, Parthasarathi P, Anjum S, Shekar BC. Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis among 12 and15 year-old school children in an endemic fluoride area of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Ann. Trop. Med. Public Health. 2013 Jul 1;6(4):422.
  27. .
  28. Wondwossen F, Astrøm AN, Bjorvatn K, Bårdsen A. The relationship between dental caries and dental fluorosis in areas with moderate- and high-fluoride drinking water in Ethiopia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;32(5):337-44.Pubmed PMID: 15341618.
  29. Grobleri SR, Louw AJ, van Kotze TJ. Dental fluorosis and caries experience in relation to three different drinking water fluoride levels in South Africa. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001 Sep;11(5):372-9.Pubmed PMID: 11572269.
  30. Anuradha B, Laxmi GS, Sudhakar P, Malik V, Reddy KA, Reddy SN, et al. Prevalence of dental caries among 13 and 15-year-old school children in an endemic fluorosis area: a cross-sectional study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):447-50.Pubmed PMID: 22269235.
  31. Recommendations for Using Fluoride to Prevent and Control Dental Caries in the United States: (548212006-001) [Internet]. 2001. Available from:
  32. Machiulskiene V, Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Nyvad B. Prevalence and extent of dental caries, dental fluorosis, and developmental enamel defects in Lithuanian teenage populations with different fluoride exposures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Apr;117(2):154-60.Pubmed PMID: 19320724.
  33. Meyers LD, Hellwig JP, Otten JJ, editors. Dietary reference intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. National Academies Press; 2006 Sep 29:1344.
  34. Quock RL. Dental caries: a current understanding and implications. J. Nat. Sci. 2015 Jan 1;1(1):27.
  35. Ganesh C, Ganasundram N, Maragathavalli G, Maheswar TU. Prevalence of Dental Caries in Different Grades of Dental Fluorosis in Salem and Dharmapuri Districts Aged 15 to 17 Years. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2013 Oct 1;25(4):251.
  36. Mann J, Mahmoud W, Ernest M, Sgan-Cohen H, Shoshan N, Gedalia I. Fluorosis and dental caries in 6-8-year-old children in a 5 ppm fluoride area. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1990 Apr;18(2):77-9.Pubmed PMID: 2335066.
  37. Molina-Frechero N, Pierdant-Rodríguez AI, Oropeza-Oropeza A, Bologna- Molina R. Fluorosis and dental caries: an assessment of risk factors in Mexican children. Rev Invest Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;64(1):67-73.Pubmed PMID: 22690531.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn